Öğretmen Eğitiminde Nesiller Arası Köprü Kurmak: Kuşaklararası Anlayışın Bibliyometrik Haritalandırılması (1988–2025)

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 12 Sayı: Özel Sayı, 253 - 270, 30.11.2025

Derya Girgin

Öz

Bu araştırma, öğretmen eğitimi bağlamında nesiller arası eğitimin dönüştürücü kapasitesini incelemekte ve çeşitli nesil grupları arasında empati, işbirliği ve kapsayıcılığı geliştirmek için temel bir çerçeve olarak Nesil Zekası (GI) kavramını vurgulamaktadır. Web of Science Core Collection (1988–2025) kaynaklı 257 akademik makalenin bibliyometrik haritalaması kullanarak, bu çalışma disiplinin entelektüel ve tematik yapısını tanımlamakta, baskın anahtar kelimeleri, üretken yazarları, kurumsal katkıları ve uluslararası ortaklıkları belirlemektedir. Sonuçlar, “nesiller arası öğrenme”yi temel tematik köşe taşı olarak vurgulamakta ve çevre eğitimi, aile odaklı öğrenme ve dijital okuryazarlığı kapsayan çok sayıda alt alanla karakterize edilen disiplinler arası ve yeni ortaya çıkan bir araştırma alanını ortaya koymaktadır. Bu araştırma, nesiller arası perspektifleri hem içerik hem de pedagojik metodoloji olarak entegre etmek için öğretmen eğitimi müfredatının sistematik olarak yeniden değerlendirilmesini savunmaktadır. Çalışma, kuşaklar arası etkileşimin öğretmenlerin yetkinliklerini artırdığı, kuşak stereotiplerini sorguladığı ve daha kapsayıcı ve sürdürülebilir bir eğitim ortamı oluşturduğu sonucuna varmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kuşaklar arası eğitim , kuşak zekası , öğretmen eğitimi , eğitim dönüşümü , kuşak çeşitliliği. , bibliyometrik haritalama

Etik Beyan

Bu çalışma, ilgili tüm etik kurallara uygun olarak yürütülmüştür. Araştırma, bibliyometrik analizlere ve kamuya açık verilere dayandığından, resmi bir etik komitesi onayı gerekmemektedir.

Destekleyen Kurum

Bu araştırma, kamu, ticari veya kâr amacı gütmeyen sektörlerdeki herhangi bir fon kuruluşundan özel bir hibe almamıştır.

Bridging Generations in Teacher Education: A Bibliometric Mapping of Intergenerational Understanding (1988–2025)

Öz

This research investigates the transformative capacity of intergenerational education within the context of teacher training, accentuating the notion of Generational Intelligence (GI) as a fundamental framework for cultivating empathy, collaboration, and inclusivity among various generational cohorts. Utilizing a bibliometric mapping of 257 scholarly articles sourced from the Web of Science Core Collection (1988–2025), this study delineates the intellectual and thematic architecture of the discipline, pinpointing predominant keywords, prolific authors, institutional contributions, and international partnerships. The results highlight "intergenerational learning" as the pivotal thematic cornerstone and expose an interdisciplinary and emergent research domain characterized by a multitude of subfields, encompassing environmental education, family-oriented learning, and digital literacy. This investigation advocates for a systemic reevaluation of teacher education curricula to integrate intergenerational perspectives as both substantive content and pedagogical methodology. The study concludes that intergenerational engagement enhances teacher competencies, interrogates generational stereotypes, and fosters a more inclusive and sustainable educational environment

Anahtar Kelimeler

Intergenerational education , generational intelligence , teacher training , educational transformation , generational diversity. , bibliometric mapping

Etik Beyan

This study adhered to all relevant ethical guidelines. Since the research is based on bibliometric analysis and publicly available data, no formal ethics committee approval was required.

