SAĞLIK ÇALIŞANLARINDA ALGILANAN ÖRGÜTSEL ENGELİN ÖRGÜTSEL SİNİZM ÜZERİNDEKİ ETKİSİNDE ADALETSİZLİK ALGISI İLE ALGILANAN MAĞDURİYETİN SERİ ARACILIK ROLÜ

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 23 Sayı: 58, 1979 - 2004, 24.10.2025

Ferhat Onur Ağaoğlu , Sinan Tarsuslu

https://doi.org/10.35408/comuybd.1584926

Öz

Bu çalışmanın amacı, algılanan adaletsizlik ve mağduriyetin, sağlık çalışanlarının örgütsel engellerle karşılaştıklarında örgütsel sinizm düzeylerini nasıl etkilediğini araştırmaktır. Algılanan adaletsizlik ve mağduriyetin seri aracılık rolünün irdelendiği bu araştırmada kesitsel bir tasarım benimsenmiştir. Nicel veri toplama yöntemine dayanan mevcut çalışma ayrıca tanımlayıcı- ilişki arayıcı türdedir. Çalışmada amaç doğrultusundaki hedefleri yerine getirebilmek için alan yazınında geçerliliği ve güvenilirliği kanıtlanmış ölçekler kullanılmıştır. Araştırmanın örneklemi ise Türkiye’nin Doğu Anadolu Bölgesi'nde yer alan, küçük ölçekli bir kamu hastanesinde çalışan doktor, hemşire, tıbbi sekreter, yardımcı sağlık personeli ve idari personelden oluşmaktadır. Örneklem seçiminde basit rastgele örnekleme yöntemi tercih edilmiştir. Araştırma bulguları değerlendirildiğinde ise sağlık çalışanlarının algıladıkları örgütsel engel ile algılanan adaletsizlik, mağduriyet ve örgütsel sinizm davranışları arasında pozitif ve anlamlı ilişkiler tespit edilmiştir. Çalışma sonucunda, sağlık çalışanlarının algıladıkları örgütsel engelin örgütsel sinizm üzerindeki etkisinde hem adaletsizlik algısının hem de mağduriyetin ayrı ayrı aracılık rolü bulunduğu, ayrıca bu iki değişkenin seri aracı rol üstlendiği belirlenmiştir. Böylece, örgütsel süreçlerde yaşanan adaletsizlik ve mağduriyet duygularının, çalışanların örgütsel sinizmini artırdığı ortaya konmuştur.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Sağlık Çalışanları , Örgütsel Engel , Mağduriyet , Adaletsizlik Algısı , Örgütsel Sinizm.

THE SERIAL MEDIATING ROLE OF PERCEIVED INJUSTICE AND PERCEIVED VICTIMIZATION IN THE EFFECT OF PERCEIVED ORGANIZATIONAL BARRIERS ON ORGANIZATIONAL CYNICISM AMONG HEALTHCARE WORKERS

Öz

This study examined how perceived injustice and victimization shape healthcare workers' cynical attitudes toward organizational barriers. A cross-sectional design was adopted in this study, and the serial mediation role of perceived injustice and victimization was examined. Based on a quantitative data collection method, this study is also a descriptive-relationship-seeking type. In order to fulfill the objectives of the study, scales with proven validity and reliability in the literature were used. The study sample consists of doctors, nurses, medical secretaries, auxiliary health personnel, and administrative staff working in a small-scale public hospital in the Eastern Anatolia Region of Turkey. A simple random sampling method was preferred in sample selection. When the research findings were evaluated, positive and significant relationships were found between the organizational barriers perceived by healthcare professionals and perceived injustice, victimization, and organizational cynicism behaviors. The results revealed that both perceived injustice and perceived victimization separately mediated the effect of perceived organizational barriers on organizational cynicism, and that these two variables also played a serial mediating role. Accordingly, it was demonstrated that feelings of injustice and victimization experienced in organizational processes increase healthcare workers’ organizational cynicism.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Health Professionals , Organisational Barrier , Victimization , Perception Of İnjustice , Organisational Cynicism.

