Müslüman-Paulisyen Karşılaşmaları ve Erken Dönem İslami Hıristiyanlık Karşıtı Polemik Yazıları

Öz

Bu makale, erken dönem İslam kaynaklarında Paulisyenlerin tasvirlerini incelemekte ve özellikle Paulisyenlerin dini görüşlerinin İslam’ın Hıristiyanlık karşıtı yazılarında oynadığı rolü analiz etmektedir. Çalışma aynı zamanda Müslüman âlimlerin elindeki materyallerin niteliği hakkında fikir vermesinin yanında belirli Hristiyan dini inançlarını çürütmek için tutarlı argümanlar da oluştururken bu Müslüman âlimlerin uyguladıkları stratejiler hakkında da fikir vermektedir. Bunu yaparken, çalışma Müslümanların dini ihtiyaçlarına ve bilimsel meraklarına değinerek, İslam dışı dini inançlar ve felsefi fikirlerle olan entelektüel etkileşimlerine ışık tutmaktadır. Makale, Pavlusçu dini inançlara yapılan atıfların öncelikle erken dönem Hıristiyan-İslam polemiklerinde de bulunabileceğini göstermektedir. Çoğu Mutezile olan Müslüman polemikçiler, Hıristiyan doktrinlerindeki yetersizlikler ve çelişkiler karşısında İslami ilkelerin sağlamlığını ve tutarlılığını göstermeye çalışmışlardır. Bu nedenle Müslüman polemikçilerin heresiografik (mezhepler ile ilgili) söyleme güvenmeleri, polemik argümanlarını kanıtlamak için önemli bir strateji oluşturmuştur. Pavlusçu doktrinlerin İslami tasvirlerinde iki önemli husus öne çıkmaktadır bunlar: Samosata’lı Pavlus’un mezhep tarihindeki merkezciliği ve İsa’nın ilahilikten yoksun bir insan olduğu görüşüyle ilişkisidir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Paulisyenler
• Hıristiyan-İslam polemikleri
• Mutezile
• İsa’nın tanrısallığı
• Meryem
• heresiografi
• Samosata’lı Pavlus
• Düalizm
• Divriği

Muslim–Paulician Encounters and Early Islamic Anti-Christian Polemical Writings

Öz

This article investigates the portrayals of the Paulicians in early Islamic sources and specifically analyses the role that Paulician religious views play in Islamic anti-Christian writings. The study also gives insights into the nature of materials that were available to Muslim scholars and the strategies they applied in constructing coherent arguments to refute certain Christian religious beliefs. In doing so, the study touches upon Muslims’ religious needs and scholarly curiosity, which sheds light on their intellectual interactions with non-Islamic religious beliefs and philosophical ideas. The article demonstrates that references to Paulician religious beliefs can be found primarily in early Christian–Islamic polemics. Muslim polemicists, most of whom were Muʿtazilites, attempted to demonstrate the soundness and the coherence of Islamic tenets vis-à-vis inadequacies and contradictions in Christian doctrines. The reliance of Muslim polemicists on heresiographical discourse therefore constituted an important strategy to substantiate their polemical arguments. Two major issues stand out in Islamic portrayals of Paulician doctrines: the centrality of Paul of Samosata in the history of the sect, and his association with the view that Jesus was a human being devoid of divinity.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Paulicians; Christian–Islamic
• polemics;
• Muʿtazilites;
• divinity of Jesus;

Kaynakça

1. Asadabādī, ʿAbd al-Jabbār al-. 1958. Al-Mughnī fī abwāb al-tawh īd wa-al-ʿadl. Edited by M. al- Khuḍayrī. Vol. 5. Cairo: al-Dār al-Misriyya li-al-Ta ̣ ʾlīf wa-al-Tarjama.
2. Asadabādī, ʿAbd al-Jabbār al-. 2010. ʿAbd al-Jabbār: Critique of Christian Origins (Tathbīt dalāʾil al-nubuwwa): A Parallel English Text. Edited and translated by G. S. Reynolds and S. K. Samir. Provo: Brigham Young University Press.
3. Barnard, L. 1974. The Graeco-Roman and Oriental Background of the Iconoclastic Controversy. Leiden: Brill.
4. Becker, A. 2006. Fear of God and the Beginning of Wisdom: The School of Nisibis and Christian Scholastic Culture in Late Antiquity Mesopotamia. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
5. Behloul, Samuel. 2002. Ibn Hazms Evangelien kritik: Eine methodische Untersuchung. Leiden: Brill.
6. Behr, J. 2001. The Way to Nicaea: The Formation of Christian Theology. Vol. 1. Crestwood, NY: St. Vladimir’s Seminary Press.
7. Bonadeo, C. M. 2011. “art. Yaḥyā b. ʿAdī.” In Encyclopedia of Medieval Philosophy: Philosophy Between 500 and 1500, edited by H. Lagerlun, Vol. 2, 1421–1422. Dordrecht: Springer.
8. Buck, C. 1984. “The Identity of the Sabiʿun: An Historical Quest.” Muslim World 74: 172–186.

