Yapay Zekâ ve Uluslararası Ticaretin Bibliyometrik Analizi

Öz

Yapay zekâ teknolojileri, bilgisayarların karmaşık problemleri çözme yeteneklerini artıran ve insan benzeri karar alma süreçlerini taklit eden çeşitli yöntemi içerir. Bu çalışmada, uluslararası ticaret ve yapay zekâ ile ilgili bir bibliyometrik analiz yapılarak bu konudaki bilimsel üretkenliği ve etkinliği ölçmek, araştırma alanının gelişimini izlemek, bilimsel iletişim ağlarını tanımlamak ve literatürdeki boşlukları belirlemek amaçlanmaktadır. Araştırma sonucunda, araştırmacılara literatürdeki eğilimleri, önemli yayınları ve belirli alanlardaki uzmanları tanıma konusunda bilgi sağlamak hedeflenmektedir. Bu amaç doğrultusunda 1984-2024 yılları arasında Scopus veri tabanında yayımlanmış çalışmalar incelenerek elde edilen veriler VOSviewer ile haritalandırılmıştır. Başlık, özet veya anahtar kelimelerinde yapay zekâ ve uluslararası ticaret kavramları geçen toplam 486 çalışma araştırmaya dahil edilerek bibliyometrik analiz yapılmıştır. Sonuçlar uluslararası yazında 1984 yılından itibaren ilgili alanda yapılan çalışmaların giderek ivme kazandığını ortaya koymaktadır. Yayın türlerine bakıldığında; ilk sırada bildiriler, ikinci sırada araştırma makaleleri, üçüncü sırada ise kitap bölümlerinin yer aldığı görülmüştür.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Uluslararası ticaret
• Yapay zekâ
• Bibliyometrik analiz

Bibliometric Analysis of Artificial Intelligence and International Trade

Öz

Artificial intelligence technologies include a set of methods that enhance the ability of computers to solve complex problems and mimic human-like decision-making processes. This study aims to conduct a bibliometric analysis on international trade and artificial intelligence to measure scientific productivity and effectiveness in this field, track the evolution of the research area, identify scientific communication networks, and identify gaps in the literature. For this purpose, the studies published in the Scopus database between 1984 and 2024 were analyzed and the data obtained were mapped with VOSviewer. A total of 486 studies with the concepts of artificial intelligence and international trade in their titles, abstracts or keywords were included in the study and subjected to bibliometric analysis. The results reveal that the number of studies in the related field has been increasing with an increasing momentum since 1984 in the international literature.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• International trade
• Artificial intelligence
• Bibliometric analysis

Kaynakça

1. Acemoglu, D. ve Restrepo, P. (2018). Artificial intelligence, automation, and work. In the Economics of Artificial Intelligence: An Agenda. University of Chicago Press. 197-236. http://www.nber.org/papers/w24196
2. Achar, S. (2015). Requirement of cloud analytics and distributed cloud computing: An initial overview. International Journal of Reciprocal Symmetry and Physical Sciences, 2, 12–18. https://upright.pub/index.php/ijrstp/article/view/70
3. Adigwe, C. S., Olaniyi, O. O., Olabanji, S. O., Okunleye, O. J., Mayeke, N. R. ve Ajayi, S. A. (2024). Forecasting the future: The interplay of artificial intelligence, innovation, and competitiveness and its effect on the global economy. Asian Journal of Economics, Business and Accounting, 24(4), 126-146. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajeba/2024/v24i41269
4. Aghion, P., Jones, B. F. ve Jones, C. I. (2017). Artificial intelligence and economic growth, NBER Working Papers 23928, National Bureau of Economic Research Inc. http://www.nber.org/papers/w23928
5. Agrawal, A., Gans, J. ve Goldfarb, A. (2019). Economic policy for artificial intelligence. Innovation Policy and the Economy, 19, 139–159. https://doi.org/10.1086/699935
6. Andersson, M., Lööf, H. ve Johansson, S. (2008). Productivity and international trade: Firm level evidence from a small open economy. Review of World Economics, 144, 774-801. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10290-008-0169-5
7. Arruda, H., Silva, E. R., Lessa, M., Proença, D., Jr. ve Bartholo, R. (2022). VOSviewer and Bibliometrix. J Med Libr Assoc, 110(3):392-395. https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2022.1434
8. Aylak, B. L., Oral, O. ve Yazıcı, K. (2021). Yapay Zekâ ve Makine Öğrenmesi Tekniklerinin Lojistik Sektöründe Kullanımı, El-Cezeri Journal of Science and Engineering, 8(1), 74–93. https://doi.org/10.31202/ecjse.776314

