Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

On the Newness of New Social Movements

Yıl 2023, Cilt: 21 Sayı: 1, 115 - 126, 28.03.2023
https://doi.org/10.18026/cbayarsos.1098724

Öz

In this study, new social movements are examined in comparison with old social movements. It has been argued that the novelty of new social movements stems from their responses to newly emerging social and political crises, which have changed the concept of political and the nature of social movements. The central argument is that social movements defend modern values, and there is no difference between old and new social movements regarding the values they support. However, since the new social movements are often compared to the working-class movement, the values they advocate are thought to be different. However, the working-class movement is not the sole movement in the nineteenth century, and it is possible to discuss various social movements. The new social movements emerged as reactions to representative democracy and established institutional politics. As the failures of the representative democracy are recognized, and as the scope of the political expands, new social movements have emerged to provide solutions to new problems. So, their newness is related to our contemporary conception of the political.

Kaynakça

  • Arrighi, G., Hopkins, T. K., & Wallerstein, I. M. (1989). Antisystemic Movements. Verso Trade.
  • Calhoun, C. (1993). “New Social Movements” of the Early Nineteenth Century. Social Science History, 17(3), 385-427.
  • Castells, M. (2015). Networks of Outrage and Hope: Social Movements in the Internet Age. Polity.
  • Castells, M. (1997). The Power of Identity. Blackwell Publishing.
  • Cerulo KA. (1997). Identity Construction: New Issues, New Directions. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 23: 385-409.
  • DuBois, E. (2012). The Radicalism of the Woman Suffrage Movement: Notes toward the Reconstruction of Nineteenth-century Feminism. KG Saur.
  • Eder, K. (1993). The New Politics of Class: Social Movements and Cultural Dynamics in Advanced Societies (Vol. 23). Sage.
  • Faulks, K. (2000). Political Sociology: A Critical Introduction. NYU Press.
  • Hardt, M., & Negri, A. (2012). Declaration. New York, NY: Argo Navis.
  • Hobsbawm, E. (1998). Uncommon People: Resistance, rebellion, and jazz. The New Press, New York.
  • Klein, N. (2001). Reclaiming the Commons. New Left Review, 81-89.
  • Lash, S., & Urry, J. (1987). The End of Organized Capitalism. Univ of Wisconsin Press.
  • Melucci, A. (1985). The Symbolic Challenge of Contemporary Movements. Social Research, 789-816.
  • Nash, K. (2009). Contemporary Political Sociology: Globalization, Politics and Power. John Wiley & Sons.
  • Offe, C. (1985). New Social Movements: Challenging the Boundaries of Institutional Politics. Social Research, 817-868.
  • Polletta F& Jasper JM. (2001). Collective Identity and Social Movements. Annu. Rev. Sociol.27:283-305.
  • Rancière, J. (2006). Democracy, Republic, Representation. CONSTELLATIONS-OXFORD, 13(3), 297-300.
  • Rancière, J. (1999). Disagreement: Politics and Philosophy. Translated by Julie Rose. The University of Minnesota Press.
  • Ranciere, J. (2010). Ten Theses on Politics. Dissensus: On Political and Aesthetics, 27-45. London and New York: Bloomsbury Academic.
  • Scott, A. (1990). Ideology and the New Social Movements. No. 24. Allen & Unwin Australia.
  • Senellart, M. (2014). Course Context. In M. Foucault, Security, Territory, Population: Lectures at the College de France, 1977-78. Palgrave Macmillan UK.
  • Sitrin, M., & Azzellini, D. (2014). They can’t Represent Us!: Reinventing Democracy from Greece to Occupy. Verso Books . Touraine, A. (1985). An Introduction to the Study of Social Movements. Social Research, 749-787.

Yeni Toplumsal Hareketlerin Yeniliği Üzerine

Yıl 2023, Cilt: 21 Sayı: 1, 115 - 126, 28.03.2023
https://doi.org/10.18026/cbayarsos.1098724

