THE RELATIONSHIP OF EXISTENTIAL AND ECONOMIC CONCERNS WITH THE TRUST IN GOVERNMENT DURING THE PANDEMIC

Öz

The aim of this study is to analyze the relationship between people’s existential and economic concerns and their trust in the government during the COVID-19 pandemic. In this context, it is aimed to obtain in-depth information about the direction of government-individual relations during the pandemic, how the policies regarding trust in the government during and after the pandemic are perceived, the relationship between the duties and responsibilities assigned to the government and the existential and economic concerns of individuals. In line with these purposes, the method of the study was determined as the explanatory sequential mixed method. In this framework, firstly, quantitative data collection and analysis process was carried out, and qualitative research was carried out with the results obtained from there. According to quantitative findings; As the trust in the government and its institutions increases, there is a regression in the existential concerns of individuals. On the other hand, it has been determined that there is no relationship between gender and trust in the government, but existential concerns are related; there is a significant difference between trust in the government and existential concerns according to work-occupational status; trust in the government and existential concerns decrease as age increases; as religious commitment increases, existential concerns decrease, while trust in the government increases. In addition, it has been observed that there is a significant relationship between the economic concerns of individuals and their trust in the government and their existential concerns. It was understood that the empirical and descriptive analysis results were also supported by the qualitative findings, and it was determined that they largely overlapped with the relevant literature.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• COVID-19 pandemic
• trust in the government
• existential concerns
• economic concerns
• government-individual relations
• duties and responsibilities assigned to the government

The Relationship of Existential and Economic Concerns with the Trust in Government During the Pandemic

Öz

The aim of this study is to analyze the relationship between people’s existential and economic concerns and their trust in the government during the COVID-19 pandemic. In this context, it is aimed to obtain in-depth information about the direction of government-individual relations during the pandemic, how the policies regarding trust in the government during and after the pandemic are perceived, the relationship between the duties and responsibilities assigned to the government and the existential and economic concerns of individuals. In line with these purposes, the method of the study was determined as the explanatory sequential mixed method. In this framework, firstly, quantitative data collection and analysis process was carried out, and qualitative research was carried out with the results obtained from there. According to quantitative findings; As the trust in the government and its institutions increases, there is a regression in the existential concerns of individuals. On the other hand, it has been determined that there is no relationship between gender and trust in the government, but existential concerns are related; there is a significant difference between trust in the government and existential concerns according to work-occupational status; trust in the government and existential concerns decrease as age increases; as religious commitment increases, existential concerns decrease, while trust in the government increases. In addition, it has been observed that there is a significant relationship between the economic concerns of individuals and their trust in the government and their existential concerns. It was understood that the empirical and descriptive analysis results were also supported by the qualitative findings, and it was determined that they largely overlapped with the relevant literature.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• COVID-19 Pandemic
• Trust in the Government
• Existential Concerns
• Economic Concerns
• Government-Individual Relations
• Duties and Responsibilities Assigned to the Government

