Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

The Frequency of Use of Contraceptive Methods and Influencing Factors in Tekirdağ Province in Northwestern Turkey: A Cross-Sectional Study

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 12 Sayı: 1, 80 - 87, 26.03.2025
https://doi.org/10.34087/cbusbed.1552960

Öz

Objective: Family planning is aimed at enabling couples to have children at the times and intervals they desire. The purpose of this study is to research the frequency of use of contraceptive strategies and the influencing elements amongst ladies residing in Tekirdağ province in northwestern Turkey
Material and Methods: This prospective randomized cross-sectional study included 500 women Demographic data of the patients, the methods used, and influencing factors were investigated.
Results: Of the participants, 68.2% reported using contraceptive methods. The percentage of those using modern methods was found to be 50.6%. Regarding the source of information on contraceptive methods, 62.2% of the cases reported receiving information from Professional health workers, 25.8% from their social environment, and 12% from social media platforms. Of those who did not use contraceptive methods, 17.6% stated it was because their husband did not approval them to, and 17% due to their beliefs. Factors affecting the use of contraceptive methods included age, marriage rate, duration of marriage, pregnancy rate, having given birth, having children, smoking, and income level.
Conclusions: The study, approximately half of the women in our region use modern contraceptive methods. While the majority of the cases obtain information about contraceptive methods from professional health workers, a significant portion also reported obtaining information from social media platforms. About one-third of the cases who had never used any contraceptive method did not use one because their husband disapprovel contraception or due to religious beliefs.

Kaynakça

  • Barnhart KT. Introduction:50 years of evolution of contraceptive medicine. Fertil Steril.2016;106(2):1271-1272 Doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.09.017
  • 2- Mekonnen G, Enquselassie F,Tesfaye G, Semahegn A. Prevalence and factors use of long acting and permanent contraceptive mehhods in Jinka town, Southern Ethiopia:a cross sectional study. Pan Afr Med J.2014;27(18):98 Doi:10.11604/pamj.2014.18.98.3421
  • 3- Britton LE, Alspaugh A,Greene MZ, McLemore MR. CE: An Evidence-Based Update on Contraception.Am J Nurs.2020;120(2):22-33 doi:10.1097/01.NAJ.0000654304.29632.a7
  • 4- Ibitoye M, Casterline JB, Zhang C. Fertility Preferences and Contraceptive Changes in Low-and Middle-Income Countries. Stud Fam Plann.2022;53(2):361-376 doi:10.1111/sifp.12202
  • 5- Gungor Ugurlucan F, Demir O, Tas S, Dural O, Yasa C, Yalcin O. Contraception counselling during gynecology visit-does a questionnaire help? Ginekol Pol.2020;91(10):582-588 doi:10.5603/GP.a2020.0102
  • 6- Talmac MA, Yuksek SC, Afsar S, Bestel A, Gunay I,Ozdemir I. How do contraception preferences change over time?Eight years of eperience in a tertiary hospital. Saudi Med . 2024;45(1):93-97 doi:10.15537/smj2024.1.20230348
  • 7- Michael TO, Ojo TF, Ijabadeniyi OA, Ibikunle MA, Oni JO, Agboola AA. Prevalence and foctors associated with contraceptive use among sexually active adolescent girls in 25-sub-Saharan African countries. PloS One,2024;19(2):e0297411 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0297411
  • 8- Cayan A, Karaçam Z. Factors concerning the attitudes of married women toward family planning in Aydıni Turkey:A cross-sectiınal study. Ian J Nurs Midwifery Res.2013;18(4):323-8
  • 9- Genazzani AR, Fidecicchi T, Arduini D,Giannini A, Simoncini T. Hormonal and natural contraceptive:a review on efficacy and risks of different methods for an informed choice. Gynecol Endocrinol.2023;39(1):2247093 doi:10.1080/09513590.2023.2247093
  • 10- Fox E, Reyna A, Malcolm NM, et al. Client Preferences for Contraceptive Counseling: A Systematic Review. Am J Prev Med.2018;55(5):691-702 doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2018.06.006
  • 11- Götmark F, Andersson M. Human fertility relation to education, economy, religion, contraception, adn family planning programs. BMC Public Health.2020;20(1):265 doi:10.1186/s12889-020-8331-7
  • 12- Burgin J, Bailey JV.Factors affecting contraceptive choice in women over 40:a qualitative study. BMJ Open 2022;12(11):e064987 doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064987
  • 13- Balakrishnan P, Kroiss C, Keskes T, Friedrich B. Perception and use of reversibl methods in Germany:A social listening analysis. Womens Health (Lond).2023;19:17455057221147390. Doi:10.1177/17455057221147390
  • 14- de Irala J, Osorio A, Carlos S, Lopez-del Burgo. Choice of birth control methods among European women and the role of partners and providers. Contraseption.20111;84(6):558-64. Doi:10.1016/j. Contraception.2011.04.004
  • 15- Al-Husban N, Kaadan D, Foudeh J, Ghazi T, Sijari Y, Maaita M. Factorsaffecting the use of long term and permanent contraceptive methods:a Facebook-focused cross-sectional study. Womens Health.2022;22(1):204 doi:10.1186/s12905-022-01784-0
  • 16- Dehlendorf C, Levy K, Kelley A, Grumbach K, Steinauer J. Women’s preferences for contraceptive counseling and decision making. Contraception.2013;88(2):250-6 doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2012.10.012
  • 17- Schivone GB, Glish LL. Current Opin Obstet Gynecol.2017;29(6):443-448. Doi:10.1097/GCO.0000000000000408
  • 18- Almalik M, Mosleh S, Almasarweh I. Are users of modern and traditional contraceptive methods in Jordan different? East Mediterr Health J. 2018;24(4):377-384. Doi:10.26719/2018.24.4.377
  • 19- Alsaleem MA, Khalil SN, Siddiqui AF, Alzahrani MM, Alsaleem SA. Contraceptive use as limiters and spacers among women of reproductive age in southwestern, Saudi Arabia. Saudi Med J.2018;39(11):1109-1115. Doi:10.15537/smj.208.11.22817
  • 20- Memon ZA, Tahmeena, Fazal SA, et al. Effective strategies for increasing the uptake of modern methods of family planning in South Asia:a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMG Womens Health.2024;24(1):13 Doi:10.1186/s12905-023-02959-2
  • 21- Admussu M, Tegegne AS. Factors Affecting Contreceptive Use in Ethiopian:A Generelized Linear Mixed Effect Model. Ethiop J Health Sci.2021;31(3):457-466 Doi:10.4312/ejhs.v31i3.2

