İran'ın Sui Generis Hükümet Sistemi

Öz

1979 Devrimi sonrasında kurulan İran İslam Cumhuriyeti Şii İslam anlayışı çerçevesinde şekillenmiştir. Resmi mezhep olarak kabul edilen Şiilik (Caferilik) ülkenin anayasal kurumlarını, dolayısıyla siyasal yapısını belirleyen en önemli unsur olmuştur. İran siyasal sistemi üzerine yapılan çalışmalar daha ziyade sistemin araçlarını ve nasıl işlediğini ele aldığından söz konusu sistemin hükümet sistemleri literatüründeki yeri ihmal edilmiştir. Bu çalışma 1979 Devrimi ile İran’da kurulan siyasi rejimin hükümet sistemleri içindeki yerine odaklanmaktadır. Anayasal inceleme ve literatür tarama yöntemlerini kullanan çalışma mezhep temelli şekillenen İran’ın mevcut sistemler içinde tasnifi yapılamayan sui generis bir hükümet sistemine sahip olduğu sonucuna ulaşmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• İran
• hükümet sistemi
• siyasal sistem
• siyasi rejim

Iran’s sui Generis Form of Government

Öz

The Islamic Republic of Iran was established after the 1979 Revolution and was restructured within the framework of Shiite Islam. Shiism (Ja’farism), accepted as the official sect, has been the most important influence on the constitutional institutions and thus on the political structure of the country. Studies examining Iran’s political system mostly focus on the instruments of the system and how it functions; therefore, the form of this system in the literature has been neglected. This study focused on the place of the political regime established in Iran following the 1979 Revolution within the forms of government context. The study used the methods of constitutional analysis and literature review and found that Iran, whose government is based on sectarianism, has a sui generis form of government that cannot be similarly classified in the context of other existing forms.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Iran
• government system
• political system
• political regime

Kaynakça

1. Abdolmohammadi, P. & Cama, G. (2015). Iran as a peculiar hybrid regime: Structure and dynamics of the Islamic Republic, British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies, 42(4), 558–578.
2. Akman, Ç. & Ergün, G. (2019). İran İslam Cumhuriyeti’nin yönetim yapısı üzerine bir değerlendirme. International Journal of Socıal Humanities Sciences Research, 6(38), 1627–1640.
3. Aramaz, C. & Korkmaz, H. (2024). Political system and public administration in Iran: A comparative evaluation with Turkiye. Journal of Current Researches on Social Sciences, 14(3), 113–134.
4. Bagehot, W. (1867). The English constitution, London: Chapman and Hall.
5. Brooker, P. (2014). Non-democratic regimes, Palgrave Macmillan.
6. Caferoğlu, O. C. & Ünal, S. (2024). The role of Shiism in the foreign policy of the Islamic Republic of Iran. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, (62), 333–352.
7. Cavlak, H. & Özbilek, Ü. (2019). Konstrüktivist perspektiften Devrim sonrası İran siyasal sistemi. Balkan Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 8(16), 129–137.
8. Cheibub, J. A. 2007). Presidentialism, Parliamentarism, and Democracy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

9. Chehabi, H. E. (1991). Religion and politics in Iran: How theocratic is the Islamic Republic?, Daedalus, 120(3), 69-91.
10. Chehabi, H. E. (2001). The political regime of the Islamic Republic of Iran in comparative perspective, Government and Opposition, 36(1), 48–70.
11. Duverger, M. (1980). A new political system: Semi-presidential government. European Journal of Political Research, 8(2): 165–187.
12. Elgie, R. (1999), “The Politics of Semi-presidentialism: Semipresidentialism in Europe”, R. Elgie (Ed.), Oxford: Oxford University Press.
13. Elgie, R. (2011). Semi-Presidentialism: Sub-types and democratic performance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
14. Elgie, R. & Moestrup, S. (2016). “Semi-Presidentialism in Democracies, Quasi-Democracies, and Autocracies”, In Semi-Presidentialism in Caucasus and Central Asia, R. Elgie & S. Moestrup (Ed). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
15. Fanid, N. A. (2015). İran İslam Cumhuriyetinin hükümet Sistemi, Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 7(12), 283–296.
16. Fanid, N. A. (2020). İran’ın idari teşkilat sistemi, Oğuzhan Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 2(2), 134–157.
17. Ganghof, S. (2014). Bicameralism as a form of government Parliamentary Affairs, 67(3), 647–663.
18. Ganghof, S. (2018). A new political system model: Semi-parliamentary government. European Journal of Political Research, 57(2), 261–281.
19. Gerring, J., Strom C. T., & Carola M. (2009). Are parliamentary systems better?, Comparative Political Studies, 42, 327–359.
20. Khomeini, I. (1981). Islamic government. (H. Algar, Tr.) Mizan Press: Berkeley.
21. Laski, H. (1944). The parliamentary and presidential systems, Public Administration Review, 4(4), 347–359.
22. Lijphart, A. (1992), “Parliamentary government and presidential government”, A. Lijphart (Ed.), In Parliamentary versus gresidential Government, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 31–47.
23. Metin, A. & Ünal, S. (2022). Yarı-monarşiden başkanlığa Türkiye’de hükümet sisteminin evrimi, Memleket Siyaset Yönetim, 17(38), 479–514.
24. Metin, A. & Ünal, S. (2023). Classifying forms of government on a global scale, Asian Journal of Comparative Politics, 8(2), 487–515.
25. Munkh-Erdene, L. (2010). The transformation of Mongolia’s political system: From semi-parliamentary to parliamentary?, Asian Survey, 50(2), 311–334.
26. Niray, N. & Deniz, D. (2010). İran İslam Cumhuriyeti: Tarihi, siyaseti ve demokrasisi, Fırat Üniversitesi Orta Doğu Araştırmaları Dergisi, 6(2), 1–32.
27. Praino, D. (2017) A new system of government? Defining the confidence relationship of the EU model, Journal of European Integration, 39(3), 1–14.
28. Roskin, M. G. (2013). Countries and concepts: Politics, geography, culture, Pearson.
29. Samuels, D. J. & Shugart M. S. (2010). Presidents, parties, and prime ministers: How the separation of powers affects party organization and behavior. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
30. Sanyürek, M. B. (2018). İran devlet teşkilatı ve anayasal kurumları, Akademik Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, (85), 359–378.
31. Shugart, M. S. & Carey, J. M. (1992). Presidents and assemblies: Constitutional design and electoral dynamics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
32. Siaroff, A. (2003). Comparative presidencies: The inadequacy of the presidential, semi-presidential and parliamentary distinction, European Journal of Political Research, 42, 287–312.
33. Skach, C. (2005). Borrowing constitutional designs: Constitutional law in Weimar Germany and the French Fifth Republic, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
34. Tan, Kevin YL. (2021). “Presidential Systems”, Oxford Constitutional Law, Encyclopedia entries from: Oxford Constitutions (http://oxcon.ouplaw.com), Oxford University Press.
35. Tsai, J. (2008). Sub-types of presidentialism and political deadlock, French Politics 6, 63–84.
36. Verney, D. (1959). The analysis of political system, Michigan: Compton Printing Works.
37. Yayla, A. (2015). Karşılaştırmalı siyasal sistemler, Ankara: Adres Yayınları.