Factors Affecting Student Motivation in the Classroom: Motivating Factors and Hygiene Factors
Abstract
Motivation is the power that mobilizes an individual to achieve a goal. Students need to be motivated to play an active role in educational process and achieve targeted outcomes. Therefore, it is important to determine the factors that increase students' motivation and to implement practices that increase student motivation in the classroom. This study investigated student perspectives on motivating and hygiene factors affecting their classroom motivation. The research employed a basic qualitative design and involved 936 undergraduate students from a state university in Turkey (2019-2020 academic year). Participants were chosen through convenience sampling, a purposive sampling method. Data collection occurred through an unstructured form developed by the researchers. MAXQDA 20 software facilitated data analysis. Five themes emerged from student responses regarding classroom motivation: teacher, student, learning environment, teaching content, and other factors. Teacher characteristics were identified as the most significant motivators, encompassing both hygiene and motivational factors. Overall, students emphasized motivating factors more than hygiene factors. The study suggests that school administrators and teachers should consider these factors to enhance student learning motivation and academic achievement. By exhibiting behaviors that address these factors, educators can foster a more positive and motivating learning environment for students.
Keywords
References
- Agustina, E. T., Wahyudin, A. Y., & Pratiwi, A. A. 2021. The students’ motivation and academic achievement at tertiary level: A correlational study. Journal of Arts and Education, 1(1), 29-38.
- Akbaba, S. (2010). Eğitimde motivasyon. Atatürk Üniversitesi Kazım Karabekir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 13, 343-361. https://izlik.org/JA42WF29CR
- Andrietti, V., & Su, X. (2018). Education curriculum and student achievement: theory and evidence. Education Economics, 27(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/09645292.2018.1527894
- Atkinson, E. (2000). An investigation into the relationship between teacher motivation and pupil motivation. Educational Psychology, 20, 45-57. https://doi.org/10.1080/014434100110371
- Bassett-Jones, N., & Lloyd, G. (2005). Does Herzberg's motivation theory have staying power? Journal of Management Development, 24, 929-943. https://doi.org/10.1108/02621710510627064
- Bhatt, R., Koedel, C., & Lehmann, D. (2013). Is curriculum quality uniform? Evidence from Florida. Economics of Education Review, 34, 107–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2013.01.014
- Braun, V., Clarke, V., Boulton, E., Davey, L., & McEvoy, C. (2021). The online survey as a qualitative research tool. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 24(6), 641-654. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2020.1805550
- Brophy, J. (1983). Conceptualizing student motivation. Educational Psychologist, 18(3), 200-215. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461528309529274
Details
Primary Language
English
Subjects
Curriculum and Instration (Other)
Journal Section
Research Article
Authors
Ramazan Başaran
0000-0003-0646-4458
Türkiye
Publication Date
October 25, 2026
Submission Date
April 14, 2026
Acceptance Date
August 28, 2026
Published in Issue
Year 2026 Volume: 8 Number: 2