Determinants of Welfare Status And Net Farm Income Among Smallholder Sorghum Farmers In North West, Nigeria

Year 2024, Volume: 12 Issue: 2, 273 - 283, 27.12.2024

Sunday Sambo Mailumo , Ibrahim Maharazu , Olugbenga Omotayo Alabı , Jeremiah Aluwong , Nancy Agbenu Olısakwe

https://doi.org/10.33202/comuagri.1551346

Abstract

This study focused on the determinants of welfare status and net farm income among smallholder sorghum farmers in North West, Nigeria. A multi-stage sampling method was employed to select 140 smallholder sorghum farmers. Primary data were used. The data were analyzed using
descriptive and inferential statistics. The results show that the mean age of smallholder sorghum farmers was 47 years. The smallholder sorghum farmers were literate with approximate of 11 years of school education. Approximate 75% of smallholder sorghum farmers were members of cooperative organizations. Averagely, the farm size was estimated at 1.5 hectares, this means they are small-scale farmers. The gross margin and net farm income were calculated at 557175.35 and 518022.45 Naira per hectare, respectively. This shows that sorghum production is profitable. The total income and expenditure were estimated at 12192714.72 and 476439.76 Naira, respectively. The sorghum farmer household income exchange was calculated at 2.56. Approximate 97 which amounted to 69.29% of smallholder farmers had increased in welfare status from sorghum farming. The age of farmers, level of education, household size, farm experience, farm size, and amount of credit accessed were significantly different from zero in influencing the welfare status of smallholder sorghum farmers. The farm size and labour were significantly different from zero in influencing the net farm income of smallholder sorghum farmers. The study recommends mechanized farming utilizing improved seeds and new farm technologies to increase productivity, income and welfare status.

Keywords

: Welfare Status, Net Farm Income, Tobit Regression Model, Sorghum Farmers, North West, Nigeria.

Project Number

NIL

DETERMINANTS OF WELFARE STATUS AND NET FARM INCOME AMONG SMALLHOLDER SORGHUM FARMERS IN NORTH WEST, NIGERIA

Abstract

This study focused on the determinants of welfare status and net farm income among smallholder sorghum farmers in North West, Nigeria. A multi-stage sampling method was employed to select 140 smallholder sorghum farmers. Primary data were used. The data were analyzed using
descriptive and inferential statistics. The results show that the mean age of smallholder sorghum farmers was 47 years. The smallholder sorghum farmers were literate with approximate of 11 years of school education. Approximate 75% of smallholder sorghum farmers were members of cooperative organizations. Averagely, the farm size was estimated at 1.5 hectares, this means they are small-scale farmers. The gross margin and net farm income were calculated at 557175.35 and 518, 022.45 Naira per hectare, respectively. This shows that sorghum production is profitable. The total income and expenditure were estimated at 12192714.72 and 476439.76 Naira, respectively. The sorghum farmer household income exchange was calculated at 2.56. Approximate 97 which amounted to 69.29% of smallholder farmers had increased in welfare status from sorghum farming. The age of farmers, level of education, household size, farm experience, farm size, and amount of credit accessed were significantly different from zero in influencing the welfare status of smallholder sorghum farmers. The farm size and labour were significantly different from zero in influencing the net farm income of smallholder sorghum farmers. The study recommends mechanized farming utilizing improved seeds and new farm technologies to increase productivity, income and welfare status.

Keywords

Welfare Status, Net Farm Income, Tobit Regression Model, Sorghum Farmers, North West, Nigeria.