Destekleyen Kurum

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Kaynakça

• Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). Bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959–975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007
• Batista, P., Mouraz, A., Viana, I., & Graça, A. (2024). Intergenerational learning among teachers’ professional development and lifelong learning: An integrative review of primary research. European Journal of Educational Research, 13(3), 1275–1290. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.13.3.1275
• Biggs, S., & Lowenstein, A. (2011). Generational intelligence: A critical approach to age relations. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203827918
• Biggs, S., Haapala, I., & Lowenstein, A. (2011). Exploring generational intelligence as a model for examining intergenerational relationships. Ageing and Society, 31(7), 1107–1124. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X10000978
• Biseth, H., Svenkerud, S. W., Magerøy, S. M., & Rubilar, K. H. (2022, March). Relevant transformative teacher education for future generations. In Frontiers in education (Vol. 7, p. 806495). Frontiers Media SA. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.806495
• Canedo-Garcia, A., Garcia-Sanchez, J. N., & Pacheco-Sanz, D. I. (2017). A systematic review of the effectiveness of intergenerational programs. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1882. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01882
• Carpenter, C. R., Cone, D. C., & Sarli, C. C. (2014). Using publication metrics to highlight academic productivity and research impact. Academic Emergency Medicine, 21(10), 1160–1172. https://doi.org/10.1111/acem.12482
• Chan, S. Y. (2023). Making the future safe for relational equality: social categories and intergenerational justice. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 28(3), 464-480. https://doi.org/10.1080/13698230.2025.2462363
• Cole, M. (2016). Designing for development: Across the scales of time. Developmental Psychology, 52(11), 1679. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/dev0000156
• Çelik, Ç., & Polat, S. (2023). The relationship between intergenerational knowledge sharing and intergenerational learning levels among teachers. Journal of Intergenerational Relationships, 21(4), 427-441. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15350770.2022.2084202
• Darling-Hammond, L., Flook, L., Cook-Harvey, C., Barron, B., & Osher, D. (2020). Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development. Applied developmental science, 24(2), 97-140. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2018.1537791
• Dittrich, A. K. (2025). An International Reconstruction of Teachers’ and Teacher Educators’ Perspectives on the Challenges of Education for Sustainable Development in Teacher Education. Journal of Education for Sustainable Development, 09734082241309704. https://doi.org/10.1177/09734082241309704
• Feldman, S., Mahoney, H., & Seedsman, T. (2003). School-based intergenerational programs: Laying the foundations for sustainability. Journal of Intergenerational Relationships, 1(2), 47-66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/J194v01n02_05
• Femia, E. E., Zarit, S. H., Blair, C., Jarrott, S. E., & Bruno, K. (2008). Intergenerational preschool experiences and the young child: Potential benefits to development. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 23(2), 272-287.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2007.05.001
• Foley, V., Myrick, F., & Yonge, O. (2013). Intergenerational conflict in nursing preceptorship. Nurse Education Today, 33(9), 1003-1007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2012.07.019
• Fraenkel, J., Wallen, N., & Hyun, H. (2006). How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education 10th ed. McGraw-Hill Education.
• Franz, J., & Scheunpflug, A. (2016). A systematic perspective on intergenerational learning: Theoretical and empirical findings. Studia paedagogica, 21(2), 25-41. http://dx.doi.org/10.5817/SP2016-2-3
• Geeraerts, K., Tynjälä, P., & Heikkinen, H. L. (2018). Inter-generational learning of teachers: what and how do teachers learn from older and younger colleagues?. European journal of teacher education, 41(4), 479-495. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2018.1448781
• Gravetter, F. J., Forzano, L. A. B., & Rakow, T. (2009). Research methods for the behavioral sciences (p. 656). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
• Greenwood, D. A. (2013). A critical theory of place-conscious education. In International handbook of research on environmental education (pp. 93-100). Routledge.
• Hallman, H. (2016). Millennial teachers: Learning to teach in uncertain times. Routledge.
• Hernández-Torrano, D., & Ibrayeva, L. (2020). Creativity and education: A bibliometric mapping of the research literature (1975–2019). Thinking skills and creativity, 35, 100625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2019.100625
• Josephine, J., & Jones, L. (2022). Understanding the impact of generation gap on teaching and learning in medical education: a phenomenological study. Advances in medical education and practice, 13, 1071. https://doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S370304
