Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Küçük Hücreli Dışı Akciğer Kanseri Evrelemesinde Bölgesel Nod Tutulumunun F-18 FDG PET/BT ile Değerlendirilmesi

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 12 Sayı: 1, 55 - 62, 26.03.2025
https://doi.org/10.34087/cbusbed.1543404

Öz

Evaluation of Regional Node Involvement in The Staging of Non-small Cell Lung Cancer with F-18 FDG PET/CT
Küçük Hücreli Dışı Akciğer Kanseri Evrelemesinde Bölgesel Nod Tutulumunun F-18 FDG PET/BT ile Değerlendirilmesi
Mutlay KESKİN1*, Haydar ASLAN1
1Mersin Şehir Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi Nükleer Tıp Kliniği Mersin, Türkiye
e-mail: mutlaykeskin@hotmail.com, draslanhaydar@gmail.com,
ORCID: 0000-0003-2528-8648
ORCID: 0009-0001-0232-6712
*Sorumlu Yazar/Corresponding Author: Mutlay Keskin
Gönderim Tarihi / Received:
Kabul Tarihi / Accepted:
DOI:

Öz
Giriş ve Amaç: PET/BT’de küçük hücreli dışı akciğer kanserinin (KHDAK) nodal evrelemesi için mediastinal kan havuzu (MKH) aktivite eşik değerinin tanısal performansını değerlendirmek ve bölgesel nod tutulumunu değerlendirmede F-18 FDG-PET/BT'nin tanısal performansını artırabilecek değişkenleri incelemektir.
Gereç ve Yöntemler: Endobronşiyal ultrason eşliğinde transbronşiyal iğne aspirasyonu ve F-18 FDG-PET/BT uygulanan KHDAK tanılı hastalar çalışmaya dahil edildi. Lenf nodu istasyonu ve lenf nodu evrelemesinin analizi, MKH eşik değeri ile diğer beş PET/BT parametresi histopatolojik sonuçlarla karşılaştırıldı.
Bulgular: Çalışmaya 88 hasta dâhil edilmiş olup 250 lenf nodu istasyonundan patolojik örneklem yapıldı. PET/BT’de lenf nodu aktivitesinin MKH'dan yüksek olması %95.3 duyarlılık, %36.1 özgüllük, %33.1 pozitif öngörü değeri, %96.2 negatif öngörü değeri göstermiştir. İncelenen diğer beş PET/BT parametresinden nodal SUVmaks değeri ve lenf nodu/MKH SUVmaks oranı en tanısal parametrelerdi. Nodal SUVmaks için 3.8 eşik değeri %90.2 duyarlılık, %61.7 özgüllüközgüllük; lenf nodu/MKH SUVmaks oranı için 1.8 eşik değeri %90.1 duyarlılık, %60.5 özgüllük değeri göstermiştir.
Sonuç: Nodal evrelemede MKH eşik değeri ile karşılaştırıldığında daha yüksek lenf nodu/MKH SUVmaks oranı eşik değeri ve diğer PET/BT değişkenlerinin kullanılması PET/BT'nin tanısal değerini artırabilir.
Anahtar Kelimeler: Küçük hücreli dışı akciğer kanseri, PET/BT, FDG

Abstract
Aim: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of mediastinal blood pool activity(MBP) threshold for nodal staging of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) on PET/CT and to examine the variables that may improve the diagnostic performance of 18F-FDG-PET/CT in evaluating regional lymph node involvement.
Materials and Methods: Patients diagnosed with NSCLC who underwent endobronchial ultrasound guided transbronchial needle aspiration and 18F-FDG-PET/CT were included in the study. Analysis of lymph node station and lymph node staging, MBP threshold value and five other PET/CT parameters compared with histopathological results.
Results: Eighty eight patients were included in the study and pathological samples were performed from 250 lymph node stations. The higher lymph node activity in PET/CT than MBP showed a sensitivity of 95.3%,a specificity of 36.1%,a positive prediction value of 33.1%, a negative prediction value of 96.2%.From the other five PET/CT parameters examined, nodal SUVmax value and lymph node/MBP SUVmax ratio were the most diagnostic parameters. The 3.8 threshold value for nodal SUVmax showed a sensitivity of 90.2%, a specificity of 61.7%,and the 1.8 threshold for lymph node/MBP SUVmax ratio showed a sensitivity of 90.1%, a specificity of 60.5%.
Conclusion: Compared to MBP threshold value in the nodal staging, use of higher lymph node/MBP SUVmax ratio threshold value and other PET/CT variables may increase the diagnostic value of PET/CT.
Keywords: Non-small cell lung cancer, PET/CT, FDG

Proje Numarası

Mersin City Training and Research Hospital, with the decision dated May 10, 2023, and numbered 70.

