Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

İkinci Dil Ediniminde Yaşın Rolü

Yıl 2024, Cilt: 18 Sayı: 2, 265 - 276, 31.12.2024

Öz

İkinci bir dil öğrenme söz konusu olunca, hemen hemen her yayın öğrenenleri başarıya götüren bireysel farklılıklardan bahseder. Bunlardan en önemlisi yaş faktörüdür diyebiliriz. Bireysel farklılıkların bir sonucu olarak çeşitli unsurlar ortaya çıkar: Edinim hızı, nihai başarı ve dil ediniminde yer alan süreçler, özellikle yaş olmak üzere öğrenciler arasındaki farklılıklardan etkilenen önemli unsurlardır. Mevcut çalışma, çoğunlukla ikinci dil edinimindeki yaş faktörüyle ve sıklıkla psikolojik pozisyonlarda ele alınan bireysel farklılıklarla ilgili diğer faktörlerle ilgilenir. Veriler alanyazın taramasından elde edilmiştir. Alan yazınındaki yazılı kaynaklara bakıldığında, ikinci dil ediniminin başlangıcı ve son aşamasının da bilim insanları tarafından çokça araştırılan iki başlık olduğu görülmektedir. Dil edinimine yönelik kritik bir dönemin var olup olmadığı sorusu bilim dünyasında tartışmalı bir konudur. Ancak, ikinci bir dilde anadil veya anadil benzeri yeterlilik elde etmek için iyi belirlenmiş yaş sınırlamaları olmasa da, kişinin başladığı dönemin (yaş’ın) nihai yeterlilikle ilişkili olduğu gösterilmiştir.

Kaynakça

  • Abrahamsson, N., Hyltenstam, K.,  Bylund E., (2018). Age effects on language acquisition, retention and loss. Cambridge University Press.
  • Baker, C. (2007). A parents’ and teachers’ guide to bilingualism. Multilingual.
  • Birdsong, D. (ed.) (1999). Second language acquisition: The critical period hypothesis. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. In Studies in Second Language Acquisition.
  • Bongaerts, T. (1999). “Ultimate attainment in L2 pronunciation: The case of very advanced late L2 learners.” In D. Birdsong (ed.) Second Language Acquisition and the Critical Period Hypothesis. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 133-159.
  • Carroll, J. B. (1965). The prediction of success in intensive foreign language training. In R. Glaser (ed.), Training, Research and Education (pp. 87-136). Wiley.
  • Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspect of theory and syntax. MIT Press.
  • Cook, V., & Singleton, D. (2014). Key topics in second language acquisition. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781783091812
  • Curtiss, S. (1977). Genie: A psycholinguistic study of a modern-day “Wild Child.” Academic Press.
  • Dörnyei, Z. (2001). New themes and approaches in second language motivation research. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 21: pp. 43-59.
  • Dörnyei, Z. (2005). The psychology of the language learner: Individual Differences in Second Language Acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. In Studies in Second Language Acquisition.
  • Dörnyei, Z.,  Ryan, S. (2015) The Psychology of the language learner revisited. Routledge.
  • Ellis, R. (2003). Second Language Acquisition. Oxford University Press.
  • Ellis, R. (2015). Understanding second language acquisition. Oxford University Press.
  • Granena, G., & Long, M. H. (2013). Sensitive periods, language aptitude, and ultimate L2 attainment. John Benjamins.
  • Granena, G., & Long, M. H. (2012). Age of onset, length of residence, language aptitude, and ultimate L2 attainment in three linguistic domains. Second Language Research, 29(3), pp. 311- 343.
  • Harley, B. (1986). Age and second language acquisition. Multilingual Matters.
  • Herschensohn, J. (2000). The second time around: Minimalism and L2 acquisition. John Benjamins.
  • Herschensohn, J. (2007). Language development and age. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511486487
  • Hyltenstam, K., & Abrahamsson, N. (2003a). Age of onset and ultimate attainment in near-native speakers of Swedish. In Fraurud, K. and Hyltenstam, K. (eds), Multilingualism in Global and Local Perspectives: Papers from the 8th Nordic Conference on Bilingualism, November 1-3, 2001. Stockholm University, pp. 319-340. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:su:diva-34735
  • Hyltenstam, K., & Abrahamsson, N. (2003b). Maturational constraints in SLA. In: Doughty, C. and Long, M. H. (eds), The handbook of second language acquisition. Blackwell. pp. 539-588.
  • Hyltenstam K., Bylund E., Abrahamsson N., & Park, H. S. (2009). Dominant language replacement: The case of international adoptees. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 12, 121-140. https://doi.org/10.1017/ S1366728908004008.
  • Krashen, S. (1973). Lateralization, language learning and the critical period: Some new evidence. Language Learning 23, 63-74.
  • Kinsbourne, M., & Hiscock, M. (1977). Does cerebral dominance develop? In Segalowitz, S. and Gruber, F. (eds) Language development and neurological theory, pp. 171-91. Academic Press.
  • Lane, H. (1976). The wild Boy of Aveyron. Harvard University Press.
  • Lenneberg, E. (1967). Biological foundations of language. Wiley.
  • Long, M. H. (1990). Maturational constraints on language development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 12. pp. 251-85.
  • Long, M. H. (2013). Maturational constraints on child and adult SLA. Language Learning & Language Teaching, 3-42. https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.35.01lon
  • Penfield, W.,  Roberts, L. (1959). Speech and brain mechanisms. Princeton University Press.
  • Rymer, R. (1993). Genie: An abused child’s flight from silence. HarperCollins Publishers.
  • Oxford, R. L.,  Ehrman, M. (1993). Second language research on individual differences. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 13(1), pp.188-205.
  • Seliger, H. (1978). Implications o f a multiple critical period hypothesis for second language learning. In Ritchie, W. (ed.), Second Language Research: Issues and Implications (pp. 11–19). Academic Press.
  • Selinker, L. (1972). Interlanguage. IRAL: International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 10, pp.209-231. https://doi.org/10.1515/iral.1972.10.1-4.209
  • Scovel, T. (1982). Individual Differences and Universals in Language Learning Aptitude. In Karl C. Diller (ed.), Rowley, MA.: Newbury House, 1981. pp. 218. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 5(1), 120–125. doi:10.1017/S0272263100004691
  • Scovel, T. (2000). A critical review of the Critical Period Hypothesis. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 20, pp.213–223.
  • Singleton, D. (2001). Age and second language acquisition. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 21, pp.77–89.
  • Singleton, D.,  Lengyel, Z. (eds) (1995). The age factor in second language acquisition. Multilingual Matters.
  • Skehan, P. (1998). A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford University Press.
  • Skehan, P. (1989). Individual differences in second language learning. Applied Psycholinguistics, 12(4), pp. 511-515.
  • Troike, M. S.,  Barto, K. (2020). Introducing second language acquisition. Cambridge University Press.
  • Yaş, E. (2019). Can becoming bilingualism in the childhood and becoming bilingual later be parallel? Journal of Current Debates in Social Sciences, 2(2), pp. 243-249.
  • Youtube: A Historic webinar with Chomsky and Krashen: Modern Linguistics - YouTube

