Comprehension of Ambiguous Idioms in Prefrontal Cortex: Evidence from rTMS

Yıl 2024, Cilt: 18 Sayı: 2, 237 - 276, 31.12.2024

Hazel Zeynep Kurada , Elif Arıca Akkok

https://doi.org/10.47777/cankujhss.1529925

Öz

The cognitive processes related to idiom comprehension have been predominantly associated with neural mechanisms and conceptual mapping processes controlled by the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC). Although the role of the DLPFC in idiom comprehension has been extensively studied, ambiguous idioms—those with more than one acceptable meaning—have been relatively understudied in the neuroscientific literature. This study explores how the left and right DLPFC contribute to resolving ambiguous idioms, with a focus on understanding the neural mechanisms underlying conceptual mapping during the comprehension of such idioms. In the study, the left and right DLPFC regions of 15 native Turkish-speaking participants were temporarily inhibited using repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) to examine the role of prefrontal areas in the brain in resolving ambiguous idioms. Following the brain stimulation, participants engaged in an experiment that required them to interpret both literal sentences without figurative meaning and ambiguous idiomatic expressions in which all figurative interpretations were meaningful and plausible. The findings revealed that when left DLPFC was suppressed, participants' ability to accurately comprehend the figurative meanings of ambiguous idioms was significantly impaired, as evidenced by increased reaction times and decreased accuracy rates. In contrast, no significant impairment in processing ambiguous idioms was observed when the right DLPFC was suppressed. These findings suggest that the cognitive load involved in processing ambiguous idioms with multiple acceptable meanings is predominantly managed by the left hemisphere. This study provides insight into the functions of both the right and left prefrontal areas of the brain during the resolution of ambiguous linguistic units, offering further understanding of lateralization, a key phenomenon in the neuroscientific processes of language comprehension.

Anahtar Kelimeler

idiom, ambiguity, context, neuromodulation, prefrontal cortex

Prefrontal Kortekste Çok Anlamlı Deyimlerin Anlaşılması: Beyin Uyarımı Bulguları

Öz

Bu araştırma çok anlamlı deyimlerin içerdiği birden fazla anlamsal gönderimin kortikal düzeyde işlemlenmesi sırasında dorsolateral prefrontal korteksin (DLPFC) rolünü incelemek amacıyla tekrarlı transkraniyal manyetik uyarım (rTMS) yöntemi kullanılarak gerçekleştirilmiştir. Araştırmada, katılımcıların sol ve sağ DLPFC'lerine uygulanan rTMS'nin, belirsiz deyimlerin ve düz anlamlı ifadelerin tepki süreleri ve doğruluk oranları üzerindeki etkileri karşılaştırılmıştır. Sonuçlar, sol DLPFC'ye uygulanan rTMS'nin belirsiz deyimlerin imgesel anlamlarının geri çağrılmasında tepki süresini uzattığını ve doğruluk oranını düşürdüğünü göstermektedir. Sağ DLPFC'ye uygulanan rTMS'de ise anlamlı bir fark bulunmamıştır. Bu bulgular, sol DLPFC'nin özellikle deyimlerin imgesel anlamlarının işlenmesinde kritik bir rol oynadığını ve dilin derin anlamını kavrama sürecinde önemli bir işlevi olduğunu düşündürmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