Kaynakça

  • World Health Organization. The top 10 causes of death. 2018. Available at: www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/the-top-10-causes-ofdeath. [Accessed 12 March 2019].
  • 2. American Cancer Society. Non-small cell lung cancer survival rates, by stage. 2017. Available at:https://www.cancer.org/cancer/non-small-celllung-cancer/detection-diagnosis-staging/survival-rates.html. [Accessed 12 March 2019].
  • 3. Chansky K, Detterbeck FC, Nicholson AG, Rusch VW, Vallières E, Groome P, et al. The IASLC Lung Cancer Staging Project: External Validation of the Revision of the TNM Stage Groupings in the Eighth Edition of the TNM Classification of Lung Cancer. J Thorac Oncol. 2017 Jul;12(7):1109-1121.
  • 4. Van Schil PE, Yogeswaran K, Hendriks JM, Lauwers P, Faivre-Finn C. Advances in the use of surgery and multimodality treatment for N2 non-small cell lung cancer. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2017 Jun;17(6):555-561.
  • 5. Donington J, Schumacher L, Yanagawa J. Surgical Issues for Operable Early-Stage Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2022 Feb 20;40(6):530-538.
  • 6. Baldwin DR. Imaging in lung cancer: recent advances in PET-CT and screening. Thorax. 2011 Apr;66(4):275-7.
  • 7. Vilmann P, Clementsen PF, Colella S, Siemsen M, De Leyn P, Dumonceau JM, et al., Combined endobronchial and esophageal endosonography for the diagnosis and staging of lung cancer: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline, in cooperation with the European Respiratory Society (ERS) and the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons (ESTS). Endoscopy. 2015 Jun;47(6):545-59.
  • 8. Lung cancer: diagnosis and management. London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE); 2023 Jul 26. PMID: 31211540.
  • 9. De Leyn P, Dooms C, Kuzdzal J, Lardinois D, Passlick B, Rami-Porta R, et al., Revised ESTS guidelines for preoperative mediastinal lymph node staging for non-small-cell lung cancer. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2014 May;45(5):787-98.
  • 10. Billé A, Pelosi E, Skanjeti A, Arena V, Errico L, Borasio P, et al., Preoperative intrathoracic lymph node staging in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer: accuracy of integrated positron emission tomography and computed tomography. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2009 Sep;36(3):440-5.
  • 11. Dinnes J, Ferrante di Ruffano L, Takwoingi Y, Cheung ST, Nathan P, Matin RN, et al., Cochrane Skin Cancer Diagnostic Test Accuracy Group. Ultrasound, CT, MRI, or PET-CT for staging and re-staging of adults with cutaneous melanoma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Jul 1;7(7):CD012806.
  • 12. Serra Fortuny M, Gallego M, Berna L, Montón C, Vigil L, Masdeu MJ, et al., FDG-PET parameters predicting mediastinal malignancy in lung cancer. BMC Pulm Med. 2016 Dec 8;16(1):177.
  • 13. Kuo WH, Wu YC, Wu CY, Ho KC, Chiu PH, Wang CW, et al., Node/aorta and node/liver SUV ratios from (18)F-FDG PET/CT may improve the detection of occult mediastinal lymph node metastases in patients with non-small cell lung carcinoma. Acad Radiol. 2012 Jun;19(6):685-92.
  • 14. Mallorie A, Goldring J, Patel A, Lim E, Wagner T. Assessment of nodal involvement in non-small-cell lung cancer with 18F-FDG-PET/CT: mediastinal blood pool cut-off has the highest sensitivity and tumour SUVmax/2 has the highest specificity. Nucl Med Commun. 2017 Aug;38(8):715-719.
  • 15. El-Sherief AH, Lau CT, Wu CC, Drake RL, Abbott GF, Rice TW. International association for the study of lung cancer (IASLC) lymph node map: radiologic review with CT illustration. Radiographics. 2014 Oct;34(6):1680-91.
  • 16. Evison M, Morris J, Martin J, Shah R, Barber PV, Booton R, et al., Nodal staging in lung cancer: a risk stratification model for lymph nodes classified as negative by EBUS-TBNA. J Thorac Oncol. 2015 Jan;10(1):126-33.
  • 17. Moloney F, Ryan D, McCarthy L, McCarthy J, Burke L, Henry MT, et al., Increasing the accuracy of 18F-FDG PET/CT interpretation of "mildly positive" mediastinal nodes in the staging of non-small cell lung cancer. Eur J Radiol. 2014 May;83(5):843-7.
  • 18. Hwangbo B, Kim SK, Lee HS, Lee HS, Kim MS, Lee JM, et al., Application of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration following integrated PET/CT in mediastinal staging of potentially operable non-small cell lung cancer. Chest. 2009 May;135(5):1280-1287.
  • 19. Billiet C, De Ruysscher D, Peeters S, Decaluwé H, Vansteenkiste J, Dooms C, et al., Patterns of Locoregional Relapses in Patients with Contemporarily Staged Stage III-N2 NSCLC Treated with Induction Chemotherapy and Resection: Implications for Postoperative Radiotherapy Target Volumes. J Thorac Oncol. 2016 Sep;11(9):1538-49.
  • 20. Guarize J, Casiraghi M, Donghi S, Casadio C, Diotti C, Filippi N, et al., EBUS-TBNA in PET-positive lymphadenopathies in treated cancer patients. ERJ Open Res. 2017 Oct 23;3(4):00009-2017.
  • 21. Liu A, Qian L, Zhong Y, Lu X, Zhao Y. Endobronchial ultrasound guided transbronchial needle aspiration combining with immunohistochemistry and genotype in lung cancer: A single-center, 55 cases retrospective study. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2017 Jul 25;23:1-7.
  • 22. Cho J, Choe JG, Pahk K, Choi S, Kwon HR, Eo JS, et al., Ratio of Mediastinal Lymph Node SUV to Primary Tumor SUV in 18F-FDG PET/CT for Nodal Staging in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2017 Jun;51(2):140-146.
  • 23. Lee AY, Choi SJ, Jung KP, Park JS, Lee SM, Bae SK. Characteristics of Metastatic Mediastinal Lymph Nodes of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer on Preoperative F-18 FDG PET/CT. Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2014 Mar;48(1):41-6.
  • 24. Stamatis G. Staging of lung cancer: the role of noninvasive, minimally invasive and invasive techniques. Eur Respir J. 2015 Aug;46(2):521-31.
  • 25. Pak K, Kim K, Kim MH, Eom JS, Lee MK, Cho JS, et al., A decision tree model for predicting mediastinal lymph node metastasis in non-small cell lung cancer with F-18 FDG PET/CT. PLoS One. 2018 Feb 27;13(2):e0193403.
  • 26. Jalil BA, Yasufuku K, Khan AM. Uses, limitations, and complications of endobronchial ultrasound. Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). 2015 Jul;28(3):325-30.
  • 27. von Bartheld MB, van Breda A, Annema JT. Complication rate of endosonography (endobronchial and endoscopic ultrasound): a systematic review. Respiration. 2014;87(4):343-51.
  • 28. Evison M, Crosbie P, Navani N, Callister M, Rintoul RC, Baldwin D, et al., How should performance in EBUS mediastinal staging in lung cancer be measured? Br J Cancer. 2016 Oct 11;115(8):e9.

