Technology Integration in English Language Teacher Education Programs in Türkiye: A Curriculum-Based Analysis through the DigCompEdu Framework

Öz

This study aimed to examine how digital competences are conceptualized and operationalized in the curricula of selected English Language Teacher Education (ELTE) programs in Türkiye through the lens of the DigCompEdu Framework (Redecker, 2017). Given CoHE’s decision to grant universities the authority to design their own curricula (Council of Higher Education, 2020), ELTE programs in Türkiye have continued program development and improvement efforts. This shift has made it necessary to investigate how technology integration is implemented at different institutions, especially in their official curriculum documents. A qualitative document analysis was conducted on program documents of selected ELTE programs in Türkiye. Program descriptions, program outcomes, course descriptions, and course contents were analyzed using DigCompEdu. The findings revealed varying degrees of technology integration in ELTE curricula. While few programs explicitly mentioned digital competences, the majority offered limited or implicit references to technology-supported instruction. Areas such as digital assessment, technology-enhanced feedback, and responsible technology use were found to be underemphasized. A holistic curricular vision for digital pedagogy is called for. Offering insights into the current state of technology integration in ELTE programs in Türkiye, this research could contribute to various stakeholders in the field aiming to enhance future teachers’ digital pedagogical readiness.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• English language teacher education
• DigCompEdu
• curriculum analysis
• technology integration

Türkiye’deki İngiliz Dili Öğretmen Eğitimi Programlarında Teknoloji Entegrasyonu: DigCompEdu Çerçevesi Kapsamında Bir Müfredat Analizi

Öz

Bu çalışma, Türkiye’deki İngiliz Dili Öğretmen Eğitimi (İDÖE) programlarının müfredatlarında dijital yeterliklerin nasıl kavramsallaştırıldığını ve uygulamaya geçirildiğini, DigCompEdu Çerçevesi (Redecker, 2017) doğrultusunda incelemeyi amaçlamaktadır. Yükseköğretim Kurulu’nun (YÖK, 2020) üniversitelere kendi müfredatlarını tasarlama yetkisi vermesiyle birlikte, İDÖE alanında program geliştirme ve iyileştirme çalışmaları sürdürülmektedir. Bu durum, farklı kurumlarda teknoloji entegrasyonunun özellikle resmi müfredat belgelerinde nasıl yansıtıldığını araştırmayı gerekli kılmıştır. Bu amaçla, seçili İDÖE programlarının program tanımları, program çıktıları, ders tanımları ve ders içeriklerine yönelik nitel bir doküman analizi gerçekleştirilmiştir. Analiz sürecinde DigCompEdu çerçevesi temel alınmıştır. Bulgular, İDÖE müfredatlarında teknoloji entegrasyonunun farklı düzeylerde gerçekleştiğini ortaya koymuştur. Az sayıda program dijital yeterliklere açıkça yer verirken, çoğu programda teknoloji destekli eğitime yalnızca sınırlı ya da dolaylı biçimde atıfta bulunulmuştur. Dijital değerlendirme, teknoloji destekli geri bildirim ve sorumlu teknoloji kullanımı gibi alanların ise yeterince vurgulanmadığı görülmüştür. Dijital pedagojiye yönelik bütüncül bir müfredat vizyonuna ihtiyaç duyulmaktadır. Türkiye’deki İngiliz Dili Öğretmen Eğitimi (İDÖE) programlarında teknoloji entegrasyonunun mevcut durumuna dair bakış açıları sunan bu araştırma, geleceğin öğretmenlerinin dijital pedagojik yeterliklerini geliştirmeyi hedefleyen alandaki çeşitli paydaşlara katkı sağlayabilir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• İngiliz dili öğretmen eğitimi
• DigCompEdu
• müfredat analizi
• teknoloji entegrasyonu

