Yeni İş Ekosistemi İçin Bir Gereklilik Olarak Dijital Liderlik: Kavramsal bir İnceleme

Öz

Örgütler maliyetleri azaltmak, fiziksel olarak bir yere bağlı olmaktan kurtulmak, nitelikli işgücünden yararlanabilmek ve beklentilere hızlı cevap verebilmek için işlerini sanal ortama taşıma gereği duymaktadırlar. Sanal örgütlerde yenilikçi düşünceler, somut ürüne dönüştürülebilir bilgiler ve dijital beceriler üretimin temel faktörleri olarak görülmektedir. Bütün bu yetkinliklerin yönetimi, geleneksel örgütsel yapılar ve yönetim anlayışından farklı yeni bir liderlik anlayışını gerektirmektedir. Dijital liderlik denilen bu yeni liderlik biçimi dijital çağın koşullarına uyum sağlamak bakımından büyük önem taşımaktadır. Dijital çağın becerilerini dijitalleşen dünyayla entegre etmek, dijital liderliği zorunlu kılmaktadır. Bu nedenle sanal örgütsel yapılarda dijital liderliğin her geçen gün daha önemli bir konuma geldiği düşünülmektedir. Dijital liderler hayal gücü geniş, entelektüel yönü gelişmiş, dijital yetkinlikleri yüksek liderler olarak öne çıkmaktadır. Bu bölümün temel amacı uzaktan çalışmanın yaygınlaşması ile birlikte örgütlerde sanallaşmanın bir gereği olan dijital liderliğin dönüştürücü yönü üzerinde durmaktır. Ayrıca dijital liderlik kavramına ilişkin literatüre katkı sağlamak amaçlanmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Sanal Örgüt
• Dijital Liderlik
• Sanal Takımlar
• Tele-çalışma
• Uzaktan çalışma
• sanal çalışma
• dijital liderlik yetkinlikleri
• örgütlerde dijitalleşme

Digital Leadership As A Requirement For The New Business Ecosystem: A Conceptual Review

Öz

Organizations need to move their businesses to the virtual environment to reduce costs, eliminate being physically tied to a place, benefit from a qualified workforce and respond quickly to expectations. Innovative thoughts, information that can be turned into tangible products and digital skills are seen as the main factors of production in virtual organizations. Managing all these competencies requires a new understanding of leadership different from traditional organizational structures and management understanding. This new form of leadership, called digital leadership, is of great importance in adapting to the conditions of the digital age. Integrating the skills of the digital age with the digitalizing world necessitates digital leadership. For this reason, it is thought that digital leadership is becoming more and more important in virtual organizational structures. Digital leaders stand out as leaders with broad imaginations, advanced intellectual aspects, and high digital competencies. The main purpose of this section is to focus on the transformative aspect of digital leadership, which is a requirement of virtualization in organizations with the spread of remote working. In addition, it is aimed to contribute to the literature on the concept of digital leadership.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Virtual organization
• Digital leadership
• Virtual teams
• Telework
• Remote work
• Virtual work
• Digital leadership competencies
• Digitalization in organizations

Kaynakça

1. Abbatiello, A., Knight, M., Philpot, S., & Roy, I. (2017). Rewriting the rules for the digital age: 2017 Deloitte Global Human Capital Trends. Birleşik Krallık: Deloitte University Press.
2. Abarca, V. M. G., Palos-Sanchez, P. R., & Rus-Arias, E. (2020). Working in virtual teams: a systematic literature review and a bibliometric analysis. IEEE Access, 8, 168923-168940.
3. Abarca, V. M. G., Palos-Sanchez, P., & Aguayo-Camacho, M. (2021). Virtual teams in times of pandemic: Factors that influence performance. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 624637.
4. Andini, R. D. (2021). Strategı Pemımpın Dalam Dıgıtal Leadershıp Dı Era Dısrupsı Dıgıtal. Al-Irsyad, 11(1), 58-72.
5. Arrais-Castro, A., Varela, MLR, Putnik, GD, Ribeiro, RA, Machado, J., & Ferreira, L. (2018). Collaborative framework for virtual organization synthesis based on a dynamic multi-criteria decision model. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 31 (9), 857-868.
6. Artüz, S. D. (2020). Dijital Liderlik Uygulaması ile Öğrenen Örgüt İlişkisinin Bireysel Performansa Etkisi. Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, İstanbul Ticaret Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü.
7. Asri, A. A. S. M. A. N., & Darma, G. S. (2020). Revealing the digital leadership spurs in 4.0 industrial revolution. International Journal of Business, Economics & Management, 3(1), 93-100.