Evaluation of Regional Node Involvement in The Staging of Non-small Cell Lung Cancer with F-18 FDG PET/CT

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 12 Sayı: 1, 55 - 62, 26.03.2025
https://doi.org/10.34087/cbusbed.1543404

Öz

Öz
Giriş ve Amaç: PET/BT’de küçük hücreli dışı akciğer kanserinin (KHDAK) nodal evrelemesi için mediastinal kan havuzu (MKH) aktivite eşik değerinin tanısal performansını değerlendirmek ve bölgesel nod tutulumunu değerlendirmede F-18 FDG-PET/BT'nin tanısal performansını artırabilecek değişkenleri incelemektir.
Gereç ve Yöntemler: Endobronşiyal ultrason eşliğinde transbronşiyal iğne aspirasyonu ve F-18 FDG-PET/BT uygulanan KHDAK tanılı hastalar çalışmaya dahil edildi. Lenf nodu istasyonu ve lenf nodu evrelemesinin analizi, MKH eşik değeri ile diğer beş PET/BT parametresi histopatolojik sonuçlarla karşılaştırıldı.
Bulgular: Çalışmaya 88 hasta dâhil edilmiş olup 250 lenf nodu istasyonundan patolojik örneklem yapıldı. PET/BT’de lenf nodu aktivitesinin MKH'dan yüksek olması %95.3 duyarlılık, %36.1 özgüllük, %33.1 pozitif öngörü değeri, %96.2 negatif öngörü değeri göstermiştir. İncelenen diğer beş PET/BT parametresinden nodal SUVmaks değeri ve lenf nodu/MKH SUVmaks oranı en tanısal parametrelerdi. Nodal SUVmaks için 3.8 eşik değeri %90.2 duyarlılık, %61.7 özgüllüközgüllük; lenf nodu/MKH SUVmaks oranı için 1.8 eşik değeri %90.1 duyarlılık, %60.5 özgüllük değeri göstermiştir.
Sonuç: Nodal evrelemede MKH eşik değeri ile karşılaştırıldığında daha yüksek lenf nodu/MKH SUVmaks oranı eşik değeri ve diğer PET/BT değişkenlerinin kullanılması PET/BT'nin tanısal değerini artırabilir.
Anahtar Kelimeler: Küçük hücreli dışı akciğer kanseri, PET/BT, FDG

Abstract
Aim: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of mediastinal blood pool activity(MBP) threshold for nodal staging of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) on PET/CT and to examine the variables that may improve the diagnostic performance of 18F-FDG-PET/CT in evaluating regional lymph node involvement.
Materials and Methods: Patients diagnosed with NSCLC who underwent endobronchial ultrasound guided transbronchial needle aspiration and 18F-FDG-PET/CT were included in the study. Analysis of lymph node station and lymph node staging, MBP threshold value and five other PET/CT parameters compared with histopathological results.
Results: Eighty eight patients were included in the study and pathological samples were performed from 250 lymph node stations. The higher lymph node activity in PET/CT than MBP showed a sensitivity of 95.3%,a specificity of 36.1%,a positive prediction value of 33.1%, a negative prediction value of 96.2%.From the other five PET/CT parameters examined, nodal SUVmax value and lymph node/MBP SUVmax ratio were the most diagnostic parameters. The 3.8 threshold value for nodal SUVmax showed a sensitivity of 90.2%, a specificity of 61.7%,and the 1.8 threshold for lymph node/MBP SUVmax ratio showed a sensitivity of 90.1%, a specificity of 60.5%.
Conclusion: Compared to MBP threshold value in the nodal staging, use of higher lymph node/MBP SUVmax ratio threshold value and other PET/CT variables may increase the diagnostic value of PET/CT.
Keywords: Non-small cell lung cancer, PET/CT, FDG

Proje Numarası

Mersin City Training and Research Hospital, with the decision dated May 10, 2023, and numbered 70.

