Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Bireysel Müşterilerin Mobil Bankacılık Kullanım Niyetini Etkileyen Faktörler

Yıl 2019, Cilt: 9 Sayı: 2, 475 - 506, 31.12.2019
https://doi.org/10.18074/ckuiibfd.590493

Öz

Bu çalışmada, Türkiye'deki
bireysel bankacılık müşterilerinin mobil bankacılığı kullanım niyetlerini
etkileyen faktörlerin analiz edilmesi amaçlanmakta olup oluşturulan model için
Teknoloji Kabul Modeli (TKM) esas alınmıştır. Teknoloji kabul modelinde yer
alan niyet, tutum, algılanan fayda ve algılanan kullanım kolaylığı değişkenlerine
ilave olarak öznel norm, güven ve algılanan risk değişkenleri araştırma modeline
eklenmiştir. Çalışmada anket tekniği ile toplanan 736 katılımcının verileri ile
Yapısal Eşitlik Modeli (YEM) uygulanmıştır.  İstatistiksel analiz sonuçlarına göre
bireylerin mobil bankacılığı kullanım niyeti üzerinde en çok etkisi olan
değişkenin kullanıma yönelik tutum olduğu; bireylerin tutumlarını etkileyen
öncelikli faktörlerin ise sırasıyla algılanan fayda, güven ve algılanan
kullanım kolaylığından oluştuğu görülmektedir. Bu çalışma, TKM'nden
geliştirdiğimiz modelin Türkiye'deki bankacılık müşterilerinin mobil
bankacılığı benimsemesini etkileyen faktörleri teorik olarak öngörebildiğini
doğrulamaktadır. 