9. Chadwick, H. 2001. The Church in Ancient Society: From Galilee to Gregory the Great. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
10. Constans, N. 2003. Proclus of Constantinople and the Cult of Mary of the Virgin in Late Antiquity: Homilies1–5, Texts and Translations. Leiden: Brill.
11. Conybeare, F., ed. 1898. The Key of Truth: A Manual of the Paulician Church of Armenia. Oxford: The Clarendon Press.
12. Dadoyan, S. 1997. The Fatimid Armenians: Cultural and Political Interaction in the Near East. Leiden: Brill.
13. Dadoyan, S. 2011. The Armenians in Medieval Islamic History: Paradigms of Interaction, Seventh to Fourteenth Centuries, Vol. 1. The Arab Period in Armīnyah: Seventh to Eleventh Centuries. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction. van Ess, J. 1975. “The Beginnings of Islamic Theology.” In The Cultural Context of Medieval Learning, edited by J.
14. Murdoch, and E. Sylla, Vol. 26, 88–111. Boston, MA: D. Reidel. van Ess, J. 1991–1997. Theologies und Gesellschaft im 2. und 3. Jahrhundert Hidschra: Eine Geschichte des Religiösen Denken im Frühen Islam. 6 vols. Berlin: de
15. Gruyter. van Ess, J. 2006. The Flowering of Islamic Theology. Translated from German by J. M. Todd. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
16. Gallagher, C. 2008. “The Episcopal Councils in the East.” In The Oxford Handbook of Byzantine Studies, edited by E. Jeffreys, 583–591. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
17. Galvão-Sobrinho, C. R. 2013. Doctrine and Power: Theological Controversy and Christian Leadership in the Later Roman Empire. Berkeley: University of California Press.
18. Garsoïan, N. 1967. The Paulician Heresy: A Study of the Origin and the Development of Paulicianism in Armenia and the Eastern Provinces of the Byzantine Empire. The Hague: Mouton.
19. Genequand, Charles. 1999. “Idolâtrie, Astrolâtrie et Sabéisme.” Studia Islamica 89: 109–128.
20. Gimaret, D. 1994. “art. Raḥma.” In Encyclopedia of Islam, Vol. 8, 398–399. Leiden: Brill.
21. Graf, G. 1944–1953. Geschichte der Christlichen Arabischen Literature. 5 vols. Citta del Vaticani: Biblioteca Apostolica Vaticana.
22. Griffith, S. H. 2001. “Melkites, Jacobites, and the Christological Controversies in Arabic in the Third/Ninth-Century Syria.” In Syrian Christians Under Islam: The First Thousand Years, edited by D. Thomas, 9–55. Leiden: Brill.
23. Griffith, S. H. 2008. The Church in the Shadow of the Mosque: Christians and Muslims in the World of Islam. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
24. Gutas, D. 1998. Greek Thought, Arabic Culture: The Graeco-Arabic Translation Movement in Baghdad and Early ‘Abbasid Society (2nd–4th/ 8th–10th Centuries). London: Routledge.
25. Hamilton, J., and B. Hamilton, eds and trans. 1998. Christian Dualist Heresies in the Byzantine World c. 650–1450. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
26. Ibn al-Bitrīq, Sa’id (Eutychius). 1905. Annales, Kitāb al-Majmūʿ ʿalā al-taḥqīq wa-al-tasḍ īq. Edited by L. Cheikho [Corpus Scriptorum Christianourm Orientalium, Scriptores Arabici Textus. Ser. III, vol. 4]. Beirut: Matbạ ʿat al-Abāʾ al-Yasūʿiyyīn.
