Examining the Influence of Institutionalization on Employee Performance in Yemen's Textile Industry.

Öz

Institutionalization is a management strategy that differs from traditional management in that organizational structures are designed to be more flexible, participatory, and free of hierarchy and detail. Additionally, institutionalization emphasizes the efficient application of professional management strategies. In other words, institutionalization refers to creating a functional mechanism inside the firm. The textile industry in Yemen is vital to the nation's economy since it substantially contributes to economic development and creates jobs. Institutionalization, which is the process of establishing and adhering to formal rules, processes, and practices inside organizations, might affect its effectiveness. There are several other aspects as well. Within the framework of the Yemeni textile industry, the purpose of this research is to explore the influence that institutionalization has on the performance of employees. This research demonstrates the need to establish successful institutionalization within the Yemeni textile industry based on the literature review conducted before this study. Policymakers, managers, and industry stakeholders are urged to build and implement strong institutional frameworks that enable employee involvement, empowerment, and appreciation. These frameworks should be designed to maximize staff productivity. By doing so, businesses can improve their employees' performance, increase their productivity, and contribute to the continued expansion of the textile industry in Yemen.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Institutionalization
• Employee Performance
• Yemen Textile Sector
• Workforce Adaptability
• Organizational Stability

Yemen Tekstil Endüstrisinde Kurumsallaşmanın Çalışan Performansına Etkisinin İncelenmesi

Öz

Kurumsallaşma, geleneksel yönetimden farklı olarak, örgütsel yapıların daha esnek, katılımcı ve hiyerarşi ile detaya erişilebilir olacak şekilde tasarlandığı bir yönetim stratejisidir. Ayrıca, kurumsallaşma, profesyonel yönetim stratejilerinin etkin bir şekilde uygulanmasını vurgular. Başka bir deyişle, kurumsallaşma, işletme içinde işlevsel bir mekanizma oluşturmayı ifade eder. Yemen tekstil sektörü, ekonomik kalkınmaya önemli katkılar sağlayarak ve istihdam yaratarak ülkenin ekonomisi için hayati öneme sahiptir. Kuruluşlar içinde resmi kurallar, süreçler ve uygulamalar oluşturma ve bunlara uyma süreci olan kurumsallaşma, sektörün verimliliğini etkileyebilir. Bunun yanı sıra, sektörde birçok farklı faktör de etkili olmaktadır. Bu araştırmanın amacı, Yemen tekstil sektörü bağlamında, kurumsallaşmanın çalışanların performansı üzerindeki etkisini incelemektir. Bu araştırma, daha önce yapılan literatür incelemeleri temelinde, Yemen tekstil sektöründe başarılı bir kurumsallaşma sağlanması gerekliliğini ortaya koymaktadır. Politika yapıcılar, yöneticiler ve sektör paydaşlarının, çalışan katılımı, güçlendirme ve takdirini sağlayacak güçlü kurumsal çerçeveler oluşturup uygulamaları önerilmektedir. Bu çerçeveler, çalışanların verimliliğini en üst düzeye çıkarmayı amaçlamalıdır. Bu şekilde, işletmeler çalışanlarının performansını artırabilir, verimliliklerini yükseltebilir ve Yemen'deki tekstil sektörünün sürekli büyümesine katkıda bulunabilir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Kurumsallaşma
• Çalışan Performansı
• Yemen Tekstil Sektörü
• İşgücü Uyum Yeteneği
• Örgütsel İstikrar