deyim, anlam bulanıklığı, bağlam, nöromodülasyon, prefrontal korteks

Kaynakça

• Akkök, E. A. (2007). Deyimlerin anlambilimsel ve bilişsel özelliklerine göre tahmin edilebilirliği: Yabancı dilde bir uygulama. Dil Dergisi, (138), 18-33.
• Aksan D. (2003). Her Yönüyle Dil Anaçizgileriyle Dilbilim. TDK.
• Aksan, Y., & Aksan, M. (2016). Turkish National Corpus (TNC): A general-purpose corpus for contemporary Turkish. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 21(3), 443-464.
• Anaki, D., Faust, M., & Kravetz, S. (1998). Cerebral hemispheric asymmetries in processing lexical metaphors. Neuropsychologia, 36(4), 353-362.
• Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2008, August). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using the lme4 package in R. In Presentation at Potsdam GLMM workshop.
• Beam, W., Borckardt, J. J., Reeves, S. T., & George, M. S. (2009). An efficient and accurate new method for locating the F3 position for prefrontal TMS applications. Brain stimulation, 2(1), 50-54.
• Beeman, M. (1998). Coarse semantic coding and discourse comprehension. Right hemisphere language comprehension: Perspectives from cognitive neuroscience, 255-284.
• Bobrow, S. A., & Bell, S. M. (1973). On catching on to idiomatic expressions. Memory & cognition, 1, 343-346.
• Bottini, G., Corcoran, R., Sterzi, R., Paulesu, E., Schenone, P., Scarpa, P., ... & Frith, D. (1994). The role of the right hemisphere in the interpretation of figurative aspects of language A positron emission tomography activation study. Brain, 117(6), 1241-1253.
• Brownell, H. H., Simpson, T. L., Bihrle, A. M., Potter, H. H., & Gardner, H. (1990). Appreciation of metaphoric alternative word meanings by left and right brain-damaged patients. Neuropsychologia, 28(4), 375-383.
• Cacciari, C., & Glucksberg, S. (1991). Understanding idioms: Do visual images reflect figurative meanings? European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 3(2), 211-233.
• Cacciari, C., & Tabossi, P. (1988). “The comprehension of idioms.” Journal of Memory and Language, 27(6), 668-683.
• Cacciari, C., Padovani, R., & Corradini, P. (2007). Exploring the relationship between individuals’ speed of processing and their comprehension of spoken idioms. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 19(3), 417-445.
• Chiarello, C., & Beeman, M. (1998). Right Hemisphere Linguistic Decoding—More Than Meets the Eye and Ear? Right Hemisphere Language Comprehension: Perspectives from Cognitive Neuroscience, 133.
• Cronk, B. C., Lima, S. D., & Schweigert, W. A. (1993). Comprehending idioms: How much easier are transparent idioms than opaque idioms? Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 22(1), 39-59.
• Çotuksöken, Y. (1992). Deyimlerimiz, İstanbul: Özgül Yayınları Eğitim ve Öğretimde Kaynak Kitaplar Dizisi.
• Eviatar, Z., & Just, M. A. (2006). Brain correlates of discourse processing: An fMRI investigation of irony and conventional metaphor comprehension. Neuropsychologia, 44(12), 2348-2359.
• Faust, M., & Chiarello, C. (1998). Sentence context and lexical ambiguity resolution by the two hemispheres. Neuropsychologia, 36(9), 827-835.
• Fogliata, A., Rizzo, S., Reati, F., Miniussi, C., Oliveri, M., & Papagno, C. (2007). The time course of idiom processing. Neuropsychologia, 45(14), 3215-3222.
• Gibbs, R. W. (1980). “Spilling the beans on understanding and memory for idioms in conversation.” Memory & Cognition, 8(2), 149-156.
• Gibbs, R. W., Nayak, N. P., & Cutting, C. (1989). “How to kick the bucket and not decompose: Analyzability and idiom processing.” Journal of Memory and Language, 28(5), 576-593.
• Giora, R., & Fein, O. (1999). “On understanding familiar and less-familiar figurative language.” Journal of Pragmatics, 31(12), 1601-1618.
• Hagoort, P., & Van Berkum, J. (2007). Beyond the sentence given. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 362(1481), 801-811
• Häuser, K. I., Titone, D. A., & Baum, S. R. (2016). The role of the ventro-lateral prefrontal cortex in idiom comprehension: An rTMS study. Neuropsychologia, 91, 360-370.
• Jackendoff, R. S. (1992). Semantic structures (Vol. 18). MIT press.
• Jung-Beeman, M. (2005). Bilateral brain processes for comprehending natural language. Trends in cognitive sciences, 9(11), 512-518.
• Keel, J. C., Smith, M. J., & Wassermann, E. M. (2001). A safety screening questionnaire for transcranial magnetic stimulation. Clinical neurophysiology: official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology, 112(4), 720.
• Kurada, H. Z., Arıca-Akkök, E., Özaydın-Aksun, Z., Şener, H. Ö., & Lavidor, M. (2021). The impact of transparency on hemispheric lateralization of idiom comprehension: An rTMS study. Neuropsychologia, 163, 108062.
• Lakoff, G. (1993). How metaphor structures dreams: the theory of conceptual metaphor applied to dream analysis. Dreaming, 3(2), 77.
• Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). The metaphorical structure of the human conceptual system. Cognitive science, 4(2), 195-208.
• Lodge, D. N., & Leach, E. A. (1975). Children’s acquisition of idioms in the English language. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 18(3), 521-529.
• Mashal, N., Faust, M., & Hendler, T. (2005). The role of the right hemisphere in processing nonsalient metaphorical meanings: Application of principal components analysis to fMRI data. Neuropsychologia, 43(14), 2084-2100.
• Mashal, N., Faust, M., Hendler, T., & Jung-Beeman, M. (2007). An fMRI investigation of the neural correlates underlying the processing of novel metaphoric expressions. Brain and language, 100(2), 115-126.
• Mashal, N., Faust, M., Hendler, T., & Jung-Beeman, M. (2008). Hemispheric differences in processing the literal interpretation of idioms: Converging evidence from behavioral and fMRI studies. cortex, 44(7), 848-860.
• Mir-Moghtadaei, A., Caballero, R., Fried, P., Fox, M. D., Lee, K., Giacobbe, P., ... & Downar, J. (2015). Concordance between BeamF3 and MRI-neuronavigated target sites for repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Brain stimulation, 8(5), 965-973.
• Nalçacı, E., Kalaycioğlu, C., Güneş, E., & Ciçek, M. (2002). Reliability and validity of a handedness questionnaire. Turk Psikiyatri Dergisi= Turkish Journal of Psychiatry, 13(2), 99-106.
• Palmer F.R., (2001). Semantik: Yeni bir Anlambilim Projesi, çev. Ramazan Ertürk, Kitabiyat Yayınevi: Ankara.
• Pobric, G., Mashal, N., Faust, M., & Lavidor, M. (2008). The role of the right cerebral hemisphere in processing novel metaphoric expressions: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study. Journal of cognitive neuroscience, 20(1), 170-181.
• R Core Team. (2013). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
• Rizzo, S., Sandrini, M., & Miniussi, C. (2007). The role of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in retrieval from long-term memory depends on the strategies elicited by the experimental paradigm. The European Journal of Neuroscience, 25(1), 189-194.
• Swinney, D. A., & Cutler, A. (1979). "The access and processing of idiomatic expressions." Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18(5), 523-534.
• Tabossi, P. & Zardon, F. (1993). The activation of idiomatic meaning in spoken language comprehension. Proceedings of the XIIIth International Congress of Phonetic Sciences.
• Titone, D. A., & Connine, C. M. (1999). On the compositional and noncompositional nature of idiomatic expressions. Journal of Pragmatics, 31(12), 1655-1674.
• Wassermann, E. M. (1998). Risk and safety of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation: report and suggested guidelines from the International Workshop on the Safety of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, June 5-7, 1996. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology. Evoked Potentials, 108(1), 1-16.
• Weinreich, U. (1969). Problems in the analysis of idioms. Substance and structure of language, 23(81), 208-264.