Evaluating the Usability of BIM-Based Quantity and Cost Estimation in Construction Projects

Yıl 2026, Cilt: 22 Sayı: 1 , 106 - 112 , 30.03.2026

Şahin Tolga Güvel , Burak Karakurumer

https://doi.org/10.18466/cbayarfbe.1659041

https://izlik.org/JA96LH59GA

Öz

As in every industry, there are technological developments in the construction industry. One such development is Building Information Modelling (BIM). Two-Dimensional (2D) projects can be interpreted differently by stakeholders and discrepancies can go undetected. Consequently, repetitive and inaccurate quantity and cost calculations may occur. BIM allows the representation of a building in three dimensions (3D) using smart objects instead of traditional lines and enables quantity and cost estimations by assigning area, volume and monetary information to these objects. Even if changes are made to the model designed in BIM, quantity and cost will also change automatically. Thus, BIM accelerates the process by reducing the necessity of repeated calculations. With these features, BIM can overcome the problems of traditional methods by providing fast, practical and realistic estimates. In this study, a building was exported from 2D to a BIM based program and modeled in 3D. Quantity and cost calculations were performed using the same program and the process was explained. To determine the accuracy rate of the BIM system, a comparison was made by calculating the cost over the bill of quantities calculated by the traditional method and the ready-made quantity (RMQ) data included in the project. As a result of the comparison, BIM calculated costs were about 7% higher than RMQ and traditional methods. This proves that the idea BIM reduces costs is inaccurate. Rather than reducing costs, BIM provides realistic results.

Anahtar Kelimeler

3D Modelling , BIM , Building Information Modelling , Cost , Quantity

Kaynakça

• [1]. Topkaya, E, Yönez, E, Kuruoğlu, M, Çelik, LY. 2012. The Comparison of Preliminary-Cost Estimation Methods Used in Construction Sector. Engineering Sciences; 7(1): 263-272.
• [2]. Azhar, S, Nadeem, A, Mok, JYN, Leung, HY. Building Information Modeling (BIM): A New Paradigm for Visual Interactive Modeling and Simulation for Construction Projects, First International Conference on Construction in Developing Countries, Karachi, Pakistan, 2008, pp 435-446.
• [3]. Waas, L, Enjellina. 2022. Review of BIM-Based Software in Architectural DesignGraphisoft Archicad VS Autodesk Revit. JARINA-Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Architecture; 1(2): 14-22.
• [4]. Xu, J. 2017. Research on Application of BIM 5D Technology in Central Grand Project. Procedia Engineering; 174: 600-610.
• [5]. Odhyan, GS. 2017. Cost of Using Building Information Modeling (BIM) in Retrofit Projects, MSc Thesis, Colorado State University Department of Construction Management, Fort Collins, Colorado, 87.
• [6]. Şahinkaya, G, Sesli, FA, Koç, V, Uzun, ÖF. 2022. Investigation of Application of Building Information Modeling for Türkiye. BSEU Journal of Science; 9(1): 555-563.
• [7]. Hasan, AN, Rasheed, SM. 2019. The Benefits of and Challenges to Implement 5D BIM in Construction Industry. Civil Engineering Journal; 5(2): 412-421.
• [8]. Budak, A, Karataş, İ. 2019. A Review of Role of the Construction Manager in the BIM System During the Pre-design, Design, and Procurement Phases. Osmaniye Korkut Ata University Journal of Natural and Applied Sciences; 2(1): 89-96.
• [9]. Smith, P. 2014. BIM & the 5D Project Cost Manager. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences; 119: 475-484.
• [10]. Topal, N. 2019. Building Information Modelling Applications in Construction Projects: Case Study With 5D Modelling, MSc Thesis, Anadolu University Graduate School of Sciences, Eskişehir, 145.
• [11]. Kamardeen, I. 8D BIM Modelling Tool for Accident Prevention Through Design, ARCOM 2010: Proceedings of the 26th Annual Association of Researchers in Construction Management Conference, Leeds, UK, 2010, pp 281-289.
• [12]. Alat, H. 2019. Using Building Information Modelling in Housing Projects: Case Study, MSc Thesis, Şeyh Edebali University Graduate School of Sciences, Bilecik, 119.
• [13]. Lee, XS, Tsong, CW, Khamidi, FK. 2016. 5D Building Information Modelling-A Practicability Review. MATEC Web of Conferences; 66: 1-7.
• [14]. Zhang, X, Bakis, N, Lukins, TC, Ibrahim, YM, Wu, S, Kagioglou, M, Aouad, G, Kaka, AP, Trucco, E. 2009. Automating Progress Measurement of Construction Projects. Automation in Construction; 18: 294-301.
• [15]. Yalcinkaya, M, Arditi, D. 2013. Building Information Modeling (BIM) and the Construction Management Body of Knowledge. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology; 409: 619-629.
• [16]. Pınar, ÖG. 2022. Electronic Tender (E-Tender) Processes and Building Information Modeling (BIM) Integration in Local Governments. Journal of Architectural Sciences and Applications; 7(2): 734-749.
• [17]. Olatunji, O, Sher, W, Gu, N. 2010. Building Information Modeling and Quantity Surveying Practice. Emirates Journal for Engineering Research; 15(1): 67-70.
• [18]. Alshamali, H. 2020. Examination of 3D and 4D Functions of Building Information Modeling on A Sample Construction Project, MSc Thesis, Çukurova University Institute of Natural and Applied Sciences, Adana, 172.
• [19]. Karagöz, ME. 2019. BIM ile Yapı Yaklaşık Maliyeti Hesaplama Önerisi. Yapı Bilgi Modelleme; 1(1): 39-45.
• [20]. Gülerses, F. 2018. Determining Advantages and Disadvantages of 5D BIM Cost Management, MSc Thesis, İstanbul Technical University Graduate School of Science Engineering and Technology, İstanbul, 99.
• [21]. Read, P, Krygiel, E, Vandezande, J. Mastering Autodesk Revit Architecture 2013: Indianapolis, Indiana, 2012; pp 52-54.
• [22]. Azhar, S. 2011. Building Information Modeling (BIM): Trends, Benefits, Risks, and Challenges for the AEC Industry. Leadership and Management in Engineering; 11(3): 241-252.
• [23]. Olsen, D, Taylor, MJ. 2017. Quantity Take-Off Using Building Information Modeling (BIM), and Its Limiting Factors. Procedia Engineering; 196: 1098-1105.
• [24]. Zhao, H. 2015. Automation of Quantity Takeoff and Material Optimization for Residential Construction Manufacturing, MSc Thesis, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering University of Alberta, Alberta, Canada, 141.
• [25]. Monteiro, A, Martins, PJ. 2013. A Survey on Modeling Guidelines for Quantity Takeoff Oriented BIM-Based Design. Automation in Construction; 35: 238-253.
• [26]. Bayram, S, Öcal, ME, Laptalı Oral, E, Atiş, CA. 2016. Comparison of Unit Price Method and Unit Area Cost Method for Construction Cost Estimation. Journal of Polytechnic; 19(2): 175-183.