Investigation of Pre-Service Elementary Science Teachers’ Nature of Science Instructional Planning

Öz

The main focus of the study was to explore pre-service science teachers’ translation of this understanding into their instructional planning for teaching Nature of science.. The study investigated pre-service science teachers’ NOS related instructional practices as a result of explicit reflective NOS instruction in the context of HOS based science method course. Seven volunteer pre-service science teachers were the participants of the study. An interpretive qualitative research was embodied as a research design for the current study. Data were collected by means of open ended questionnaire in conjunction with interviews, student journals and lesson plans and interviews. Regarding development of NOS instructional planning, most of them provided NOS objectives, explicit reflective NOS instructional planning and some assessment strategies specific to NOS. Participants were attributed to their development for instructional planning NOS to several sources provided through the course. Mostly they perceived microteaching lesson plan presentations followed by discussions and one to one feedback as main source contributing their NOS instructional planning.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Nature of science teaching, teacher education, interpretive qualitative research

Öğretmen Adaylarının Bilimin Doğası Öğretimine Yönelik Planlama Becerilerinin İncelenmesi

Öz

Bu araştırma fen bilgisi öğretmen adaylarının bilimin doğası öğretimine yönelik planlama becerilerini geliştirmeyi hedeflemiştir. Çalışmaya yedi fen bilgisi öğretmen adayı gönüllü olarak katılmış olup, bilim tarihi ile bağlamsallaştırılmış açık-yansıtıcı bilimin doğası yaklaşımı ile yapılandırılmış fen öğretim yöntemleri dersi içinde bilimin doğasına yönelik planlama becerilerindeki değişim incelenmiştir. Nitel araştırma yöntemlerinden, yorumlayıcı nitel çalışma kullanılmıştır. Ders planları, yansıtıcı yazınlar ve yüz yüze görüşmeler veri toplama aracı olarak kullanılmıştır. Bilimin doğasına yönelik öğretim becerilerine ilişkin olarak, katılımcılardan çoğunluğu bilimin doğasına yönelik kazanım yazma, bilimin doğasının açık-yansıtıcı öğretime dair stratejiler kullanma ve bilimin doğasını değerlendirmeye dair planlamalar yapmıştır. Katılımcılar planlama becerilerinin kaynağı olarak, mikroöğretim uygulamaları, tartışma ortamı ve geri dönüt gibi uygulamaları işaret etmiştir. Çoğunlukla mikro öğretim ders planı sunumlarını, ardından tartışmaları ve bire bir geri bildirimi, bilimin doğasına yönelik öğretim planlamalarına katkıda bulunan ana kaynak olarak algıladılar.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Bilimin doğası öğretimi, öğretmen eğitimi, yorumlayıcı nitel çalışma

Kaynakça

1. Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N. G. 2000 . Improving science teachers’ conceptions of nature of science: A critical review of the literature. International Journal of Science Education, 22 7 , 665-701.
2. Akerson, V., Nargund-Joshi, V., Weiland, I., Pongsanon & K., Avsar, B. 2013 . What third-grade students of differing ability levels learn about nature of science after a year of instruction. International Journal of
3. Science Education,1-33.
4. Akerson, V.L., Carter, I. & Pongsanon, K. 2019 . Teaching and Learning Nature of Science in Elementary Classrooms. Sci & Educ 28, 391–411.
5. Akerson, V. L., Donnelly, L. A., Riggs, M. L., & Eastwood, J. L. 2012 . Developing a community of practice to support preservice elementary teachers’ nature of science instruction. International Journal of ScienceEducation, 34 9 , 1371-1392.
6. Akerson, V. L., Pongsanon, K., Rogers, M. A. P., Carter, I., & Galindo, E. 2017 . Exploring the use of lesson study to develop elementary preservice teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge for teaching nature of science.International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education,15 2 , 293-312
7. Bilican, K. 2014 . Development of Pre-Service Science Teachers ‘nature Of Science Views and Nature of Science Instructional Planning within a Contextualized Explicit Reflective Approach.Unpublished doctoral dissertation, METU, Ankara.
8. Creswell, J. W. 2007 . Qualitative enquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. US: Sagepublications Ltd.

9. Edgerly, H., Kruse, J., & Wilcox, J. 2022 . Investigating Elementary Teachers’ Views, Implementation, and Longitudinal Enactment of Nature of Science Instruction. Science & Education, 1-25.
10. Hanuscin, D. L., Lee, M. H., & Akerson, V. L. 2011 . Elementary teachers' pedagogical content knowledge for teaching the nature of science. Science education, 95 1 , 145-167.
11. Hinds, P.S., Vogel, R.J., Clarke-Steffen, L. 1997 'The possibilities and pitfalls of doing a secondary analysis of a qualitative data set', Qualitative Health Research, vol. 7 3 : 408-24.
12. Khishfe, R., & Abd‐El‐Khalick, F. 2002 . Influence of explicit and reflective versus implicit inquiry‐oriented instruction on sixth graders' views of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 39 7 , 551-578.
13. Kruse, J., Kent-Schneider, I., Voss, S., Zacharski, K., & Rockefeller, M. 2021 . Investigating Student Nature of Science Views as Reflections of Authentic Science. Science & Education, 30 5 , 1211–1231.
14. Lederman, N. G. 1992 . Students' and teachers' conceptions of the nature of science: A review of the research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching,29 4 , 331-359.
15. Lederman, N. G. 1999 . Teachers' understanding of the nature of science and classroom practice: Factors that facilitate or impede the relationship. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36 8 , 916-929.
16. Lederman, N. G., Abd‐El‐Khalick, F., Bell, R. L., & Schwartz, R. S. 2002 . Views of nature of science questionnaire: Toward valid and meaningful assessment of learners' conceptions of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39 6 , 497-521
17. Lederman, N.G. 2007 . The nature of science: Past, present, and future. In S.K.Abell & N.G.Lederman Eds. , Handbook of Research on Science Education. London: Lawrence Erlbaum & Associates, Publishers.
18. Lederman, N. G., & Lederman, J. S. 2019 . Teaching and learning nature of scientific knowledge: Is it Déjà vu all over again?. Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research, 1 1 , 1-9.
19. MEB 2013, 2018 . İlköğretim Kurumları İlkokullar ve Ortaokullar Fen Bilimleri Dersi 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, ve 8. Sınıflar Öğretim Programı. Ankara: Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı Talim ve Terbiye Kurulu Başkanlığı.
20. Merriam, S. B. 2009 . Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation: Revised and expanded from qualitative research and case studyapplications in education. San Franscisco: Jossey-Bass.
21. Supprakob, S., Faikhamta, C., & Suwanruji, P. 2016 . Using the lens of pedagogical content knowledge for teaching the nature of science to portray novice chemistry teachers' transforming NOS in early years of teaching profession. Chemistry Education Research and Practice,17 4 , 1067-1080
22. Szabo, V. & Strang, V.R. 1997 'Secondary analysis of qualitative data', Advances in Nursing Science, vol. 20 2 : 66-74.
23. Wahbeh, N., & Abd-El-Khalick, F. 2014 . Revisiting the Translation of Nature of Science Understandings into Instructional Practice: Teachers' nature of science pedagogical content knowledge. International Journal of Science Education, 36 3 , 425-466.