Kaynakça

1. Aggarwal, A., & Thakur, G. S. M. (2013). Techniques of performance appraisal review. International Journal of Engineering and Advanced Technology (IJEAT), 2(3), 617-621.
2. Ahmad, T., Farrukh, F., & Nazir, S. (2015). Capacity building boosts employees performance. Industrial and Commercial Training, 47(2), 61-66. https://doi.org/10.1108/ICT-05-2014-0036
3. Ayranci, E. (2017). Trust issue in family businesses and its relationships with institutionalization. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 7(10), 26-40. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v7-i10/3356
4. Bakker, A. B., & Bal, M. P. (2010). Weekly work engagement and performance: A study among starting teachers. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83(1), 189-206. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317909X402596
5. Başar, P. (2017). Kurumsallaşmanın performansa etkisi: Sağlık sektöründe bir uygulama. İstanbul Ticaret Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 16(31), 179-195.
6. Başkurt, G., & Altındağ, E. (2017). The impact of institutionalization of family business on strategic human resources management and company performance. Business Management Dynamics, 7(3), 10-25.
7. Becker, T. E., Billings, R. S., Eveleth, D. M., & Gilbert, N. L. (1996). Foci and bases of employee commitment: Implications for job performance. Academy of Management Journal, 39(2), 464–482. https://doi.org/10.2307/256788
8. Bennett, J. V., & Thompson, H. C. (2011). Changing district priorities for school–business collaboration: Superintendent agency and capacity for institutionalization. Educational Administration Quarterly, 47(5), 826-868.