Kaynakça

1. Ağan, B. (2020). Davranışsal iktisatta Covid-19 pandemi süreci: kaygı düzeyinin sosyo-ekonomik karar alma davranışları üzerine etkisi. Turkish Studies, 15(6), 1001-1016. https://dx.doi.org/10.7827/TurkishStudies.43731
2. Ankara, H. G. ve Tekin, B. (2021) “Bir Güven Araştırması: “Hayat Eve Sığar” Uygulaması”, Sağlık ve Sosyal Refah Araştırmaları Dergisi 2021, Cilt-Vol. 3, Sayı-No 2, 153-158.
3. Aribogan, D. U., and Tugba Aydin-Ozturk, T. (2021). Coronavirus in Turkey effects on daily life and change of habits in society. In V. Bozkurt, G. Dawes, H. Gulerce, & P. Westenbroek (Eds), The societal impacts of COVID-19: A transnational perspective (pp. 29-43). Istanbul, Turkey: Istanbul University Press. https://doi.org/10.26650/B/SS49.2021.006.03
4. Bartik, A. W., Bertrand, M., Cullen, Z., Glaeser, E. L., Luca, M., & Stanton, C. (2020). The impact of COVID-19 on small business outcomes and expectations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(30), 17656-17666.
5. Bayhan, V., and Bozkurt, V. (2021). Psycho-social effects of the covid-19 pandemic on the young people. In H. Gülerce, V. Nimehchisalem, V. Bozkurt, G. Dawes, & S. Rafik-Galea (Eds), Society in the covid-19 pandemic: inequalities, challenges, and opportunities (pp. 57-68). Ankara, Turkey: Pegem Akademi.
6. Bozkurt, V. (2020). Working during a Pandemic: Economic concerns, digitalization, and productivity, in the COVID-19 Pandemic and its Economic, Social, and Political Impacts, Editors: D. Demirbaş, V. Bozkurt, S. Yorğun, Istanbul University Press, Istanbul.
7. Bozkurt, V., and Aytaç, S. (2021). Life satisfaction and happiness during the pandemic period. In H. Gülerce, V. Nimehchisalem, V. Bozkurt, G. Dawes, & S. Rafik-Galea (Eds), Society in the covid-19 pandemic: inequalities, challenges, and opportunities (pp. 259-272). Ankara, Turkey: Pegem Akademi.
8. Bylski, N. C., and Westman, A. S. (1991). Relationships among Defense Style, Existential Anxiety, and Religiosity. Psychological Reports, 68(3_suppl), 1389–1390. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1991.68.3c.1389

