Evolutional Analysis of the Concept of Hegemony within the Perspective of International Political Economy Theories

Yıl 2022, Cilt: 20 Sayı: 4, 269 - 286, 28.12.2022

Betül Sarı Aksakal

https://doi.org/10.18026/cbayarsos.1114306

Öz

Over the past few decades, the international political economy has attained itself particular independence within the wider discipline of international relations step by step. The endeavors to figure out the determiners of the radical changes taking place in the world economy since the early 1970s have placed several special theoretical concepts in the focus of interest which directly associates with the international political economy. The concept of hegemony is one of them. Today, hegemony is one of the most discussed subject matters. Antonio Gramsci was an Italian Marxist intellectual, theoretician and politician who developed the concept of hegemony in the Prison Notebooks. Gramsci's writings made incontrovertible contributions to the understanding of hegemony within the context of Marxist thought and philosophy. However, in the historical process, lots of views and theories have been put forward regarding the concept of hegemony. Thus, the application of the concept in international political economy is widely contested and necessitates disambiguation. From this point of view, we have tried to analyze how the concept was handled by theorists belonging to different schools of thought in the international political economy literature. In all these respects, this article takes its point of departure in the multiplicity of characterizations of the concept of hegemony and fastens on elucidating a certain strand of conceptualising hegemony more closely.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Hegemony, International Political Economy, Antonio Gramsci, Realism

Uluslararası Politik Ekonomi Teorileri Perspektifinden Hegemonya Kavramının Evrimi

Öz

Uluslararası politik ekonomi, son birkaç on yıldır uluslararası ilişkilerin bir alt dalı olmaktan koparak ayrı bir disiplin olma yolunda ilerlemiştir. 1970'li yılların başlarından itibaren dünya ekonomisinde meydana gelen radikal değişimlerin belirleyicilerini saptamaya yönelik çabalar, uluslararası politik ekonomiyle doğrudan bağlantısı olan birçok özel teorik kavramı ilgi odağı haline getirmiştir. Hegemonya, bu kavramlardan biridir. Hegemonya, günümüzde de en çok tartışılan konuların başında gelmektedir. Antonio Gramsci-İtalyan Marksist entelektüel, teorisyen ve politikacı- Hapishane Defterleri adlı eserinde hegemonya kavramını geliştirmiştir. Gramsci'nin kaleme aldığı yazılar, hegemonya anlayışına Marksist düşünce ve felsefe bağlamında yadsınamayacak katkılar sunmuştur.Ancak tarihsel süreç içerisinde hegemonya kavramına ilişkin birçok görüş ve teori ortaya atılmıştır. Bu nedenle, kavramın uluslararası politik ekonomiye uyarlanması geniş çapta tartışmalıdır ve konuyla ilgili belirsizliğin giderilmesini gerektirir. Buradan hareketle, kavramın uluslararası politik ekonomi literatüründe farklı düşünce ekollerine mensup teorisyenler tarafından nasıl ele alındığı incelenmiştir. Tüm bu bağlamlarda, makale hareket noktasını hegemonya kavramının farklı tanımlamalarından almıştır. Kavrama ilişkin yapılan farklı tanımlamaların belirli bir kolunu aydınlatmayı hedeflemiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Hegemonya, Uluslararası Politik Ekonomi, Antonio Gramsci, Realizm