Kaynakça

  • Ajzen, I. (1991). The Theory of Planned Behavior. Organizational Behavior And Human Decision Processes, 50, 179-211.Akturan, U. ve Tezcan, N. (2012). Mobile Banking Adoption of the Youth Market. Marketing Intelligence and Planning, 30(4), 444-459. Al-Gahtani, S.S. (2011). Modeling the Electronic Transactions Acceptance Using Extended Technology Acceptance Model. Applied Computing and Informatics, 9, 47-77.Al-Somali, S.A., Gholami, R. ve Clegg, B. (2009). An Investigation into the Acceptance of Online Banking in Saudi Arabia. Technovation, 29, 130-141. Amin, H., Hamid M.R.A., Lada S. ve Anis, Z. (2008). The Adoption of Mobile Banking in Malaysia: The Case of Bank Islam Malaysia Berhad. International Journal of Business and Society, 9(2), 43-53.Bagozzi, R.P., Yi Y. ve Phillips L.W. (1991). Assessing Construct Validity in Organizational Research. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36(3), 421-30.Bayrakdaroğlu, A. (2012). Bireylerin İnternet Bankacılığı Kullanımını Etkileyen Faktörlerin Belirlenmesi Üzerine Bir Alan Araştırması. Business and Economics Research Journal, 3(4), 57-75. Brown, I., Cajee, Z., Davies, D., Stroebel, S. (2003). Cell Phone Banking: Predictors of Adoption in South Africa an Exploratory Study. International Journal of Information Management, 23, 381–394. Ceylan, H.H., Genç, E. ve Erem, I. (2013). Tüketicilerin İnternet Bankacılığını Benimsemesini Etkileyen Faktörlerin Yapısal Eşitlik Modeli ile Araştırılması. Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 3, 143-154. Cheng, T.C.E., Lam, D.Y.C. ve Yeung, A.C.L. (2006). Adoption of Internet Banking: An emprical study in Hong Kong. Decision Support Systems, 42(3), 1558-1572. Cheung, C.M.K. ve Lee, M.K.O. (2003). An Integrative Model of Consumer Trust in Internet Shopping. In Proceedings of the 11th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS 2003), Naples, Italy, 12-21.Chong, A.Y.L., Keng-Boon, O., Binshan L. ve Boon-In T. (2010). Online Banking Adoption: an Empirical Analysis. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 28 (4), 267-287. Churchill Jr, G.A. (1979). A Paradigm for Developing Better Measures of Marketing Constructs. Journal of Marketing Research, 16(1), 64-73.Crabbe, M., Standing, C., Standing, S. ve Karjaluoto, H. (2009). An adoption model for mobile banking in Ghana. International Journal of Mobile Communications, 7 (5), 515-543. Cruz, P., Neto L.B.F., Munoz-Gallego, P. ve Laukkanen, T. (2010). Mobile Banking Rollout in Emerging Markets: Evidence from Brazil. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 28(5), 342-371. Davis, F.D. (1989). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340. Davis, F.D., Bagozzi, R.P. ve Warshaw, P.R. (1989). User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models. Management Science, 35(8), 982-1003. Eriksson, K., Kerem, K. ve Nilsson, D. (2005). Customer Acceptance of Internet Banking in Estonia. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 23(2), 200-216. Featherman M.S. ve Pavlou P.A. (2003). Predicting e-Services Adoption: a Perceived Risk Facets Perspective. International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 59(4), 451-74.Finlay, K.A., Trafimow, D. ve Villarreal, A. (2002). Predicting Exercise and Health Behavioral Intentions: Attitudes, Subjective Norms and Other Behavioral Determinants. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32, 342-358. Fishbein, M. ve Ajzen I. (1975). Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research, MA: Addison-Wesley.Flavian, C., Guinaliu, M. ve Torres, E. (2006). How Bricks and Mortar Attributes Affect Online Banking Adoption. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 24 (6), 406-423. Fornell, C. ve Larcker, D.F. (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research, 39-50.Gefen, D. (2002). Customer Loyalty in e-Commerce. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 3(2), 27-51.Gefen, D., Karahanna, E. ve Straub, D. (2003). Trust and TAM in Online Shopping: An Integrated Model. MIS Quarterly, 27(1), 51-90.Gu, J., Lee, S. ve Suh, Y. (2009). Determinants of Behavioral Intention to Mobile Banking. Expert Systems with Applications, 36, 11605-11616. Hair, J.F, Anderson R.E., Tatham, R.L. ve Black, W. (1998). Multivariate Data Analysis. NJ: Prentice Hall. Hair J.F., Black W.C., Babin B.J., Anderson R.E. ve Tatham R.L. (2006). Multivariate Data Analysis. 6th ed. Upper Saddle River. NJ: Prentice Hall. Hanafizadeh, P., Behboudi, M., Koshksaray A.A. ve Shirkhani Tabar, M.J. (2014). Mobile Banking Adoption by Iranian Bank Clients. Telematics and Informatics, 31(1), 62-78. Jarvis, C. B., MacKenzie, S.B. ve Podsakoff, P.M. (2003). A Critical Review of Construct Indicators and Measurement Model Misspecification in Marketing and Consumer Research. Journal of Consumer Research, 30(2), 199-218.Karagöz, Y. (2017). Spss ve Amos Uygulamalı Nitel, Nicel, Karma Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemleri ve Yayın Etiği. Sivas: Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık.Kesharwani A. ve Bisht, S.S. (2012). The Impact of Trust and Perceived Risk on Internet Banking Adoption in Indian Extension of Technology Acceptance Model. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 30(4), 303-322.Kleijnen, M., Lee, N. ve Wetzels, M. (2009). An exploration of Consumer Resistance to Innovation and Its Antecedents. Journal of Economic Psychology, 30, 344-357.Kline, R. B. (2016). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. Guilford Publications. Kuisma, T., Laukkanen, T. ve Hiltunen, M. (2007). Mapping the Reasons For Resistance to Internet Banking: A Means-end Approach. International Journal of Information Management, 27(2), 75-85. Lee, K.C. ve Chung, N. (2009). Understanding Factors Affecting Trust in and Satisfaction with Mobile Banking in Korea: A Modified DeLone and McLean's Model Perspective. Interacting with Computers, 21(5-6), 385-392. Lee, M.C. (2009). Factors Influencing the Adoption of Internet Banking: An Integration of TAM And TPB With Perceined Risk And Perceived Benefit. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 130-141.Lee, Y.K., Park, J.H., Chung, N., ve Blakeney, A. (2012). A Unified Perspective on the Factors Influencing Usage Intention Toward Mobile Financial Services. Journal of Business Research, 65(11), 1590-1599.Lewis, N.K., Palmer, A. ve Moll, A. (2010). Predicting Young Consumers’ Take up of Mobile Banking Services. