EntrepreneuroDesign: A Novel Framework for Enhancing Final Year Mechanical Engineering Course Efficiency

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 12 Sayı: 2, 77 - 87, 31.07.2025

Onat Halis Totuk

Öz

This paper presents an innovative theoretical framework that integrates design thinking principles with entrepreneurial education and R&D strategies to enhance the efficiency of final year mechanical engineering courses. The proposed approach, termed "EntrepreneuroDesign," combines the iterative problem-solving methodology of design thinking with entrepreneurial mindset development and industry-driven R&D practices. By restructuring the traditional course curriculum, EntrepreneuroDesign creates a dynamic learning environment that simulates real-world engineering challenges. Students engage in rapid prototyping, market analysis, and collaborative problem-solving, fostering both technical proficiency and business acumen. The framework incorporates three key components: (1) industry-partnered project challenges, (2) iterative design sprints, and (3) entrepreneurial pitch sessions. This structure not only enhances students' engineering skills but also cultivates innovation capabilities and market awareness. Preliminary assessments of the EntrepreneuroDesign framework in a pilot program demonstrate significant improvements in student engagement, project outcomes, and industry-readiness compared to traditional teaching methods. This research contributes to the evolving landscape of engineering education by offering a scalable model that bridges the gap between academic learning and industry demands, potentially developing the preparation of mechanical engineering graduates for the innovation-driven job market.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Design thinking , Mechanical engineering education , EntrepreneuroDesign , Innovation pedagogy , Industry-Academia collaboration

Kaynakça

• Akera, A. (2017). Setting the standards for engineering education: A history. Proceedings of the IEEE, 105(9), 1834-1843.
• Ankrah, S., & Al-Tabbaa, O. (2015). Universities–industry collaboration: A systematic review. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 31(3), 387-408.
• Borrego, M., Foster, M. J., & Froyd, J. E. (2018). Systematic literature reviews in engineering education and other developing interdisciplinary fields. Journal of Engineering Education, 107(3), 468-489.
• Borrego, M., Karlin, J., McNair, L. D., & Beddoes, K. (2013). Team effectiveness theory from industrial and organizational psychology applied to engineering student project teams: A research review. Journal of Engineering Education, 102(4), 472–512.
• Brown, T. (2008). Design thinking. Harvard Business Review, 86(6), 84-92.
• Bruneel, J., D'Este, P., & Salter, A. (2010). Investigating the factors that diminish the barriers to university–industry collaboration. Research Policy, 39(7), 858-868.
• Bucciarelli, L. L. (2016). A review of innovation and change in professional education: Preparing students for complex problem-solving. Journal of Engineering Education, 105(2), 295-301.
• Byers, T., Seelig, T., Sheppard, S., & Weilerstein, P. (2013). Entrepreneurship: Its role in engineering education. The Bridge, 43(2), 35-40.
• Discover Engineering. (n.d.). The challenges of a mechanical engineering degree. Retrieved from https://www.discoverengineering.org/the-challenges-of-a-mechanical-engineering-degree/
• Duval-Couetil, N., Reed-Rhoads, T., & Haghighi, S. (2016). Engineering students and entrepreneurship education: Involvement, attitudes and outcomes. International Journal of Engineering Education, 28(2), 425-435.
• Dym, C. L., Agogino, A. M., Eris, O., Frey, D. D., & Leifer, L. J. (2005). Engineering design thinking, teaching, and learning. Journal of Engineering Education, 94(1), 103-120.
• Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: From national systems and "Mode 2" to a triple helix of university–industry–government relations. Research Policy, 29(2), 109-123.
• Fayolle, A. (2013). Personal views on the future of entrepreneurship education. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 25(7-8), 692-701.
• Goldberg, D. E., & Somerville, M. (2014). A whole new engineer: The coming revolution in engineering education. ThreeJoy Associates, Inc.
• Guilford, J. P. (1967). The nature of human intelligence. McGraw-Hill.
• Hatano, G., & Inagaki, K. (1986). Two courses of expertise. In H. Stevenson, H. Azuma, & K. Hakuta (Eds.), Child development and education in Japan (pp. 262-272). Freeman.
• Johnson, B., & Ulseth, R. (2016). Development of professional competence in the Iron Range Engineering program. In ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings (Vol. 2016-June).
• Kamp, A. (2016). Engineering education in the rapidly changing world. Rethinking the mission and vision on engineering education at TU Delft. Delft University of Technology.
• Kolb, D. A. (2014). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. FT press.
• Kriewall, T. J., & Mekemson, K. (2010). Instilling the entrepreneurial mindset into engineering undergraduates. The Journal of Engineering Entrepreneurship, 1(1), 5-19.
• Lande, M., & Leifer, L. (2010). Difficulties student engineers face designing the future. International Journal of Engineering Education, 26(2), 271-277.
• Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press.
• Litzinger, T., Lattuca, L. R., Hadgraft, R., & Newstetter, W. (2011). Engineering education and the development of expertise. Journal of Engineering Education, 100(1), 123-150.
• Maresch, D., Harms, R., Kailer, N., & Wimmer-Wurm, B. (2016). The impact of entrepreneurship education on the entrepreneurial intention of students in science and engineering versus business studies university programs. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 104, 172-179.
• Neck, H. M., & Greene, P. G. (2011). Entrepreneurship education: Known worlds and new frontiers. Journal of Small Business Management, 49(1), 55-70.
• Nottingham University Malaysia. (2024, February 28). Is mechanical engineering hard? Demystifying the challenges. Retrieved from https://www.nottingham.edu.my/NewsEvents/News/2024/is-mechanical-engineering-hard.aspx
• Perkmann, M., & Walsh, K. (2009). The two faces of collaboration: Impacts of university-industry relations on public research. Industrial and Corporate Change, 18(6), 1033-1065.
• Perkmann, M., Tartari, V., McKelvey, M., Autio, E., Broström, A., D'Este, P., ... & Sobrero, M. (2013). Academic engagement and commercialisation: A review of the literature on university–industry relations. Research Policy, 42(2), 423-442.
• Piaget, J. (1976). Piaget's theory. In B. Inhelder, H. H. Chipman, & C. Zwingmann (Eds.), Piaget and his school (pp. 11-23). Springer.
• Qadir, J., Al-Fuqaha, A., Hussain, Z., Zheng, T., Iqbal, T., Imran, M. A., & Vasilakos, A. V. (2020). Engineering education, moving into 2020s: Essential competencies for effective 21st century electrical and computer engineers. Education Sciences, 10(2), 30.
• Ro, H. K., & Knight, D. B. (2016). Gender differences in learning outcomes from the college experiences of engineering students. Journal of Engineering Education, 105(3), 478-507.
• Sari, U., Alici, M., & Sen, Ö. F. (2018). The application of STEM education in science learning at schools in industrial areas. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 16(2), 278-289.
• Shane, S., & Venkataraman, S. (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 217-226.
• Sheppard, S. D., Macatangay, K., Colby, A., & Sullivan, W. M. (2009). Educating engineers: Designing for the future of the field. Jossey-Bass.
• Slaughter, S., & Rhoades, G. (2004). Academic capitalism and the new economy: Markets, state, and higher education. JHU Press.