The Role of Age in Second Language Acquisition

Yıl 2024, Cilt: 18 Sayı: 2, 265 - 276, 31.12.2024

Öz

When it comes to learning a second language, no matter what age, almost every publication talks about individual differences that lead the learners to success. It is possible to say that the age factor is the most significant of these. Various elements occur as a result of individual differences: The rate of acquisition, ultimate achievement and the processes involved in language acquisition are important ones affected by differences among learners, particularly their age. The present work deals mainly with the age issue in second language acquisition, along with other factors related to individual differences, which are often treated in psychological positions. The data were obtained from a literature search. Looking at the written literature in the field, it has been found that the onset of second language acquisition and the final accomplishment are also the two titles that scholars have studied very much. The question of whether a critical period addressed language acquisition exists is a controversial one in the scientific world. However, even though there are no well-delineated age restrictions ready for attaining native or native-like proficiency in a second language, the period (age) at which one starts has been shown to correlate with ultimate proficiency.

Kaynakça

  • Abrahamsson, N., Hyltenstam, K.,  Bylund E., (2018). Age effects on language acquisition, retention and loss. Cambridge University Press.
  • Baker, C. (2007). A parents’ and teachers’ guide to bilingualism. Multilingual.
  • Birdsong, D. (ed.) (1999). Second language acquisition: The critical period hypothesis. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. In Studies in Second Language Acquisition.
  • Bongaerts, T. (1999). “Ultimate attainment in L2 pronunciation: The case of very advanced late L2 learners.” In D. Birdsong (ed.) Second Language Acquisition and the Critical Period Hypothesis. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 133-159.
  • Carroll, J. B. (1965). The prediction of success in intensive foreign language training. In R. Glaser (ed.), Training, Research and Education (pp. 87-136). Wiley.
  • Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspect of theory and syntax. MIT Press.
  • Cook, V., & Singleton, D. (2014). Key topics in second language acquisition. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781783091812
  • Curtiss, S. (1977). Genie: A psycholinguistic study of a modern-day “Wild Child.” Academic Press.
  • Dörnyei, Z. (2001). New themes and approaches in second language motivation research. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 21: pp. 43-59.
  • Dörnyei, Z. (2005). The psychology of the language learner: Individual Differences in Second Language Acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. In Studies in Second Language Acquisition.
  • Dörnyei, Z.,  Ryan, S. (2015) The Psychology of the language learner revisited. Routledge.
  • Ellis, R. (2003). Second Language Acquisition. Oxford University Press.
  • Ellis, R. (2015). Understanding second language acquisition. Oxford University Press.
  • Granena, G., & Long, M. H. (2013). Sensitive periods, language aptitude, and ultimate L2 attainment. John Benjamins.
  • Granena, G., & Long, M. H. (2012). Age of onset, length of residence, language aptitude, and ultimate L2 attainment in three linguistic domains. Second Language Research, 29(3), pp. 311- 343.
  • Harley, B. (1986). Age and second language acquisition. Multilingual Matters.
  • Herschensohn, J. (2000). The second time around: Minimalism and L2 acquisition. John Benjamins.
  • Herschensohn, J. (2007). Language development and age. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511486487
  • Hyltenstam, K., & Abrahamsson, N. (2003a). Age of onset and ultimate attainment in near-native speakers of Swedish. In Fraurud, K. and Hyltenstam, K. (eds), Multilingualism in Global and Local Perspectives: Papers from the 8th Nordic Conference on Bilingualism, November 1-3, 2001. Stockholm University, pp. 319-340. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:su:diva-34735
