Lathyrus Cinsi Lathyrus Seksiyonundaki (Papilionoideae, Fabaceae) Bazı Türler Üzerine Karşılaştırmalı Anatomik ve Mikromorfolojik Çalışmalar

Yıl 2017, Cilt: 1 Sayı: 1, 42 - 50, 29.12.2017

Hüseyin Çildir Ahmet Kahraman Musa Doğan Hatice Nurhan Büyükkartal

https://doi.org/10.31594/commagene.392133

Öz

Lathyrus L. (Papilionoideae, Fabaceae) ekonomik, ekolojik ve genetik olarak
çiçekli bitkilerin en önemli cinsleri arasında kabul edilir ve Türkiye’nin
bulunduğu Güneybatı Asya çeşitlilik merkezidir. Lathyrus cinsinde yer alan türlerin anatomik ve mikromorfolojik özellikleri
sadece birkaç çalışmada bildirilmiştir. Bu yüzden, bu güncel çalışmada bu
cinsin Lathyrus seksiyonuna ait L. cassius Boiss., L. chloranthus Boiss. & Balansa, L. cicera L., L. hirsutus
L. ve L. sativus L. türlerinin
karşılaştırmalı anatomisi ve yaprak epidermal mikromorfolojisi tür ayrımında
anatomik ve mikromofolojik karakterlerin taksonomik önemini değerlendirmek için
ışık ve taramalı elektron mikroskobu kullanılarak ayrıntılı bir şekilde
araştırılmıştır. Elde edilen sonuçlar bazı anatomik ve mikromorfolojik
karakterlerin tür düzeyinde ayrım için faydalı olduğunu göstermiştir.
Taksonomik öneme sahip anatomik ve mikromorfolojik özellikler şunlardır:
kökteki ışın sıralarının sayısı, gövdenin enine kesitteki şekli, kanat
uzunluğunun gövdenin çapına oranı, her bir kanattaki iletim demetlerinin
sayısı, yapraktaki epidermal hücrelerin ve bunların antiklinal duvarlarının
şekli ve tüylerin varlığı.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Anatomi, Lathyrus, mikromorfoloji

Comparative Anatomical and Micromorphological Studies on Some Species of Lathyrus L. Section Lathyrus (Papilionoideae, Fabaceae)

Öz

Lathyrus L. (Papilionoideae,
Fabaceae) is considered economically, ecologically, and genetically among the
most significant genera of the flowering plants having its centre of diversity
in Southwest Asia where Turkey is located. The anatomical and micromorphological
characteristics of species of the genus Lathyrus
have been reported in only a few studies. Thus, in the present study,
comparative anatomy and leaf epidermal micromorphology of L. cassius Boiss., L.
chloranthus Boiss. & Balansa, L.
cicera L., L. hirsutus L., and L. sativus L. belonging to the section Lathyrus
of this genus are comprehensively investigated by light and scanning electron
microscopy so as to assess the taxonomic importance of anatomical and
micromorphological characters in species separation. The results obtained
reveal that some anatomical and micromorphological characters have proved
useful for discrimination at the species level. Anatomical and
micromorphological properties of taxonomic significance are as follows: the
number of ray rows in the root, the outline of the stem in transverse section,
the ratio of the wing length to the stem diameter, the number of vascular
bundles in each wing, the shape of leaf epidermal cells, the pattern of their
anticlinal walls, and the presence/absence of trichomes on the leaf.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Anatomy, Lathyrus, micromorphology