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 28(5), 410-432.Lin, H. (2011). An Empirical Investigation of Mobile Banking Adoption: The Effect of Innovation Attributes and Knowledge-based Trust. International Journal of Information Management. 31(3), 252-260.Luarn, P. ve Lin, H. (2005). Toward an Understanding of The Behavioral Intention to Use Mobile Banking. Computers in Human Behavior, 21, 873-891. Malaquias, R.F ve Hwang, Y. (2016). An Empirical Study on Trust in Mobile Banking: A Developing Country Perspective. Computers in Human Behavior, 54, 453-461Martins, C., Oliveira, T. ve Popovič A. (2014). Understanding the Internet Banking Adoption: A Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology and Perceived Risk Application. International Journal of Information Management, 34(1), 1-13.Mayer R.C., Davis J.H. ve Schoorman F.D. (1995). An Integrative Model of Organizational Trust. Academy of Management Review, 20, 709-734.Nasri, W. ve Charfeddine, L. (2012). Factors Affecting The Adoption of Internet Banking in Tunisia: an Integration Theory of Acceptance Model and Theory of Planned Behavior. The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 23(1), 1-14. Oliveira T., Faria, M., Thomas, M.A. ve Popovic A. (2014). Extending the Understanding of Mobile Banking Adoption: When UTAUT Meets TTF and ITM. International Journal of Information Management 34, 689-703.Pala, E. ve Kartal, B. (2010). Banka Müşterilerinin İnternet Bankacılığı İle İlgili TutumlarınaYönelik Bir Pilot Araştırma. Celal Bayar Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 17(2), 43-61.Pavlou, P.A. (2003). Consumer Acceptance of Electronic Commerce: Integrating Trust and Risk with the Technology Acceptance Model. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 7(3), 101-134. Podsakoff, P.M. ve Organ, D.W. (1986). Self-Reports in Organizational Research: Problems and Prospects. Journal of Management, 12(4), 531-544. Podsakoff, P.M., Mackenzie, S.B., Podsakoff, N.P. ve Lee, J.Y. (2003). Common Method Biases in Behavioral Research: A Critical Review of the Literature and Recommended Remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879-903.Puschel, J., Mazzon, J.A. ve Hernandez, J.M.C. (2010). Mobile banking: Proposition of an integrated adoption intention framework. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 28(5), 389-409. Ram, S. ve Sheth, J.N. (1989). Consumer Resistance to Innovations: The Marketing Problem and Its Solutions. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 6(2), 5-14. Sarıyer, N. (2007). Banka Çağrı Merkezi Pazarının Bölümlendirilmesi: Yozgat İl Merkezi'nde Bir Uygulama. Zonguldak Karaelmas Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi (ZKÜ), 3(6), 150. Schierz, P.G, Schilke, O. ve Wirtz, B.W. (2010). Understanding Consumer Acceptance of Mobile Payment Services: An Empirical Analysis. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 9(3), 209-216.Schumacker, R.E. ve Lomax, R.G. (2004). A Beginner's Guide to Structural Equation Modelling (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Sinha, I. ve Mukherjee, S. (2016). Acceptance of Technology, Related Factors in Use of off Branch e-Banking: An Indian Case Study. The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 27(1), 88-200. Straub, D.W. (1989). Validating Instruments in MIS Research. Quarterly 13(2), 47-169.Suh, B. ve Han, I. (2002). Effect of Trust on Customer Acceptance of Internet Banking. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 1, 3(4), 247-263. Taylor, S. ve Todd, P.A. (1995). Understanding Information Technology Usage: A Test of Competing Models. Information Systems Research, 6, 144-176.Teo, A.C., Tan, G.W.H., Cheah, C.M., Ooi, K.B. ve Yew, K.T. (2012). ‘Can the Demographic and Subjective Norms Influence the Adoption of Mobile Banking?’, International Journal of Mobile Communications, 10(6), 578-597.Ustasüleyman, T. ve Eyüboğlu, K. (2010). Bireylerin İnternet Bankacılığını Benimsemesini Etkileyen Faktörlerin Yapısal Eşitlik Modeli İle Belirlenmesi. BDDK Bankacılık ve Finansal Piyasalar, 4(2), 11-38.Venkatesh, V. ve Davis, F.D. (2000). “A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Feld Studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186-204.Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B. ve Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27, 425-478.Wang, Y.S., Wang, Y.M., Lin, H.H. ve Tang, T.I. (2003). Determinants of User Acceptance of Internet Banking: An Empirical Study. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 14(5), 501-519.Wessels, L. ve Drennan, J. (2010). An Investigation of Consumer Acceptance of M-banking. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 28 (7), 547-568.Wu, J.H. ve Wang, S.C. (2005). What Drives Mobile Commerce? An Empirical Evaluation of the Revised Technology Acceptance Model. Information and Management 42(5), 719-729.Yadav, R., Chauhan, V. ve Pathak, G.S. (2015). Intention to Adopt Internet Banking in an Emerging Economy: a Perspective of Indian Youth. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 33(4), 530-544. Yu, C.-S. (2012). Factors Affecting Individuals to Adopt Mobile Banking: Empirical Evidence from the UTAUT Model. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 31(2), 104-121. Zhao, A.L., Koenig-Lewis, N., Hammer-Lloyd, S. ve Ward, P. (2010). Adoption of Internet Banking Services in China: Is It All About Trust? International Journal of Bank Marketing, 28(1), 7-26. Zhou, T. (2011). The Effect of Initial Trust on User Adoptin of Mobile Payment. Information Development, (27)4, 290-300.Zhou, T. (2012). Understanding Users' Initial Trust in Mobile Banking: An Elaboration Likelihood Perspective. Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 1518-1525.Zhou, T., Lu, Y. ve Wang, B. (2010). Integrating TTF and UTAUT to Explain Mobile Banking User Adoption. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 760-767.
  • İnternet kaynakları: Türkiye Bankalar Birliği, (TBB). Dijital, İnternet ve Mobil Bankacılık İstatistikleri 2018-Aralık, https://www.tbb.org.tr/tr/banka-ve-sektor-bilgileri/istatistiki-raporlar/Dijital,_Internet_ve_Mobil_Bankacilik_Istatistikleri/3754, (Erişim tarihi: 7.04.2019).
Toplam 2 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Konular İşletme
Bölüm Araştırma Makalesi
Yazarlar