Ethical Statement

NIL

Supporting Institution

NIL

Project Number

NIL

Thanks

Thanks

References

• Aduba, J.J., Mohammed, B.T., Jiasaya, I., Ozumba, I.C., 2013. An Economic Analysis of Sorghum Production among Sorghum Farmers in Kwara State, Nigeria. Global Journal of Current Research, 1(4), 116 – 123.
• Ajeigbe, H.A., Akinseye, F.M., Jonah, J., Kunihya, A., 2018. Sorghum Yield and Water Use under Phosphorous Fertilization Application in the Sudan Savanna of Nigeria. Global Advanced Research Journal of Agricultural Science, 7(8), 245 – 257.
• Alemu, G., Haji, J., 2016. Economic Efficiency of Sorghum Production for Smallholder Farmers in Eastern Ethiopis: The Case of Habro District. Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development, 7 (15), 44 – 51.
• Baiyegunhi, L.J.S., Fraser, G.C.G., 2009. Profitability in Sorghum Production in Three Villages of Kaduna State, Nigeria. Journal of Applied Sciences Research, 5 (10), 1685 – 1691.
• Dube, M.H., Musara, J.P., Bediako, J., & Munyati, V.T., 2014. Marketing Proclivity, Constraints and Opportunities in the Sorghum Based Stockfeed Value Chain in Lusitu, Zambia. Journal of Agriculture, Economics and Rural Development, 2(3), 110 – 122.
• FAO, 2024. Food and Agriculture Organization, Data Base, Rome, Italy, 2024.
• FMARD (2018). Federal Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development of Nigeria.
• Grovermann, C., Umesh,K.B., Qui,S., Kumar,B.G., Sakamma, S., Moakes, S., 2018. The Economic Reality of Under-Utilized Crops for Climate Resilience, Food Security and Nutrition: Assessing Finger Millet Productivity in India. Agriculture, 8(9), 131
• Mitaru, N.B., Mgonja, A.M., Rwomushana, I., Opio, F., 2012. Integrated Sorghum and Millet Sector for Improved Livelihood in ECA. Proceedings of the ECARSAM Stakeholders’ Conference, 20th – 22nd November, 2006 Dar-es-Salaam Tanzania.
• Mundia, C.W., Secchi, S., Akamani, K., Wang, G., 2019. A Regional Comparison of Factors Affecting Global Sorghum Production: The Case of North America, Asia and Africa’s Sahel. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11072135.
• Mustapha, M.B., Abdullahi, A.N., Yusuf, B.I., 2018. “Impact of Fadama iii additional financing (AF) on income and food security status of beneficiaries in Sokoto state, Nigeria”, International Journal of Development and Sustainability, 7(11),2731-2742.
• Naik, A., Teggelli, R.G., Ahamed, Z., Patil, D.H., 2016. Yield Gap Analysis of Sorghum through Front Line Demonstrations in Kalaburagi Region of Northern Karnataka. Research in Environment and Life Sciences, 9 (5), 597 – 598.
• Ndjeunga, J., Mausch, K & Simtowe, F 2015. Assessing the Effectiveness of Agricultural R&D for Groundnut, Pearl Millet, Pigeon Pea, and Sorghum in West and Central Africa and East and Southern Africa. In: Walker, T.S., Alwang, J Editor. Crop Improvement, Adoption, and Impact of Improved Varieties in Food Crops in Sub-Saharan Africa. Wallingford, UK: CABI; p. 123 – 147
• Kuswanto, K., Zukifli, A., Armandelis, A., 2019. The Impacts of the Efficiency of Rubber Production on the Welfare of Rubber Farmers in Jambi Province. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 9 (2), 80 – 86.
• Onuk, E.G., Girei, A.A., Audu, S.I., 2020. Production Function Analysis and Profitability of Sorghum-Groundnut Intercropping in Doma Local Government Area of Nasarawa State, Nigeria. Russian Journal of Agricultural and Socio-Economic Sciences, 6 (102), 170 – 177.
• Okeyo, S.O., Ndirangu, S.N., Isaboke, H.N., Njeru, L.K., 2020. Determinants of Sorghum Productivity among Small-Scale Farmers in Siaya County, Kenya. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 16(5), 722 – 731.
• Teferi, E.T., 2013. Adoption of Improved Sorghum Varieties and Farmers’ Varietal Trait Preference, North Wolo Zone, Ethiopia.
• Tugga, S.E., Hassan, A.A., Ojeleye, O.A., 2023. Profitability Analysis of Sorghum Small-Scale Farmers in Selected Local Government Areas of Gombe State, Nigeria. Journal of Agripreneurship and Sustainable Development, 6(1), 47 – 55.
• Yahaya, M.A., Shimelis, H., Nebie, B., Ojiewo,C.O., & Danso-Abbeam, G., 2022. Sorghum Production in Nigeria: Opportunities, Constraints, and Recommendations. ACTA Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section B-Soil & Plant Science, 72 (1), 660 – 672
• Yamane, T., 1967. Statistics: An Introductory Analysis, 2nd Edition., New York: Harper and Row. Pp. 33-50.