9. Benbya, H., Davenport, T. H. ve Pachidi, S. (2020). Artificial intelligence in organizations: Current state and future opportunities. MIS Quarterly Executive, 19(4). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3741983
10. Brynjolfsson, E., Hui, X. ve Liu, M. (2019). Does machine translation affect ınternational trade? Evidence from a large digital platform. Management Science, 65(12), 5449-5460. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2019.3388
11. Burnham, J. F. (2006). Scopus database: a review. Biomedical Digital Libraries, 3, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-5581-3-1
12. Cheng, P., Tang, H., Dong, Y., Liu, K., Jiang, P. ve Liu, Y. (2021). Knowledge mapping of research on land use change and food security: A visual analysis using citespace and VOSviewer. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(24), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182413065
13. Çelen, A. ve Baran, Ş. (2021). Fiyat Algoritmaları ve Rekabet Hukuku. N. Ö. İyigün ve M. K. Yılmaz (Eds.), Yapay Zekâ: Güncel Yaklaşımlar ve Uygulamalar içinde (ss. 401-435). Beta Yayıncılık.
14. Duan, Y., Edwards, J. S., ve Dwivedi, Y. K. (2019). Artificial intelligence for decision making in the era of Big Data—Evolution, challenges and research agenda. International Journal of Information Management, 48, 63–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.01.021
15. Egger, P. ve Lassmann, A. (2012). The language effect in international trade: A meta-analysis. Economics Letters, 116(2), 221-224, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2012.02.018
16. Erat, V. ve Arap, İ. (2016). Bilimin Devlet İçin Önemi: Bilim-Devlet İlişkisi Üzerine Bir Çözümleme. Eğitim Bilim Toplum Dergisi, 14 (53), 10-45.
17. Fallucchi, F., Coladangelo, M., Giuliano, R. ve William De Luca, E. (2020). Predicting Employee Attrition using Machine Learning Techniques. Computers, 9(4), 86. https://doi.org/10.3390/computers9040086
18. Ferencz, J., J., González, J. L. ve García, I. O. (2022). "Artificial Intelligence and international trade: Some preliminary implications", OECD Trade Policy Papers, No. 260, https://doi.org/10.1787/13212d3e-en
19. Fuchs, M. ve Reichert, R. (2018). Introduction: Rethinking artificial intelligence. Neural Networks, Biometrics and the New Artificial Intelligence. Digital Culture & Society, 4(1), 5-13. https://doi.org/10.25969/mediarep/13522
20. Garnham, A. (1988). Artificial Intelligence: An Introduction (1. Baskı). London, United Kingdom: Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203704394
21. Goldfarb, A. ve Trefler, D. (2018). Artificial intelligence and International Trade. NBER Working Paper No. 24254. https://doi.org/10.3386/w24254
22. Igbinenikaro, E. ve Adewusi, O. A. (2024). Policy recommendations for integrating artificial intelligence into global trade agreements. International Journal of Engineering Research Updates, 6(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.53430/ijeru.2024.6.1.0022
23. Jones, E. (2023). Digital disruption: artificial intelligence and international trade policy. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 39(1), 70-84. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/grac049
24. Kang, Z., Zhao, Y., Chen, L., Guo Y., Mu, Q. ve Wang, S. (2022). Advances in Machine Learning and Hyperspectral Imaging in the Food Supply Chain. Food Engineering Reviews, 14, 596–616. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12393-022-09322-2
25. Kaplan, A. ve Haenlein, M. (2019). Siri, Siri, in My Hand: Who’s the Fairest in the Land? On the Interpretations, Illustrations and Implications of Artificial Intelligence. Business Horizons, 62(1), 15-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2018.08.004
26. Kim, L. (1998). Technology Policies and Strategies for Developing Countries: Lessons from the Korean Experience, Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 10(3), 311-324.
27. Kornienko, A. A., Kornienko, A. V., Fofanov, O. B. ve Chubik, M.P., (2015). Knowledge In Artificial Intelligence Systems: Searching The Strategies for Application. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 166, 589-594. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.12.578
28. Kurzweil, R. (2019). Bir Zihin Yaratmak: İnsan Düşüncesinin Esrarı. (Çev. Gostolüpçe, D.). İstanbul: İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları
29. Loureiro, S. M. C., Guerreiro, J. ve Tussyadiah, I. (2021). Artificial intelligence in business: State of the art and future research agenda. Journal of Business Research, 129, 911-926. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.11.001
30. Lu, H., Yujie L., Min C., Hyoungseop K. ve Seiichi S. (2018). Brain intelligence: Go Beyond Artificial Intelligence. Mobile Networks and Applications, 23(7553), 368–375, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11036-017-0932-8
31. Lohmann, J. (2011). Do Language Barriers Affect Trade?. Economics Letters. 110. 159-162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2010.10.023
32. Melitz, M. J. ve Redding, S. J. (2014). Heterogeneous Firms and Trade. In: Gopinath, G., Helpman, E. ve Rogoff, K., Eds., Handbook of International Economics, 4, 1-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-444-54314-1.00001-x
33. Meltzer, J. P. (2018). The impact of artificial intelligence on international trade. Center of Technology Innovation at Brookings Institution. https://www.hinrichfoundation.com/media/2bxltgzf/meltzerai-and-trade_final.pdf
34. Mhlanga, D. (2021). Artificial intelligence in the industry 4.0, and its impact on poverty, innovation, infrastructure development, and the sustainable development goals: Lessons from emerging economies?. Sustainability, 13(11), 5788, https://doi.org/10.3390/su13115788
35. Min, H. (2010). Artificial intelligence in supply chain management: theory and applications. International Journal of Logistics: Research and Applications, 13(1), 13-39. https://doi.org/10.1080/13675560902736537
36. Molnar, A. (2013). Language barriers to foreign trade: evidence from translation costs. Nashville: Vanderbilt University.
37. McCorduck, P. (2004). Machines Who Think: A Personal Inquiry into the History and Prospects of Artificial Intelligence. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.42-0916
38. Ontañón, S., Barriga, N. A., Silva, C. R., Moraes, R. O. ve Lelis, L. H. S. (2018). The first MicroRTS artificial intelligence competition. AI Magazine, 39(1), 75-83. https://doi.org/10.1609/aimag.v39i1.2777
39. Panch, T., Szolovits, P., ve Atun, R. (2018). Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning and Health Systems. Journal of Global Health, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.7189%2Fjogh.08.020303
40. Qi, B., Shen, Y. ve Xu, T. (2023). An artificial-intelligence-enabled sustainable supply chain model for B2C E-commerce business in the international trade, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 191, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122491
41. Raza, M. Q. ve Khosravi, A. (2015). A review on artificial intelligence based load demand forecasting techniques for smart grid and buildings. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 50, 1352-1372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.04.065
42. Sun, R. ve Trefler, D. (2023). The impact of AI and cross-border data regulation on international trade in digital services: A large language model, NBER Working Paper No. w31925, https://www.doi.org/10.3386/w31925 Tegmark, M. (2017). Life 3.0: Being human in the age of artificial intelligence. Knopf Press, Münih.
43. Turgut, A. (2023). Lojistik ve Tedarik Zincirinde Yapay Zekâ Çalışmaları: Bibliyometrik Bir Analiz. Alanya Akademik Bakış, 7(1), 461-480. https://doi.org/10.29023/alanyaakademik.1167224
44. Türkcan, E. (2006). “Teknoloji Seçimi Olarak Bilim ve Teknoloji Politikaları”, içinde Ahmet Köse, Fikret Şenses ve Erinç Yeldan (Der.), İktisat Üzerine Yazılar II: İktisadi Kalkınma, Kriz ve İstikrar, 3. Baskı, İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları
45. UNECE (2023). eDATA Domain – Artificial Intelligence in Trade Facilitation Raporu. https://unece.org/trade/documents/2023/09/reports/report-edata-domain-artificial-intelligence-trade-facilitation
46. Wang,P.(2019). On defining artificial intelligence. Journal of Artificial General Intelligence, 10(2), 1-37. https://doi.org/10.2478/jagi-2019-0002
47. World Trade Organization (WTO) ve World Customs Organization (WCO), (2022). "The role of advanced technologies in cross-border trade: A customs perspective". https://www.wto.org/english/res_e/booksp_e/wcotech22_e.pdf.
48. Winfield, A. (2020). Intelligence is not one thing. Journal of Artificial General Intelligence, 11(2), 97-100. https://doi.org/10.2478/jagi-2020-0003
49. Yılmaz, G. (2017). Restoranlarda Bahşiş ile İlgili Yayınlanan Makalelerin Bibliyometrik Analizi. Seyahat ve Otel İşletmeciliği Dergisi. 65-79. https://doi.org/10.24010/soid.335082