KEMALPAŞA VE ÇEVRESİ (İZMİR) MİKSOBİOTASININ BELİRLENMESİ - DETERMINATION THE MYXOBIOTA OF KEMALPAŞA AND SURROUNDING (İZMİR)

Yıl 2015, , 59 - 68, 06.07.2015

Mustafa Oskay , Ömür Tüzün

https://doi.org/10.18466/cbufbe.26449

Cited By: 3

Öz

KEMALPAŞA VE ÇEVRESİ (İZMİR) MİKSOBİOTASININ

BELİRLENMESİ

 

Bu araştırma Ekim-2013 ile Temmuz 2014 arasında Kemalpaşa (İzmir) ve çevresinde belirlenen alanlarda miksomisetlerin bulunuşu ve dağılımını belirlemek üzere yapılmıştır. Çalışmada genellikle Quercus sp. ve Pinus sp. ağaçları başta olmak üzere, yaprak döküntüleri, canlı ağaçların ölü kabukları ve toprak örnekleri olmak üzere 11 lokaliteden 91substrat toplanmıştır. Her bir çalışılan alan için, miksomisetler hem doğal substratlar üzerinde hem de nemli oda kültürü ile belirlenerek karakterizasyonları yapılmıştır. Sıcaklık, nem ve ışık yoğunluğu gibi çevresel faktörler gerçek zamanlı olarak ölçülmüş ve buna bağlı türlerin dağılımı tartışılmıştır. Sonuçlarımıza göre, 10 familyaya ait 29 tür (7’si doğal) ve 1 cins bazında olmak üzere toplam 30 takson tanılanmıştır. Türlerin çoğunluğu (%77) nemli oda kültüründen, diğerleri (%23) doğal olarak elde edilmiş olup, belirlenen 16 cins sırasıyla; Ceratiomyxa, Echinostelium, Cribraria, Lycogala, Licea, Arcyria, Perichaena, Trichia, Didymium, Physarum, Collaria, Comatricha, Enerthenema, Macbrideola, Stemonitis ve Stemonitopsis’dir. Çalışılan alanlardaki miksomiset dağılımları genellikle benzerlik göstermekte ve belirlenen çoğu tür kozmopolittir. Araştırma alanında belirlenen en yaygın tür ise Arcyria cinerea’ dır.

DETERMINATION THE MYXOBIOTA OF KEMALPAŞA AND

SURROUNDING (İZMİR)

This research assessed the occurrence and distribution of myxomycetes, and it was carried out in theselected surrounding areas of Kemalpaşa, (İzmir) between October 2013 and July 2014. A total of 91 specimensin 11 localities were collected in Quercus sp. and Pinus sp. plants were the most common type of substrateinvestigated, but leaf litter, dead barks of living trees and soil materials were also included in the survey. Myxomycetes were determined and characterized both on natural substrates and in the moist chambers for each ofthe study sites. Environmental factors such as temperature, humidity and light intensity were analyzed with realtime and occurrence of some species was discussed. The obtained results showed that a total of 30 taxa representing 29 species (7 species naturally) with 1 genus belonging to 10 families were identified. Most of the species collected from prepared moist chambers (77%) and others from naturel (23%) resulted in 16 genera including Ceratiomyxa, Echinostelium, Cribraria, Lycogala, Licea, Arcyria, Perichaena, Trichia, Didymium, Physarum, Collaria, Comatricha, Enerthenema, Macbrideola, Stemonitis and Stemonitopsis. A comparison of the distribution of myxomycete showed similarities in this area and many species were reported as cosmopolite. Arcyria cinerea was the most wide spread species in the research area.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Biyoçeşitlilik, ekoloji, Kemalpaşa, nemli oda kültürü, miksomisetler, Protista, cıvık küfler. / Biodiversity, ecology, Kemalpaşa, moist chamber culture, myxomycetes, Protista, slime moulds.

DETERMINATION THE MYXOBIOTA OF KEMALPAŞA AND SURROUNDING (İZMİR)

Öz

This research assessed the occurrence and distribution of myxomycetes, and it was carried out in the selected surrounding areas of Kemalpaşa, (İzmir) between October 2013 and July 2014. A total of 91 specimens in 11 localities were collected in Quercus sp. and Pinus sp. plants were the most common type of substrate investigated, but leaf litter, dead barks of living trees and soil materials were also included in the survey. Myxomycetes were determined and characterized both on natural substrates and in the moist chambers for each of the study sites. Environmental factors such as temperature, humidity and light intensity were analyzed with real time and occurrence of some species was discussed.The obtained results showed that a total of 30 taxa representing 29 species (7 species naturally) with 1 genus belonging to 10 families were identified. Most of the species collected from prepared moist chambers (77%) and others from naturel (23%) resulted in 16 genera including Ceratiomyxa, Echinostelium, Cribraria, Lycogala, Licea, Arcyria, Perichaena, Trichia, Didymium, Physarum, Collaria, Comatricha, Enerthenema, Macbrideola, Stemonitis and Stemonitopsis. A comparison of the distribution of myxomycete showed similarities in this area and many species were reported as cosmopolite. Arcyria cinerea was the most wide spread species in the research area

