Rethinking Teaching as a Performative Act: An Interdisciplinary Model Proposal Grounded in Voice, Body, and Narrative

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 12 Sayı: Özel Sayı, 288 - 306, 30.11.2025

Elif Özcan

Öz

This study proposes an interdisciplinary teacher education model that aims to foreground the performative and aesthetic dimensions of the teaching profession. Components that are often overlooked in traditional teacher education programs—namely voice, body, and narrative—are reconceptualized as foundational elements that shape the teacher’s classroom presence, expressive capacity, and professional self-narration. The model is structured around three core components: the expression of voice, the representation of the body, and the construction of narrative. These components are integrated through performative pedagogical approaches. The theoretical framework draws on John Dewey’s and Elliot Eisner’s perspectives on arts education, Dorothy Heathcote’s conception of the teacher-in-role, Erika Fischer-Lichte’s theory of performance, and Kristin Linklater’s voice pedagogy. The distinctive feature of the model lies in its ability to bring together these diverse theoretical sources under a single structural framework, thereby approaching teacher identity from an aesthetic, relational, and transformative perspective. The proposed model is operationalized through micro-modules and applied activities designed to transform teacher candidates’ classroom presence into an aesthetic experience. In the discussion section, the potential contributions of the model to the field, its practical limitations, and suggestions for future research are addressed in detail. In this regard, the study offers a holistic and creative theoretical framework for rethinking teacher education.

Anahtar Kelimeler

performative pedagogy , teacher identity , arts-based education , voice training , body awareness , narrative construction , drama in education , aesthetic presence , reflective practice , interdisciplinary model

Etik Beyan

This study does not involve any human participants or experimental procedures; therefore, it does not require ethical committee approval. All scientific and academic ethical principles have been strictly followed throughout the research process.

Destekleyen Kurum

This study has not received any financial or institutional support from any organization or institution.

Teşekkür

There are no individuals or institutions that have directly contributed to the scientific development of this study. However, the author wishes to express sincere gratitude to colleagues whose valuable insights and suggestions have supported the intellectual development of the study.

Öğretmenliği Performatif Bir Eylem Olarak Yeniden Düşünmek: Ses, Beden ve Anlatı Temelli Disiplinlerarası Bir Model Önerisi

Öz

Bu çalışma, öğretmenlik mesleğinin performatif ve estetik yönlerini görünür kılmayı amaçlayan disiplinlerarası bir öğretmen eğitimi modeli önermektedir. Geleneksel öğretmen eğitimi programlarında çoğunlukla göz ardı edilen ses, beden ve anlatı bileşenleri; öğretmenin sınıf içi varlığını, ifade gücünü ve mesleki öz-anlatımını belirleyen temel unsurlar olarak yeniden konumlandırılmıştır. Model, “sesin ifadesi”, “bedenin temsili” ve “anlatının inşası” olmak üzere üç ana bileşen etrafında yapılandırılmış ve performatif pedagojik yaklaşımlarla bütünleştirilmiştir. Kuramsal çerçevede John Dewey ve Elliot Eisner’in sanat eğitimi yaklaşımlarından, Dorothy Heathcote’un öğretmen-yaratan rolü anlayışından, Erika Fischer-Lichte’nin performans kuramından ve Kristin Linklater’ın ses pedagojisinden yararlanılmıştır. Modelin özgün yönü, bu farklı kuramsal kaynakları tek bir yapısal çatı altında buluşturarak öğretmen kimliğini estetik, ilişkisel ve dönüştürücü bir perspektiften ele almasıdır. Çalışmada önerilen model, özellikle öğretmen adaylarının sınıf içi varlığını estetik bir deneyim alanına dönüştürmeyi hedefleyen mikro-modüller ve uygulamalı etkinliklerle somutlaştırılmıştır. Tartışma bölümünde modelin alana sağlayabileceği katkılar, uygulamaya yönelik potansiyel sınırlılıklar ve gelecekteki araştırmalar için öneriler detaylı olarak ele alınmıştır. Bu bağlamda çalışma, öğretmen eğitiminin yeniden düşünülmesine yönelik bütüncül ve yaratıcı bir kuramsal çerçeve sunmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Performatif pedagojik yaklaşım , öğretmen kimliği , sanat temelli eğitim , ses eğitimi , beden farkındalığı , anlatı oluşturma , eğitimde drama , estetik duruş , yansıtıcı uygulama , disiplinlerarası model

Etik Beyan

Bu çalışma, herhangi bir katılımcı verisi veya deneysel uygulama içermediğinden etik kurul onayı gerektirmemektedir. Araştırma sürecinde bilimsel ve akademik etik ilkelere bütünüyle uyulmuştur.

