Araştırma Makalesi
PDF EndNote BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Bir Tarihi Kitabenin Çokdilli Çevirilerinde Gerçekleşen Çevirisel Metinlerarasılıkta Bozulmalar

Yıl 2022, Cilt 20, Sayı 32, 145 - 171, 27.05.2022
https://doi.org/10.17518/canakkalearastirmalari.1081557

Öz

Bu çalışma, bir tarihi kitabenin çokdilli çevirilerinde gerçekleşen çevirisel metinlerarasılık üzerinde yeniden çeviri ve aktarım çevirilerini ele alışı bakımından bir ilk niteliği taşımaktadır. Çalışılan çevirilerin birbirlerine bağlanılarak bir çeviri zinciri oluşturulması amaçlanmıştır. Bu zincirde çalışılan çeviriler için uygulanmış farklı yöntemler ve diliçi ve dillerarasındaki değişimler öne çıkarılmıştır. Çalışmanın bütüncesi altı akademik çalışma ve kaynak dil dahil olmak üzere beş dil içermektedir. Bahsedilen altı çalışma Türkiye’nin Alanya ilçesinde bulunan bir tarihi kitabenin dillerarası çevirilerinden oluşmaktadır. Bütüncenin çözümlemesinde nitel içerik çözümlemesi ve nitel amaçlı örneklem yöntemleri kullanılmıştır. Çözümleme sonucunda, anlambilimsel değişikliklere ve çeviri görüngülerimin uygulanmasına maruz kalan çevirilerin metinliklerini değiştirmeye yatkın olduğu görülmüştür. Ayrıca, bu yapılan değişiklikler sonucunda kaynak metne yeni anlamlar kazandırıldığı gözlemlenmiştir. Bu bağlamda, çevirisel metinlerarasılık kavramının hedef dilde oluşturulacak çeviriye dayalı çeviri metinlerde önem arz ettiği vurgulanmıştır. Buna ek olarak, çevirisel metinlerarasılıkta muhtemel bozulmaların çeviri zincirinin diğer halkalarını da etkilediği izlenmiştir. Bu bozulmalar doğrudan veya dolaylı olarak yanlış bilginin yayılmasına ve/ya da hedef dildeki okuyucuya yabancılaştırma hissi vereceği gözlemlenmiştir. Son olarak, gelecekte yapılacak çevirilerin bu bozulmalardan etkileneceği vurgulanmış ve böylelikle bozulmuş ileri dönük çevirisel metinlerarasılık bağlarından çeviriler aracılığıyla disiplinler arası oluşturulmuş metinlerarası bağlarının da etkilenebileceği görülmüştür.

