TEDARİK ZİNCİRİ MÜŞTERİ ENTEGRASYONUNUN FİRMA PERFORMANSI ÜZERİNDEKİ ETKİSİNDE ÜRÜN İNOVASYON KAPASİTESİNİN ARACI ROLÜ

Yıl 2020, Cilt: 10 Sayı: 1, 319 - 348, 30.06.2020

Bülent Yıldız , Behzat Sayın

https://doi.org/10.18074/ckuiibfd.683723

Cited By: 9

Öz

Son yıllarda hızla artan rekabetçi iş ortamında, firmaların tedarik zinciri ortaklarıyla yaptıkları stratejik iş ortaklığı ve tedarik zinciri ortaklarını inovasyon sürecine katılmanın önemi firmalar tarafından önem kazanmıştır. Bu bakımdan firmaların tedarik zinciri müşteri entegrasyonu ve ürün inovasyon kapasitesi, üzerinde durulması gereken önemli konular olmaktadır. Bu çalışmada müşteri entegrasyonunun firma performansı üzerindeki etkisinde, ürün inovasyon kapasitesinin aracılık etkisi araştırılmaktadır. Bu amaçla ilk 1000 ihracatçı firma arasından seçilen 96 imalat firmadan anket ile veri toplanmıştır. Araştırma modeli öncelikli olarak yapısal eşitlik modeli ile analiz edilmiştir. Analiz neticesinde müşteri entegrasyonunun firma performansı ve ürün inovasyon kapasitesini pozitif yönde anlamlı olarak etkilediği bulgusuna ulaşılmıştır. Ayrıca ürün inovasyon kapasitesinin de firma performansını pozitif yönde anlamlı olarak etkilediği tespit edilmiştir. Process makro yöntemi ile yapılan aracılık testi sonucunda ise müşteri entegrasyonunun firma performansı üzerindeki etkisinde ürün inovasyon kapasitesinin aracılık rolü bulunduğu tespit edilmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