Kaynakça

• Alexakos, K. (2007). The science teacher as the organic link. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 2(4), 883-921.
• Bates, T. R. (1975). Gramsci and the theory of hegemony. Journal of the History of Ideas, 36(2), 351-366.
• Bieler, A. and Morton, A. D. (2004). A critical theory route to hegemony, world order and historical change: Neo-Gramscian perspectives in international relations. Capital & Class, 28(1), 85-113.
• Boothman, D. (2017). Gramsci’s historical bloc: structure, hegemony and dialectical ınteractions. Movimento-Revista de Educação, 4(6), 131-150.
• Burawoy, M. (2003). For a sociological Marxism: the complementary convergence of Antonio Gramsci and Karl Polanyi. Politics & Society, 31(2), 193-261.
• Burnham, P. (1991). Neo-Gramscian hegemony and the international order. Capital & class, 15(3), 73-92.
• Carnoy, M. (1984). The state and political theory. NJ: Princeton University Press.
• Cox, R. W. (1981). Social forces, states and world orders: beyond international relations theory. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 10 (2), 126–155.
• Cox, R. W. (1983). Gramsci, hegemony and international relations: an essay in method. Millennium Journal of International Studies, 12(2), 162–175.
• Cox, R. W. (1987). Production, power and world order: Social forces in the making of history. New York: Columbia University Press.
• Cox, R. W. (1996). “Social Forces, States and World Orders: Beyond International Relations Theory”, R. W. Cox and T. J. Sinclair (Eds.), in Approaches to World Order, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 85-123.
• Davidson, A. (2005). Gramsci, hegemony and globalization. Kasarinlan: Philippine Journal of Third World Studies, 20(2), 4-36.
• Ferguson, N. (2003). Hegemony or Empire? Foreign Affairs, 82(5), 154-161.
• Germain, R. D. and Kenny, M. (1998). Engaging Gramsci: International relations theory and the new Gramscians. Review of international studies, 24(1), 3-21.
• Gill, S. (1986). Hegemony, Consensus and Trilateralism. Review of International Studies, 12, 205-221.
• Gill, S. (1991). Reflections on global order and sociohistorical time. Alternatives, 16, 275-314.
• Gill, S. (2003). Power and resistance in the new world order. UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
• Gill, S. and Law, D. (1989). Global hegemony and the structural power of capital. International Studies Quarterly, 33(4), 475-499.
• Gill, S. and Law, D. (1993). “Global hegemony and the structural power of capital”, S. Gill (Ed.), in Gramsci, Historical Materialism and International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 93-126.
• Gilpin, R. (1976). The political economy of the multinational corporation: three contrasting perspectives. American Political Science Review, 70(1), 184-191.
• Gilpin, R. (1981). War and change in world politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
• Gilpin, R. (1987). The political economy of ınternational relations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
• Gilpin, R. (1988). The theory of hegemonic war. The Journal of Interdisciplinary History, 18(4), 591-613.
• Gilpin, R. (2001). Global political economy: Understanding the international economic order. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
• Gramsci, A. (1971). Selections from the prison notebooks. London: Lawrence and Wishart.
• Grunberg, I. (1990). Exploring the “myth” of hegemonic stability. International Organization, 44(4), 431-477.
• Hawley, J. P. (1980). Antonio Gramsci's marxism: Class, state and work. Social Problems, 27(5), 584-600.
• Hobden, S. and Wyn Jones, R. (2008). “Marxist theories of international relations”, J. Baylis, J., S. Smith and P. Owens, P. (Eds), in The Globalization of World Politics. An Introduction to International Relations. New York: Oxford University Press, 130-146.
• Hoffmann, S. (1977). An American social science: International relations. Daedalus, 106(3), 41-60.
• Linklater, A. (1989). Beyond realism and marxism: Critical theory and ınternational relations. UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
• Morgenthau, H. J. and Thompson, K. (1985). Politics among nations: The struggle for power and peace. New York: McGraw-Hill.
• Joseph, J. (2000). A realist theory of hegemony. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 30(2), 179–202.
• Keohane, R. O. (1984). After hegemony: Cooperation and the discord in the world political economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
• Keohane, R. O. and Nye, J. S. (1972). Transnational relations and world politics. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
• Keohane, R. O. and Nye, J. S. (1974). Transgovernmental relations and ınternational organizations. World Politics, 27(1), 39-62.
• Keohane, R.O. and Nye, J.S. (1989). Power and interdependence. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman/ Little, Brown.
• Keohane, R. O. and Nye, J. S. (2001). Power and interdependence. New York: Addison Wesley Longman.
• Kindleberger, C. P. (1975). The World in depression, 1929-1939. Berkeley: University of Carolina Press.
• Maglaras, V. (2013). Consent and submission: Aspects of Gramsci’s theory of the political and civil society. SAGE Open, 1-8.
• Milner, H. V. (1998). International Political Economy: Beyond Hegemonic Stability. Foreign Policy, 110, 112–123.
• Monasta, A. (1993). Antonio Gramsci. Prospects, 23(3-4), 597-612.
• Overbeek, H. (2004). Transnational class formation and concepts of control: Towards a genealogy of the Amsterdam project in international political economy. Journal of International Relations and Development, 7(2), 113–141.
• Piccone, P. (1974). Gramsci's Hegelian marxism. Political Theory, 2(1), 32-45.
• Raber, D. (2003). Librarians as organic intellectuals: a Gramscian approach to blind spots and tunnel vision. The Library Quarterly, 73(1), 33-53.
• Robinson, W. I. (2005). Gramsci and globalisation: from nation‐state to transnational hegemony. Critical review of international social and political philosophy, 8(4), 559-574.
• Rupert, M. (1995). Producing hegemony. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Van der Pijl, K. (1989). Ruling classes, hegemony, and the state system: Theoretical and historical considerations. International Journal of Political Economy, 19(3), 7–35.
• Snidal, D. (1985). The limits of hegemonic stability theory. International organization, 39(4), 579-614.
• Waltz, K. N. (1988). The origins of war in neorealist theory. The Journal of Interdisciplinary History, 18(4), 615-628.
• Waltz, K. N. (1990). Realist thought and neorealist theory. Journal of International Affairs, 44(1), 21-37.
• Waltz, K. N. (1993). The emerging structure of international politics. International Security, 18(2), 44-79.
• Waltz, K. N. (2004). Neorealism: Confusions and criticisms. Journal of Politics and Society, 15(1), 2-6.
• Wikinson, D. (2008). Hêgemonía: Hegemony, classical and modern. Journal of World-Systems Research, 119-141.
• Wohlforth, W. C. (1994). Realism and the end of the Cold War. International Security, 19(3), 91-129.
• Woolcock, J. A. (1985). Politics, ideology and hegemony in Gramsci's theory. Social and Economic Studies, 34(3), 199-210.
• Yarmolenka, I. (2014). 11 Eylül sonrası askeri alanda ABD hegemonyası ve Türkiye’nin rolü, Master Thesis, İzmir: Ege University Institute of Social Sciences.
• Yavuzaslan, K. (2015). Stratejik yönetim penceresinden 21. yüzyıl Amerikan hegemonyası. Ankara: Nobel.