Vocabulary Learning on Learner-Created Content by Using Web 2.0 Tools

Yıl 2015, Cilt: 6 Sayı: 4, 281 - 300, 01.12.2015

Omer Eren

Öz

The present research examined the use of Web 2.0 tools to improve students’ vocabulary knowledge at the School of Foreign Languages, Gaziantep University. Current studies in literature mostly deal with descriptions of students’ attitudes towards the reasons for the use of web-based platforms. However, integrating usual classroom environment with Web 2.0 tools for specific sub-skills has not been examined much. It is aimed to contribute by investigating the feasibility of those tools as a supplement for vocabulary learning. This is an experimental research supported with semi-structured interviews and field notes. A pre-test and a post-test were administered to an experimental and a control group, and results were analyzed with the independent samples t-test. Following the post-test, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 18 students in the experimental group. The analyses of the test results demonstrated that both groups had gains but the mean of the experimental group was higher, and this difference was statistically significant. Findings suggest that almost all students have positive attitudes towards the educational use of Web 2.0 tools.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Web 2.0, Social networking, Learner created content, Vocabulary learning, Computer-assisted language learning

Kaynakça

• Akcay, A. & Arslan A. (2010). The using blogs in Turkish Education. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 1195-1199.
• Altay, M. & Tilfarlioglu, F. Y. (2012). Building up a learner corpus through creative nonfiction prose: an experimental research. Electronic Journal of Social Sciences, 11(39), 22-35.
• Baird E & Fisher M. (2005). Neomillennial user experience design strategies: Utilizing social networking media to support “always on” learning styles. Educational Technology Systems, 34(1) 5-32.
• Chan, C. & Cmor, D. (2009). Blogging toward information literacy: Engaging students and facilitating peer learning. Reference Services Review, 37(4), 395-407.
• Cormode, G. & Krishnamurthy, B. (2008). Key differences between Web 1.0 and Web 2.0. First Monday, 13(6). Retrieved on 1 July 2015 from http://firstmonday.org/article/view/ 2125/1972
• Crook, C. & Harrison, C. (2008, September). Web 2.0 technologies and learning at key stages 3 and 4: Summary report. Retrieved on 1 July 2015 from http://dera.ioe.ac.uk/1480/1/ becta_2008_web2_summary.pdf
• Cullen, R., Kullman, J., & Wild, C. (2013). Online collaborative learning on an ESL teacher education programme. ELT Journal, 67(4), 425-434.
• Eren, Ö. (2012). Students’ attitudes towards using social networking in foreign language classes: A Facebook example. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 3(20), 288-294.
• George, D. R. & Dellasega, C. (2011). Use of social media in graduate-level medical humanities education: Two pilot studies from Penn State College of Medicine. Medical Teacher, 33(8), 429-434.
• Greenhow, C., Robelia, B., & Hughes, J. (2009). Learning, teaching, and scholarship in a digital age: Web 2.0 and classroom research: What path should we take now? Educational Researcher, 38, 246–259.
• Horst, M., Cobb, T., & Nicolae, I. (2005). Expanding academic vocabulary with an interactive online database. Language Learning & Technology, 9(12), 90-110.
• Lee, L. & Markey, A. (2014). A study of learners’ perceptions of online intercultural exchange through Web 2.0 technologies. ReCALL, 26(03), 281-297.
• Lin, C. C., Hsiao, H. S., Tseng, S. P., & Chan, H. J. (2014). Learning English vocabulary collaboratively in a technology-supported classroom. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 13(1), 162-173.
• Mason, R. (2006 ). Learning technologies for adult continuing education. Studies in Continuing Education , 28(2) 121-133.
• McKeown, M. G. (1985). The acquisition of word meaning from context by children of high and low ability. Reading Research Quarterly, 20(4), 482-496.
• Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., Bakia, M., & Jones, K. (2009). Evaluation of Evidence-Based Practices in Online Learning: A Meta-Analysis and Review of Online Learning Studies. US Department of Education. Retrieved on 1 July 2015 from https://www2.ed.gov/rschstat/ eval/tech/evidence-based-practices/finalreport.pdf
• Monica-Ariana, S. & Anamaria-Mirabela, P. (2014). The impact of social media on vocabulary learning case study Facebook. Annals of the University of Oradea, Economic Science Series, 23(2), 120-130.
• Nation, I. S. P. (1990). Teaching and learning vocabulary. Rowley, MA: Newbury.
• O'Reilly, T. (2005). What is Web 2.0: Design patterns and business models for the next generation of software. Retrieved on 1 July 2015 from http://oreilly.com/web2/archive/ what-is-web-20.html
• Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the horizon, 9(5). 1-6.
• Piriyasilpa, Y. (2011). See you in Facebook: The effects of incorporating online social networking in the language classroom. Journal of Global Management Research. 67-80. Retrieved on 1 July 2015 from http://gmrjournal.uqam.ca/documents/GMRJ-V7N1- JUN2011-67-80.pdf
• Richards, J. C. (1976). The role of vocabulary teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 10(1), 77-89.
• Richards, J. C. & Rodgers, T. S., (2001). Approaches and methods in language teaching. New York: Cambridge University Press.
• Stubbs, M. (2008). Language corpora. In A Davies & C. Elder (Eds.), Handbook of applied linguistics (pp. 106-108). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
• Tanaka, H., Yonesaka, S. M., Ueno, Y., & Ohnishi, A. (2015). An e-portfolio to enhance sustainable vocabulary learning in English. European Association for Computer Assisted Language Learning, 23(1), 41-58.
• Thornbury, S. (2002). How to teach vocabulary. Boston, MA: Pearson Education.
• Wong, L. H. & Looi, C. K. (2010). Vocabulary learning by mobile assisted authentic content creation and social meaning making. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26, 421- 433.
• Ziegler, S. (2007). The (mis)education of Generation M. Learning, Media and Technology , 32(1), 69-81.
• Correspondence: Omer Eren, Lecturer, School of Foreign Languages, Gaziantep University, Gaziantep, Turkey