tedarik zinciri müşteri entegrasyonu, ürün inovasyonu, yapısal eşitlik

Kaynakça

• Afshan, N. ve Motwani, J. (2018). The mediating role of customer related performance outcomes on the relationship between customer integration and firm performance An empirical investigation in Indian context. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 25(7), 2184-2197.
• Ataseven, C. ve Nair, A. (2017). Assessment of supply chain integration and performance relationships: A meta-analytic investigation of the literature. International Journal of Production Economics, 185(2017), 252-265.
• Ayoub, H. F., Abdallah, A. B. ve Suifan, T. S. (2017). The effect of supply chain integration on technical innovation in Jordan The mediating role of knowledge management. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 24(3), 594-616.
• Baharanchi, S. R. H. (2009). Investigation of the Impact of Supply Chain Integration on Product Innovation and Quality. Transaction E: Industrial Engineering, 16(1), 81-89.
• Bergfors M. E. ve Larsson A. (2009). Product and process innovation in process industry: a new perspective on development. Journal of Strategy and Management, 2(3), 261-276.
• Bernon, M., Upperton, J., Bastl, M. ve Cullen, J. (2013). An exploration of supply chain integration in the retail product returns process". International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 43(7), 586-608.
• Boon-itt, S. (2009). The effect of internal and external supply chain integration on product quality and innovation: evidence from Thai automotive industry. International Journal of Integrated Supply Management Copyright © 200X Inderscience Enterprises Ltd. Boon‐itt, S. ve Wong, C. Y. (2011). The moderating effects of technological and demand uncertainties on the relationship between supply chain integration and customer delivery performance. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 41(3), 253-276.
• Brettel, M. ve Cleven, N. J. (2011). Innovation Culture, Collaboration with External Partners and NPD Performance. Creativity and Innovation Management, 20(4), 253-272.
• Cassivi, L., Léger, P.M. ve Hadaya, P. (2005). Electronic commerce and supply chain integration: the case of the telecommunication equipment industry. Business Process Management Journal, 11(5), 559-572.
• Chang, J. (2017). The effects of buyer-supplier's collaboration on knowledge and product innovation. Industrial Marketing Management, 65(2017), 129-143.
• Chavez, R., Yu W., Gimenez, C., Fynes, B. ve Wiengarten, F. (2015). Customer integration and operational performance: The mediating role of information quality. Decision Support Systems, 80(2015), 83-95.
• Chen, M., Liu H., Wei, S. ve Gu, J.(2018). Top managers' managerial ties, supply chain integration, and firm performance in China: A social capital perspective. Industrial Marketing Management, 74(2018), 205-214.
• Cousins, P.D. ve Lawson, B. (2007) The Effect of Socialization Mechanisms and Performance Measurement on Supplier Integration in New Product Development. British Journal of Management, 18(1), 311-326.
• Danese, P. ve Romano, P. (2011). Supply chain integration and efficiency performance: a study on the interactions between customer and supplier integration. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 16(4), 220-230.
• Danese, P. ve Romano, P. (2013). The moderating role of supply network structure on the customer integration-efficiency relationship. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 33(4), 372-393.
• de Guimarães, J. C. F., Severo, E. A., Henri Dorion, E. C., Coallier, F. ve Olea, P. M. (2016). The use of organisational resources for product innovation and organisational performance: A survey of the Brazilian furniture industry. Int. J.Production Economics, 180(2016), 135-147.
• Droge, C., Jayaram, J., ve Vickery, S. K. (2004). The effects of internal versus external integration practices on time-based performance and overall firm performance. Journal of Operations Management, 22(6), 557-573.
• Elvers, D. ve Song, C. H. (2016). Conceptualizing a framework for customer integration during new product development of chemical companies. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 31(4), 488-497.
• Flynn, B. B., Huo, B. ve Zhao, X. (2010). The impact of supply chain integration on performance: a contingency and configuration approach. Journal of Operations Management, 28(1), 58-71.
• Hayes, A. F. (2018). Introduction to mediating, moderating and conditional process analysis: A refresion based approch (2. Baskı). New York: The Guilford Press.
• He, Y., Lai K. K., Sun, H.ve Chen, Y. (2014). The impact of supplier integration on customer integration and new Product performance: The mediating role of manufacturing flexibility under trust theory. Int. J.Production Economics, 147(2014), 260-270.
• Jacob, F. (2006). Preparing industrial suppliers for customer integration. Industrial Marketing Management, 35(2006), 45-56.
• Jajja, M. S. S., Kannan, V. R., Brah, S. A. ve Hassan, S. Z. (2017). Linkages between firm innovation strategy, suppliers, product innovation, and business performance Insights from resource dependence theory. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 37(8), 1054-1075.
• Kang, M., Yang, M. G., Park, Y. ve Huo, B. (2018). Supply chain integration and its impact on sustainability. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 118(9), 1749-1765.
• Kesidou, S. L. ve Sorrell, S. (2018). Low-carbon innovation in non-domestic buildings: The importance of supply chain integration. Energy Research & Social Science, 45(2018), 195-213.
• Kim M. ve Chai S. (2016). Assessing the impact of business uncertainty on supply chain integration. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 27(2), 463-485.
• Kumar V., Chibuzo E. N., Garza-Reyes J. A., Kumari A., Rocha-Lona L., ve Lopez-Torres G. C. (2017). The Impact of Supply Chain Integration on Performance: Evidence from the UK Food Sector. Procedia Manufacturing, 11( 2017), 814-821.