Kaynakça

1. Aşık, A., Köse, S., Yangın Ekşi, G., Seferoğlu, G., Pereira, R., & Ekiert, M. (2020). ICT integration in English language teacher education: Insights from Turkey, Portugal and Poland. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 33(7), 708–731. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1588744
2. Bayrak Karsli, M., Küçük, S., Kılıç, R., & Albayrak-Ünal, Ö. (2023). Assessment of digital competencies of teacher educators with the DigCompEdu framework. International Journal of Curriculum and Instructional Studies, 13(1), 67–94. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1395263.pdf
3. Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027
4. Cabero-Almenara, J., Gutiérrez-Castillo, J. J., Palacios-Rodríguez, A., & Barroso-Osuna, J. (2021). Comparative European DigCompEdu framework (JRC) and Common Framework for Teaching Digital Competence (INTEF) through expert judgment. Texto Livre: Linguagem e Tecnologia, 14(1), e25740. https://doi.org/10.35699/1983-3652.2021.25740
5. Calvani, A., Cartelli, A., Fini, A., & Ranieri, M. (2008). Models and instruments for assessing digital competence at school. Journal of E-Learning and Knowledge Society, 4(3), 183–193.https://doi.org/10.20368/1971-8829/288
6. Chapelle & S. Sauro (Eds.), The handbook of technology and second language teaching and learning (pp. 278–292). Wiley-Blackwell.
7. Council of Higher Education. (2018). Undergraduate teacher education programs [Öğretmen yetiştirme lisans programları]. https://eski.yok.gov.tr/Documents/Kurumsal/egitim_ogretim_dairesi/Yeni-Ogretmen-Yetistirme-Lisans-Programlari/AA_Sunus_%20Onsoz_Uygulama_Yonergesi.pdf
8. Council of Higher Education. (2020, August 18). YÖK's major delegation of authority decision to faculties of education [YÖK'ten eğitim fakültelerine önemli yetki devri kararı] [News release]. https://eski.yok.gov.tr/Sayfalar/Haberler/2020/egitim-fak%C3%BCltelerine-yetki-devri.aspx