Kaynakça

• Asmussen, C., Liston, A. 1998: Chloroplast DNA characters, phylogeny and classification of Lathyrus (Fabaceae). American Journal of Botany, 85: 387-401.
• Basconsuelo, S., Grossoa, M., Molina, M. G., Malpassia, R., Kraus, T., Bianco, C. 2011: Comparative root anatomy of papilionoid legumes. Flora, 206: 799-807.
• Bernard, R. L., Singh, B. B. 1969: Inheritance of pubescence type in soybeans: glabrous, curly, dense, sparse, and pubescent. Crop Science, 9: 192-197.
• Celep, F., Çildir, H., Kahraman, A., Doğan, M., Cabi, E. 2011: Morphological and anatomical properties of Lathyrus cilicicus Hayek & Siehe (sect. Platystylis, Fabaceae) from the Mediterranean region of Turkey. Australian Journal of Crop Science, 5 (2): 223-226.
• Croft, A. M., Pang, E. C. K., Taylor, P. W. J. 1999: Molecular analysis of Lathyrus sativus L. (grasspea) and related Lathyrus species. Euphytica, 107: 167-176.
• Crow, E., Stirton, C. H., Cultler, D. F. 1997: Leaf anatomy of the genus Psoralea sensu stricto (Psoraleeae, Papilionoideae, Leguminosae). Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 124: 155-182.
• Cutler, D. F. 1976: Variation in root wood anatomy. Leiden Botanical Series, 3: 143-156.
• Czefranova, Z. V. 1971: Review of the species of the genus Lens Mill. Novosti Sistematiki Vyshikh Rastenii, 8: 197-204.
• Davis, P. H. 1970: Lathyrus L. In: Davis, P. H. (ed.), Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands, vol. 3, pp. 328-369. Edinburgh, UK: Edinburgh University Press.
• Davis, P. H., Mill, R. R., Kit, T. 1988: Flora of Turkey and East Aegean Islands, vol. 10, pp. 125-126. Edinburgh, UK: Edinburgh University Press.
• de Freitas Mansano, V., de Pádua Teixeira, S. 2008: Floral anatomy of the Lecointea clade (Leguminosae, Papilionoideae, Swartzieae sensu lato). Plant Systematics and Evolution, 273: 201-209.
• Devecchi, M. F., Pirani, J. R. Melo-de-Pinna, G. F. A., 2015: Comparative leaf anatomy and morphology of some Brazilian species of Crotalaria L. (Leguminosae: Papilionoideae: Crotalarieae). Acta Botanica Brasilica, 28 (4): 583-593.
• Fortuna-Perez, A. P., Castro, M. M., Tozzi, A. M. G. A. 2012: Leaflet secretory structures of five taxa of the genus Zornia J.F. Gmel. (Leguminosae, Papilionoideae, Dalbergieae) and their systematic significance. Plant Systematics and Evolution, 298 (8): 1415-1424.
• Franceschi, V. R., Giaquinta, R. T. 1983: Glandular trichomes of soybean leaves: cytological differentiation from initiation to senescence. Botanical Gazette, 144: 175-184.
• Gaboreanu, I., Florincescu, A., Moldovan, A. 1998: Morpho-anatomical aspects of the epiderm in two species of Lathyrus. Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca, 27: 11-16.
• Genç, H., Şahin, A. 2011: A new species of Lathyrus L. (Fabaceae) from Turkey. Journal of Systematics and Evolution, 49 (5): 505-508.
• Ghorbel, M., Marghali, S., Trifi-Farah, N., Chtourou-Ghorbel, N. 2014: Phylogeny of Mediterranean Lathyrus species using inter simple sequence repeats markers. Acta Botanica Gallica: Botany Letters, 161 (1): 91-98.
• Guard, A. T. 1931: Development of floral organs of the soy bean. Botanical Gazette, 91: 97-102.
• Gunasinghe, U. B., Irwin, M. E., Kampmeier, G. E. 1988: Soybean leaf pubescence affects aphid vector transmission and field spread of soybean mosaic virus. Annals of Applied Biology, 112: 259-272.
• Güneş, F., Özhatay, N. 2000: Lathyrus L. In: Güner, A., Özhatay, N., Ekim, T., Başer, K. H. C. (eds.), Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands, vol. 11, pp. 92-94. Edinburgh, UK: Edinburgh University Press.
• Güneş, F., Çırpıcı, A. H. 2012: A new record for the flora of Turkey: Lathyrus atropatanus (Leguminosae). Turkish Journal of Botany, 36, 425.
• Güneş, F. 2014: A new species of Lathyrus (Fabaceae) from Turkey. Pensee Journal, 76 (3): 339-350.