8. Atasever, M. (2017). Sanal Örgütlerde, Örgüt Kültürünü Etkileyen Unsurların, Geleneksel Örgüt Yapısından Farklılıkları ve Sanal Örgütlerde Bir Uygulama. Doğu Anadolu Sosyal Bilimlerde Eğilimler Dergisi, 1(1), 43-62.

9. Austin-Egole, I. S., Iheriohanma, E. B. J., & Nwokorie, C. (2020). Flexible working arrangements and organizational performance: An overview. IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science (IOSR-JHSS), 25(5), 50-59.
10. Aydınöz, G. (2014). İş Hukukunda Tele (Uzaktan) Çalışma. Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Ankara Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü. Aytar, O. (2019). Dijital Çağ Örgütlerinde Güncel Yönetim Konuları. Hiperyayın, İstanbul.
11. Bach, C., & Sulíková, R. (2021). Leadership in the Context of a NewWorld: Digital Leadership and Industry 4.0. Managing global transitions, 19(3), 209-226.
12. Beauregard, T. Basile, K.A. and Canónico, E. (2019) Telework: outcomes and facilitators for employees. In: Landers, R.N. (ed.) The Cambridge Handbook of Technology and Employee Behavior. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 511-543.
13. Ben Youssef, A., Dahmani, M., & Ragni, L. (2022). ICT use, digital skills and students' academic performance: exploring the digital divide. Information, 13(3), 129.
14. Bresciani, S., Ferraris, A., Romano, M., & Santoro, G. (2021). Digital Leadership. In Digital Transformation Management for Agile Organizations: A Compass to Sail the Digital World. Emerald Publishing Limited.
15. Brett, J. (2019). Evolving digital leadership: how to be a digital leader in tomorrow's disruptive world, New South Wales: Apress. Brown, M. (2022). Hello Hybrid: The Future of Hybrid Working. Retrieved Jun 19, 2022, from https://gdsgroup.com/insights/hr/hello-hybrid-the-future-of-hybrid-working/
16. Burns, A. (2022). Digital Transformation In The Workplace. Retrieved Jun 17, 2022, from https://gdsgroup.com/insights/hr/digital-transformation-in-the-workplace/
17. Cahyadi, A., & Magda, R. (2021). Digital leadership in the economies of the G20 countries: A secondary research. Economies, 9(1), 32.
18. Carretero, S., Vuorikari, R., & Punie, Y. (2017). The digital competence framework for citizens with eight proficiency levels and examples of use. EUR 28558 EN, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg.
19. Charalampous, M., Grant, C., Tramontano, C. and Michailidis, E. (2019), 'Systematically reviewing remote worker's well-being at work: A multidimensional approach, European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 28(1), 51-73.
20. Contreras, F., Baykal, E., & Abid, G. (2020). E-leadership and teleworking in times of COVID-19 and beyond: What we know and where do we go? Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 590271.
21. Cortellazzo, L., Bruni, E., & Zampieri, R. (2019). The role of leadership in a digitalized world: A review. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1938.
22. Çakmak, Z. (2016). Sanal Organizasyonların Yönetim Fonksiyonları Açısından Geleneksel Organizasyonlardan Farklılıkları. Florya Chronicles of Political Economy, 2(2), 35-58.
23. Çelebi, F. (2021). Dijital Çağda Liderlik ve Girişimcilik. Iksad Publications, Ankara.
24. Çelen, A. İ. (2020). Dijital dönüşüm sürecinde yükselen bir değer: Dijital liderlik. Proceedıngs e-book, 449-461. Retrieved Jun 17, 2022, from https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Hamayoun-Ghafourzay/publication/348295453_The_Impact_of_Brand_Value_Constituent_Factors_on_Brand_Value_A_Case_Study_of_Ocarina_Brand_in_Kabul_City/links/5ff6911392851c13fef33c39/The-Impact-of-Brand-Value-Constituent-Factors-on-Brand-Value-A-Case-Study-of-Ocarina-Brand-in-Kabul-City.pdf#page=449
25. Danışmaz, A. T. (2019). Sanal Örgütlerde Örgüt Kültürü. Ekonomi, Yönetim ve Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 4(1), 32-40.
26. Davidavičienė, V., Al Majzoub, K., & Meidute-Kavaliauskiene, I. (2020). Factors affecting knowledge sharing in virtual teams. Sustainability, 12(17), 6917.
27. De Araujo, L. M., Priadana, S., Paramarta, V., & Sunarsi, D. (2021). Digital leadership in business organizations. International Journal of Educational Administration, Management, and Leadership, 45-56.