Kaynakça

  • World Health Organization. The top 10 causes of death. 2018. Available at: www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/the-top-10-causes-ofdeath. [Accessed 12 March 2019].
  • 2. American Cancer Society. Non-small cell lung cancer survival rates, by stage. 2017. Available at:https://www.cancer.org/cancer/non-small-celllung-cancer/detection-diagnosis-staging/survival-rates.html. [Accessed 12 March 2019].
  • 3. Chansky K, Detterbeck FC, Nicholson AG, Rusch VW, Vallières E, Groome P, et al. The IASLC Lung Cancer Staging Project: External Validation of the Revision of the TNM Stage Groupings in the Eighth Edition of the TNM Classification of Lung Cancer. J Thorac Oncol. 2017 Jul;12(7):1109-1121.
  • 4. Van Schil PE, Yogeswaran K, Hendriks JM, Lauwers P, Faivre-Finn C. Advances in the use of surgery and multimodality treatment for N2 non-small cell lung cancer. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2017 Jun;17(6):555-561.
  • 5. Donington J, Schumacher L, Yanagawa J. Surgical Issues for Operable Early-Stage Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2022 Feb 20;40(6):530-538.
  • 6. Baldwin DR. Imaging in lung cancer: recent advances in PET-CT and screening. Thorax. 2011 Apr;66(4):275-7.
  • 7. Vilmann P, Clementsen PF, Colella S, Siemsen M, De Leyn P, Dumonceau JM, et al., Combined endobronchial and esophageal endosonography for the diagnosis and staging of lung cancer: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline, in cooperation with the European Respiratory Society (ERS) and the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons (ESTS). Endoscopy. 2015 Jun;47(6):545-59.
  • 8. Lung cancer: diagnosis and management. London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE); 2023 Jul 26. PMID: 31211540.
  • 9. De Leyn P, Dooms C, Kuzdzal J, Lardinois D, Passlick B, Rami-Porta R, et al., Revised ESTS guidelines for preoperative mediastinal lymph node staging for non-small-cell lung cancer. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2014 May;45(5):787-98.
  • 10. Billé A, Pelosi E, Skanjeti A, Arena V, Errico L, Borasio P, et al., Preoperative intrathoracic lymph node staging in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer: accuracy of integrated positron emission tomography and computed tomography. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2009 Sep;36(3):440-5.
  • 11. Dinnes J, Ferrante di Ruffano L, Takwoingi Y, Cheung ST, Nathan P, Matin RN, et al., Cochrane Skin Cancer Diagnostic Test Accuracy Group. Ultrasound, CT, MRI, or PET-CT for staging and re-staging of adults with cutaneous melanoma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Jul 1;7(7):CD012806.
  • 12. Serra Fortuny M, Gallego M, Berna L, Montón C, Vigil L, Masdeu MJ, et al., FDG-PET parameters predicting mediastinal malignancy in lung cancer. BMC Pulm Med. 2016 Dec 8;16(1):177.
  • 13. Kuo WH, Wu YC, Wu CY, Ho KC, Chiu PH, Wang CW, et al., Node/aorta and node/liver SUV ratios from (18)F-FDG PET/CT may improve the detection of occult mediastinal lymph node metastases in patients with non-small cell lung carcinoma. Acad Radiol. 2012 Jun;19(6):685-92.
  • 14. Mallorie A, Goldring J, Patel A, Lim E, Wagner T. Assessment of nodal involvement in non-small-cell lung cancer with 18F-FDG-PET/CT: mediastinal blood pool cut-off has the highest sensitivity and tumour SUVmax/2 has the highest specificity. Nucl Med Commun. 2017 Aug;38(8):715-719.