9. Cukur, H. S. (2023). Technology integration beliefs and practices of Turkish novice EFL teachers after online practicum. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 24(3), 293–310.
10. Çebi, A., & Reisoğlu, İ. (2020). Digital competence: A study from the perspective of pre-service teachers in Turkey. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 9(2), 294–308. https://doi.org/10.7821/naer.2020.7.583
11. Darling-Hammond, L. (2006). Powerful teacher education: Lessons from exemplary programs. Jossey-Bass.
12. Farhadi, S., & Öztürk, G. (2023). Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) level and needs of pre-service English as a foreign language (EFL) teachers: Evidence from Turkey. Revista Educación, 47(1), 187–203. https://doi.org/10.15517/revedu.v47i1.51920
13. Feiman-Nemser, S. (2001). From preparation to practice: Designing a continuum to strengthen and sustain teaching. Teachers College Record, 103(6), 1013–1055.
14. Ferrari, A. (2012). Digital competence in practice: An analysis of frameworks (Joint Research Centre Technical Report, EUR 25351 EN). Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2791/82116
15. Guikema, J. P., & Menke, M. R. (2014). Preparing future foreign language teachers: The role of digital literacies. In J. P. Guikema & L. Williams (Eds.), Digital literacies in foreign and second language education (CALICO Monograph Series, Vol. 2, pp. 265–285). CALICO.
16. Harmandaoğlu Baz, E., Balçıkanlı, C., & Cephe, P. T. (2018). Introducing an innovative technology integration model: Echoes from EFL pre-service teachers. Education and Information Technologies, 23(5), 2179–2200. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9711-9
17. Haşlaman, T., Atman Uslu, N., & Mumcu, F. (2024). Development and in-depth investigation of pre-service teachers' digital competencies based on DigCompEdu: A case study. Quality & Quantity, 58, 961–986. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-023-01674-z
18. Instefjord, E. J., & Munthe, E. (2017). Preparing pre-service teachers to integrate technology: An analysis of the emphasis on digital competence in teacher education curricula. European Journal of Teacher Education, 40(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2015.1100602
19. Jantos, A., Langesee, L. M., Volkmann, N., & Lindner, M. (2024). Exploring the impact of AI on DigCompEdu competences for higher education teaching. In INTED2024 Proceedings (pp. 3742–3751). IATED.
20. Kapucu, N. K., Adnan, M., & Duman, B. (2025). Exploring faculty digital competencies in the context of online course delivery: An analysis based on DigCompEdu. Journal of Qualitative Research in Education, 43, 24–59. https://doi.org/10.14689/enad.43.2076
21. Karacan, C. G., & Can, T. (2025). Assessing teacher digital competences in pre-service language teachers: Adaptation and validation of the DigCompEdu scale. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2025.2504354
22. Kennedy, D. (2006). Writing and using learning outcomes: A practical guide. University College Cork.
23. Kessler, G., & Hubbard, P. (2017). Language teacher education and technology. In C. A. Chapelle & S. Sauro (Eds.), The handbook of technology and second language teaching and learning (pp. 278–292). Wiley-Blackwell.
24. Kessler, G. (2018). Technology and the future of language teaching. Foreign Language Annals, 51(1), 205–218. https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12318
25. Krumsvik, R. J. (2014). Teacher educators’ digital competence. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 58(3), 269–280. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2012.726273
26. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE Publications.
27. Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
28. OECD. (2019). Future of education and skills 2030: OECD learning compass 2030. OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/about/projects/edu/education-2040/1-1-learning-compass/OECD_Learning_Compass_2030_Concept_Note_Series.pdf
29. Öztürk, G., & Aydın, B. (2019). English language teacher education in Turkey: Why do we fail and what policy reforms are needed? Anadolu Journal of Educational Sciences International, 9(1), 181–213. https://doi.org/10.18039/ajesi.520842
30. Park, M., & Son, J.-B. (2022). Pre-service EFL teachers’ readiness in computer-assisted language learning and teaching. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 42(2), 320–334. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2020.1815649
31. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
32. Quast, J., Rubach, C., & Porsch, R. (2023). Professional digital competence beliefs of student teachers, pre-service teachers and teachers: Validating an instrument based on the DigCompEdu framework. European Journal of Teacher Education, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2023.2251663
33. Redecker, C. (2017). European framework for the digital competence of educators: DigCompEdu (JRC Science for Policy Report). Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2760/159770
34. Reisoğlu, İ., & Çebi, A. (2020). How can the digital competences of pre-service teachers be developed? Examining a case study through the lens of DigComp and DigCompEdu. Computers & Education, 156, 103940. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103940
35. Røkenes, F. M., & Krumsvik, R. J. (2014). Development of student teachers’ digital competence in teacher education: A literature review. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 9(4), 250–280. https://doi.org/10.18261/ISSN1891-943X-2014-04-03
36. Schreier, M. (2012). Qualitative content analysis in practice. SAGE Publications.
37. Sert, O., & Li, L. (2017). A qualitative study on CALL knowledge and materials design: Insights from pre-service EFL teachers. International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching, 7(3), 73–87. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJCALLT.2017070105
38. Taşçı, S. (2023). A comprehensive study on the problems of English language teaching in Turkey: Reflections from pre-service ELT teachers. Trakya Journal of Education, 13(3), 1656–1672. https://doi.org/10.24315/tred.1174706
39. Tondeur, J., Van Braak, J., Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. (2017). Understanding the relationship between teachers’ pedagogical beliefs and technology use in education: A systematic review of qualitative evidence. Educational Technology Research and Development, 65(3), 555–575. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9481-2
40. UNESCO. (2018). ICT competency framework for teachers (Version 3). United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000265721
41. Uzun, L. (2016). The educational and technical courses in the ELT program in Turkey: Do they contribute to ICT skills? Cogent Education, 3(1), 1141454. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2016.1141454