The Impact of Digital Citizenship Instruction through Flipped Classroom Model on Various Variables

Abstract

With the advent of portable technological devices such as mobile phones and tablets, online learning environments have become widespread at schools. This, in turn, has resulted in the emergence of a new learning environment: flipped classrooms. The flipped classroom could be defined as a modern learning environment where teaching content is presented to students through online sources outside the school. The present study examined the impact of digital citizenship instruction through the flipped classroom model on various variables such as learning performance, self-regulated learning, self-directed learning, and information literacy. The study employed a quasi-experimental research design in which pre-tests and post-tests were applied to both research and control groups. The participants were 59 teacher candidates who were freshman undergraduates at Bozok University. During a five-week implementation process, research group students performed certain activities related to digital citizenship while the control group learned digital citizenship via traditional methods. The results showed that the flipped classroom model had a significant effect on only learning performance. No difference were observed between research and control groups in terms of self-regulated learning, self-directed learning, and information literacy variables.

Keywords

• Digital citizenship,Flippped classroom,Learning performance,Self-regulated learning,Self-directed learning,Information literacy

Kaynakça

1. Adiguzel, A. (2011). Bilgi okuryazarligi olceginin gelistirilmesi. Dicle Universitesi Ziya Gokalp Egitim Fakultesi Dergisi, 17, 15-28.
2. Aidinopoulou, V. & Sampson, D. G. (2017). An action research study from implementing the flipped classroom in primary school history teaching and learning. Educational Technology & Society, 20(1), 237-247.
3. Alsancak-Sirakaya, D. & Ozdemir, S. (2018). The effect of a flipped classroom model on academic achievement, self-directed learning readiness, motivation and retention. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology, 6(1), 76-91.
4. Al‐Zahrani, A. M. (2015). From passive to active: The impact of the flipped classroom through social learning platforms on higher education students' creative thinking. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(6), 1133-1148.
5. Arslan, S., & Gelisli, Y. (2015). Algilanan oz-duzenleme olceginin gelistirilmesi: Gecerlik ve guvenirlik calismasi. Sakarya University Journal of Education, 5(3), 67-74.
6. Baepler, P., Walker, J. D., & Driessen, M. (2014). It’s not about seat time: Blending, flipping, and efficiency in active learning classrooms. Computers and Education, 78, 227-236.
7. Bhagat, K. K., Chang, C.-N., & Chang, C.-Y. (2016). The impact of the flipped classroom on mathematics concept learning in high school. Educational Technology & Society, 19(3), 134-142.
8. Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