Türkiye'nin Kuzeybatısında Tekirdağ İlinde Doğum Kontrol Yöntemlerinin kullanım Sıklığı ve Etkileyen Faktörler: Kesitsel Bir Çalışma

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 12 Sayı: 1, 80 - 87, 26.03.2025
https://doi.org/10.34087/cbusbed.1552960

Öz

Amaç: Aile planlaması, çiftlerin istedikleri zamanlarda ve aralıklarda çocuk sahibi olmalarını sağlamayı amaçlamaktadır. Bu çalışmanın amacı, kuzeybatı Türkiye'de bulunan Tekirdağ ilinde yaşayan kadınlar arasında doğum kontrol yöntemlerinin kullanım sıklığını ve etkileyen faktörleri araştırmaktır.

Gereç ve Yöntemler: Bu prospektif randomize kesitsel çalışmaya 500 kadın dahil edilmiştir. Hastaların demografik verileri, kullanılan yöntemler ve etkileyen faktörler incelenmiştir.

Bulgular: Katılımcıların %68,2'si doğum kontrol yöntemleri kullandığını bildirmiştir. Modern yöntemleri kullananların oranı %50,6 olarak bulunmuştur. Doğum kontrol yöntemleri hakkında bilgi kaynağına bakıldığında, vakaların %62,2'si profesyonel sağlık çalışanlarından, %25,8'i sosyal çevresinden ve %12'si sosyal medya platformlarından bilgi aldığını belirtmiştir. Doğum kontrol yöntemi kullanmayanların %17,6'sı eşlerinin onay vermemesi nedeniyle, %17'si ise inançları nedeniyle kullanmadığını ifade etmiştir. Doğum kontrol yöntemlerinin kullanımını etkileyen faktörler arasında yaş, evlenme oranı, evlilik süresi, gebelik oranı, doğum yapma, çocuk sahibi olma, sigara kullanımı ve gelir düzeyi yer almıştır.

Tartışma: Çalışmada, bölgemizdeki kadınların yaklaşık yarısının modern doğum kontrol yöntemleri kullandığı görülmüştür. Vakaların çoğunluğu doğum kontrol yöntemleri hakkında bilgiyi profesyonel sağlık çalışanlarından alırken, önemli bir kısmı da sosyal medya platformlarından bilgi aldığını bildirmiştir. Hiç doğum kontrol yöntemi kullanmayan vakaların yaklaşık üçte biri, eşlerinin doğum kontrolünü onaylamaması veya dini inançlar nedeniyle kullanmadığını belirtmiştir.