• Kaplan, M., Sanchez, M., & Hoffman, J. (2017). Intergenerational pathways to a sustainable society (pp. 141-162). Berlin, Germany: Springer International Publishing.
• Kelly, C. (2015). ‘Let’s do some jumping together’: Intergenerational participation in the use of remote technology to co-construct social relations over distance. Journal of Early Childhood Research, 13(1), 29-46. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476718X12468121
• Laszlo, K., & Laszlo, A. (2019). A whole systems approach to education redesign: A case study on the need for intergenerational perspectives and inclusion. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 36(4), 532-537. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sres.2568
• MacCallum, J., Palmer, D., Wright, P., Cumming-Potvin, W., Brooker, M., & Tero, C. (2010). Australian perspectives: Community building through intergenerational exchange programs. Journal of Intergenerational relationships, 8(2), 113-127. https://doi.org/10.1080/15350771003741899
• Mannion, G. (2018). Intergenerational education and learning: We are in a new place. Families, intergenerationality, and peer group relations, 307-327. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-026-1_5
• Mannion, G., & Gilbert, J. (2015). Place-responsive intergenerational education. In Intergenerational space (pp. 228-241). Routledge.
• Martin, G. (2024). Drumming Our Way Home: Intergenerational Learning, Teaching, and Indigenous Ways of Knowing. UBC Press.
• Martín-Martín, A., Orduna-Malea, E., & Delgado López-Cózar, E. (2018). Coverage of highly-cited documents in Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: a multidisciplinary comparison. Scientometrics, 116(3), 2175-2188. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2820-9
• McDaniel, S. A., Gazso, A., & Um, S. (2013). Generationing relations in challenging times: Americans and Canadians in mid-life in the Great Recession. Current Sociology, 61(3), 301-321.
• Meho, L. I., & Yang, K. (2007). Impact of data sources on citation counts and rankings of LIS faculty: Web of Science versus Scopus and Google Scholar. Journal of the American society for information science and technology, 58(13), 2105-2125. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20677
• Merigó, J. M., Pedrycz, W., Weber, R., & De la Sotta, C. (2018). Fifty years of Information Sciences: A bibliometric overview. Information Sciences, 432, 245-268. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2017.11.054
• Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (2020). Teachers and leaders in vocational education and training. https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/reports/2021/03/teachers-and-leaders-in-vocational-education-and-training_5641deea/59d4fbb1-en.pdf
• Pardue, C. J. (2024). The Lived Experiences of First-Generation Female College Graduates as Leaders in Education (Doctoral dissertation, Houston Baptist University).
• Portela Pruaño, A., Bernárdez Gómez, A., Marrero Galvan, J. J., & Nieto Cano, J. M. (2022). Intergenerational professional development and learning of teachers: A mixed methods study. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 21, 16094069221133233. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069221133233
• Sánchez, M., & Kaplan, M. (2014). Intergenerational learning in higher education: Making the case for multigenerational classrooms. Educational Gerontology, 40(7), 473-485. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1080/03601277.2013.844039
• Shaw, S., & Fairhurst, D. (2008). Engaging a new generation of graduates. Education+ training, 50(5), 366-378. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/00400910810889057
• Small, H. (1973). Co‐citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for information Science, 24(4), 265-269. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630240406
• Stephan, P. (2012). How economics shapes science. Harvard University Press.
• United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. (2020). Education for sustainable development: A roadmap. Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development A/RES/70/1, available online at.
• Van Eck, N., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523-538. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3
• Yuan, Y., & Wu, L. (2021). A scoping review on intergenerational learning in Urban China. Acta Educationis Generalis, 11(3), 53-80. http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/atd-2021-0021
• Yuan, Y., & Yarosh, S. (2019, May). Beyond tutoring: Opportunities for intergenerational mentorship at a community level. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1-14).
• Zimmerman, H. T., & McClain, L. R. (2014). Intergenerational learning at a nature center: Families using prior experiences and participation frameworks to understand raptors. Environmental education research, 20(2), 177-201. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2013.775219
• Zupic, I., & Čater, T. (2015). Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organizational research methods, 18(3), 429-472. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1094428114562629