9. Brooks, A. W. (2014). Information literacy and the flipped classroom. Communications in Information Literacy, 8(2), 225-235.
10. Burke, A. S. & Fedorek, B. (2017). Does “flipping” promote engagement? A comparison of a traditional, online, and flipped class. Active Learning in Higher Education, 18(1), 11-24.
11. Chao, C. Y., Chen, Y. T., & Chuang, K. Y. (2015). Exploring students' learning attitude and achievement in flipped learning supported computer aided design curriculum: A study in high school engineering education. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 23(4), 514-526.
12. Cascallar, E., Boekaerts, M., & Costigan, T. (2006). Assessment in the evaluation of self-regulation as a process. Educational Psychology Review, 18(3), 297-306.
13. Celik, K. A. & Arslan, S. (2016). Oz-yonetimli ogrenme olceginin Turkceye uyarlanmasi ve gecerlik calismasi. International Journal of New Trends in Arts, Sports &Science Education, 5(1), 19-25.
14. Davies, R. S., Dean, D. L., & Ball, N. (2013). Flipping the classroom and instructional technology integration in a college-level information systems spreadsheet course. Educational Technology Research and Development, 61(4), 563-580.
15. Elmaadaway, M. A. N. (2018). The effects of a flipped classroom approach on class engagement and skill performance in a blackboard course. British Journal of Educational Technology, 49(3), 479-491.
16. Findlay-Thompson, S., & Mombourquette, P. (2014). Evaluation of a flipped classroom in an undergraduate business course. Business Education & Accreditation, 6(1), 63-71.
17. Foo, S. Y. & Hussain, R. M. R. (2010). Self-directed learning in a socio-constructivist learning environment. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 9, 1913-1917.
18. Graham, M., McLean, J., Read, A., Suchet-Pearson, S., & Viner, V. (2017). Flipping and still learning: Experiences of a flipped classroom approach for a third-year undergraduate human geography course. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 41(3), 403-417.
19. Karatas, K. (2016). Ogretmen adaylarinin oz yonetimli ogrenmeye hazirbulunusluk duzeylerinin ust-bilissel farkindalik duzeyleri acisindan yordanmasi. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 32(2), 451-465.
20. Kim, M. K., Kim, S. M., Khera, O., & Getman, J. (2014). The experience of three flipped classrooms in an urban university: An exploration of design principles. Internet and Higher Education, 22, 37-50.
21. Kim, S. H., Park, N. H., & Joo, K. H. (2014). Effects of flipped classroom based on smart learning on self-directed and collaborative learning. International Journal of Control and Automation, 7(12), 69-80.
22. Kong, S. C. (2014). Developing information literacy and critical thinking skills through domain knowledge learning in digital classrooms: An experience of practicing flipped classroom strategy. Computers & Education, 78, 160-173.
23. Lai, C.-L., & Hwang, G.-J. (2016). A self-regulated flipped classroom approach to improving students’ learning performance in a mathematics course. Computers & Education, 100, 126-140.
24. Long, T., Cummins, J., & Waugh, M. (2017). Use of the flipped classroom instructional model in higher education: instructors’ perspectives. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 29(2), 179-200.
25. O’Flaherty, J. & Phillips, C. (2015). The use of flipped classrooms in higher education: A scoping review. Internet and Higher Education, 25, 85-95.
26. Olakanmi, E. E. (2017). The effects of a flipped classroom model of instruction on students’ performance and attitudes towards chemistry. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 26(1), 127-137.
27. Overmyer, G. R. (2014). The flipped classroom model for college algebra: Effects on student achievement (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado.
28. Pintrich, P. R. (1995). Understanding self‐regulated learning. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 1995(63), 3-12.
29. Porcaro, P. A., Jackson, D. E., McLaughlin, P. M., & O’Malley, C. J. (2016). Curriculum Design of a Flipped Classroom to Enhance Hematology Learning. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(3), 345-357.
30. Ranaweera, P. (2008). Importance of Information Literacy skills for an Information Literate society. NACLIS 2008, Colombo, 1-13.
31. Sun, J. C. Y., Wu, Y. T., & Lee, W. I. (2017). The effect of the flipped classroom approach to OpenCourseWare instruction on students’ self-regulation. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(3), 713-729.
32. Thai, N. T. T., De Wever, B., & Valcke, M. (2017). The impact of a flipped classroom design on learning performance in higher education: Looking for the best “blend” of lectures and guiding questions with feedback. Computers and Education, 107, 113-126.
33. TUIK (2017). Girisimlerde bilisim teknolojileri kullanim arastirmasi. Retrieved on 18 March 2018 from http://www.tuik.gov.tr/PreTablo.do?alt_id=1048
34. Turan, Z. & Goktas, Y. (2016). The flipped classroom: instructional efficiency and impact on achievement and cognitive load levels. Journal of E-Learning and Knowledge Society, 12(4), 51-62.
35. Wang, F. H. (2017). An exploration of online behavior engagement and achievement in flipped classroom supported by learning management system. Computers and Education, 114, 79-91.
36. Wang, Y. H. (2016). Could a mobile-assisted learning system support flipped classrooms for classical Chinese learning? Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 32(5), 391–415.
37. Yilmaz, R. (2017). Exploring the role of e-learning readiness on student satisfaction and motivation in flipped classroom. Computers in Human Behavior, 70, 251-260.
38. Yilmaz, R. & Baydas, O. (2017). An examination of undergraduates’ metacognitive strategies in pre-class asynchronous activity in a flipped classroom. Educational Technology Research and Development, 65(6), 1547-1567.
39. Zhai, X., Gu, J., Liu, H., Liang, J., & Tsai, C. (2017). An experiential learning perspective on students’ satisfaction model in a flipped classroom. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 20(1), 198-210.
40. Zhonggen, Y. & Guifang, W. (2016). Academic achievements and satisfaction of the clicker-aided flipped business English writing class. Educational Technology & Society, 19(2), 298-312.
41. Zimmerman, B. J. (1989). A social cognitive view of self-regulated academic learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(3), 329-339.
42. Zumbrunn, S., Tadlock, J., & Roberts, E. D. (2011). Encouraging self-regulated learning in the classroom : A review of the literature. Metropolitan Educational Research Consortium (MERC), 1-28.