• Lau, A. K. W., Tang, E., ve Yam R. C. M. (2010). Effects of Supplier and Customer Integration on Product Innovation and Performance: Empirical Evidence in Hong Kong Manufacturers. J Prod Innov Manag, 2010(27), 761–777.
• Lee, H. Y., Seo Y. J. ve Dinwoodie J. (2016). Supply chain integration and logistics performance: the role of supply chain dynamism. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 27(3), 668-685.
• Lee, V. H., Ooi, K. B., Chong, A. Y. L. ve Sohal A. (2018). The effects of supply chain management on technological innovation: The mediating role of guanxi. International Journal of Production Economics, 205(2018), 15-29.
• Li, Y., Li, G. ve Feng, T. (2015). Effects of suppliers’ trust and commitment on customer involvement. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 115(6), 1041-1066.
• Löfsten, H. (2014). Product innovation processes and the trade-off between product innovation performance and business performance. European Journal of Innovation Management, 17(1), 61-84.
• Lotfi, Z., Sahran, S., Mukhtar, M. ve Ali Taei Zadeh, A. T. (2013). The Relationships between Supply Chain Integration and Product Quality. Procedia Technology, 11(2013), 471-478.
• Mitrega, M., Forkmann, S., Zaefarian, G. ve Henneberg, S. C. (2017). Networking capability in supplier relationships and its impact on product innovation and firm performance. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 37(5), 577-606.
• Najafi-Tavani, S., Najafi-Tavani, Z., Naudé, P., Oghazi, P. ve Zeynaloo, E. (2018). How collaborative innovation networks affect new product performance: Product innovation capability, process innovation capability, and absorptive capacity. Industrial Marketing Management, 73(2018), 193-205.
• Oke, A., Prajogo, D. I. ve Jayaram, J. (2013). Strengthening the innovation chain: The role of internal innovation climate and strategic relationships with supply chain partners. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 49(4), 43-58.
• Ramadani, V., Hisrich, R. D., Abazi-Alili, H., Dana, L.P., Panthi L. ve Abazi-Bexheti, L. (2019). Product innovation and firm performance in transition economies: A multistage estimation approach. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 140(2019), 271-280.
• Sadiq Jajja, M. S., Chatha, K. A. ve Farooq, S. (2018). Impact of supply chain risk on agility performance: Mediating role of supply chain integration. International Journal of Production Economics, 205(2018), 118-138.
• Sandmeier, P. (2009). Customer integration strategies for innovation projects: anticipation and brokering. International Journal of Technology Management, 48(1), 1-23.
• Schaarschmidt, M. ve Kilian, T. (2014). Impediments to customer integration into the innovation process: A case study in the telecommunications industry. European Management Journal, 32(2014), 350-361.
• Sezen, B. (2008). Relative effects of design, integration and information sharing on supply chain performance. Supply Chain Management: An International, 13(3), 33-240.
• Soosay, C. A., Hyland, P. W. ve Ferrer, M. (2008). Supply chain collaboration: capabilities for continuous innovation. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 13(2), 160-169.
• Stonebraker, P. W. ve Liao, J. (2006). Supply chain integration: exploring product and environmental contingencies. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 11(1), 34-43.
• Vanpoucke, E., Vereecke, A. ve Muylle, S., (2017). Leveraging the impact of supply chain integration through information technology". International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 37(4), 510-530.
• von Haartman, R. ve Bengtsson, L. (2015). The impact of global purchasing and supplier integration on product innovation. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 35(9), 1295-1311.
• Wang, C. ve Hu, Q. (2017). Knowledge sharing in supply chain networks: Effects of collaborative innovation activities and capability on innovation performance. Technovation https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2017.12.002
• Wong, C. W. Y., Wong, C. Y. ve Boon-itt, S. (2013). The combined effects of internal and external supply chain integration on product innovation. Int. J.Production Economics, 146(2013), 566-574.
• Wu, J. (2014). Cooperation with competitors and product innovation: Moderating effects of technological capability and alliances with universities. Industrial Marketing Management, 43(2014), 199-209.
• Xu, D., Huo, B. ve Sun, L., (2014). Relationships between intra-organizational resources, supply chain integration and business performance: An extended resource-based view. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 114(8), 1186-1206.
• Yan, B. ve Huang, G. (2009). Supply Chain Information Transmission based on RFID and Internet of Things. ISECS International Colloquium on Computing, Communication, Control, and Management China: Sanya,
• Yang, J., Han, Q., Zhou, J. ve Yuan, C. (2015). The influence of environmental management practices and supply chain ıntegration on technological innovation performance. Evidence from China’s Manufacturing Industry. Sustainability, 7(11), 15342-15361.
• Yıldız, B. ve Aytekin, M. (2019). Kalite yönetimi uygulamalarının firma performansı üzerindeki etkisinde inovasyonun aracı rolü ile çevresel dinamizmin moderatör rolü. Journal of Yasar University, 14(56), 489-506.
• Yıldız, B. ve Seyhan, M. (2019). Ürün inovasyon uygulamalarının ürün pazar performansı üzerindeki etkisinde ürün kalitesinin aracı rolü. Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 18(71), 1409-1428.
• Zhang, M. ve Huo, B. (2013). The impact of dependence and trust on supply chain integration. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 43(7), 544-563.
• Zhao, L., Huo, B., Sun, L. ve Zhao, X. (2013). The impact of supply chain risk on supply chain integration and company performance: A global investigation. supply chain management. An International Journal, 18(2), 115-131.
• Zimmermann, R., Ferreira, L. M. D. F. ve Moreira, A. C. (2016). The influence of supply chain on the innovation process: A systematic literature review. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 21(3), 289-304.