Kaynakça

  • Altın, M. (2014). Çevirmenin Yükü: Dilek Şendil Çevirisi ile Weight. In C. Ertem & T. Ertem (Eds.), Littera: Edebiyat Yazıları (Vol. 35) (pp. 227–234).
  • André, J. S. (2003). Retranslation As Argument: Canon Formation, Professionalization, and International Rivalry in 19th Century Sinological Translation. Cadernos de Tradução, 1(11), 59–93.
  • Azzam, S. M. (2017). The Seljuks of Anatolia: An epigraphic study [Master’s Thesis, the American University in Cairo]. AUC Knowledge Fountain.
  • Britannica, T. Editors of Encyclopaedia (2021, September 20). grace. Encyclopedia Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/topic/grace-religion
  • Collet, T. (2016). Intertextuality in specialised translation: Citations as semantic markers in social science. Journal of Specialised Translation, 26, 72–95.
  • Combe, E., Wiet, G., Sauvaget, J., Elisseeff, N., & Rice, D. S. (1931-1956). Répertoire Chronologique d’Epigraphie Arabe: Tome 11. Français d’Archéologie Orientale.
  • De Beaugrande, R., & Dressler, W. U. (1981). Introduction to Text linguistics. Longman.
  • Desmidt, I. (2009). (Re) translation Revisited. Meta: Journal Des Traducteurs / Meta: Translators’ Journal, 54(4), 669–683.
  • Dollerup, C. (2014). Relay in Translation. In Cross-linguistic Interaction: Translation, Contrastive and Cognitive Studies. (pp. 21–32). St. Kliminent Ohridski University Press.
  • Esser, H.-H. (1976). Grace, Spiritual Gifts. In C. Brown (Ed.), The New International Dictionary of New Testament Theology: Volume 2. Zondervan Publishing House.
  • Ezzy, D. (2002). Qualitative Analysis: Practice and Innovation. In Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling.
  • Gambier, Y. (1994). La retraduction, retour et détour. Meta: Journal Des Traducteurs, 39(3), 413. https://doi.org/10.7202/002799ar
  • Gambier, Y. (2003). Working with Relay: An Old Story and a New Challenge. In L. P. González (Ed.), Speaking in Tongues: Language Across Contexts and Users (pp. 47–66). Universitat de València.
  • Kantar, D. (2003). Mikhail Bakhtin'e Göre Dilde ve Roman Dilinde Söyleşimlilik. In A. (Eziler) Kıran, E. Korkut, & S. Ağıldere (Eds.), Günümüz Dilbilim Çalışmaları (pp. 156–164). Multilingual.
  • Knight, C. (1845). Political dictionary; forming a work of universal reference, both constitutional and legal; and embracing the terms of civil administration, of political economy and social relations, and of all the more important statistical departments of finance and commerce. Charles Knight and Co., Ludgate Street.
  • Konyalı, İ. H. (1946). Alanya (Alâiyye). Ayaydın Basımevi
  • Koskinen, K., & Paloposki, O. (2010). Retranslation. In Y. Gambier & L. van Doorslaer (Eds.), Handbook of Translation Studies 1 (pp. 294–297). John Benjamins Publishing Company.
  • Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content Analysis: An introduction to its methodology (2nd Edition). Sage Publications, Inc.
  • Lloyd, S., & Rice, D. S. (1958). Alanya ('Alā’iyya). British Institute of Archaeology at Ankara.
  • Lloyd, S., & Rice, D. S. (1964). Alanya ('Alā’iyya) (N. Sinemoğlu, Trans.). Türk Tarih Kurumu. (Original work published 1958)
  • Lloyd, S., & Rice, D. S. (1989). Alanya ('Alā’iyya) (N. Sinemoğlu, Trans.). Türk Tarih Kurumu. (Original work published 1958)
  • Lockwood, C., Munn, Z., & Porritt, K. (2015). Qualitative research synthesis: methodological guidance for systematic reviewers utilizing meta-aggregation. International journal of evidence-based healthcare, 13(3), 179–187. https://doi.org/10.1097/XEB.0000000000000062
  • Lowe, Elizabeth (2014). Revisiting Retranslation: Re-creation and Historical Re-vision. In S. Bermann & C. Porter (Eds.), A companion to translation studies 11. Wiley Blackwell. pp. 413–424.
  • Mayring, P. (2000). Qualitative Content Analysis. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 1(2). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-1.2.1089
  • Riefstahl, R. M. (1931). Turkish Architecture in southwestern Anatolia. Harvard University Press.
  • Riefstahl, R. M. (1941). Cenubu Garbî Anadolu’da Türk Mimarisi (O.Ş. Gökyay, Trans.). Maarif Matbası. (Original work published 1931)
  • Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2015). Purposeful Sampling for Qualitative Data Collection and Analysis in Mixed Method Implementation Research. Administration and policy in mental health, 42(5), 533–544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y
  • Patton, M. (2001). Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods (Third ed.). Sage Publications Inc.
  • Pym, A. (2011). Translation research terms: a tentative glossary for moments of perplexity and dispute. Translation Research Projects 3, 3(November), 75–99. http://wwwa.urv.cat/deaa/isg/publicity/isg/publications/trp_3_2011/isgbook3_web.pdf#page=67
  • Ringmar, M. (2012). Relay translation. In Y. Gambier & L. van Doorslaer (Eds.), Handbook of Translation Studies 3 (pp. 141–143). John Benjamins Publishing Company.
  • Tahir-Gürçağlar, Ş. (2020). Retranslation. In M. Baker & G. Saldanha (Eds.), Routledge Encyclopedia of Translation Studies (Third, pp. 484–489). Routledge.
  • Venuti, L. (2008). The Translator’s Invisibility (Second ed.). Routledge
  • Venuti, L. (2009). Translation, intertextuality, interpretation. Romance Studies, 27(3), 157–173. https://doi.org/10.1179/174581509X455169
  • Washbourne, K. (2014). Nonlinear Narratives: Paths of Indirect and Relay Translation. Meta, 58(3), 607–625. https://doi.org/10.7202/1025054ar
  • Yardım, A. (2002). Alanya Kitabeleri. İstanbul Fetih Cemiyeti Yayınları.
  • Yıldız, M. (2020). Identification of Morphological, Lexical, and Syntactical Obfuscating Elements in Pseudo-Retranslations. Amasya Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi (ASOBİD). Translation Studies Special Issue (April 2020), 131–161.
  • Yıldız, M. (2021a). In Search of Patient Zero: Pseudo-Retranslation in Turkish Academic Works. Journal of Academic Ethics, 19(2), 253–278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-020-09371-4
  • Yıldız, M. (2021b, September 2). Pseudo-retranslation: A novel perspective on translational intertextuality [Paper presentation]. The Łódź‐ZHAW Duo Colloquium on Translation and Meaning, Winterthur, Switzerland.