28. De Waal, B., Van Outvorst, F., & Ravesteyn, P. (2016). Digital leadership: The objective-subjective dichotomy of technology revisited. In 12 th European Conference on Management, Leadership and Governance ECMLG 2016 (p. 52).
29. Deloitte, (2017). Rewriting the rules for the digital age. Deloitte University Press. Retrieved Jun 17, 2022, from https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/global/Documents/HumanCapital/hc-2017-global-human-capital-trends-gx.pdf El Sawy, O.A., Kræmmergaard, P., Amsinck, H. Ve Vinther, A.L. (2016). How Lego Built The Foundations And Enterprise Capabilities For Digital Leadership. Mis Quarterly Executive, 15(2), 141-166.
30. El Yousfi, F., & Anand, A. (2021). Investigating the Factors Affecting Virtual Team Performance in Public Organizations. Management International/International Management/Gestiòn Internacional, 25(6), 264-283.
31. Erhan, T., Uzunbacak, H. H., & Aydin, E. (2022). From conventional to digital leadership: exploring digitalization of leadership and innovative work behavior. Management Research Review. https://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-05-2021-0338
32. Eurofound (2020), Telework and ICT-based mobile work: Flexible working in the digital age, New forms of employment series, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg. Retrieved Jun 20, 2022, from https://www.eurofound.europa.eu/sites/default/files/ef_publication/field_ef_document/ef19032en.pdf
33. Fidanboy, C. Ö. (2021). Sanal Takım Yönetimi İçin Öz Liderlik Stratejilerini Anlamak: Birey ve Takım Düzeyinde Bir İnceleme. (Edt. Karabulut, Ş.) İçinde, Yönetim-Strateji-Organizasyon: Teoride ve Uygulamada Cilt 2, Gazi Kitapevi, Ankara.
34. Filardi, F., Castro, R. M. P., & Zanini, M. T. F. (2020). The advantages and disadvantages of teleworking in Brazilian public administration are analysis of SERPRO and Federal Revenue experiences. Cadernos EBAPE. B.R., 18, 28-46. Retrieved Jun 19, 2022, from https://www.scielo.br/j/cebape/a/pJSWmhnCPvz6fGwdkcFyvLc/?lang=en
35. Ganguly, A., Joseph, J. M., Dutta, S., & Dey, K. (2022). Exploring the Employer-Employee Relationship: A Management Versus Employee Perspective of the Vicissitudes in the Virtual Workplace. Global Business Review, 09721509221086353.
36. Gardner, R., Kil, A., & van Dam, N. (2019). Research opportunities for determining the elements of early trust in virtual teams. Management Research Review, 43(3), 350-366.
37. GDS Group, (2020). What is Digital Leadership? Definition, Examples, Skills, Qualities. Retrieved Jun 11, 2022, from https://gdsgroup.com/insights/marketing/blueprint-for-digital-leadership/
38. Geister, S., Konradt, U., & Hertel, G. (2019). A group development system for improving motivation, performance and team climate in virtual teams. In Human-Centered Computing (pp. 719-723). CRC Press.
39. Gómez-Orjuela, Y. R. (2021). Digital Skills for Communication and Content Creation: Can B-learning Greatly Influence Them? HOW Journal, 28(1), 45-68.
40. Gönüllü, C. (2021). Türkiye’de “Tele Çalışma” Üzerine Sosyolojik Bir Değerlendirme: Gölge Çalışanlar. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Edebiyat Fakültesi Dergisi, 38(1), 41-57.
41. Güz, M., Tüfekçi, M. (2020). Yeni Çalışma Sistemi Tele Çalışma ve Evden Çalışma Modelinin İncelenmesi. Retrieved Jun 12, 2022, from https://mucahittufekci.av.tr/yeni-calisma-sistemi-tele-calisma-ve-evden-calisma-modelinin-incelenmesi/
42. Halid, I., & Hatu, R. A. (2022). Improvıng The Qualıty Of Publıc Servıces In The Socıety 5.0 Era Through Dıgıtal Lıterature Capabılıtıes Of LLDIKTI Apparatus For Regıon XVI. Public Policy Journal, 3(1), 33-42.
43. Hara, Y., Nakazono, H., & Imagawa, T. (2022). Are We Pretenders of Digitalization? Towards a New Management Using Telework and Digital Transformation? In Platforms and Artificial Intelligence (pp. 211-223). Springer, Cham.
44. Hensellek, S. (2020). Digital leadership: A framework for successful leadership in the digital age. Journal of Media Management and Entrepreneurship (JMME), 2(1), 55-69.
