The main focus of the criticisms raised by O'Kelly and Soltani (2025) (hereafter referred to as discussers) to the authors' article in Bulletin of Mineral Research and Exploration (174, 1-10) is to examine the veracity of the strength-based equations presented by Kayabalı et al. (2024). The discussers applied the predictive equations proposed by the authors to dissimilar soils in the two articles (Kayabalı et al., 2015a; Kayabalı et al., 2015b) published earlier by the lead author with his research group. The discussers showed that the predictive equations 6 and 7 given by Kayabalı et al. (2024) yield extremely high values of liquid limit (LL) and plastic limit (PL) when applied to dissimilar soils. Further, discussers argued that the approach proposed by Kayabalı et al. (2024) led to erroneous results in determining soil classes.
Fine-grained soil Liquid limit Plastic limit Vane shear strength Regression analysis
Birincil Dil | İngilizce |
---|---|
Konular | Genel Jeoloji |
Bölüm | Makaleler |
Yazarlar | |
Erken Görünüm Tarihi | 26 Şubat 2025 |
Yayımlanma Tarihi | |
Gönderilme Tarihi | 25 Şubat 2025 |
Kabul Tarihi | 26 Şubat 2025 |
Yayımlandığı Sayı | Yıl 2025 Cilt: 176 Sayı: 176 |
Copyright and Licence
The Bulletin of Mineral Research and Exploration keeps the Law on Intellectual and Artistic Works No: 5846. The Bulletin of Mineral Research and Exploration publishes the articles under the terms of “Creatice Common Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs (CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0)” licence which allows to others to download your works and share them with others as long as they credit you, but they can’t change them in any way or use them commercially.
For further details;
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/?lang=en