  • Hyltenstam, K., & Abrahamsson, N. (2003b). Maturational constraints in SLA. In: Doughty, C. and Long, M. H. (eds), The handbook of second language acquisition. Blackwell. pp. 539-588.
  • Hyltenstam K., Bylund E., Abrahamsson N., & Park, H. S. (2009). Dominant language replacement: The case of international adoptees. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 12, 121-140. https://doi.org/10.1017/ S1366728908004008.
  • Krashen, S. (1973). Lateralization, language learning and the critical period: Some new evidence. Language Learning 23, 63-74.
  • Kinsbourne, M., & Hiscock, M. (1977). Does cerebral dominance develop? In Segalowitz, S. and Gruber, F. (eds) Language development and neurological theory, pp. 171-91. Academic Press.
  • Lane, H. (1976). The wild Boy of Aveyron. Harvard University Press.
  • Lenneberg, E. (1967). Biological foundations of language. Wiley.
  • Long, M. H. (1990). Maturational constraints on language development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 12. pp. 251-85.
  • Long, M. H. (2013). Maturational constraints on child and adult SLA. Language Learning & Language Teaching, 3-42. https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.35.01lon
  • Penfield, W.,  Roberts, L. (1959). Speech and brain mechanisms. Princeton University Press.
  • Rymer, R. (1993). Genie: An abused child’s flight from silence. HarperCollins Publishers.
  • Oxford, R. L.,  Ehrman, M. (1993). Second language research on individual differences. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 13(1), pp.188-205.
  • Seliger, H. (1978). Implications o f a multiple critical period hypothesis for second language learning. In Ritchie, W. (ed.), Second Language Research: Issues and Implications (pp. 11–19). Academic Press.
  • Selinker, L. (1972). Interlanguage. IRAL: International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 10, pp.209-231. https://doi.org/10.1515/iral.1972.10.1-4.209
  • Scovel, T. (1982). Individual Differences and Universals in Language Learning Aptitude. In Karl C. Diller (ed.), Rowley, MA.: Newbury House, 1981. pp. 218. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 5(1), 120–125. doi:10.1017/S0272263100004691
  • Scovel, T. (2000). A critical review of the Critical Period Hypothesis. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 20, pp.213–223.
  • Singleton, D. (2001). Age and second language acquisition. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 21, pp.77–89.
  • Singleton, D.,  Lengyel, Z. (eds) (1995). The age factor in second language acquisition. Multilingual Matters.
  • Skehan, P. (1998). A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford University Press.
  • Skehan, P. (1989). Individual differences in second language learning. Applied Psycholinguistics, 12(4), pp. 511-515.
  • Troike, M. S.,  Barto, K. (2020). Introducing second language acquisition. Cambridge University Press.
  • Yaş, E. (2019). Can becoming bilingualism in the childhood and becoming bilingual later be parallel? Journal of Current Debates in Social Sciences, 2(2), pp. 243-249.
  • Youtube: A Historic webinar with Chomsky and Krashen: Modern Linguistics - YouTube
Toplam 41 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Dilbilim (Diğer)
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Emin Yaş 0000-0001-6813-1160

Yayımlanma Tarihi 31 Aralık 2024
Gönderilme Tarihi 18 Ekim 2024
Kabul Tarihi 14 Aralık 2024
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2024 Cilt: 18 Sayı: 2

Kaynak Göster

APA Yaş, E. (2024). The Role of Age in Second Language Acquisition. Cankaya University Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 18(2), 265-276.

Çankaya University Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences
İletişim | Communication: e-mail: mkirca@gmail.com | mkirca@cankaya.edu.tr
Çankaya University Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Dergisi ulusal ve uluslararası
araştırma ve derleme makalelerini yayımlayan uluslararası onlne bir yayındır. Yılda iki
kez yayımlanır (Haziran ve Aralık). Derginin yayın dili İngilizcedir.
CUJHSS, e-ISSN 3062-0112