9. Caki, N., Krupić, D., and Corr, P. J. (2021). Pyschosocial effects of the COVID-19 pandemic. In V. Bozkurt, G. Dawes, H. Gulerce, & P. Westenbroek (Eds), The societal impacts of COVID-19: A transnational perspective (pp. 63-78). Istanbul, Turkey: Istanbul University Press. https://doi.org/10.26650/B/SS49.2021.006.05
10. Chanley, V. A., Rudolph, T. J., & Rahn, W. M. (2000). The Origins and Consequences of Public Trust in Government. Public Opinion Quarterly, 64(3), 239–256. doi:10.1086/317987
11. Christensen, L. B., Johnson, R. B., ve Turner, L. A. (2020). Araştırma Yöntemleri: Desen ve Analiz. (Çev. A., Aypay). Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık.
12. Creswell John W., Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Karma Yöntem Araştırmaları, Tasarımı ve Yürütülmesi, Çev. Ed. Yüksel Dede ve Selçuk Beşir Demir, Ankara, Anı Yayıncılık.
13. Creswell, John W. (2014). Nitel, Nicel ve Karma Yöntem Yaklaşımları Araştırma Deseni. (Çev. Ed. Selçuk Beşir Demir). Ankara, Eğiten Kitap.
14. Çelebi, E., ve Özgüzel, S. (2021). Covid-19 Pandemi Sürecine Yönelik Kamu Spotlarının Etkinliği Üzerine Bir Araştırma. OPUS Uluslararası Toplum Araştırmaları Dergisi, 17 (Pandemi Özel Sayısı), 3448-3466.
15. Çoymak, A., Gheorghıu, M., Niens, U., Lyons, E. (2015). Vatandaşlığın Psikolojisi ve Politik Güven. Siyaset Psikolojisi (pp.257-280), Ankara: Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık.
16. Demir, Ş. ve İkizer, G. (2020). Varoluşsal Kaygının Kişilik, Sağlık ve Demografik Özellikler ile İlişkisi. Manisa Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 18 (4), 352-368. DOI: 10.18026/cbayarsos.648986
17. Demirhan, K. (2021). Kamu Yönetiminde Çevrimiçi Kitle Kaynak Kullanımı: Sağlık Bakanlığı Tarafından Covid-19 Salgını Sürecinde Açılan #Sağlıkbakanlığısizidinliyor Etiketi Örneği. Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 39(Covid 19 Özel Sayısı), 55-68.
18. Dovidio, J. F., Ikizer, E. G., Kunst, J. R., and Levy, A. (2020). “Common identity and humanity” in Together apart: The psychology of COVID-19. Eds. J. Jetten, S. D. Reicher, S. A. Haslam and T. Cruwys. London: Sage, 141–148
19. Easton, D. (1975). A Re-assessment of the Concept of Political Support. British Journal of Political Science, 5(4), 435-457. doi:10.1017/S0007123400008309
20. Esmer, Y. (1999) Devrim, Evrim, Statüko: Türkiye’de Sosyal Siyasal Ekonomik Değerler, İstanbul, TESEV Yayınları.
21. Esmer, Y. (2012) Türkiye Değerler Atlası 2012: Değişimin Kültürel Sınırları, İstanbul, Bahçeşehir Üniversitesi Yayınları.
22. Fukuyama, F. (2000). Güven, Sosyal Erdemler ve Refahın Yaratılması, Çev: Ahmet Buğdaycı, Türkiye İş Bankası Kültür Yayınları, İstanbul.
23. Garan, Ö., Yöney, E., and Bozkurt, V. (2021). Mask and adaptation to the distance during the pandemic period. In H. Gülerce, V. Nimehchisalem, V. Bozkurt, G. Dawes, & S. Rafik-Galea (Eds), Society in the covid-19 pandemic: inequalities, challenges, and opportunities (pp. 87-112). Ankara, Turkey: Pegem Akademi.
24. Gökalp, N. (2003). “Ekonomide Güven Faktörü”. Yönetim ve Ekonomi Dergisi. (10) 163-174.
25. Gönç Şavran, T., and Suğur, N. (2021). The gendered pattern of covid-19 pandemic. In H. Gülerce, V. Nimehchisalem, V. Bozkurt, G. Dawes, & S. Rafik-Galea (Eds), Society in the covid-19 pandemic: inequalities, challenges, and opportunities (pp. 1-26). Ankara, Turkey: Pegem Akademi.
26. Gündüz, F. (2020). Türkiye’nin Yeni Koronavirüs (Kovid-19) Salgını ile Sınavı: Güvenli Gelecek İnşası Çalışmaları ve Kamuoyu Algısı. Avrasya Uluslararası Araştırmalar Dergisi, 8(23), 447-467.
27. Gür, N. (2017). Güven, bürokrasi ve refah devleti. İnsan & Toplum, 7(1), 89-115. https://dx.doi.org/10.12658/human.society.7.13.M0197
28. Halıcı Kurtulan, M. ve Karaırmak, Ö. (2016). Ölüm kaygısı, tinsellik, dindarlık eğilimi ve varoluş kaygısı arasındaki ilişkilerin incelenmesi. Spiritual Psychology and Counseling, 1, 163‒187. http://dx.doi.org/10.12738/spc.2016.2.0007
29. Hardin, R. (2002), Trust and Trustworthiness, Russel Sage Foundation, New York. Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture's consequences: International differences in work-related values. Sage.