• Healy, R. A., Horner, H. T., Bailey, T. B., Palmer, R. G. 2005: A microscopic study of trichomes on gynoecia of normal and tetraploid clark cultivars of Glycine max and seven near-isogenic lines. International Journal of Plant Sciences, 166: 415-425.
• ILDIS (International Legume Database and Information Service), 2005: http://www.ildis.org/ date accessed 1 Temmuz 2017.
• Johansen, D. A. 1944: Plant Microtechnique. New-York: McGraw-Hill.
• Kahraman, A., Çildir, H., Doğan, M. 2014: Macromorphology, micromorphology and anatomy of Lathyrus sect. Nissolia (Fabaceae) and their taxonomic significance. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, India, Section B: Biological Sciences, 84: 407-417.
• Kannabiran, B., Krisshnamurthy, K. H. 1974: Morphology of foliar epidermis and taxonomy of the genus Crotalaria. Phytomorphology, 24: 61-68.
• Kenicer, G., Kajita, T., Pennington, R. T., Murata, J. 2005: Systematics and biogeography of Lathyrus (Leguminosae) based on internal transcribed spacer and cpDNA sequence data. American Journal of Botany, 92 (7): 1199-1209.
• Kothari, M. J., Shah, G. L. 1975: Epidermal structures and ontogeny of stomata in the Papilionaceae (Tribe Hedysareae). Botanical Gazette, 136 (4): 372-379.
• Krisshnamurthy, K. H., Kannabiran, B. 1970: A note on the secretory idioblasts of the foliar epidermis of Crotalaria restusa L. Current Science, 39: 262-263.
• Krstić, B. D., Boža, P. P., Merkulov, L. S., Krstić, L. N., Pajević, S. P., Stanković, Ž. S. 2002: Morphological, anatomical and physiological characteristics of Lathyrus latifolius L. (Fabaceae). Proceedings for Natural Sciences, Matica Srpska Novi Sad, 103: 81-89.
• Kupicha, F. K. 1975: Observations on the vascular anatomy of the tribe Vicieae (Leguminosae). Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 70: 231-242.
• Kupicha, F. K. 1983: The infrageneric structure of Lathyrus. Notes from the Royal Botanic Garden, Edinburgh, 41 (2): 209-244.
• Lackey, J. A. 1978: Leaflet anatomy of Phaseoleae (Leguminosae: Papilionoideae) and its relation to taxonomy. Botanical Gazette, 139 (4): 436-446.
• Leht, M. 2009: Phylogenetics of Vicia (Fabaceae) based on morphological data. Feddes Repertorium, 120: 379-393.
• Lersten, N, R,, Brubaker, C. L. 1987: Extrafloral nectaries in Leguminosae: review and original observations in Erythrina and Mucuna (Papilionoideae: phaseoleae). Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club, 114 (4): 437-447.
• Lewis, G. M., Schrire, B., Mackinder, B., Lock, M. 2005: Legumes of the World. London, UK: Kew Press.
• Mantar, N., Bağci, E., Şahin, A., Gür, N. 2003: Lathyrus sativus L. ve L. hirsutus L. (Fabaceae/Leguminosae) türleri üzerinde morfolojik, palinolojik ve anatomik bir çalışma. Fırat Üniversitesi Fen ve Müh. Bilimleri Dergisi, 15 (3): 303-314.
• Metcalfe, C. R., Chalk, L. 1950: Anatomy of the Dicotyledons, vol. 1, pp. 504-516. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
• Patel, R. N. 1965: A comparison of the anatomy of the secondary xylem in roots and stems. Holzforschung, 19: 72-79.
• Retallack, B., Willson, J. H. M. 1988: Morphology, anatomy, and distribution of capitate glandular trichomes on selected Trifolium species. Crop Science, 28: 677-680.
• Shaheed, S. A., Illoh, H. C. 2010: A taxonomic study of some species in Cassiinae (Leguminosae) using leaf epidermal characters. Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca, 38 (1): 21-27.
• Teixeira, S. P., Gabrielli, A. C. 2006: Taxonomic value of foliar characters in Dahlstedtia Malme Leguminosae, Papilionoideae, Millettieae. Acta Botanica Brasilica, 20 (2): 395-403.
• Tucker, S. C. 1997: Floral evolution, development, and convergence: the hierarchical-significance hypothesis. International Journal of Plant Sciences, 158: 143-161.
• Wilkinson, H. P. 1979: The plant surface (mainly leaf). In: Metcalfe, C. R., Chalk, L. (eds), Anatomy of the Dicotyledons, vol. 2, pp. 97-114, 143-161. Oxford: Clarendon Press.