Assessment and Documentation Methods in Early Childhood Education: Cases from Türkiye and the United States

Öz

Assessment and documentation are indispensable components for ensuring high-quality learning environments in early childhood education. This study aimed to investigate the assessment and documentation methods used by early childhood education teachers in Türkiye and the United States. A total of 24 teachers from both Reggio Emilia-inspired preschools and university-affiliated preschools participated in the study. Data were collected by means of both interview and survey. As a result, it was found that observation, portfolio, and developmental assessment reports were commonly practiced assessment methodologies within each country. In contrast, rating scale, rubric, and audio-video recording were found to be the least frequently used ones. Additionally, in both countries, it was determined that all teachers utilized documentation methods including photos and anecdotal notes as well as commonly created daily and weekly news, monthly newsletters, and/or wall documentations. Accordingly, the results indicated to the profound influence of national curriculum or guidelines on the practices.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Early childhood education
• Assessment
• Documentation

Kaynakça

1. Alaçam, N., & Olgan, R. (2021). Pedagogical documentation in early childhood education: A systematic review of the literature. Elementary Education Online, 20(1).
2. Alacam, N., Olgan, R., & Çapa-Aydın, Y. (2023). Development of Portfolio Related Scales for Early Childhood Teachers: A Validity and Reliability Study. Indexing/Abstracting, 19(4), 1.
3. Ahtiainen, R., Fonsen, E., & Kiuru, L. (2021). Finnish early childhood education and care leaders’ perceptions of pedagogical leadership and assessment of the implementation of the National Core Curriculum in times of change. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 46(2) 126–138.
4. Alvestad, T., & Sheridan, S. (2015). Preschool teachers' perspectives on planning and documentation in preschool. Early Child Development and Care, 185(3), 377-392. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2014.929861
5. Aras, S., Şahin, F., Yılmaz, A., & Ülker, A. (2021). Common language among child, school and parents: The use of pedagogical documentation in the parent involvement process. Journal of Qualitative Research in Education, 27, 298-318. doi:10.14689/enad.27.14
6. Becker, I., Rigaud, V.M., & Epstein, A. (2022). Getting to know young children: Alternative assessments in early childhood education. Early Childhood Education Journal. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-022-01353-y
7. Birbili, M., & Myrovali, A. (2020). Early childhood teachers’ relationship with the official curriculum: The mediating role of professional and policy contexts. Education Inquiry, 11(2), 110-125. https://doi.org/10.1080/20004508.2019.1687080
8. Bowne, M., Cutler, K., DeBates, D., Gilkerson, D., & Stremmel, A. (2010). Pedagogical documentation and collaborative dialogue as tools of inquiry for pre-service teachers in early childhood education: An exploratory narrative. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 10(2), 48 - 59.