Anahtar Kelimeler

Biodiversity, ecology, Kemalpaşa, moist chamber culture, myxomycetes, Protista, slime moulds

Kaynakça

• Keller, H.W.,Kilgore, M.C., Everthart, S.E., Carmack, J.G., Crabtree, D.C., andScarborough, R.A., “MyxomycetePlasmodialandFruitingBodies: UnusualOccurencesand User-FriendlyStudyTechniques”, Fungi, 1(1): 24-37 (2008).
• Baba, H., “Manisa İli MiksomisetlerininTaksonomik Yönden İncelenmesi”, Doktora Tezi, Celal Bayar Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Manisa, 114, (2007).
• Kilgore, M.C., Keller, W.H. andEly, S.J., “AerialReproductiveStructures of VascularPlants as a MicrohabitatforMyxomycetes”, Mycologia, 101(3): 305-319 (2009).
• Stephenson, S.L. andStempen, H., “Myxomycetes: A Handbook of SlimeMolds”, TimberPress, Inc., USA. (1994).
• Alexopoulos, C.J.,Mims, C.W. andBlackwell, M., “IntroductoryMycology”, 4th Edition, John WileyandSons, Inc. New York (1996).
• Zümre, M., Baba, H. ve Gelen, M., “Türkiye Miksomisetleri için Yeni Bir Varyete Kaydı”, Karadeniz Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, 3(8): 47-51 (2013).
• Sarıoğlu, S., “Eskişehir Kırka Ormanı Myxomyceteleri”, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Afyonkarahisar, 94, (2011).
• Keller, H.W. andEverthart, S.E., ‘Importance of Myxomycetes in BiologicalResearchandTeaching’ Fungi 3(1): 13-27 (2010).
• Bican Süerdem, T., “Dünyada ve Türkiye’de Miksomiset Çalışmaları ve Taksonomik Özelliklerine Genel Bir Bakış” 1.Ulusal Mikoloji Günleri, Erzurum, 37-38, (2014).
• Şimşek, C., Demirkıran, Z., Çetiner, L., Gündüz, O. ve Öcal, G.,”Kemalpaşa Ovasının Üç Boyutlu İnteraktif Hidrojeolojik Modeli”, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Fen ve Mühendislik Dergisi, 11(31): 11-21 (2009).
• Yörük, Ş., “Kemalpaşa İlçesinde Eğitim Çevre İlişkisi”, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Uşak Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Uşak, 116, (2010).
• Gilbert, H.C.,and Martin, G.W., “MyxomycetesFound on the Bark of LivingTrees”, University of Iowa, Iowa Studies in Natural History. 15(3): 3-5 (1933).
• Farr, M.L., “True SlimeMolds”, Wm. C. Brown, Comp. Pulp. Dubuque, Iowa, 132, (1981).
• Martin, G.W. andAlexopoulos, C.J., “Monograph of theMyxomycetes”University of Iowa Press, Iowa City (1969).
• Neubert, H.,Nowotny, W., Baumann, K. andMarx, H.,“DieMyxomyceten (Band III)”, Gomaringen,KarlheinzBaumannVerlag, (2000).
• Oran, R.B., “Marmara Bölgesinde Yayılış Gösteren Quercus. L. (Meşe) Türleri Üzerindeki KortikolMiksomisetlerin Belirlenmesi”, Doktora Tezi, Uludağ Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Bursa, 225, (2011).
• Sesli, E. andDenchev, C.M., “Checklists of theMyxomycetes, largerAscomycetesandlargerBasidiomycetes in Turkey”, Mycotaxon, 106: 65–67 (2009).
• Anonim, http://www.speciesfungorum.org Erişim tarihi: 10.01.2015.
• Anonim, http://www.catalogueoflife.org Erişim tarihi: 15.01.2015.
• Anonim, http://www.nomen.eumycetozoa.com Erişim tarihi: 15.01.2015.
• Anonim, http://www.discoverlife.org Erişim tarihi: 15.01.2015.
• Baba, H., “Myxomycetes of Mustafa Kemal Universitycampusandenvirons (Turkey)”,TurkishJournal of Botany, 36: 769-777 (2012).
• Baba, H., “DiversityandEcology of Myxomycetes in Antakya-Hatay (Turkey)” Mantar Dergisi,3(1-2): 5-11(2012).
• Dagamac, N.H.A., Stephenson, S.L. and Dela Cruz, T.E.E., “Occurrence, distribution and diversity of myxomycetes (plasmodial slime moulds) along two transects in Mt. Arayat National Park, Pampanga, Philippines”,Mycology, 3(2): 119–126 (2012).
• Eroğlu, G.,Öztürk, C.,Kaşık, G., Doğan, H.H.,Aktaş, S. andAlkan, S., “Some myxomycete from Çivril (Denizli-Turkey) province”, Journal of Selçuk University Natural andApplied Science, 3(4): 21-26, (2014).
• Oran, R.B. and Ergül, C.C.,”NewRecordsfortheMyxobiota of Turkey”, TurkishJournal of Botany, 28: 511-515 (2004).
• Baba, H., “A newMyxomycetesGenusand Three SpeciesRecordforTurkey”, International Journal of Botany, 4(3): 336-339 (2008).