Technology-enhanced Self-directed Language Learning Behaviors of EFL Student Teachers

Abstract

English as a Foreign Language (EFL) education not only requires students to receive in-class instruction but also necessitates them to engage in extra practices outside the classroom by using technological or non-technological resources. Hence, this study aimed to investigate the self-directed language learning behaviors of the EFL student teachers and their use of technology in the process by employing a mixed-methods study within an explanatory sequential research design. The quantitative data were collected from 110 EFL student teachers by using two distinct research instruments, whereas the qualitative data were collected through an open-ended questionnaire form, responded by 47 of these students. The results of the study indicated that technology utilization is a significant predictor of self-directed language learning. However, the findings show that the off-campus self-directed language learning abilities of the students, with or without the use of technology, do not significantly differ according to gender, age, and grade levels. The differences were only found in terms of unaided off-campus learning abilities of the students and their technology utilization frequency in language learning. The qualitative findings also show that students engage in a variety of self-directed language learning activities outside the classroom mostly by using technology.  

Keywords

• Technology enhanced learning,Self directed learning,EFL student teachers,Language learning

Kaynakça

1. Bryman, A. (2012). Social research methods (4th ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
2. Buitrago, A. G. (2017) Collaborative and self-directed learning strategies to promote fluent EFL speakers. English Language Teaching, 10, 139-157. doi:10.5539/elt.v10n5p139.
3. Bullock, S. M. (2013). Using digital technologies to support Self-Directed Learning of preservice teacher education. The Curriculum Journal, 24, 103-120. doi.org/10.1080/09585176. 2012.744695
4. Cetin, Y., Sozcu, O. F., & Kiniy, H. (2012). Incidental foreign language vocabulary acquisition from social network games. International Journal of Human Sciences, 9(2), 535-552.
5. Christensen, L. B., Johnson, R. B., & Turner, L. A. (2015). Research methods, design, and analysis (12th ed.). Courier/Westford: Pearson Education Limited.
6. Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (3rd Ed). New York: Sage.
7. Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th Ed). New York: Pearson Education.
8. Cuhadar, C. & Yucel, M. (2010). Perceptions of Foreign language education pre-service teachers on educational use of information and communication technologies. Pamukkale University Journal of Education, 27, 199-210.

9. Du Toit-Brits, C. & Van Zyl, C. M. (2017). Self-directed learning characteristics: Making learning personal, empowering and successful. Africa Education Review, 14, 122-141. doi:10.1080/18146627.2016.1267576
10. Du, F. (2013). Students’ perspectives of self-directed language learning: Implications for teaching and research. International Journal for Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 7(2). doi:10.20429/ijsotl.2013.070224
11. Eksi, G. & Aydin, H. (2013). What are the students doing out there? An investigation of out-of-class language learning activities. AIBU Journal of Social Sciences, 13(2), 191-210.
12. Fraenkel, J. R. & Wallen, N. E. (2009). How to design and evaluate research in education (7th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
13. Garrison, D. R. (1997). Self-directed learning: Toward a comprehensive model. Adult Education Quarterly, 48, 18-33. doi: 10.1177/074171369704800103
14. Gay, L. R., Mills, G. E., & Airasian, P. (2012). Educational research: Competencies for analysis and application (10th ed.). USA: Pearson Education.
15. Gibbons, M. (2002). The self-directed learning handbook: Challenging adolescent students to excel. Hoboken, NJ: Jossey-Bass/John Wiley & Sons.
16. Golonka, E. M., Bowles, A. R., Frank, V. M., Richardson, D. L., & Freynik, S. (2014). Technologies for foreign language learning: A review of technology types and their effectiveness. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 27, 70-105. doi:10.1080/09588221.2012.700315
17. Grover, K. S., Miller, M. T., Swearingen, B., & Wood, N. (2014). An examination of the self-directed learning practices of ESL adult language learners. Journal of Adult Education, 43(2), 12-19.
18. Inozu, J., Sahinkarakas, S., & Yumru, H. (2010). The nature of language learning experiences beyond the classroom and its learning outcomes. US-China Foreign Language, 8(1), 14-19.
19. Jennett, P. A. (1992). Self-directed learning: A pragmatic view. The Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, 12, 99-104.
20. Khiat, H. (2015). Measuring self-directed learning: A diagnostic tool for adult learners. Journal of University & Learning Practice, 12(2). Retrieved on 19 September 2018 from http://ro.uow.edu.au/jutlp/vol12/iss2/2
21. Knowles, M. S. (1975). Self-directed learning: a guide for learners and teachers. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Cambridge Adult Education.
22. Lai, C. (2013). A framework for developing self-directed technology use for language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 17, 100-122.
23. Lai, C. (2015). Modeling teachers’ influence on learners’ self-directed use of technology for language learning outside of the classroom. Computer & Education, 82, 74-83.
24. Lai, C., Li, X., & Wang, Q. (2017). Students’ perceptions of teacher impact on their self-directed language learning with technology beyond the classroom: cases of Hong Kong and U.S. Education Technology Research & Development, 65, 1105-1133. doi: 10.1007/s11423-017-9523-4
25. Lau, K. (2017). To be or not to be: Understanding university academic English teachers’ perceptions of assessing self-directed learning. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 55(2), 201-211. doi: 10.1080/14703297.2017.1292942
26. Leach, L. (2000). Self-directed learning: Theory and practice (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Technology, Sydney.
27. Lee, D., Yeung, A. S., & Ip, T. (2017). University English language learners' readiness to use computer technology for self-directed learning. System, 67, 99-110. doi: 10.1016/j. system.2017.05.001.
28. McGarrell, H. M. (1996). Self-directed learning contracts to individualize language learning in the classroom. Foreign Language Annuals, 29(3), 495-508.
29. Orhon, Y. (2018). An investigation of out-of-class language activities of tertiary level EFL learners. Education Reform Journal, 3(1), 1-14.
30. Rashid, T. & Asghar, H. M. (2016). Technology use, self-directed learning, student engagement and academic performance: Examining the interrelations. Computer in Human Behavior, 63, 604-612. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.084
31. Richards, J. C. (2015). The changing face of language learning: Learning beyond the classroom. RELC Journal, 46(1). doi: 10.1177/0033688214561621
32. Selwyn, N. (2006). ICT in adult education: Defining the territory. In D. A., Wagner & R. Sweet (Eds.), ICT and learning: Supporting out-of-school youth and adults (pp. 13-42). Paris: OECD. doi:10.1787/9789264012288-en
33. Suh, H. N., Wang, K. T., & Arterberry, B. J. (2015). Development and initial validation of the self-directed learning inventory with Korean college students. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 33, 687-697. doi:10.1177/0734282914557728
34. Thornton, K. (2010). Supporting self-directed learning: A framework for teachers. Language Education in Asia, 1, 158-170. doi:10.5746/LEiA/10/V1/A14/Thornton
35. Vu, H. Y. & Shah, M. (2016) Vietnamese students’ self-direction in learning English listening skills. Asian Englishes, 18, 53-66. doi:10.1080/13488678.2015.1136104
36. Xodabande, I. (2018). Iranian EFL learners’ preferences of different digital technologies for language learning beyond the classroom. International Journal of Education & Literacy Studies, 6, 20-31. doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijels.v.6n.3p.20
37. Yang, Y. F. (2016). Self-directed learning to develop autonomy in an online ESP community. Interactive Learning Environments, 24, 1629-1646. doi: 10.1080/10494820.2015. 1041402.