TR
EN
Rural Sustainable Development Management: Conceptual Approaches and Tools
Öz
The article aims to find sound approaches to tackling the challenges related to the lagging development of rural areas and their spatial compression due to the outflow of the most active rural population. For this purpose, the author perform an analysis of the experience accumulated by the EU countries, the USA, “Russia and Türkiye and come to the conclusion that any sectoral and redistributive approaches to managing the sustainable development of rural areas are ineffective and can only be considered as complementary to the territorial approach, which is based on the development of competitive advantages of the rural areas. The author consider such components of the territorial approach as the establishment of a hierarchical system of supporting rural settlements and the involvement of local communities in the development of rural areas.
Anahtar Kelimeler
Kaynakça
- Krugman, P. (1980). Scale economies, product differentiation, and the pattern of trade. American Economic Review, 70(5), 950–959. Krugman, P. (1991a). Geography and trade. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1991. Krugman, P. (1991b). Increasing returns and economic geography. Journal of Political Economy, 99(3), 483–499. Krugman, P., & Venables, A. (1995). Globalization and the inequality of nations. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(4), 857–880. Krugman, P., & Elizondo, R. (1996). Trade policy and the Third World metropolis. Journal of Development Economics, 49, 137–150. Mantino, F. (2010). Lo sviluppo rurale in Europa: politiche, istituzioni e attori locali dagli anni’70 ad oggi [Rural development in Europe: policies, institutions and local actors from the 70s to today]. FAO. [In Russian]. Retrieved from: https://www.fao.org/3/i2001r/i2001r.pdf
Ayrıntılar
Birincil Dil
İngilizce
Konular
Siyaset Bilimi (Diğer)
Bölüm
Araştırma Makalesi
Yazarlar
Yayımlanma Tarihi
29 Aralık 2024
Gönderilme Tarihi
4 Ekim 2024
Kabul Tarihi
9 Aralık 2024
Yayımlandığı Sayı
Yıl 2024 Cilt: 22 Sayı: 4
APA
Harputlu, M. (2024). Rural Sustainable Development Management: Conceptual Approaches and Tools. Manisa Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 22(4), 343-357. https://doi.org/10.18026/cbayarsos.1561368
AMA
1.Harputlu M. Rural Sustainable Development Management: Conceptual Approaches and Tools. Manisa Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi. 2024;22(4):343-357. doi:10.18026/cbayarsos.1561368
Chicago
Harputlu, Mustafa. 2024. “Rural Sustainable Development Management: Conceptual Approaches and Tools”. Manisa Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 22 (4): 343-57. https://doi.org/10.18026/cbayarsos.1561368.
EndNote
Harputlu M (01 Aralık 2024) Rural Sustainable Development Management: Conceptual Approaches and Tools. Manisa Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 22 4 343–357.
IEEE
[1]M. Harputlu, “Rural Sustainable Development Management: Conceptual Approaches and Tools”, Manisa Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, c. 22, sy 4, ss. 343–357, Ara. 2024, doi: 10.18026/cbayarsos.1561368.
ISNAD
Harputlu, Mustafa. “Rural Sustainable Development Management: Conceptual Approaches and Tools”. Manisa Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 22/4 (01 Aralık 2024): 343-357. https://doi.org/10.18026/cbayarsos.1561368.
JAMA
1.Harputlu M. Rural Sustainable Development Management: Conceptual Approaches and Tools. Manisa Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi. 2024;22:343–357.
MLA
Harputlu, Mustafa. “Rural Sustainable Development Management: Conceptual Approaches and Tools”. Manisa Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, c. 22, sy 4, Aralık 2024, ss. 343-57, doi:10.18026/cbayarsos.1561368.
Vancouver
1.Mustafa Harputlu. Rural Sustainable Development Management: Conceptual Approaches and Tools. Manisa Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi. 01 Aralık 2024;22(4):343-57. doi:10.18026/cbayarsos.1561368