Disruptions in Translational Intertextuality across Multilingual Translations of a Historical Inscription

Yıl 2022, Cilt 20, Sayı 32, 145 - 171, 27.05.2022
https://doi.org/10.17518/canakkalearastirmalari.1081557

Öz

This is the first research study to investigate translational intertextuality across multilingual translations of a historical inscription through retranslation and relay translation. It aims to offer a translational chain by linking the studied translations that involve different translational strategies and reveals intra- and multi-lingual alterations within the collection of the analyzed works. The corpus of the study consists of six academic works – on the interlingual translations of a historical inscription in Alanya, Türkiye – in five different languages, including the source language. To analyze the corpus, qualitative content analysis and purposeful sampling are applied. It is revealed that the translations tend to change their textuality through semantic alterations and application of translational phenomena, and thanks to the alterations, it is seen that the source text evolved through translations. It is suggested that translational intertextuality has a crucial role in the creation of new texts in a target language based on a translation, and the studied corpus illustrated that any disruptions in translational intertextuality affect the other rings of the translation chain, directly or indirectly helping to disseminate false knowledge or/and foreignizing the resultant text for the target audience. Moreover, it is highlighted that an ulterior translation can be affected by these disruptions; therefore, the disrupted prospective translational intertextuality could influence the intertextual ties across disciplines established by translations.