45. ILO, (2020). Teleworking during the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond; A practical guide. Retrieved Jun 13, 2022, from https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---ed_protect/---protrav/---travail/documents/instructionalmaterial/wcms_751232.pdf
46. Kanbur, A. (2008). Küreselleşme Sürecinde Post Modern Örgüt Yapıları. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 13(3), 387-404.
47. Kane, G.C., Phillips, A.N., Copulsky, J. & Garth, A. (2019). How Digital Leadership Is(n't) Different, MIT Sloan Management Review, 60(3), 34-39.
48. Kevük, S. (2006). Bilgi Ekonomisi. Journal of Yasar University, 1(4), 319-350.
49. Kılıç, G. (2020). Uzaktan Çalışmanın Bir Türü Olarak Tele Çalışma ve Evden Çalışmadan Farkı. Terazi Hukuk Dergisi, 15(164), 805-819.
50. Kırel, A. Ç. (2020). Sanal Örgütlerde Davranış. (Edt. Taşçı, D. & Yalçınkaya). İçinde Sanal Örgütler Alanlar, Araştırmalar, Vakalar. Maltepe Üniversitesi Kitapları, İstanbul.
51. Kim, T., Mullins, L. B., & Yoon, T. (2021). Supervision of telework: a key to organizational performance. The American Review of Public Administration, 51(4), 263-277.
52. Kohntopp, T., & McCann, J. (2020). Leadership in virtual organizations: Influence on workplace engagement. The Palgrave Handbook of Workplace Well-Being, 1-26.
53. Kuusisto, M. (2017). Organizational effects of digitalization: A literature review. International journal of organization theory and behavior.
54. López-Igual, P., & Rodríguez-Modroño, P. (2020). Who is teleworking and where from? Exploring the main determinants of telework in Europe. Sustainability, 12(21), 8797.
55. Lunde, L. K., Fløvik, L., Christensen, J. O., Johannessen, H. A., Finne, L. B., Jørgensen, I. L., Mohr B. & Vleeshouwers, J. (2022). The relationship between telework from home and employee health: a systematic review. BMC public health, 22(1), 1-14.
56. Malakyan, P. G. (2019). Digital leader-followership for the digital age: A North American perspective. In M.Franco (Ed.), Digital leadership -A new leadership style for the 21st century. IntechOpen.
57. Mattar, J., Ramos, D. K., & Lucas, M. R. (2022). DigComp-Based Digital Competence Assessment Tools: Literature Review and Instrument Analysis. Education and Information Technologies, 1-25.
58. Meffert, J., & Swaminathan, A. (2018). Leadership and the urgency for digital transformation. Leader to leader, (88), 44-49.
59. Megha, A. K. (2022). An assessment of the vertical and horizontal impact of information and communication technology (ICT) on business. International Journal of Health Sciences, 6(S2), 13012–13017. Retrieved Jun 14, 2022, from https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6nS2.8423
60. Mert, G. (2021). Dijital Dünyada Yeni Bir Boyut: Dijital Liderlik. Satın alma Dergisi 97, 50-51.
61. Mihardjo, L.W.W. & Sasmoko, S. (2019), Digital Transformation: Digital Leadership Role in Developing Business Model Innovation Mediated by Co-Creation Strategy for Telecommunication Incumbent Firms, Strategy and Behaviors in the Digital Economy, InTechopen, 1-18.
62. Myltykbayeva, A. (2017). Kazak ve Türk İş Hukuku Çerçevesinde Tele Çalışmanın Düzenlenmesi. Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü.
63. Neubauer, R., Tarling, A., & Wade, M. (2017). Redefining leadership for a digital age. Global Center for Digital Business Transformation and metaBeratung GmbH. Retrieved Jun 18, 2022, from https://blog.hostalia.com/wp-content/themes/hostalia/images/metaberatung-redefining-leadership-digital-age-informe-blog-hostalia-hosti.pdf.
64. Nordbäck, E. S., & Espinosa, J. A. (2019). Effective coordination of shared leadership in global virtual teams. Journal of Management Information Systems, 36(1), 321-350.
65. Ordu, A., & Nayır, F. (2021). What is digital leadership? A suggestion of the definition, E-InternationalJournal of Educational Research, 12(3), 68-81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19160/e-ijer.946094
66. Öz, Ö. (2020). Dijital Liderlik: Dijital Dünyada Okul Lideri Olmak. Uluslararası Liderlik Çalışmaları Dergisi: Kuram ve Uygulama, 3(1), 45-57. Özmen, Ö. N., Eriş, E. D., & Özer, P. S. (2020). Dijital Liderlik Çalışmalarına Bir Bakış. Suleyman Demirel University Journal of Faculty Of Economics & Administrative Sciences, 25(1), 57-69.