27. Ibn ʿAdī, Yaḥyā. 1987. Jawāb Yaḥyā b. ʿAdī ʿan radd Abī ʿĪsā al-Warrāq ʿalā al-Nasạ̄ rā, fī al-ittiḥād, in Abū ʿĪsā al-Warrāq Yaḥyā b. ʿAdī de l’Incarnation. Edited by E. Platti [Corpus Scriptorum Christianorum Orientalium 490, Scriptores Arabici 46]. Louvain: Peeters.
28. Ibn al-Nadīm, Abū al-Faraj. 1996. Kitāb al-fihrist. Edited by Y. Ṭawīl. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyya.
29. Ibn Ḥazm, al-Andalusī. n.d. Kitāb al-fasl f ̣ ī al-milal, wa-al-ahwāʾ wa-al-niḥal. 5 vols. Beirut: Maktabat Khayyāt.̣
30. Ibn Qunstant ̣ ị̄n, Maḥbūb (Agapius). 1911. Kitāb al-ʿunwān: Histoire Universelle. Edited and translated by A. Vasiliev. [Patrologia Orientalis, 7, 4, part two]. Paris: Firmin Didot. Jāḥiz, Ab ̣ ū ʿUthmān al-. 1991. Al-Radd ʿalā al-Nasạ̄ rā. In Rasāʾil al-Jāḥiz. Vol. 3. Edited by ̣A. Hārūn. Beirut: Dār al-Jīl.
31. Kaatz, K. 2012. Early Controversies and the Growth of Christianity. Santa Barbara, CA: Prager. Khalidi, T. 2001. The Muslim Jesus: Sayings and Stories in Islamic Literature. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
32. Khalidi, T. 2003. Al-Injīl bi-riwāyat al-Muslimīn. Beirut: Dār al-Nahār li-al-Nashr.
33. Khawārizmī, Abū ʿAbdallāh al-. n.d. Mafātīḥ al-ʿulūm. Edited by A. M. al-ʿAbd. Cairo: Dār al-Nahḍa al-ʿArabiyya.
34. Le Coz, R. 1992. Jean Damascène: Écrits sur Islam [Source Chrétiens 383]. Paris: Cerf.
35. Lemerle, P. 1973. “L’Histoire des Pauliciens d’Asie Mineure d’après le Sources Grecques.” Travaux et Mémoires 5: 1–144.
36. Loos, M. 1974. Dualist Heresy in the Middle Ages. Prague: Academia Publishing House of the Czechoslovak Academy of Sciences.
37. Ludwig, C. 1998. “The Paulicians and Ninth-Century Byzantine Thought.” In Byzantium in the Ninth Century: Dead or Alive? Papers from the Thirtieth Symposium of Byzantine Studies. Birmingham, March 1996, edited by L. Brubaker, 23–36. Aldershot: Ashgate.
38. Maqdisī, al-Mutahhar, al-. ̣ n.d. Al-badʾ wa-al-taʾrīkh. Edited by C. Huart. 6 vols. Beirut: Dār Ṣādir.
39. Masʿūdi, Abū al-Ḥasan al-. 1894. Kitāb al-tanbīh wa-al-ishrāf. Edited by M. J. de Goeje. [Bibliotheca Geographorum Arabicorum 8]. Leiden: Brill.
40. Masʿūdī, Abū al-Ḥasan al-. 1965. Murūj al-dhahab wa-maʿādin al-jawhar. Vol. 5. Edited by Ch. Pellat. Beirut: Manshūrāt al-Jāmiʿa al-Lubnāniyya.
41. Monnot, G. 1983. “Les doctrines des chrètiens dans le ‘Moghni’ de ʿAbd al-Jabbar.” Mélanges de l’Institut Dominicain d’Etudes Orientales 16: 9–30.
42. Nāshiʾ, al-Akbar al-. 1971. “Kitāb al-awsat.̣” In Werke des Naši’ al-Akbar, edited by J. van Ess, 82–83. Beirut: Franz Steiner.
43. Nersoyan, T. 1996. The Armenian Church Historical Studies: Matters of Doctrine and Administration. New York: St Vartan Press.
44. O’Grady, J. 1995. Early Christian Heresies. New York: Barnes & Noble.
45. Papandrea, J. 2016. The Earliest Christologies: Five Images of Christ in the Postapostolic Age. Downer Grove, IL: Inter Varsity Press.
46. Penn, M. P. 2015. Envisioning Islam: Syriac Christians and the Early Muslim World. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
47. Qudāma, ibn Jaʿfar. 1967. Kitāb al-kharāj. Edited by M. J. de Goeje. [Bibliotheca Geographorum Arabicorum 6]. Leiden: Brill.
48. Rassī, Ibn Ibrāhīm al-. 2000. Al-radd ʿalā al-Nasạ̄ rā. Edited by Imām Ḥanafī ʿAbdallah. Cairo: Dār al-Āfāq al-ʿArabiyya.
49. Räisänen, H. 1980. “The Portrait of Jesus in the Qur’an: Reflections of a Biblical Scholar.” The Muslim World 70 (2): 122–133.