Öz

Bu çalışmada, yeni toplumsal hareketler, geleneksel toplumsal hareketlerle karşılaştırmalı olarak incelenmiştir. Yeni toplumsal hareketlerin yeniliğinin, ortaya çıkan yeni toplumsal ve siyasal krizlere verdikleri yanıtlardan kaynaklandığı tartışılmıştır. Bu krizlerin, siyasal kavramının ve toplumsal hareketlerin doğasını değiştirdiği iddia edilmiştir. Bu çalışmanın temel iddiası, toplumsal hareketlerin modern değerleri savunduğu ve değer açısından eski ve yeni toplumsal hareketler arasında farklılık bulunmadığı yönünde olmuştur. Ancak, yeni toplumsal hareketler genelde işçi sınıfı hareketiyle karşılaştırıldığı için savundukları değerlerin farklı oldukları düşünülmektedir. Halbuki işçi sınıfı hareketi on dokuzuncu yüzyıl toplumsal hareketlerinden sadece bir tanesidir ve bu yüzyılda farklı toplumsal hareketlerden bahsetmek mümkündür. Yeni toplumsal hareketler, temsili demokrasiye ve yerleşik kurumsal siyasete tepki niteliği taşımaktadır. Temsili demokrasinin başarısız olduğu alanların belirgin hale gelmesi ve siyasetin anlamının ve kapsamının genişlemesi, ortaya çıkan yeni sorunlara farklı perspektiflerden yaklaşmayı ve çözüm getirmeyi gerektirmiştir. Sonuç olarak, yeni toplumsal hareketlerin yeniliğinin aslında siyasalın yeniden düşünülmesiyle ve kavramsallaştırılmasıyla ilgili olduğu iddia edilmiştir.

Kaynakça

  • Arrighi, G., Hopkins, T. K., & Wallerstein, I. M. (1989). Antisystemic Movements. Verso Trade.
  • Calhoun, C. (1993). “New Social Movements” of the Early Nineteenth Century. Social Science History, 17(3), 385-427.
  • Castells, M. (2015). Networks of Outrage and Hope: Social Movements in the Internet Age. Polity.
  • Castells, M. (1997). The Power of Identity. Blackwell Publishing.
  • Cerulo KA. (1997). Identity Construction: New Issues, New Directions. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 23: 385-409.
  • DuBois, E. (2012). The Radicalism of the Woman Suffrage Movement: Notes toward the Reconstruction of Nineteenth-century Feminism. KG Saur.
  • Eder, K. (1993). The New Politics of Class: Social Movements and Cultural Dynamics in Advanced Societies (Vol. 23). Sage.
  • Faulks, K. (2000). Political Sociology: A Critical Introduction. NYU Press.
  • Hardt, M., & Negri, A. (2012). Declaration. New York, NY: Argo Navis.
  • Hobsbawm, E. (1998). Uncommon People: Resistance, rebellion, and jazz. The New Press, New York.
  • Klein, N. (2001). Reclaiming the Commons. New Left Review, 81-89.
  • Lash, S., & Urry, J. (1987). The End of Organized Capitalism. Univ of Wisconsin Press.
  • Melucci, A. (1985). The Symbolic Challenge of Contemporary Movements. Social Research, 789-816.
  • Nash, K. (2009). Contemporary Political Sociology: Globalization, Politics and Power. John Wiley & Sons.
  • Offe, C. (1985). New Social Movements: Challenging the Boundaries of Institutional Politics. Social Research, 817-868.
  • Polletta F& Jasper JM. (2001). Collective Identity and Social Movements. Annu. Rev. Sociol.27:283-305.
  • Rancière, J. (2006). Democracy, Republic, Representation. CONSTELLATIONS-OXFORD, 13(3), 297-300.
  • Rancière, J. (1999). Disagreement: Politics and Philosophy. Translated by Julie Rose. The University of Minnesota Press.
  • Ranciere, J. (2010). Ten Theses on Politics. Dissensus: On Political and Aesthetics, 27-45. London and New York: Bloomsbury Academic.
  • Scott, A. (1990). Ideology and the New Social Movements. No. 24. Allen & Unwin Australia.
  • Senellart, M. (2014). Course Context. In M. Foucault, Security, Territory, Population: Lectures at the College de France, 1977-78. Palgrave Macmillan UK.
  • Sitrin, M., & Azzellini, D. (2014). They can’t Represent Us!: Reinventing Democracy from Greece to Occupy. Verso Books . Touraine, A. (1985). An Introduction to the Study of Social Movements. Social Research, 749-787.
Toplam 22 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Ayça Berna Görmez 0000-0002-5782-580X

Yayımlanma Tarihi 28 Mart 2023
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2023 Cilt: 21 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA Görmez, A. B. (2023). On the Newness of New Social Movements. Manisa Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 21(1), 115-126. https://doi.org/10.18026/cbayarsos.1098724