9. Bradbury A (2018) Datafied at four: The role of data in the ‘schoolification’ of early childhood education in England. Learning, Media and Technology 44(1), 7–21.
10. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
11. Brown, J., & Rolfe, S.A. (2005). Use of child development assessment in early childhood education: Early childhood practitioner and student attitudes toward formal and informal testing. Early Child Development and Care, 175(3), 193-202. https://doi.org/10.1080/0300443042000266240
12. Buldu, M., Şahin, F., & Yılmaz, A. (2018). Exploring the contribution of pedagogical documentation to the development and learning of young children from teacher perspective. Elementary Education Online, 17(3),1444-1462. doi 10.17051/ilkonline.2018.466365
13. Buldu, M. (2020). Strengthening pre-service early childhood teachers’ confidence and competence on assessment through their pedagogical documentation experiences. Turkish Studies - Educational Sciences,15(1), 33-42. https://dx.doi.org/10.29228/TurkishStudies.40324
14. Butler, S.M., & McMunn, N.D. (2006). A teacher’ guide to classroom assessment. Understanding and using classroom assessment to improve student learning. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
15. Carr, M., & Lee, W. (2012). Learning stories: Constructing learner identities in early education. London: Sage.
16. Chng, A., Waniganayake, M., & Andrews, R. (2022). Inviting inquiry on pedagogical documentation in Singapore: Perspectives of parents and teachers. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 30(2), 296-308. doi:10.1080/1350293X.2022.2046837
17. Collins, D. (2003). Pretesting survey instruments: An overview of cognitive methods. Quality of Life Research 12, 229–238.
18. Creswell, J.W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design. Choosing among five approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
19. Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
20. Dahlberg, G., Moss, P., & Pence, A. (2007). Beyond quality in early childhood education: Languages of evaluation. London: Routledge.
21. Damjanovic, V., & Blank, J. (2023). Building a professional learning community: Teachers’ documentation of and reflections on preschoolers’ work. Early Childhood Educ Journal, 46, 567–575. doi:10.1007/s10643-017-0888-0
22. DeLuca, C., Pyle, A., Roy, S., Chalas, A., & Danniels, E. (2019). Perspectives on kindergarten assessment: Toward a common understanding. Teachers College Record, 121(3), 1-58.
23. Drennan, J. (2003). Cognitive interviewing: Verbal data in the design and pretesting of questionnaires. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 42(1), 57-63.
24. Dubiel, J. (2014). Effective assessment in the early years foundation stage. London: Sage Publications.
25. Elfström Pettersson, K. (2015) Sticky dots and lion adventures playing a part in preschool documentation practices. International Journal of Early Childhood, 47(3), 443–460.
26. Elicker, J., & McMullen, M.B. (2013). Using documentation and assessment to support children's Learning. Young Children, 22-27.
27. European Commission. (2014). Proposal for key principles of a quality framework for early childhood education and care.
28. Fawcett, M., & Hay, P. (2004). 5×5×5 = creativity in the early years. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 23, 234–245.
29. Fraenkel, J.R., Wallen, N.E., & Hyun, H.H. (2018). How to design and evaluate research in education (10th Edition). New York. NY: McGraw Hill.
30. Fyfe, B. (2012). The relationship between documentation and assessment. In C. Edwards, L. Gandini, & G. Forman, (Eds.) The hundred language of children (3rd edition) (pp. 273-291). Santa Barbara, California: Praeger.
31. Gandini, L. (1993). Fundamentals of the Reggio Emilia Approach to early childhood education. Young Children, 49(1), 4-8.
32. Gronlund, G., & James, M. (2013). Focused observations: How to observe young children for assessment and curriculum planning (2nd ed.). St. Paul, MN: Readleaf Press.
33. Gullo, D.F. (2005). Understanding assessment and evaluation in early childhood education (2nd ed.). New York: Teachers College Press.
34. Guyevsky, V. (2005). Interpreting the Reggio Emilia approach. Documentation and emergent curriculum in a preschool setting (Unpublished master’s thesis). Faculty of Education, York University, Toronto, Canada.
35. Hanes, B.M. (2009). Perceptions of early childhood assessment among early childhood educators (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation). Widener University, Chester, PA, U.S.
36. Helm, J.H., Beneke, S., & Steinheimer, K. (2007). Windows on learning: Documenting young children’s work (2nd edition). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
37. Hooker, T. (2019). Using e-portfolios in early childhood education: Recalling, reconnecting, restarting, and learning. Journal of Early Childhood Research, 17(4), 376-391. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476718X19875778
38. Hostyn, I., Mäkitalo, A., Hakari, S., & Vandenbussche, L. (2020). The professional actuation of pedagogical documentation in Belgian and Finnish early childhood education settings. Early Child Development and Care, 190(3), 400-413. doi: 10.1080/03004430.2018.1475368
39. Knauf, H. (2017). Documentation as a tool for participation in German early childhood education and care. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 25(1), 19-35. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350293X.2015.1102403
40. Knauf, H. (2020). Documentation strategies: Pedagogical documentation from the perspective of early childhood teachers in New Zealand and Germany. Early Childhood Education Journal, 48, 11–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-019-00979-9
41. Krechevsky, M., Mardell, B., Rivard, M., & Wilson, D. (2013). Visible learners. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. Kuru, N., & Akman, B. (2019). Pedagogical documentation as a child recognition and evaluation tool. Journal of Theoretical Educational Science, 12(3), 935-949. http://dx.doi.org/10.30831/akukeg.406586
42. Lee-Hammond, L., & Bjervas, L. (2021). Pedagogical documentation and systematic quality work in early childhood: Comparing practices in Western Australia and Sweden. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 22(2) 156–170. https://doi.org/10.1177/1463949120928431