Destekleyen Kurum

Bu çalışma, herhangi bir kurum veya kuruluş tarafından maddi ya da kurumsal olarak desteklenmemiştir.

Teşekkür

Bu çalışmanın hazırlanma sürecinde doğrudan bilimsel katkı sunan kişi veya kurum bulunmamaktadır. Yazar, çalışmanın geliştirilmesinde görüş ve önerileriyle katkı sağlayan meslektaşlarına teşekkür eder.

Kaynakça

• Adıgüzel, Ö. (2013). Eğitimde Yaratıcı Drama. Ankara: PegemA Yayıncılık
• Albrecht, R., Güngör, L., & Sandbothe, M. (2019). Achtsamkeit als Metabildung in der digitalen Gesellschaft. In R. Albrecht, L. Güngör, & J. Achatz (Eds.), Digitalisierung – Werte zählen? (pp. 157–170). Königshausen & Neumann.
• Altner, N., & Adler, B. (2021). Being really present as a teacher. In Education for the Common Good. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-30832-2_13
• Aspen Commission. (2018). The Arts and the Future of Learning: A report from the Aspen Institute National Commission on Social, Emotional, and Academic Development. Aspen Institute. https://www.aspeninstitute.org/publications/arts-social-emotional-learning/
• Barab, S. A., & Squire, K. (2004). Design-based research: Putting a stake in the ground. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1301_1
• Barnes, J., & Shirley, I. (2007). Strangely familiar: Cross-curricular and creative thinking in teacher education. Improving Schools, 10(2), 162–179. https://doi.org/10.1177/1365480207078580
• Bhukhanwala, F., Dean, K., & Troyer, M. (2017). Beyond the student teaching seminar: Examining transformative learning through arts-based approaches. Teachers & Teaching: Theory & Practice, 23(5), 611–630. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2016.1219712
• Boal, A. (2000). Theatre of the oppressed (R. C. Leal McBride & M.-O. Leal McBride, Trans.; New ed.). Pluto Press.
• Brecht, B. (1964). Brecht on theatre: The development of an aesthetic (J. Willett, Ed. & Trans.). Hill and Wang.
• Brekke, B., & Willbergh, I. (2017). Frihet, fantasi og utfoldelse. Nordisk tidsskrift for pedagogikk og kritikk, 3(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.23865/ntpk.v3.554
• Bresler, L. (2004). Knowing bodies, moving minds: Towards embodied teaching and learning. Springer.
• Britzman, D. P. (1991). Practice makes practice: A critical study of learning to teach. State University of New York Press.
• Brook, P. (2017). The empty space. Penguin.
• Brookfield, S. D. (2017). Becoming a critically reflective teacher (2nd ed.). Jossey-Bass.
• Bruner, J. (1990). Acts of meaning. Harvard University Press.
• Burnard, P., Holliday, C., Jasilek, S., & Nikolova, A. (2015). Artists and higher education partnerships: A living enquiry. Education Journal, 4(3), 98–105. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.edu.20150403.12
• Chappell, S. V., & Chappell, D. (2016). Building social inclusion through critical arts-based pedagogies. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 20(3), 292–308. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2015.1047658
• Cheng, R. H. M. (2003). Philosophy of education through narrative pedagogy. Educational Research Journal, 18(2), 125–150.
• Clandinin, D. J., & Connelly, F. M. (2000). Narrative inquiry: experience and story in qualitative research. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
• Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. L. (2009). Inquiry as stance: Practitioner research for the next generation. Teachers College Press.
• Cochran-Smith, M., & Zeichner, K. M. (Eds.). (2005). Studying teacher education: The report of the AERA Panel on Research and Teacher Education. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
• Connington, B. (2020). Introduction to the Alexander Technique: A practical guide for actors (Acting Essentials series). Methuen Drama.
• Çakır İlhan, A. (2003). Sınıf Öğretmeni Yetiştirme Programları ve Sanat Eğitimi. Ankara University Journal of Faculty of Educational Sciences (JFES), 36(1), 13-24. https://doi.org/10.1501/Egifak_0000000081
• Çalışkan, N., & Yeşil, R. (2005). EĞİTİM SÜRECİNDE ÖĞRETMENİN BEDEN DİLİ. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Kırşehir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 6(1), 199-207.
• Darling-Hammond, L., & Bransford, J. (Eds.). (2005). Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do. Jossey-Bass.
• Dievernich, F. E. P., Döben-Henisch, G. D., & Frey, R. (2019). Bildung 5.0: Wissenschaft, Hochschulen und Meditation. Beltz Juventa.
• Dewey, J. (2005). Art as experience. Perigee Books.
• Eisner, E. W. (2002). The arts and the creation of mind. Yale University Press.
• Elliot, A. J., Dweck, C. S., & Yeager, D. S. (Eds.). (2018). Handbook of competence and motivation: Theory and application (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.
• Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (2002). The way we think: Conceptual blending and the mind’s hidden complexities. Basic Books.
• Fischer-Lichte, E. (2008). The transformative power of performance: A new aesthetics. Routledge.
• Giorza, T. (2016). Thinking together through pictures. Perspectives in Education, 34(1), 167–181. https://doi.org/10.18820/2519593X/pie.v34i1.12
• Goh, P. S. C., & Blake, D. (2015). Teacher preparation in Malaysia. Teaching in Higher Education, 20(5), 469–480. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2015.1020780
• Goodson, I. F., & Gill, S. R. (2011). The narrative turn in education. In M. F. D. Peter Smeyers & J. Depaepe (Eds.), Educational research: Discourses of change and changes of discourse (pp. 47–60). Springer.
• Greene, M. (1995). Releasing the imagination: Essays on education, the arts, and social change. Jossey-Bass.
• Guay, F. (2022). Applying self-determination theory to education. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 37(1), 75–92.
• Gulikers, J. T. M., Bastiaens, T. J., & Kirschner, P. A. (2004). A five-dimensional framework for authentic assessment. Educational Technology Research and Development, 52(3), 67–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504676
• Hall, C., & Thomson, P. (2007). Creative partnerships? British Educational Research Journal, 33(3), 315–329. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920701243586
• Hardiman, M., & Magsamen, S. (2009–2010). Connecting brain research with dimensions of learning for the arts. Neuroeducation: Learning, Arts, and the Brain. The Dana Foundation.
• Hardiman, M., Rinne, L., & Yarmolinskaya, J. (2014). The effects of arts integration. Mind, Brain, and Education, 8(3), 144–148. https://doi.org/10.1111/mbe.12053
• Harris, D. X., & Lemon, A. (2012). Bodies that shatter: Creativity, culture and the new pedagogical imaginary. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 20(3), 413–433. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2012.712054
• Heathcote, D., & Bolton, G. (1995). Drama for learning: Dorothy Heathcote's mantle of the expert approach to education. Heinemann.
• Jaakkola, E. (2020). Designing conceptual articles: Four approaches. AMS Review, 10(1), 18–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13162-020-00161-0
• Johnstone, K. (2018). Impro: Improvisation and the Theatre (Bloomsbury Revelations ed.). Bloomsbury Academic.
• Kincheloe, J. L., & McLaren, P. (2005). Rethinking critical theory and qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 303–342). Sage Publications.
• Korthagen, F. (2017). Inconvenient truths about teacher learning: Towards professional development 3.0. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 23(4), 387–405. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2016.1211523
• Kovacic, G. (2005). Voice education in teacher training. Journal of Education for Teaching, 31(2), 87–97.
• Lecoq, J. (2000). The moving body: Teaching creative theatre. Methuen Drama.
• Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage Publications.
• Lindqvist, G. (2003). Vygotsky’s theory of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 15(2–3), 245–251. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2003.9651416
• Linklater, K. (2006). Freeing the natural voice: Imagery and art in the practice of voice and language. Drama Publishers.
• Lynham, S. A. (2002). The general method of theory-building research in applied disciplines. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 4(3), 221–241. https://doi.org/10.1177/1523422302043002
• Maxwell, J. A. (2013). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
• McKenney, S., & Reeves, T. C. (2012). Conducting educational design research. Routledge.
• Mergler, A. G., & Spooner-Lane, R. (2012). What pre-service teachers need to know to be effective at values-based education. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 37(8), 66–81. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2012v37n8.5
• Merleau-Ponty, M. (2012). Phenomenology of perception (D. A. Landes, Trans.). Routledge. (Original work published 1945)
• Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2013). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
• Morgan, P. F. (2015). A brief history of the current reemergence of contemplative education. Journal of Transformative Education, 13(3), 197–218. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541344614564875
• Møller-Skau, M., & Lindstøl, F. (2022). Arts-based teaching and learning in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 109, 103545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103545
• Nicolescu, B. (2002). Manifesto of transdisciplinarity (K.-C. Voss, Trans.). State University of New York Press.
