Kamu Kurumlarında Görev Yapan Memurların Vatandaş Kavramına İlişkin Metaforik Algıları

Öz

Bu araştırmanın temel amacı kamu görevlilerinin vatandaş algısını anlamak ve bu algının kamu yönetimi süreçlerine etkisini metaforlar aracılığıyla incelemektir. Araştırmada nitel araştırma yöntemlerinden temel nitel araştırma deseni benimsenmiştir. Araştırmada toplam 424 kamu görevlisinden metafor formları aracılığıyla veriler elde edilmiştir. Elde edilen veriler tümevarımsal analiz yaklaşımı ile analiz edilmiştir. Araştırmada elde edilen verilerin analizi sonucunda vatandaş-devlet ilişkisi, rol, davranış, toplumsal konum, kimlik, işlev, değer ve duygu temalarına ulaşılmıştır. Başka bir deyişle kamu görevlilerinin vatandaşa ilişkin metafor algılarının bu temalar ile ilişkili olduğu belirlenmiştir. Araştırma sonuçlarına göre vatandaşın devlete bağlı, çalışkan ve uyumlu bir figür olarak tanımlanması, Weberyen bürokratik otorite modelinin izlerini taşırken, aynı zamanda vatandaşın edilgen, yönlendirilmeye açık ve bazen kişisel çıkarlarını ön planda tutan bir figür olarak görülmesi, modern yönetişim anlayışıyla çelişen bir bakış açısını ortaya koymaktadır. Ayrıca elde edilen bulgular, vatandaş algısının yalnızca yönetsel bir kategori değil, aynı zamanda toplumsal hiyerarşiyi, iktidar ilişkilerini ve kamusal alandaki birey-devlet etkileşimini nasıl şekillendirdiğini göstermektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Kamu Görevlileri
• Vatandaş
• Birey Devlet İlişkisi
• Aidiyet
• Algı

Metaphorical Perceptions Of Officals Working In Public Institutions About The Concept Of Citizen

Öz

The main purpose of this reseach is to investigate public officers’metaphoric perceptions regarding “citizen”. The basic qualitative research design, one of the qualitative research methods, was adopted in this study. Data were obtained from a total of 424 public officers through metaphor forms and they were analyzed by means of the inductive analysis approach. As a result of the analysis, the themes of citizen-state relations, role, behavior, social position, identity, function, value and emotion were revealed. In other words, it was determined that the metaphorical perceptions of public officers regarding citizens were related to these themes. According to the research findings, the perception of the citizen as a hardworking and compliant figure loyal to the state bears resemblance to the Weberian bureaucratic authority model, while the citizen is also viewed as a passive figure, susceptible to manipulation and sometimes prioritizing her personal interests, revealing a perspective that contradicts modern understandings of governance. In addition, the findings highlight that citizen perception is not merely an administrative construct but also a mechanism that influences state-society relations, power distribution, and the accessibility of public services.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Public Officials
• Citizen
• Individual–State Relationship
• Belonging
• Perception

Kaynakça

1. Almond, G. ve Verba, S. (1963). The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in the Five Nations, Princeton University Press 1963.
2. Azungah, T. (2018). Qualitative research: deductive and inductive approaches to data analysis, Qualitative Research Journal, 18(4), 383-400.
3. Baş, G. (2018). Kamu yönetiminde vatandaş algısı: Bürokratik işleyiş ve yönetişim perspektifinden bir değerlendirme, Kamu Yönetimi Araştırmaları Dergisi, 4(2), 45-67.
4. Bektaş, H. (2019). Yeni kamu yönetimi anlayışında vatandaş odaklı hizmet sunumu: Türkiye’de e-devlet uygulamalarının değerlendirilmesi, Yönetim ve Politika Dergisi, 6(1), 23-41.
5. Bell, E., Christensen, J., & Jessen Hansen, K. (2022). Resistance or Capitulation? How Discrete Emotions Shape Citizens’ Interactions With the Administrative State, The American Review of Public Administration, 52, 535 - 557.
6. Bogner, A. (2012). The Paradox of Participation Experiments, Science, Technology, & Human Values, 37, 506 - 527.
7. Ceyhan, S., Okcu, M., & Usta, S. (2024). Kamu görevlilerinin bürokratik yönetim kültürüne yönelik algısı: Hazine ve Maliye Bakanlığında bir uygulama, Kamu Yönetimi ve Araştırma Dergisi, 11(1), 78-102.
8. Couldry, N. (2004). The productive 'consumer' and the dispersed 'citizen', International Journal of Cultural Studies, 7 (1), 21-32