  • 15. El-Sherief AH, Lau CT, Wu CC, Drake RL, Abbott GF, Rice TW. International association for the study of lung cancer (IASLC) lymph node map: radiologic review with CT illustration. Radiographics. 2014 Oct;34(6):1680-91.
  • 16. Evison M, Morris J, Martin J, Shah R, Barber PV, Booton R, et al., Nodal staging in lung cancer: a risk stratification model for lymph nodes classified as negative by EBUS-TBNA. J Thorac Oncol. 2015 Jan;10(1):126-33.
  • 17. Moloney F, Ryan D, McCarthy L, McCarthy J, Burke L, Henry MT, et al., Increasing the accuracy of 18F-FDG PET/CT interpretation of "mildly positive" mediastinal nodes in the staging of non-small cell lung cancer. Eur J Radiol. 2014 May;83(5):843-7.
  • 18. Hwangbo B, Kim SK, Lee HS, Lee HS, Kim MS, Lee JM, et al., Application of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration following integrated PET/CT in mediastinal staging of potentially operable non-small cell lung cancer. Chest. 2009 May;135(5):1280-1287.
  • 19. Billiet C, De Ruysscher D, Peeters S, Decaluwé H, Vansteenkiste J, Dooms C, et al., Patterns of Locoregional Relapses in Patients with Contemporarily Staged Stage III-N2 NSCLC Treated with Induction Chemotherapy and Resection: Implications for Postoperative Radiotherapy Target Volumes. J Thorac Oncol. 2016 Sep;11(9):1538-49.
  • 20. Guarize J, Casiraghi M, Donghi S, Casadio C, Diotti C, Filippi N, et al., EBUS-TBNA in PET-positive lymphadenopathies in treated cancer patients. ERJ Open Res. 2017 Oct 23;3(4):00009-2017.
  • 21. Liu A, Qian L, Zhong Y, Lu X, Zhao Y. Endobronchial ultrasound guided transbronchial needle aspiration combining with immunohistochemistry and genotype in lung cancer: A single-center, 55 cases retrospective study. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2017 Jul 25;23:1-7.
  • 22. Cho J, Choe JG, Pahk K, Choi S, Kwon HR, Eo JS, et al., Ratio of Mediastinal Lymph Node SUV to Primary Tumor SUV in 18F-FDG PET/CT for Nodal Staging in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2017 Jun;51(2):140-146.
  • 23. Lee AY, Choi SJ, Jung KP, Park JS, Lee SM, Bae SK. Characteristics of Metastatic Mediastinal Lymph Nodes of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer on Preoperative F-18 FDG PET/CT. Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2014 Mar;48(1):41-6.
  • 24. Stamatis G. Staging of lung cancer: the role of noninvasive, minimally invasive and invasive techniques. Eur Respir J. 2015 Aug;46(2):521-31.
  • 25. Pak K, Kim K, Kim MH, Eom JS, Lee MK, Cho JS, et al., A decision tree model for predicting mediastinal lymph node metastasis in non-small cell lung cancer with F-18 FDG PET/CT. PLoS One. 2018 Feb 27;13(2):e0193403.
  • 26. Jalil BA, Yasufuku K, Khan AM. Uses, limitations, and complications of endobronchial ultrasound. Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). 2015 Jul;28(3):325-30.
  • 27. von Bartheld MB, van Breda A, Annema JT. Complication rate of endosonography (endobronchial and endoscopic ultrasound): a systematic review. Respiration. 2014;87(4):343-51.
  • 28. Evison M, Crosbie P, Navani N, Callister M, Rintoul RC, Baldwin D, et al., How should performance in EBUS mediastinal staging in lung cancer be measured? Br J Cancer. 2016 Oct 11;115(8):e9.
Toplam 28 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Radyoloji ve Organ Görüntüleme, Klinik Tıp Bilimleri (Diğer)
Bölüm Araştırma Makalesi
Yazarlar