50. Reeves, J. 2010. Prolegomena to a History of Islamicate Manichaeism. Sheffield: Equinox.
51. Reynolds, G. S. 2004. A Muslim Theologian in the Sectarian Milieu: ʿAbd al-Jabbār and the Critique of Christian Origins. Leiden: Brill.
52. Reynolds, G. S. 2009. “The Muslim Jesus: Dead or Alive?” Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 72 (2): 237–258.
53. Reynolds, G. S. 2014. “On the Presentation of Christianity in the Qur’ān and Many Aspects of Qur’ānic Rhetoric.” Al-Bayān 12: 42–54.
54. Runciman, S. 1999. The Medieval Manichee: A Study of the Christian Dualist Heresy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
55. Sahas, D. J. 1972. John of Damascus on Islam: The ‘Heresy of the Ishmaelites’. Leiden: Brill.
56. Shahrastānī, Abū al-Fatḥ al-. 1992. Kitāb al-milal wa al-niḥal. Edited by A. Muḥammad. 2 vols. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyya.
57. Simeon of Beth Arsham. 2002. Epistola de Barsauma. Edited and translated by S. S. Assemani. Repr. Piscataway, NJ: Gorgias Press.
58. Swanson, M. 2006. “Folly to the Hunafāʾ: The Crucifixion in Early Christian–Muslim Controversy.” In The Encounter of Eastern Christianity with Early Islam, edited by E. Grypeou, M. Swanson, and D. Thomas, 248–256. Leiden: Brill.
59. Tardieu, M. 1986. “Sabiens Coraniques et Sabiens de Harran.” Journal Asiatique 274: 1–44.
60. Thomas, D. 1996. “Abū ‘Īsā al-Warrāq and the History of Religions.” Journal of Semitic Studies, 41 (2): 275–290.
61. Thomas, D. 2002. Early Muslim Polemic Against Christianity: Abū ‘Īsā al-Warrāq’s Against the Incarnation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
62. Thomas, D. 2006. “Christian Theologians and New Questions.” In The Encounter of Eastern Christianity with Early Islam, edited by E. Grypeou, M. Swanson, and D. Thomas, 259–267. Leiden: Brill.
63. Thurlkill, M. 2007. Chosen among Women: Mary and Fatima in Medieval Christianity and Sh’ite Islam. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
64. Tobias, Norman. 2007. Basil I Founder of the Macedonian Dynasty: A Study of the Political and Military History of the Byzantine Empire in the Ninth Century. Lewiston, NY: Edwin Mellen Press.
65. Tolan, J. 2002. Saracens: Islam in the Medieval European Imagination. New York: Columbia University Press.
66. Tabarī, Abū Jarīr al-. 1960. Taʾrīkh al-rusul wa-al-mulūk. Edited by M. Abū al-Faḍl Ibrāhīm. 11 vols. Cairo: Dār al-Maʿārif.
67. Vasiliev, A. 1935. Byzance et les arabes: La dynastie d’Amorium (820–867). Vol. 1. [Corpus Bruxellense Historiae Byzantinae 1]. Brussels: Institute de Philologie et d’Histoire Orientales.
68. Warrāq, Abū ʿIsā al-. 1992. Anti-Christian Polemic in Early Islam: Abū ʿĪsā al-Warrāq’s Against the Trinity. Edited and translated by David Thomas. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
69. Warrāq, Abū ʿĪsā al-. 2002. Early Muslim Polemic against Christianity: Abū ʿĪsā al-Warrāq’s Against the Incarnation. Edited and translated by David Thomas. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
70. Wensinck, A. J. 1991. “art. Maryam.” In Encyclopedia of Islam, Vol. 6, 628–632. Leiden: Brill.
71. Zaman, M. Q. 1997. Religion and Politics under the Early ʿAbbasids: The Emergence of the Proto-Sunni Elite. Leiden: Brill.