Hacer Paçan Özcan 0000-0002-0344-5350

Şenay Sabah Çelik Bu kişi benim 0000-0001-5764-6783

Alper Özer 0000-0002-2886-7314

Yayımlanma Tarihi 31 Aralık 2019
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2019 Cilt: 9 Sayı: 2

Kaynak Göster

APA Paçan Özcan, H., Sabah Çelik, Ş., & Özer, A. (2019). Bireysel Müşterilerin Mobil Bankacılık Kullanım Niyetini Etkileyen Faktörler. Çankırı Karatekin Üniversitesi İktisadi Ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 9(2), 475-506. https://doi.org/10.18074/ckuiibfd.590493
AMA Paçan Özcan H, Sabah Çelik Ş, Özer A. Bireysel Müşterilerin Mobil Bankacılık Kullanım Niyetini Etkileyen Faktörler. Çankırı Karatekin Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi. Aralık 2019;9(2):475-506. doi:10.18074/ckuiibfd.590493
Chicago Paçan Özcan, Hacer, Şenay Sabah Çelik, ve Alper Özer. “Bireysel Müşterilerin Mobil Bankacılık Kullanım Niyetini Etkileyen Faktörler”. Çankırı Karatekin Üniversitesi İktisadi Ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi 9, sy. 2 (Aralık 2019): 475-506. https://doi.org/10.18074/ckuiibfd.590493.
EndNote Paçan Özcan H, Sabah Çelik Ş, Özer A (01 Aralık 2019) Bireysel Müşterilerin Mobil Bankacılık Kullanım Niyetini Etkileyen Faktörler. Çankırı Karatekin Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi 9 2 475–506.
IEEE H. Paçan Özcan, Ş. Sabah Çelik, ve A. Özer, “Bireysel Müşterilerin Mobil Bankacılık Kullanım Niyetini Etkileyen Faktörler”, Çankırı Karatekin Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, c. 9, sy. 2, ss. 475–506, 2019, doi: 10.18074/ckuiibfd.590493.
ISNAD Paçan Özcan, Hacer vd. “Bireysel Müşterilerin Mobil Bankacılık Kullanım Niyetini Etkileyen Faktörler”. Çankırı Karatekin Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi 9/2 (Aralık 2019), 475-506. https://doi.org/10.18074/ckuiibfd.590493.
JAMA Paçan Özcan H, Sabah Çelik Ş, Özer A. Bireysel Müşterilerin Mobil Bankacılık Kullanım Niyetini Etkileyen Faktörler. Çankırı Karatekin Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi. 2019;9:475–506.
MLA Paçan Özcan, Hacer vd. “Bireysel Müşterilerin Mobil Bankacılık Kullanım Niyetini Etkileyen Faktörler”. Çankırı Karatekin Üniversitesi İktisadi Ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, c. 9, sy. 2, 2019, ss. 475-06, doi:10.18074/ckuiibfd.590493.
Vancouver Paçan Özcan H, Sabah Çelik Ş, Özer A. Bireysel Müşterilerin Mobil Bankacılık Kullanım Niyetini Etkileyen Faktörler. Çankırı Karatekin Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi. 2019;9(2):475-506.