9. Boivin, G., Brummans, B. H., & Barker, J. R. (2017). The institutionalization of CCO scholarship: Trends from 2000 to 2015. Management Communication Quarterly, 31(3), 331-355. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318916687396
10. Bose, I., & Emirates, U. A. (2018). Employee empowerment and employee performance: An empirical study on selected banks in UAE. Journal of Applied Management and Investments, 7(2), 71-82.
11. Boxall, P., & Macky, K. (2009). Research and theory on high‐performance work systems: Progressing the high‐involvement stream. Human Resource Management Journal, 19(1), 3-23. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-8583.2008.00082.x
12. Buller, P. F., & McEvoy, G. M. (1989). Determinants of the institutionalization of planned organizational change. Group & Organization Studies, 14(1), 33-50. https://doi.org/10.1177/105960118901400105
13. Cardy, R. (2004). Performance Management: Concepts, Skills and Exercises. M.E. Sharpe.
14. Çetin, F., & Aşkun, D. (2018). The effect of occupational self-efficacy on work performance through intrinsic work motivation. Management Research Review, 41(2), 186-201. https://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-03-2017-0062
15. Çetinkaya, A. S., Karayel, S., & Tefek, A. (2018). The effect of institutionalization on firm performance. Management and Business Research Quarterly, 6(2), 16-38.
16. Christian, M. S., Garza, A. S., & Slaughter, J. E. (2011). Work engagement: A quantitative review and test of its relations with task and contextual performance. Personnel Psychology, 64(1), 89-136. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2010.01203.x
17. Chuang, E., Dill, J., Morgan, J. C., & Konrad, T. R. (2012). A configurational approach to the relationship between high‐performance work practices and frontline health care worker outcomes. Health Services Research, 47(4), 1460-1481. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6773.2011.01366.x
18. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage Publications.
19. De Medeiros, M. M. D., Carletti, T. M., Magno, M. B., Maia, L. C., Cavalcanti, Y. W., & Rodrigues-Garcia, R. C. M. (2020). Does the institutionalization influence elderly’s quality of life? A systematic review and meta–analysis. BMC Geriatrics, 20(1), 44. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-020-1452-0
20. DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (2000). The iron cage revisited institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. Economics Meets Sociology in Strategic Management, 45(2), 74-89. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-3322(00)17011-1
21. Dobbin, F., & Kalev, A. (2017). Are diversity programs merely ceremonial? Evidence-free institutionalization. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, T. B. Lawrence, & R. E. Meyer (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism (pp. 808–828). Sage Publishing.
22. Duran, C., & Boz, D. (2021). Kurumsallaşmanin iş ve işletme performansina etkisi. International Marmara Social Sciences Congress, 358-362.
23. Engelen, L., Chau, J., Young, S., Mackey, M., Jeyapalan, D., & Bauman, A. (2019). Is activity-based working impacting health, work performance and perceptions? A systematic review. Building Research & Information, 47(4), 468-479. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2018.1440958
24. Gilboa, S., Shirom, A., Fried, Y., & Cooper, C. (2008). A meta‐analysis of work demand stressors and job performance: Examining main and moderating effects. Personnel Psychology, 61(2), 227-271. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2008.00113.x
25. Griffin, M. A., Neal, A., & Parker, S. K. (2007). A new model of work role performance: Positive behavior in uncertain and interdependent contexts. Academy of Management Journal, 50(2), 327-347. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2007.24634438
26. Haila, A. (2017). Institutionalization of ‘the property mind’. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 41(3), 500-507. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12495
27. Hoekstra, A., & Kaptein, M. (2012). The institutionalization of integrity in local government. Public Integrity, 15(1), 5-28. https://doi.org/10.2753/PIN1099-9922150101
28. Hou, M. (2019). Social media celebrity and the institutionalization of YouTube. Convergence, 25(3), 534-553. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856517750368
29. Kaplan, M., & Kaplan, A. (2018). The relationship between organizational commitment and work performance: A case of industrial enterprises. Journal of Economic and Social Development, 5(1), 46-50.
30. Kaplan, R. (2015). Who has been regulating whom, business or society? The mid-20th-century institutionalization of ‘corporate responsibility’ in the USA. Socio-Economic Review, 13(1), 125-155. https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwu031
31. Lamb, S., & Kwok, K. C. (2016). A longitudinal investigation of work environment stressors on the performance and wellbeing of office workers. Applied Ergonomics, 52(1), 104-111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2015.07.010
32. Lepak, D. P., Taylor, M. S., Tekleab, A. G., Marrone, J. A., & Cohen, D. J. (2007). An examination of the use of high‐investment human resource systems for core and support employees. Human Resource Management: Published in Cooperation with the School of Business Administration, The University of Michigan and in alliance with the Society of Human Resources Management, 46(2), 223-246. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.20158
33. Mahmoud, M. A., Adams, M., Abubakari, A., Commey, N. O., & Kastner, A. N. A. (2020). Social media resources and export performance: The role of trust and commitment. International Marketing Review, 37(2), 273-297. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMR-02-2019-0084
34. Mauro, S. G., Cinquini, L., & Grossi, G. (2018). External pressures and internal dynamics in the institutionalization of performance-based budgeting: An endless process? Public Performance & Management Review, 41(2), 224-252. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2018.1431137
35. Medlin, C. J., & Törnroos, J. Å. (2015). Interacting for legitimacy: A dynamic perspective on institutionalization in business networks. Industrial Marketing Management, 49(1), 42-52.
36. Melin, L., & Nordqvist, M. (2007). The reflexive dynamics of institutionalization: The case of the family business. Strategic Organization, 5(3), 321-333. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127007079959
37. Meyer, R. E., Jancsary, D., Höllerer, M. A., & Boxenbaum, E. (2018). The role of verbal and visual text in the process of institutionalization. Academy of Management Review, 43(3), 392-418. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2014.0301