• Nieveen, N. (1999). Prototyping to reach product quality. In J. van den Akker, R. Branch, K. Gustafson, N. Nieveen, & T. Plomp (Eds.), Design approaches and tools in education and training (pp. 125–135). Kluwer Academic Publishers.
• Nilson, C., Fetherston, C. M., McMurray, A., & Fetherston, T. (2013). Creative arts: An essential element in the teacher’s toolkit. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 38(7). https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2013v38n7.4
• Nusseck, M., Immerz, A., Spahn, C., Echternach, M., & Richter, B. (2021). Long-term effects of a voice training program. Journal of Voice, 35(3), 438–446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2019.11.016
• O’Neill, C. (1995). Drama worlds: A framework for process drama. Heinemann Drama.
• Ogden, H., DeLuca, C., & Searle, M. (2010). Authentic arts-based learning. Teaching Education, 21(4), 367–383. https://doi.org/10.1080/10476210.2010.495770
• Ogier, S., & Ghosh, K. (2018). Exploring student teachers’ capacity for creativity. Journal of Graphic Novels & Comics, 9(4), 293–309. https://doi.org/10.1080/21504857.2017.1319871
• Oreck, B. (2004). The artistic and professional development of teachers. Journal of Teacher Education, 55(1), 55–69. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487103260072
• Özbent, S. (2007). Sınıfta Beden Dili. Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 27(2), 259-289.
• Patterson, J. A. (2017). Too important to quit: A call for teacher support of art. The Educational Forum, 81(3), 339–355. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131725.2017.1314568
• Paulmann, S., & Weinstein, N. (2023). Teachers' motivational prosody. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(2), 437–452.
• Pool, J., Dittrich, C., & Pool, K. (2011). Arts integration in teacher preparation. Journal for Learning through the Arts, 7(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.21977/D97110004
• Reeve, J., & Shin, S. H. (2020). How teachers can support students' agentic engagement. Theory Into Practice, 59(2), 150–161.
• Rinne, L., Gregory, E., Yarmolinskaya, J., & Hardiman, M. (2011). Why arts integration improves long-term retention. Mind, Brain, and Education, 5(2), 89–96. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-228X.2011.01114.x
• Roy, N., Merrill, R. M., Thibeault, S., Gray, S. D., & Smith, E. M. (2004). Voice disorders in teachers. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 47, 542–551.
• Sawyer, R. K. (2012). Explaining creativity: The science of human innovation (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.
• Schechner, R. (2003). Performance Theory (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203426630
• Schwab, J. J. (1969). The practical: A language for curriculum. School Review, 78(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1086/442881
• Schwandt, T. A. (2007). The Sage dictionary of qualitative inquiry (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
• Selkrig, M., & Bottrell, C. (2009). Transformative learning for pre-service teachers. The International Journal of Learning, 16(1), 395–408. https://doi.org/10.18848/1447-9494/CGP/v16i01/46103
• Selkrig, M., & Bottrell, C. (2018). Exploring particular creativities in the arts. In L. de Bruin, P. Burnard, & S. Davies (Eds.), Creativities in arts education, research and practice (pp. 15–32). Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004369603_002
• Shockley, E. T., & Krakaur, L. (2021). Arts at the core. Pedagogies, 16(1), 19–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/1554480X.2020.1738936
• Sheets-Johnstone, M. (2011). The primacy of movement (2nd ed.). John Benjamins.
• Stanislavski, C. (2015). An actor prepares (E. R. Hapgood, Trans.). Bloomsbury Academic.
• Thomas, D., & Brown, J. S. (2011). A new culture of learning: Cultivating the imagination for a world of constant change. CreateSpace.
• Thomson, P. (2009). Schooling the rustbelt kids: Making the difference in changing times. Trentham Books.
• Timmermans, B., Coveliers, Y., Meeus, W., Vandenabeele, F., Van Looy, L., & Wuyts, F. (2011). The effect of a short voice training program. Journal of Voice, 25(4), e191–e198.
• Valtl, K. (2019). Achtsamkeit als Komponente sozial-emotionalen Lernens. Universität Hamburg. https://lecture2go.uni-hamburg.de/l2go/-/get/v/24642
• Watson, J. (2018). Deferred creativity. Teaching and Teacher Education, 71, 206–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.12.018
• Wiggins, G. (1998). Educative assessment: Designing assessments to inform and improve student performance. Jossey-Bass.
• Zeichner, K. M., & Liston, D. P. (2013). Reflective teaching: An introduction (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203771136