Mutlay Keskin 0000-0003-2528-8648

Haydar Aslan 0009-0001-0232-6712

Proje Numarası Mersin City Training and Research Hospital, with the decision dated May 10, 2023, and numbered 70.
Erken Görünüm Tarihi 26 Mart 2025
Yayımlanma Tarihi 26 Mart 2025
Gönderilme Tarihi 4 Eylül 2024
Kabul Tarihi 25 Kasım 2024
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2025 Cilt: 12 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA Keskin, M., & Aslan, H. (2025). Evaluation of Regional Node Involvement in The Staging of Non-small Cell Lung Cancer with F-18 FDG PET/CT. Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, 12(1), 55-62. https://doi.org/10.34087/cbusbed.1543404
AMA Keskin M, Aslan H. Evaluation of Regional Node Involvement in The Staging of Non-small Cell Lung Cancer with F-18 FDG PET/CT. CBU-SBED. Mart 2025;12(1):55-62. doi:10.34087/cbusbed.1543404
Chicago Keskin, Mutlay, ve Haydar Aslan. “Evaluation of Regional Node Involvement in The Staging of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer With F-18 FDG PET/CT”. Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi 12, sy. 1 (Mart 2025): 55-62. https://doi.org/10.34087/cbusbed.1543404.
EndNote Keskin M, Aslan H (01 Mart 2025) Evaluation of Regional Node Involvement in The Staging of Non-small Cell Lung Cancer with F-18 FDG PET/CT. Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi 12 1 55–62.
IEEE M. Keskin ve H. Aslan, “Evaluation of Regional Node Involvement in The Staging of Non-small Cell Lung Cancer with F-18 FDG PET/CT”, CBU-SBED, c. 12, sy. 1, ss. 55–62, 2025, doi: 10.34087/cbusbed.1543404.
ISNAD Keskin, Mutlay - Aslan, Haydar. “Evaluation of Regional Node Involvement in The Staging of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer With F-18 FDG PET/CT”. Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi 12/1 (Mart 2025), 55-62. https://doi.org/10.34087/cbusbed.1543404.
JAMA Keskin M, Aslan H. Evaluation of Regional Node Involvement in The Staging of Non-small Cell Lung Cancer with F-18 FDG PET/CT. CBU-SBED. 2025;12:55–62.
MLA Keskin, Mutlay ve Haydar Aslan. “Evaluation of Regional Node Involvement in The Staging of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer With F-18 FDG PET/CT”. Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, c. 12, sy. 1, 2025, ss. 55-62, doi:10.34087/cbusbed.1543404.
Vancouver Keskin M, Aslan H. Evaluation of Regional Node Involvement in The Staging of Non-small Cell Lung Cancer with F-18 FDG PET/CT. CBU-SBED. 2025;12(1):55-62.