67. Öztürk, B. (2017). Türk İş Kanunu'nda yeni bir esnek çalışma modeli: Tele çalışma. Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü.
68. Öztürk, U., C. (2015). Bağlantıda Kalmak Ya Da Kalmamak İşte Tüm Korku Bu: İnternetsiz Kalma Korkusu ve Örgütsel Yansımaları. Uluslararası Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 8 (37), 629-638.
69. Pizło, W., Parzonko, A., Mazurkiewicz-Pizło, A., Parzonko, A., Jędrzejczyk, I., & Bórawski, P. (2021). Virtual Organizations: A Case Study of the Polish Agricultural Sector. European Research Studies Journal, 24(3B), 361-371.
70. Poiger, M. (2022). Digital Leadership. Konzeption einer integrativen und multigenerativen Führungstaxonomie.
71. Popovici, V., & Popovici, A. L. (2020). Remote work revolution: Current opportunities and challenges for organizations. Ovidius Univ. Ann. Econ. Sci. Ser, 20, 468-472.
72. Pordelan, N., Hosseinian, S., Heydari, H., Khalijian, S., & Khorrami, M. (2022). Consequences of teleworking using the internet among married working women: Educational careers investigation. Education and Information Technologies, 27(3), 4277-4299.
73. Ravalet, E., & Rérat, P. (2019). Teleworking: decreasing mobility or increasing tolerance of commuting distances? Built Environment, 45(4), 582-602.
74. Raza, B. (2016). Leadershıp 4.0 Module: Management Competencies 1 (Mc1). Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Frankfurt Unıversity Of Applied Sciences, Almanya.
75. Savu, I. (2019). Amplifying performance in virtual teams by optimizing communication strategies. Res. & Sci. Today, 17, 112- 122.
76. Serafimova, D., Andreeva, A., & Banabakova, V. (2022). Digitalization of Business and Public Organizations- Communication Problems with I.T. Companies and Possible Solutions. In Education, Research and Business Technologies (pp. 347-359). Springer, Singapore.
77. Sheninger, E. (2014). Digital leadership: Changing paradigms for changing times. Thousand Oaks: CA: Corwin Press.
78. Simovic, D. (2022). The Ultimate List of Remote Work Statistics- 2022 Edition. Retrieved Jun 19, 2022, from https://www.smallbizgenius.net/by-the-numbers/remote-work-statistics/#gref
79. Smulders, P., Kraan, K., Pot, F., (2011). Telewerkers vormen een elite. Economisch Statistische Berichten, 96 (4616), 493-495.
80. Softchoice, (2017). Collaboration Unleashed: Research Study. Retrieved Jun 16, 2022, from https://m.softchoice.com/web/newsite/documents/research/SoftchoiceResearchStudy_CollaborationUnleashed.pdf
81. Stiles, J., & Smart, M. J. (2021). Working at home and elsewhere: daily work location, telework, and travel among United States knowledge workers. Transportation, 48(5), 2461-2491.
82. Subramanian, K., R. (2018). Technology and transformation in communication, Journal of Advance Research in Electrical & Electronics Engineering, 1(1), 38-50.
83. Taşçı, D. & Yalçınkaya, A. (2020). Sanal Örgütler Alanlar, Araştırmalar, Vakalar. Maltepe Üniversitesi Kitapları, İstanbul.
84. Van Slyke, C., Lee, J., Duong, B. Q., & Ellis, T. S. (2022). Eustress and Distress in the Context of Telework. Information Resources Management Journal (IRMJ), 35(1), 1-24.
85. Vasilev, V. L., Gapsalamov, A. R., Akhmetshin, E. M., Bochkareva, T. N., Yumashev, A. V., & Anisimova, T. I. (2020). Digitalization peculiarities of organizations: A case study. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 7(4), 3173.
86. Weber, E., Büttgen, M., & Bartsch, S. (2022). How to take employees on the digital transformation journey: An experimental study on complementary leadership behaviors in managing organizational change. Journal of Business Research, 143, 225-238.
87. Westerman, G., Bonnet, D. & Mcafee, A. (2014). The nine elements of digital transformation. MIT Sloan Management Review, 55(3), 1-6.
88. Yamamoto, T. (2022). Virtual Organization, Organizational Intelligence, and Imperfect Information Processing. In Systems Research II (pp. 107-122). Springer, Singapore.
89. Yopan, M., Kasali, R., Balqiah, T. E., & Pasaribu, M. (2022). The Role of Digital Leadership, Customer Orientation and Business Model Innovation for IoT Companies. International Journal of Business, 27(2).