30. Karakaya, Ş. (2019). “Sosyolojik Araştırma, Yöntem ve Tekniklerinin Sosyal Medya Üzerinden Kullanımı”. Akdeniz Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi. (6). 37-56.
31. Karataş, Z. (2020). COVID-19 Pandemisinin Toplumsal Etkileri, Değişim ve Güçlenme. Türkiye Sosyal Hizmet Araştırmaları Dergisi 4(1), 3-15.
32. Konat, G. (2021). “COVID-19 Salgınının Makroekonomik Etkileri: Ekonometrik Bir Analiz”. (Ed. Aksoy, A., Karapınar, A., Zaif, F. ve Aydıntan, B.) Covid 19 Pandemisinin İşletme ve Ekonomi Alanında Etkileri Seçme Yazılar. Ankara: Gazi Kitabevi.
33. Manav, F. (2011). Kaygı Kavramı. Toplum Bilimleri Dergisi. (9). 192-201.
34. Memiş Doğan, M. ve Düzel, B. (2020). Covid-19 özelinde korku-kaygı düzeyleri. Turkish Studies, 15(4), 739-752. https://dx.doi.org/10.7827/TurkishStudies.44678
35. Messick, K. J. (2021). Music industry in crisis: The impact of a novel coronavirus on touring metal bands, promoters, and venues. In V. Bozkurt, G. Dawes, H. Gulerce, & P. Westenbroek (Eds), The societal impacts of COVID-19: A transnational perspective (pp. 83-98). Istanbul, Turkey: Istanbul University Press. https://doi.org/10.26650/B/SS49.2021.006.07
36. Neuman, W. L. (2014). Toplumsal Araştırma Yöntemleri 2. (Çev. Sedef Özge). Ankara: Siyasal Kitabevi.
37. OECD (2017). Trust and Public Policy: How Better Governance Can Help Rebuild Public Trust, OECD Public Governance Reviews, OECD Publishing, Paris. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264268920-en
38. Örselli, E. ve Sipahi, E. B. (2016). Türkiye’de Vatandaşların Kamu Kurumlarına Güveni. Journal of International Social Research, 9(45), 843-850.
39. Pasqualin, F. A., and Paiva, C. M. (2021). Brazil, land of samba and pandemic: psychosocial views on the developments of covid-19 in Brazilian society. In H. Gülerce, V. Nimehchisalem, V. Bozkurt, G. Dawes, and S. Rafik- Galea (Eds), Society in the covid-19 pandemic: inequalities, challenges, and opportunities (pp. 113-126). Ankara, Turkey: Pegem Akademi.
40. Sartre, J. P. (2016). Varoluşçuluk, Çev. Asım Bezirci, Say Yayınları.
41. Senturk, U., and Bozkurt, V. (2021). Family in the COVID-19 pandemic: Family ties and communication problems. In V. Bozkurt, G. Dawes, H. Gulerce, & P. Westenbroek (Eds), The societal impacts of COVID-19: A transnational perspective (pp. 173-191). Istanbul, Turkey: Istanbul University Press. https://doi.org/10.26650/B/SS49.2021.006.13
42. Sirgy, M. J. (2021). The Psychology of Quality of Life: Wellbeing and Positive Mental Health. Springer Nature.
43. Şahin, H., and Nerse, S. (2021). Psyco-social effects in the pandemic process and expectations for new social life. In H. Gülerce, V. Nimehchisalem, V. Bozkurt, G. Dawes, & S. Rafik-Galea (Eds), Society in the covid-19 pandemic: inequalities, challenges, and opportunities (pp. 69-86). Ankara, Turkey: Pegem Akademi.
44. T.C. İçişleri Bakanlığı Nüfus ve Vatandaşlık İşleri Genel Müdürlüğü. (2021). 2020 Yılında Türkiye’de En Çok Tercih Edilen İsimler. Erişim 20 Ağustos 2021. https://www.nvi.gov.tr/2020-yilinda-turkiyede-en-cok-tercih-edilen-isimler-merkezicerik
45. Toraman, S. (2021). Karma Yöntemler Araştırması: Kısa Tarihi, Tanımı, Bakış Açıları ve Temel Kavramlar/ Mixed Methods Research: A Brief History, Definitions, Perspectives, and Key Elements. Nitel Sosyal Bilimler, 3 (1), 1-29. DOI: 10.47105/nsb.847688
46. Turan, E., Aydilek, E., ve Taban, H. (2017). Vatandaşların Güven Algılarının ve Vatandaşla Devlet Arasındaki Psikolojik Sözleşmenin Kamu Yönetimine Etkisine Yönelik Uygulamalı Bir Araştırma. Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal ve Teknik Araştırmalar Dergisi, (13), 25-44. Uslaner, M. E. (2002), The Moral Foundations of Trust. Cambridge University Press.
47. van Bruggen, V., Vos, J., Westerhof, G., Bohlmeijer, E., and Glas, G. (2015). Systematic review of existential anxiety instruments. Journal of humanistic psychology, 55(2), 173-201.
48. Yilmazkuday, H. (2020), Unequal Unemployment Effects of COVID-19 and Monetary Policy across U.S. States (August 28, 2020). Journal of Behavioral Economics for Policy, Forthcoming, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3559860 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3559860