AI Film Festivals and the Transformation of Cinema Culture: New Research Methods in the Age of Generative Cinema

Öz

This article examines how generative artificial intelligence is transforming contemporary cinema and film festival culture. The emergence of AI film festivals represents not merely a technological shift but a broader institutional and cultural transformation in how cinematic works are produced, curated, and evaluated. Drawing on festival studies and digital media theory, the article argues that film festivals function as key cultural intermediaries and gatekeepers, shaping the visibility, legitimacy, and circulation of films. In the context of generative cinema, this role is being reconfigured as festivals engage with new forms of human–machine collaboration, algorithmic aesthetics, and computational creativity. The study further proposes that existing methodological frameworks in festival studies are insufficient to address these transformations. It introduces new research approaches, including digital ethnography, platform analysis, algorithmic aesthetics, and production workflow analysis, to better understand AI-driven media production. The article also considers the emerging AI cinema ecosystem in Turkey, highlighting how regional media cultures engage with global technological shifts. Ultimately, it argues that AI film festivals should be understood as institutional laboratories where the future of cinema is actively negotiated.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• artificial intelligence
• film festivals
• generative cinema
• algorithmic aesthetics
• digital culture

Yapay Zekâ Film Festivalleri ve Sinema Kültürünün Dönüşümü: Generatif Sinema Çağında Yeni Araştırma Yöntemleri

Öz

Bu çalışma, generatif yapay zekâ teknolojilerinin sinema üretimi ve festival kültürü üzerindeki etkilerini incelemektedir. Son yıllarda ortaya çıkan yapay zekâ film festivalleri, yalnızca teknolojik yeniliklerin sergilendiği platformlar değil, aynı zamanda sinemanın estetik, kurumsal ve yaratıcı sınırlarının yeniden tanımlandığı deneysel alanlar olarak değerlendirilmektedir. Makale, film festivallerinin tarihsel olarak kültürel aracı ve küratöryel otoriteler olarak işlev gördüğünü ortaya koyarak, bu rolün yapay zekâ destekli üretim bağlamında nasıl dönüştüğünü tartışmaktadır. Generatif sinema, insan-yapay zekâ işbirliğine dayalı üretim süreçleri aracılığıyla yazarlık, özgünlük ve estetik kavramlarını yeniden düşünmeyi gerektirmektedir. Bu bağlamda çalışma, festival araştırmaları alanında yeni metodolojik yaklaşımların gerekliliğini vurgular. Dijital etnografi, platform analizi, algoritmik estetik incelemesi ve üretim süreçlerinin analizi gibi yöntemlerin, yapay zekâ temelli sinemanın anlaşılmasında önemli katkılar sunduğu ileri sürülmektedir. Ayrıca Türkiye bağlamında ortaya çıkan erken dönem yapay zekâ sinema ekosistemi incelenerek, bölgesel medya kültürlerinin bu dönüşüme nasıl dahil olduğu değerlendirilmektedir. Çalışma, yapay zekâ film festivallerinin sinemanın geleceğini şekillendiren önemli kurumsal alanlar olduğunu savunmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• yapay zekâ
• film festivalleri
• generatif sinema
• algoritmik estetik
• dijital kültür

Kaynakça

1. Chow, P.-S., & Celis Bueno, C. (2025). The cloak of creativity: AI imaginaries and creative labour in media production. European Journal of Cultural Studies. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549425132299
2. Chow, P.-S., Celis Bueno, C., & Pereira, G. (2026). Generative AI and creative practices: Four critical keywords between the artworld and the creative industries. Media, Culture & Society. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443726143482
3. Chung, H.-F. (2026). Travelling with(in) critical AI studies: An East Asian standpoint. Media, Culture & Society, 48(3), 595–607.
4. Coeckelbergh, M. (2020). AI ethics. MIT Press.
5. Crawford, K. (2021). Atlas of AI: Power, politics, and the planetary costs of artificial intelligence. Yale University Press.
6. de Valck, M. (2007). Film festivals: From European geopolitics to global cinephilia. Amsterdam University Press
7. Elsaesser, T. (2016). Film history as media archaeology: Tracking digital cinema. Amsterdam University Press.
8. Flusser, V. (2011). Into the universe of technical images (N. A. Roth, Çev.). University of Minnesota Press. (Orijinal eser 1985 yılında yayımlanmıştır)

9. Frederick, E. (2019, 2 Ağustos). Artificial intelligence predicts which movies will succeed—and fail—simply from plot summaries. Science.
10. Galloway, A. R. (2012). The interface effect. Polity Press.
11. Halperin, B. A., & Rosner, D. K. (2025). “AI is soulless”: Hollywood film workers’ strike and emerging perceptions of generative cinema. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 32(2), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1145/3716135
12. Iordanova, D. (2013). The film festival circuit. In D. Iordanova & R. Rhyne (Eds.), Film festival yearbook 5: Archival film festivals (pp. 23–39). St Andrews Film Studies.
13. Iordanova, D. (2015). The film festival is an industry node. Media Industries Journal, 2(1), 7–11.
14. Lindgren, S. (2023). Critical theory of AI. John Wiley & Sons.
15. Loist, S. (2016). The film festival circuit: Networks, hierarchies, and circulation. New Review of Film and Television Studies, 14(2), 173–190. https://doi.org/10.1080/17400309.2016.1158138
16. Manovich, L. (2001). The language of new media. MIT Press.
17. Manovich, L. (2019). Cultural analytics. MIT Press.
18. Manovich, L. (2020). AI aesthetics. Strelka Magazine. https://strelkamag.com
19. Pasquinelli, M. (2019). Three thousand years of algorithmic ritual. e-flux Journal, 101. https://www.e-flux.com/journal/101/273221
20. Pasquinelli, M. (2023). The eye of the master: A social history of artificial intelligence. Verso.
21. Sönmez, S., & Gülay, H. G. (2026). The new threshold of creative labor: Qualitative insights from Turkish cinema professionals. CINEJ Cinema Journal, 14(1), 374–417. https://doi.org/10.5195/cinej.2026.892
22. Srnicek, N. (2017). Platform capitalism. Polity Press.
23. Steyerl, H. (2017). A sea of data: Apophenia and pattern (mis-)recognition. e-flux Journal, 72. https://www.e-flux.com/journal/72/60480
24. Suner, A. (2010). New Turkish cinema: Belonging, identity, and memory. I.B. Tauris.
25. Tryon, C. (2013). On-demand culture: Digital delivery and the future of movies. Rutgers University Press.
26. van Dijck, J., Poell, T., & de Waal, M. (2018). The platform society: Public values in a connective world. Oxford University Press.
27. Wong, C. H. Y. (2011). Film festivals: Culture, people, and power on the global screen. Rutgers University Press.
28. Zalipour, A. (2026). AI at the greenlight: Negotiating creative agency in early-stage film development. Media Practice and Education. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/25741136.2026.2633391
29. Zylinska, J. (2020). AI art: Machine visions and warped dreams. Open Humanities Press.