Etik Beyan

Bu çalışma için Tekirdağ Namık Kemal Üniversitesi tıp Fakültesi Etikkurul onayı alınmıştır.

Destekleyen Kurum

Yok.

Teşekkür

Yazarlar görüş ve Önerileri için Prof. Dr.Fatin Rüştü Polat'a teşekkür ediyorler.

Kaynakça

  • Barnhart KT. Introduction:50 years of evolution of contraceptive medicine. Fertil Steril.2016;106(2):1271-1272 Doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.09.017
  • 2- Mekonnen G, Enquselassie F,Tesfaye G, Semahegn A. Prevalence and factors use of long acting and permanent contraceptive mehhods in Jinka town, Southern Ethiopia:a cross sectional study. Pan Afr Med J.2014;27(18):98 Doi:10.11604/pamj.2014.18.98.3421
  • 3- Britton LE, Alspaugh A,Greene MZ, McLemore MR. CE: An Evidence-Based Update on Contraception.Am J Nurs.2020;120(2):22-33 doi:10.1097/01.NAJ.0000654304.29632.a7
  • 4- Ibitoye M, Casterline JB, Zhang C. Fertility Preferences and Contraceptive Changes in Low-and Middle-Income Countries. Stud Fam Plann.2022;53(2):361-376 doi:10.1111/sifp.12202
  • 5- Gungor Ugurlucan F, Demir O, Tas S, Dural O, Yasa C, Yalcin O. Contraception counselling during gynecology visit-does a questionnaire help? Ginekol Pol.2020;91(10):582-588 doi:10.5603/GP.a2020.0102
  • 6- Talmac MA, Yuksek SC, Afsar S, Bestel A, Gunay I,Ozdemir I. How do contraception preferences change over time?Eight years of eperience in a tertiary hospital. Saudi Med . 2024;45(1):93-97 doi:10.15537/smj2024.1.20230348
  • 7- Michael TO, Ojo TF, Ijabadeniyi OA, Ibikunle MA, Oni JO, Agboola AA. Prevalence and foctors associated with contraceptive use among sexually active adolescent girls in 25-sub-Saharan African countries. PloS One,2024;19(2):e0297411 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0297411
  • 8- Cayan A, Karaçam Z. Factors concerning the attitudes of married women toward family planning in Aydıni Turkey:A cross-sectiınal study. Ian J Nurs Midwifery Res.2013;18(4):323-8
  • 9- Genazzani AR, Fidecicchi T, Arduini D,Giannini A, Simoncini T. Hormonal and natural contraceptive:a review on efficacy and risks of different methods for an informed choice. Gynecol Endocrinol.2023;39(1):2247093 doi:10.1080/09513590.2023.2247093
  • 10- Fox E, Reyna A, Malcolm NM, et al. Client Preferences for Contraceptive Counseling: A Systematic Review. Am J Prev Med.2018;55(5):691-702 doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2018.06.006
  • 11- Götmark F, Andersson M. Human fertility relation to education, economy, religion, contraception, adn family planning programs. BMC Public Health.2020;20(1):265 doi:10.1186/s12889-020-8331-7
  • 12- Burgin J, Bailey JV.Factors affecting contraceptive choice in women over 40:a qualitative study. BMJ Open 2022;12(11):e064987 doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064987
  • 13- Balakrishnan P, Kroiss C, Keskes T, Friedrich B. Perception and use of reversibl methods in Germany:A social listening analysis. Womens Health (Lond).2023;19:17455057221147390. Doi:10.1177/17455057221147390
  • 14- de Irala J, Osorio A, Carlos S, Lopez-del Burgo. Choice of birth control methods among European women and the role of partners and providers. Contraseption.20111;84(6):558-64. Doi:10.1016/j. Contraception.2011.04.004
  • 15- Al-Husban N, Kaadan D, Foudeh J, Ghazi T, Sijari Y, Maaita M. Factorsaffecting the use of long term and permanent contraceptive methods:a Facebook-focused cross-sectional study. Womens Health.2022;22(1):204 doi:10.1186/s12905-022-01784-0
  • 16- Dehlendorf C, Levy K, Kelley A, Grumbach K, Steinauer J. Women’s preferences for contraceptive counseling and decision making. Contraception.2013;88(2):250-6 doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2012.10.012
  • 17- Schivone GB, Glish LL. Current Opin Obstet Gynecol.2017;29(6):443-448. Doi:10.1097/GCO.0000000000000408
  • 18- Almalik M, Mosleh S, Almasarweh I. Are users of modern and traditional contraceptive methods in Jordan different? East Mediterr Health J. 2018;24(4):377-384. Doi:10.26719/2018.24.4.377
  • 19- Alsaleem MA, Khalil SN, Siddiqui AF, Alzahrani MM, Alsaleem SA. Contraceptive use as limiters and spacers among women of reproductive age in southwestern, Saudi Arabia. Saudi Med J.2018;39(11):1109-1115. Doi:10.15537/smj.208.11.22817
  • 20- Memon ZA, Tahmeena, Fazal SA, et al. Effective strategies for increasing the uptake of modern methods of family planning in South Asia:a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMG Womens Health.2024;24(1):13 Doi:10.1186/s12905-023-02959-2
  • 21- Admussu M, Tegegne AS. Factors Affecting Contreceptive Use in Ethiopian:A Generelized Linear Mixed Effect Model. Ethiop J Health Sci.2021;31(3):457-466 Doi:10.4312/ejhs.v31i3.2
Toplam 21 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Kadın Hastalıkları ve Doğum
Bölüm Araştırma Makalesi
Yazarlar