Kaynakça

  • Altın, M. (2014). Çevirmenin Yükü: Dilek Şendil Çevirisi ile Weight. In C. Ertem & T. Ertem (Eds.), Littera: Edebiyat Yazıları (Vol. 35) (pp. 227–234).
  • André, J. S. (2003). Retranslation As Argument: Canon Formation, Professionalization, and International Rivalry in 19th Century Sinological Translation. Cadernos de Tradução, 1(11), 59–93.
  • Azzam, S. M. (2017). The Seljuks of Anatolia: An epigraphic study [Master’s Thesis, the American University in Cairo]. AUC Knowledge Fountain.
  • Britannica, T. Editors of Encyclopaedia (2021, September 20). grace. Encyclopedia Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/topic/grace-religion
  • Collet, T. (2016). Intertextuality in specialised translation: Citations as semantic markers in social science. Journal of Specialised Translation, 26, 72–95.
  • Combe, E., Wiet, G., Sauvaget, J., Elisseeff, N., & Rice, D. S. (1931-1956). Répertoire Chronologique d’Epigraphie Arabe: Tome 11. Français d’Archéologie Orientale.
  • De Beaugrande, R., & Dressler, W. U. (1981). Introduction to Text linguistics. Longman.
  • Desmidt, I. (2009). (Re) translation Revisited. Meta: Journal Des Traducteurs / Meta: Translators’ Journal, 54(4), 669–683.
  • Dollerup, C. (2014). Relay in Translation. In Cross-linguistic Interaction: Translation, Contrastive and Cognitive Studies. (pp. 21–32). St. Kliminent Ohridski University Press.
  • Esser, H.-H. (1976). Grace, Spiritual Gifts. In C. Brown (Ed.), The New International Dictionary of New Testament Theology: Volume 2. Zondervan Publishing House.
  • Ezzy, D. (2002). Qualitative Analysis: Practice and Innovation. In Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling.
  • Gambier, Y. (1994). La retraduction, retour et détour. Meta: Journal Des Traducteurs, 39(3), 413. https://doi.org/10.7202/002799ar
  • Gambier, Y. (2003). Working with Relay: An Old Story and a New Challenge. In L. P. González (Ed.), Speaking in Tongues: Language Across Contexts and Users (pp. 47–66). Universitat de València.
  • Kantar, D. (2003). Mikhail Bakhtin'e Göre Dilde ve Roman Dilinde Söyleşimlilik. In A. (Eziler) Kıran, E. Korkut, & S. Ağıldere (Eds.), Günümüz Dilbilim Çalışmaları (pp. 156–164). Multilingual.
  • Knight, C. (1845). Political dictionary; forming a work of universal reference, both constitutional and legal; and embracing the terms of civil administration, of political economy and social relations, and of all the more important statistical departments of finance and commerce. Charles Knight and Co., Ludgate Street.
  • Konyalı, İ. H. (1946). Alanya (Alâiyye). Ayaydın Basımevi
  • Koskinen, K., & Paloposki, O. (2010). Retranslation. In Y. Gambier & L. van Doorslaer (Eds.), Handbook of Translation Studies 1 (pp. 294–297). John Benjamins Publishing Company.
  • Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content Analysis: An introduction to its methodology (2nd Edition). Sage Publications, Inc.
  • Lloyd, S., & Rice, D. S. (1958). Alanya ('Alā’iyya). British Institute of Archaeology at Ankara.
  • Lloyd, S., & Rice, D. S. (1964). Alanya ('Alā’iyya) (N. Sinemoğlu, Trans.). Türk Tarih Kurumu. (Original work published 1958)
  • Lloyd, S., & Rice, D. S. (1989). Alanya ('Alā’iyya) (N. Sinemoğlu, Trans.). Türk Tarih Kurumu. (Original work published 1958)
  • Lockwood, C., Munn, Z., & Porritt, K. (2015). Qualitative research synthesis: methodological guidance for systematic reviewers utilizing meta-aggregation. International journal of evidence-based healthcare, 13(3), 179–187. https://doi.org/10.1097/XEB.0000000000000062
  • Lowe, Elizabeth (2014). Revisiting Retranslation: Re-creation and Historical Re-vision. In S. Bermann & C. Porter (Eds.), A companion to translation studies 11. Wiley Blackwell. pp. 413–424.
  • Mayring, P. (2000). Qualitative Content Analysis. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 1(2). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-1.2.1089
  • Riefstahl, R. M. (1931). Turkish Architecture in southwestern Anatolia. Harvard University Press.
  • Riefstahl, R. M. (1941). Cenubu Garbî Anadolu’da Türk Mimarisi (O.Ş. Gökyay, Trans.). Maarif Matbası. (Original work published 1931)
  • Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2015). Purposeful Sampling for Qualitative Data Collection and Analysis in Mixed Method Implementation Research. Administration and policy in mental health, 42(5), 533–544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y
  • Patton, M. (2001). Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods (Third ed.). Sage Publications Inc.
  • Pym, A. (2011). Translation research terms: a tentative glossary for moments of perplexity and dispute. Translation Research Projects 3, 3(November), 75–99. http://wwwa.urv.cat/deaa/isg/publicity/isg/publications/trp_3_2011/isgbook3_web.pdf#page=67
  • Ringmar, M. (2012). Relay translation. In Y. Gambier & L. van Doorslaer (Eds.), Handbook of Translation Studies 3 (pp. 141–143). John Benjamins Publishing Company.
  • Tahir-Gürçağlar, Ş. (2020). Retranslation. In M. Baker & G. Saldanha (Eds.), Routledge Encyclopedia of Translation Studies (Third, pp. 484–489). Routledge.
  • Venuti, L. (2008). The Translator’s Invisibility (Second ed.). Routledge
  • Venuti, L. (2009). Translation, intertextuality, interpretation. Romance Studies, 27(3), 157–173. https://doi.org/10.1179/174581509X455169
  • Washbourne, K. (2014). Nonlinear Narratives: Paths of Indirect and Relay Translation. Meta, 58(3), 607–625. https://doi.org/10.7202/1025054ar
  • Yardım, A. (2002). Alanya Kitabeleri. İstanbul Fetih Cemiyeti Yayınları.
  • Yıldız, M. (2020). Identification of Morphological, Lexical, and Syntactical Obfuscating Elements in Pseudo-Retranslations. Amasya Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi (ASOBİD). Translation Studies Special Issue (April 2020), 131–161.
  • Yıldız, M. (2021a). In Search of Patient Zero: Pseudo-Retranslation in Turkish Academic Works. Journal of Academic Ethics, 19(2), 253–278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-020-09371-4
  • Yıldız, M. (2021b, September 2). Pseudo-retranslation: A novel perspective on translational intertextuality [Paper presentation]. The Łódź‐ZHAW Duo Colloquium on Translation and Meaning, Winterthur, Switzerland.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Sosyal
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Serhat KAHYAOĞLU> (Sorumlu Yazar)
CANAKKALE ONSEKIZ MART UNIVERSITY
0000-0002-7157-1770
Türkiye