9. Cornwall, A., & Gaventa, J. (2017). Participation in governance İçinde A. S. Huque & A. Shafiqul (ed.), International Development Governance, 405-413, Routledge.
10. Demirci, M. (2024). A metaphor study on the concepts of state, nation and democracy, HUMANITAS - Journal of Social Sciences, 12(24), 49-75
11. Döring, M., & Madsen, J. K. (2022). Mitigating psychological costs—The role of citizens' administrative literacy and social capital, Public Administration Review, 82(4), 671–681
12. Durmuş, H., Baş, A., & Atik, H. (2017). Kamu yönetiminde vatandaş algısı: Sokak seviyesi bürokrasi perspektifinden bir değerlendirme, Türkiye Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 8(2), 56-78
13. Fitzgerald, C., McCarthy, S., Carton, F., Connor, Y. O., Lynch, L., & Adam, F. (2016). Citizen participation in decision-making: can one make a difference, Journal of Decision Systems, 25(sup1), 248–260
14. Foucault, M. (1991). Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. Penguin Books.
15. Gilens, M., & Page, B. I . (2014). Testing Theories of American Politics: Elites, Interest Groups, and Average Citizens, Perspectives on Politics, 12(3), 564–581
16. Golzar, J., Noor, S., & Tajik, O. (2022). Convenience sampling, International Journal of Education & Language Studies, 1(2), 72-77.
17. Habermas, J. (1996). Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. MIT Press.
18. Hochschild, A. R. (1979). Emotion Work, Feeling Rules, and Social Structure, American Journal of Sociology, 85(3), 551-575
19. Karakoyunlu, B. (2022). Türkiye’de bürokrasi ve memur-vatandaş etkileşimi. Ankara: Akademisyen Kitabevi.
20. Kim, S., & Lee, J. (2012). E‐Participation, Transparency, and Trust in Local Government, Public Administration Review, 72, 819-828
21. Knox, C. (2020). Development evaluation in authoritarian states: A case from Kazakhstan, Development Policy Review, 1-20
22. Lee, S.J., & Yu, H.J. (2013). Factors Affecting Public Servants’ Trust in Citizens: A Case Study of South Korean Central Government Officials, International Review of Public Administration, 18, 85-114
23. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G . (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE Publications.
24. Lipset, Seymour Martin (1959). Some Social Requisites of Democracy: Economic Development and Political Legitimacy, The American Political Science Review, 53 (1), s. 69-105
25. Lipset, S. M . (1960). Political man: The social bases of politics. Doubleday.
26. Lipsky, M. (2010). Street-Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services. Russell Sage Foundation.
27. Liu, L. (2010). Using generic inductive approach in qualitative educational research: A case study analysis, Journal of Education and Learning, 5(2), 129-135
28. Mansoor M (2021). Citizens' trust in government as a function of good governance and government agency's provision of quality information on social media during COVID-19, Government information quarterly, 38(4), 101597
29. Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J . (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and ımplementation John Wiley & Sons.
30. Migchelbrink, K., & Walle, S.V. (2020). When Will Public Officials Listen? A Vignette Experiment on the Effects of Input Legitimacy on Public Officials’ Willingness to Use Public Participation, Public Administration Review, 80, 271-280
31. Moyson, S., Van de Walle, S., & Groeneveld, S. (2016). What do public officials think about citizens? The role of public officials’ trust and their perceptions of citizens’ trustworthiness in interactive governance. In Critical reflections on interactive governance (pp. 189-208). Edward Elgar Publishing.
32. Murray, R., Caulier-Grice, J., and Mulgan, G. (2020). The Open Book of Social Innovation. National Endowment for Science, Technology and the Art.
33. Oliveira, Daniel & Ckagnazaroff, Ivan. (2022). Citizen participation as one of the principles of open governmen. Cadernos Gestão Pública e Cidadania, 28, 1-19
34. Page, B.I., Bartels, L.M., & Seawright, J. (2013). Democracy and the Policy Preferences of Wealthy Americans. Perspectives on Politics, 11, 51 – 73.
35. Public Servants’ Trust in Citizens: An Extension of Theory and an Empirical Examination with Structural Equation Modeling (SEM), Public Organization Review, 12, 383-399.
36. Shenton, A. K. (2004). Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects, Education for Information, 22(2), 63–75