43. LeeKeenan, D., & Ponte, I. C. (2018). Meaningful assessment and documentation: How directors can support teaching and learning. Young Children, 73(5), 87–92.
44. Lindh, C., & Mansikka, J. (2023). Adoption of pedagogical documentation in Finnish ECEC settings. Early Childhood Education Journal, 51, 393-405. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-022-01321-6
45. McAfee, A., Leong, D.J., & Bodrova, E. (2004). Basis of assessment. A primer for early childhood education. Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children.
46. McAfee, O., Leong, D.J., & Bodrova, E. (2016). Assessing and guiding young children’s development and learning (6th ed.). Boston: Pearson.
47. McKenna, D.E. (2005). Documenting development and pedagogy in the Swedish preschool: The portfolio as a vehicle for reflection, learning, and democracy. The Interdisciplinary Journal of Study Abroad, 12(1), 163-184. doi:10.36366/frontiers. v12i1.188
48. Meisels, S.J., & Atkins-Burnett, S. (2006). Evaluating early childhood assessments: A differential analysis. In K. McCartney & D. Phillips (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of early childhood education (pp.533-549). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
49. Merriam, S.B. (2009). Qualitative research. A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
50. Miles, M.B., & Huberman, A.M. (1994). An expanded sourcebook: Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
51. Ministry of National Education (MoNE). (2013). Early Childhood Education Program. Ankara, Türkiye. Morrison, G.S. (2007). Early childhood education today (10th ed.). Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall.
52. Morrison, G.S. (2014). Fundamentals of early childhood education (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
53. National Association for the Education of Young Children. (2022). Developmentally appropriate practice: Observing, documenting, and assessing children’s development and learning. Retrieved from: https://www.naeyc.org/resources/position- statements/dap/assessing-development
54. Nitko, A.J., & Brookhart, S.M. (2007). Educational Assessment of students (5th edition). New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall.
55. OECD. (2003). Thematic review of education and care policy: United States of America.
56. OECD. (2011). Starting strong III. Paris: OECD Publishing.
57. Özenç, E.E., & Yazgın, E. (2022). Reggio Emilia in pre-school environment: Developing pedagogical documentation from the perspectives of parents, teachers and children. Journal of Uludag University Faculty of Education, 35(1), 181-199. https://doi.org/10.19171/uefad.939639
58. Picchio, M., Di Giandomenico, I., & Musatti, T. (2014). The use of documentation in a participatory system of evaluation. Early Years, 34(2), 133-145. doi: 10.1080/09575146.2014.897308
59. Pyle, A., DeLuca, C., Danniels, E., & Wickstrom, H. (2020). A model for assessment in play-based kindergarten education. American Educational Research Journal, 57(6), 2251–2292. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831220908800
60. Rethza, S.B.Y.A., & Jamaluddin, S. (2010). Preschool teachers’ assessment practices, knowledge and perceptions in selected districts. Jurnal Pendidikan, 30, 127-157.
61. Reynolds, B., & Duff, K. (2016). Families’ perceptions of early childhood educators’ fostering conversations and connections by sharing children's learning through pedagogical documentation. Education 3-13, 44(1), 93-100. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2015.1092457
62. Rinaldi, C. (2004). The relationship between documentation and assessment. In Innovations in early education: The international Reggio exchange. Winter, pp. 1–4.
63. Rinaldi, C. (2005). In Dialogue with Reggio Emilia. London: Routledge
64. Rinaldi, C. (2012). The pedagogy of listening: The listening perspective from Reggio Emilia. In C. Edwards, L. Gandini, & G. Forman, (Eds.) The hundred language of children (3rd edition) (pp. 233-245). Santa Barbara, California: Praeger.
65. Rintakorpi, K. (2016). Documenting with early childhood education teachers: Pedagogical documentation as a tool for developing early childhood pedagogy and practices. Early Years, 36(4), 399-412. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/09575146.2016.1145628
66. Saldana, J. (2016). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (3rd ed.). London: Sage.
67. Saracho, O.N. (2015). Research in early childhood educational assessment and evaluation. In O.N. Saracho, Contemporary perspectives on research in assessment and evaluation in early childhood education (pp.3-22). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
68. Seitz, H. (2023). Authentic assessment: A Strengths-based approach to making thinking, learning, and development visible. Young Children, 6-11.
69. Shepard, L., Kagan, S., & Wurtz, E. (Eds.). (1998). Principles and recommendations for early childhood assessments. Washington, DC: National Education Goals Panel.
70. Shermis, M.D., & Di Vesta, F.J. (2011). Classroom assessment in action. EBSCO Publishing: eBook Academic Collection.
71. Smidt, S. (2015). Observing young children: The role of observation and assessment in early childhood setting (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
72. Stacey, S. (2015). Pedagogical documentation in early childhood: Sharing children’s learning and teachers’ thinking. St. Paul, MN: Redleaf Press.
73. Stacey, S. (2019). Inquiry based early learning environments. St. Paul, MN: Redleaf Press.
74. Turner, T. & Wilson, D.G. (2010). Reflections on documentation: A discussion with thought leaders from Reggio Emilia. Theory Into Practice, 49, 5–13. doi: 10.1080/00405840903435493
75. VanTassel-Baska, J. (2013). Performance-based assessment. The road to authentic learning for the gifted. Gifted Child Today, 37(1), 41-47. https://doi.org/10.1177/1076217513509618
76. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
77. Wortham, S., & Hardin, B.J. (2016). Assessment in early childhood education (7th ed.). USA: Pearson.
78. Yılmaz, A., Şahin, F., Buldu, M., Erdem, A.Ü., Ezmeci, F., Ölmez, B.S., Aydos, E.H., Buldu, E., Ünal, H.B., Aras, S., Buldu, M., & Akgül, E. (2020). An examination of Turkish early childhood teachers’ challenges in implementing pedagogical documentation, Early Childhood Education Journal, 49, 1047–1059. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-020-01113-w