38. Moore, D. (2013). Sustainability, institutionalization, and the duality of structure: Contradiction and unintended consequences in the political context of an Australian water business. Management Accounting Research, 24(4), 366-386. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2277975
39. Morcol, G., & Gautsch, D. (2013). Institutionalization of business improvement districts: A longitudinal study of the state laws in the United States. Public Administration Quarterly, 37(2), 238. https://link.gale.com/apps/doc/A336602957/AONE?u=anon~68b15766&sid=googleScholar&xid=f90d3635
40. Nikpour, A. (2017). The impact of organizational culture on organizational performance: The mediating role of employee’s organizational commitment. International Journal of Organizational Leadership, 6(1), 65-72. https://doi.org/10.33844/ijol.2017.60432
41. Nyberg, A., Pieper, J., & Trevor, C. (2016). Pay-for-performance’s effect on future employee performance. Journal of Management, 42(7), 1753-1783. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206313515520
42. Othman, A. S., Raflis, A., Omar, C., Sabirah, U., & Hanafi, B. (2018). Relationship between satisfaction with commitment, motivation, and performance. European Journal of Business, Economics, and Accountancy, 6(5), 1-16.
43. Pitafi, A. H., Kanwal, S., Ali, A., Khan, A. N., & Ameen, M. W. (2018). Moderating roles of IT competency and work cooperation on employee work performance in an ESM environment. Technology in Society, 55, 199-208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2018.08.002
44. Richard, T., & Morrison, M. (2009). Challenges of performance management in contemporary scenario. Journal of Business and Psychology, 39(2), 56-71.
45. Richardson, A., & Beckham, L. (2015). Paradox in performance challenges: International banking in Canada and North America. International Journal of Banking and Finance, 27(1), 51-68.
46. Rostini, R., Souisa, W., Masmarulan, R., & Yasin, N. (2021). Competitiveness development, learning orientation, entrepreneurial commitment, and business performance in the silk industry. Management Science Letters, 11(3), 903-908. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.msl.2020.10.008
47. Rowlinson, M., & Hassard, J. (2011). How come the critters came to be teaching in business schools? Contradictions in the institutionalization of critical management studies. Organization, 18(5), 673-689. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508410396397
48. Samoff, J. (2003). Institutionalizing international influence. Safundi: The Journal of South African and American Comparative Studies, 4(1), 1-35. https://doi.org/10.1080/17533170300404104
49. Sathyanarayan, D. K., & Lavanya, D. B. L. (2018). Effect of organizational commitment, motivation, attitude towards work on job satisfaction, job performance and turnover intention‖-VUCA perspective. Journal of Management, 5(4), 445-457.
50. Schmitt, N. (2014). Personality and cognitive ability as predictors of effective performance at work. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 1(1), 45-65. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-031413-091255
51. Scott, W. R. (2008). Institutions and organizations: Ideas and interests. Sage.
52. Shields, J. (2012). Managing employee performance and reward: Concepts, practices and strategies. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139168748
53. Shin, N., Park, S. H., & Park, S. (2019). Partnership-based supply chain collaboration: Impact on commitment, innovation, and firm performance. Sustainability, 11(2), 449-468. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11020449
54. Sigler, T. H., & Pearson, C. M. (2000). Creating an empowering culture: Examining the relationship between organizational culture and perceptions of empowerment. Journal of Quality Management, 5(1), 27-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1084-8568(00)00011-0
55. Simat, K., Dragin, A., & Dragićević, V. (2012). The institutionalization of business ethics of travel agencies in Serbia. Turizam, 16(3), 113-123.
56. Singhapakdi, A., & Vitell, S. J. (2007). Institutionalization of ethics and its consequences: A survey of marketing professionals. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 35(2), 284-294. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-007-0030-8
57. Sinha, A., Pandey, J., & Varkkey, B. (2017). Professionalizing religious family-owned organizations: An examination of human resource challenges. South Asian Journal of Management, 24(2), 8-24.
58. Spencer, L. M., & Spencer, P. S. M. (2008). Competence at work: Models for superior performance. Wiley.
59. Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a methodology for developing evidence‐informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British Journal of Management, 14(3), 207-222. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.00375
60. Tsao, C. W., Chen, S. J., Lin, C. S., & Hyde, W. (2009). Founding-family ownership and firm performance: The role of high-performance work systems. Family Business Review, 22(4), 319-332. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486509339322
61. Úbeda-García, M., Claver-Cortés, E., Marco-Lajara, B., Zaragoza-Sáez, P., & García-Lillo, F. (2018). High performance work system and performance: Opening the black box through the organizational ambidexterity and human resource flexibility. Journal of Business Research, 88(1), 397-406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.12.045
62. Usop, A. M., Askandar, D. K., Langguyuan-Kadtong, M., & Usop, D. A. S. O. (2013). Work performance and job satisfaction among teachers. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 3(5), 245-252.
63. Warr, P., & Nielsen, K. (2018). Well-being and work performance. In E. Diener, S. Oishi, & L. Tay (Eds.), Handbook of well-being. Salt Lake City, UT: DEF Publishers.
64. Webster, J., & Watson, R. T. (2002). Analyzing the past to prepare for the future: Writing a literature review. MIS Quarterly, 26(2), xiii-xxiii. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4132319
65. Wiedenhöft, G. C., Luciano, E. M., & Pereira, G. V. (2020). Information technology governance institutionalization and the behavior of individuals in the context of public organizations. Information Systems Frontiers, 22(6), 1487-1504. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-019-09945-7
66. Yin, R. K. (2015). Qualitative research from start to finish. New York, NY: Guilford Publications.
67. Zhang, B., & Morris, J. L. (2014). High-performance work systems and organizational performance: Testing the mediation role of employee outcomes using evidence from PR China. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 25(1), 68-90. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2013.781524