-

Öz

Bu çalışmada etik inancı ile kendi kendine denetim arasındaki ilişki araştırılmıştır.Etik inancının iki boyutu araştırılmıştır: göreceli etik ve idealizm. Anket sorusuna 125 ihracattan ve ithalattan sorumlu yönetici cevap vermiştir. Yöneticilerin verdikleri cevapların sonuçlarına göre, idealizm ile kendi kendine denetim ve kendi kendine denetim alt bölümleri arasında bir ilişki yoktur. Diğer taraftan, göreceli etik ile kendi kendine denetim ve alt bölümleri arasında pozitif bir ilişki bulunmuştur. Ancak, kendi kendine denetimin bir alt bölümü olan fazla dışa yönelik ile göreceli etik arasında bir ilişki bulunmamıştır

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Etik, göreceli, idealism, kendi- kendini denetim, işletme

ETHICAL BELIEFS AND SELF-MONITORING

Öz

This paper explores possible relationships between ethical beliefs and selfmonitoring. Two dimensions of ethical beliefs were investigated: ethical relativism and idealism. The data was collected from 125 managers of exporting and importing departments of Turkish firms by means of a self - administered questionnaire. The results indicate that there is no relationship between ethical idealism and selfmonitoring and its subscales. However, the results do show positive relationships between ethical relativism and self- monitoring and its subscales except for the extraversion subscale

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Ethics, idealism, relativism, self-monitoring, business

Kaynakça

1. Anderson, L. R. (1990). Toward a two-track model of leadership training: Suggestions from self-monitoring theory, Small Group Behavior, 20, 24-36.
2. Barnett, T. Buss, K. & Brown, G. (1994). Ethical ideology and ethical judgment regarding ethical issues in business, Journal of Business Ethics, 13,
3. Blodgett, M. & Carlson, P.J. (1997). Corporate ethics codes a practical application of liability prevention. Journal of Business Ethics, 16, 1363-1369.
4. Briggs, S. R.; Cheek, J.J., & Bass, A.H. (1980). An analysis of the self- monitoring scale, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 679-686.
5. Goffman, E. (1955). On face work: An analysis of ritual elements in social interaction. Psychiatry, 1955, 18, 213-221.
6. Gudykunst, W. B., Yang, S. M. & Nishida, T. (1987). Cultural differences in self-consciousness and self- monitoring. Communication Research, 14, 7-34.
7. Forsyth, D. R. (1980). A taxomony of ethical ideologies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 39 (1) 175-184.
8. Furnham, A. & Briggs, J. (1993) Ethical ideology and moral choice. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 8(1), 87-98.

9. Forsyth, D. R., & Pope, W. R. (1984). Ethical ideology and judgments of social psychology research: Multi dimensional analysis. Journal of personality and social psychology 46(6) 1365-1375.
10. Hall, E. T. (1977). Beyond culture. New York: Doubleday.
11. Haan, N. (1986). Systematic variability in the quality of moral action as defined in two formulations. Personality and Social Psychology 50, 1271- 1284.
12. Head, T. C. (1998). Roles of self-monitoring and situational ambiguity in the social information-processing model, Psychological Reports, 83, 1447-1453.
13. Hogan, R., & Emler, N. P. (1978). A socioanalytic theory of moral development. In W. Damon directions for child development. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
14. Leona, C.&Corte, V. (1994) Concern for presentation and self-congruence: Self- monitoring, Machiavellianism, and social conflicts. Social Behavior and Personality, 22, 306-312.
15. Mayo, B. (1986). The philosophy of light or wrong: An introduction to ethical theory. London: Routledge.
16. Miesing, P. & Preble, J. F. (1985). A comparison of five business philosophies, Journal of Business Ethics, 4, 465-476.
17. Norris, S.L.& Zweingenhaft, R.I. (1999) Self-monitoring trust and commitment in romantic relationships. The Journal of Social Psychology, 139(2)
18. Rieff (1967). The triumph of the therapeutic. New York: Harper & Row.
19. Robin, D. P. (1980). Values issues in marketing. In C. W. Lamb and P. M. Danne (Eds.), Theoretical developments in marketing (pp. 142-145). Chicago:AMA.
20. Schlenker, B. R. & Forsyth, D. R. (1977). On the ethics of psychological research. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 9, 369-396.
21. Schlenker, B. R. & Weigold, M. F.(1992). Interpersonal processes involving impression regulation and management. Annu. Rew. Psychol, 43, 133- 68.
22. Snyder, M. (1974). Self-monitoring of expressive behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30, 526-537.
23. Snyder, M. (1987) Public appearances / private realities: The psychology of self-monitoring. New York: W. H. Freeman
24. Snyder, M., Simpson, J., Gangestad, S. (1986). Personality and sexual relations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 181-190.
25. Vitell, S.J., Lumpkin, J.R., & Rawwas, M. Y.A. (1991) Consumer ethics: An investigation of the Business Ethics, 10, 365-375.
26. Waterman, A. S. (1988) On the uses of psychological theory and research in the process of ethical inquiry. Psychology Bulletin, 103, 283-298.
27. Williams, B. (1985). Ethics and the limits of philosophy. London: Fontana Press.
28. Yurtsever, G. (1998) Ethical beliefs and creativity. Journal of Social Behavior, 13, 747-754.