Emel Çağlayan 0000-0002-4290-6412

Serap Simavlı 0000-0001-6994-0269

Erken Görünüm Tarihi 26 Mart 2025
Yayımlanma Tarihi 26 Mart 2025
Gönderilme Tarihi 19 Eylül 2024
Kabul Tarihi 25 Kasım 2024
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2025 Cilt: 12 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA Çağlayan, E., & Simavlı, S. (2025). The Frequency of Use of Contraceptive Methods and Influencing Factors in Tekirdağ Province in Northwestern Turkey: A Cross-Sectional Study. Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, 12(1), 80-87. https://doi.org/10.34087/cbusbed.1552960
AMA Çağlayan E, Simavlı S. The Frequency of Use of Contraceptive Methods and Influencing Factors in Tekirdağ Province in Northwestern Turkey: A Cross-Sectional Study. CBU-SBED. Mart 2025;12(1):80-87. doi:10.34087/cbusbed.1552960
Chicago Çağlayan, Emel, ve Serap Simavlı. “The Frequency of Use of Contraceptive Methods and Influencing Factors in Tekirdağ Province in Northwestern Turkey: A Cross-Sectional Study”. Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi 12, sy. 1 (Mart 2025): 80-87. https://doi.org/10.34087/cbusbed.1552960.
EndNote Çağlayan E, Simavlı S (01 Mart 2025) The Frequency of Use of Contraceptive Methods and Influencing Factors in Tekirdağ Province in Northwestern Turkey: A Cross-Sectional Study. Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi 12 1 80–87.
IEEE E. Çağlayan ve S. Simavlı, “The Frequency of Use of Contraceptive Methods and Influencing Factors in Tekirdağ Province in Northwestern Turkey: A Cross-Sectional Study”, CBU-SBED, c. 12, sy. 1, ss. 80–87, 2025, doi: 10.34087/cbusbed.1552960.
ISNAD Çağlayan, Emel - Simavlı, Serap. “The Frequency of Use of Contraceptive Methods and Influencing Factors in Tekirdağ Province in Northwestern Turkey: A Cross-Sectional Study”. Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi 12/1 (Mart 2025), 80-87. https://doi.org/10.34087/cbusbed.1552960.
JAMA Çağlayan E, Simavlı S. The Frequency of Use of Contraceptive Methods and Influencing Factors in Tekirdağ Province in Northwestern Turkey: A Cross-Sectional Study. CBU-SBED. 2025;12:80–87.
MLA Çağlayan, Emel ve Serap Simavlı. “The Frequency of Use of Contraceptive Methods and Influencing Factors in Tekirdağ Province in Northwestern Turkey: A Cross-Sectional Study”. Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, c. 12, sy. 1, 2025, ss. 80-87, doi:10.34087/cbusbed.1552960.
Vancouver Çağlayan E, Simavlı S. The Frequency of Use of Contraceptive Methods and Influencing Factors in Tekirdağ Province in Northwestern Turkey: A Cross-Sectional Study. CBU-SBED. 2025;12(1):80-7.