Mehmet YILDIZ>
CANAKKALE ONSEKIZ MART UNIVERSITY
0000-0001-9482-4358
Türkiye

Teşekkür We would like to thank Prof. Alptekin Yavaş for sharing with us his priceless knowledge on the political events concerned with the inscription’s engravement date(s) with us. In addition, we would like to acknowledge Kemal Deniz Karabacak’s efforts to provide us with the several of the academic works in the corpus.
Yayımlanma Tarihi 27 Mayıs 2022
Yayınlandığı Sayı Yıl 2022, Cilt 20, Sayı 32

Kaynak Göster

Bibtex @araştırma makalesi { canakkalearastirmalari1081557, journal = {Çanakkale Araştırmaları Türk Yıllığı}, issn = {2148-0877}, address = {}, publisher = {Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart Üniversitesi}, year = {2022}, volume = {20}, number = {32}, pages = {145 - 171}, doi = {10.17518/canakkalearastirmalari.1081557}, title = {Disruptions in Translational Intertextuality across Multilingual Translations of a Historical Inscription}, key = {cite}, author = {Kahyaoğlu, Serhat and Yıldız, Mehmet} }
APA Kahyaoğlu, S. & Yıldız, M. (2022). Disruptions in Translational Intertextuality across Multilingual Translations of a Historical Inscription . Çanakkale Araştırmaları Türk Yıllığı , 20 (32) , 145-171 . DOI: 10.17518/canakkalearastirmalari.1081557
MLA Kahyaoğlu, S. , Yıldız, M. "Disruptions in Translational Intertextuality across Multilingual Translations of a Historical Inscription" . Çanakkale Araştırmaları Türk Yıllığı 20 (2022 ): 145-171 <https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/canakkalearastirmalari/issue/70025/1081557>
Chicago Kahyaoğlu, S. , Yıldız, M. "Disruptions in Translational Intertextuality across Multilingual Translations of a Historical Inscription". Çanakkale Araştırmaları Türk Yıllığı 20 (2022 ): 145-171
RIS TY - JOUR T1 - Bir Tarihi Kitabenin Çokdilli Çevirilerinde Gerçekleşen Çevirisel Metinlerarasılıkta Bozulmalar AU - SerhatKahyaoğlu, MehmetYıldız Y1 - 2022 PY - 2022 N1 - doi: 10.17518/canakkalearastirmalari.1081557 DO - 10.17518/canakkalearastirmalari.1081557 T2 - Çanakkale Araştırmaları Türk Yıllığı JF - Journal JO - JOR SP - 145 EP - 171 VL - 20 IS - 32 SN - 2148-0877- M3 - doi: 10.17518/canakkalearastirmalari.1081557 UR - https://doi.org/10.17518/canakkalearastirmalari.1081557 Y2 - 2022 ER -
EndNote %0 Çanakkale Araştırmaları Türk Yıllığı Disruptions in Translational Intertextuality across Multilingual Translations of a Historical Inscription %A Serhat Kahyaoğlu , Mehmet Yıldız %T Disruptions in Translational Intertextuality across Multilingual Translations of a Historical Inscription %D 2022 %J Çanakkale Araştırmaları Türk Yıllığı %P 2148-0877- %V 20 %N 32 %R doi: 10.17518/canakkalearastirmalari.1081557 %U 10.17518/canakkalearastirmalari.1081557
ISNAD Kahyaoğlu, Serhat , Yıldız, Mehmet . "Disruptions in Translational Intertextuality across Multilingual Translations of a Historical Inscription". Çanakkale Araştırmaları Türk Yıllığı 20 / 32 (Mayıs 2022): 145-171 . https://doi.org/10.17518/canakkalearastirmalari.1081557
AMA Kahyaoğlu S. , Yıldız M. Disruptions in Translational Intertextuality across Multilingual Translations of a Historical Inscription. Çanakkale Araştırmaları Türk Yıllığı. 2022; 20(32): 145-171.
Vancouver Kahyaoğlu S. , Yıldız M. Disruptions in Translational Intertextuality across Multilingual Translations of a Historical Inscription. Çanakkale Araştırmaları Türk Yıllığı. 2022; 20(32): 145-171.
IEEE S. Kahyaoğlu ve M. Yıldız , "Disruptions in Translational Intertextuality across Multilingual Translations of a Historical Inscription", Çanakkale Araştırmaları Türk Yıllığı, c. 20, sayı. 32, ss. 145-171, May. 2022, doi:10.17518/canakkalearastirmalari.1081557