Kaynakça

• Abraham, R. (2000). Organisational cynicism: Bases and consequences. Genetic, social, and general psychology monographs, 126(3), 269.
• Abubakar, A., Namin, B., Harazneh, I., Arasli, H. and Tunç, T. (2017). Does gender moderates the relationship between favouritism/nepotism, supervisor incivility, cynicism and workplace withdrawal: A neural network and SEM approach. Tourism Management Perspectives, 23, 129-139. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TMP.2017.06.001.
• Aquino, K. and Bradfield, M. (2000). Perceived Victimization in the Workplace: The Role of Situational Factors and Victim Characteristics. Organization Science, 11, 525-537. https://doi.org/10.1287/ORSC.11.5.525.15205.
• Aquino, K. and Lamertz, K. (2004). A relational model of workplace victimization: social roles and patterns of victimization in dyadic relationships. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(6), 1023.
• Aquino, K., & Thau, S. (2009). Workplace victimization: Aggression from the target's perspective. Annual review of psychology, 60(1), 717-741.
• Aquino, K., Grover, S. L., Bradfield, M. and Allen, D. G. (1999). The effects of negative affectivity, hierarchical status, and self-determination on workplace victimization. Academy of Management Journal, 42(3): 260-272.
• Baron, M. and Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182.
• Brandes, P, Dharwadkar, R. and Dean, J. W., (1999), Does Organisational Cynicism Matter? Employee and Supervisor Perspectives on Work Outcomes. Eastern Academy of Management Proceedings, 150-153.
• Çiğdemli, A. Ö. Ö., Kobanoğlu, M. S. and Erdoğan, S. U. (2023). The Mediating Role of Organisational Cynicism in the Relationship between Perceived Organisational Barrier and Task Sabotage in Hotel Businesses. Anadolu University Journal of Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, 24(1), 425-450.
• Colquitt, J. A., Conlon, D. E., Wesson, M. J., Porter, C. O., & Ng, K. Y. (2001). Justice at the millennium: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 425–445.
• Coser, L. (1957). Social Conflict and the Theory of Social Change. British Journal of Sociology, 8, 197. https://doi.org/10.2307/586859.
• Cropanzano, R., & Mitchell, M. S. (2005). Social exchange theory: An interdisciplinary review. Journal of management, 31(6), 874-900.
• Dean Jr, J. W., Brandes, P., & Dharwadkar, R. (1998). Organizational cynicism. Academy of Management review, 23(2), 341-352.
• Gibney, R. A. Y., Zagenczyk, T. J., Fuller, J. B., Hester, K. I. M. and Caner, T. (2011). Exploring Organizational Obstruction and the Expanded Model of Organizational Identification, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 41(5), 1083-1109.
• Gibney, R., Zagenczyk, T. J. and Masters, M. F. (2009). The Negative Aspects of Social Exchange: An Introduction to Perceived Organisational Obstruction, Group and Organization Management, 34(6) 665- 697.
• Gibney, R.F., Jr. (2007). Cognitive organisational obstruction: Its nature, antecedents and consequences. (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation). Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh.
• Greenberg, J. (1990). Organizational justice: Yesterday, today, and tomorrow. Journal of management, 16(2), 399-432.
• Gürbüz, S. (2019). Mediating, regulatory and situational impact analyses in social sciences. Ankara: Seçkin Publishing.
• Gürbüz, S. (2019). Structural equation modelling with Amos, Ankara: Seçkin publishing.
• Gürbüz, S. and Şahin, F. (2014). Research methods in social sciences. Ankara: Seçkin Publishing, 271.
• Hair, J.F., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J. and Anderson, R.E. (2014). Multivariate data analiysis (7th Edn). Harlow; Pearson, p.619.
• Hayes, A. F. (2013). Mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis. Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach, 1, 20.
• James, M. S. L. (2005). Antecedents and consequences of cynicism in organizations: An examination of the potential positive and negative effects on school systems (Order No. 3183076). Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (304997847).
• Jordan, S. L., Palmer, J. C., Daniels, S. R., Hochwarter, W. A., Perrewé, P. L., and Ferris, G. R. (2022). Subjectivity in fairness perceptions: How heuristics and self-efficacy shape the fairness expectations and perceptions of organisational newcomers. Applied Psychology, 71(1), 103-128.
• Kanbur, E., and Canbek, M. (2018). The Effect of Perceived Organisational Justice on Organisational Cynicism: The Mediating Role of Perceived Organisational Support. Business and Management Studies: An International Journal, 6(3), 36-57.
• Kayış, A. (2010), Reliability Analysis, SPSS Applied Multivariate Statistical Techniques, 404-419, Ed. Şeref Kalaycı, 5th Edition, Ankara, Asil Yayın Dağıtım,
• Kee, D. M. H., and Chung, K. S. (2021). Perceived organisational injustice, job satisfaction, organisational commitment, and turnover intention: a study of MNCs in Malaysia. International Journal of Business and Society, 22(2), 1047-1065.
• Koçak, D. (2019). Turkish Adaptation of Perceived Organisational Barrier Scale and Its Effect on Intention to Stay at Work. Business and Management Studies: An International Journal, 7(1), 58-77.
• Koçak, D., and Kerse, G. (2022). How Perceived Organizational Obstruction Influences Job Satisfaction: The Roles of Interactional Justice and Organizational Identification. SAGE Open, 12. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221079933.
• Köse, N., and Aydoğan, E. (2021). The mediating role of organisational cynicism in the effect of organisational justice on turnover intention in a research for defence industry employees. Ankara Hacı Bayram Veli University Journal of Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, 23(1), 233-250.
• Kuo, C. C., Chang, K., Quinton, S., Lu, C. Y., and Lee, I. (2015). Gossip in the workplace and the implications for HR management: A study of gossip and its relationship to employee cynicism. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 26(18), 2288-2307.
• MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., and Williams, J. (2004). Confidence limits for the indirect effect: Distribution of the product and resampling methods. Multivariate behavioural research, 39(1), 99-128.
• Nagel, T. (1973). Rawls on justice. The Philosophical Review, 220-234.
• Naseer, S., Raja, U., Syed, F. and Baig, MUA (2021). When and why organisational cynicism leads to CWBs. Personnel Review, 50 (1), 90-107.
• Niehoff, B. P. and Moorman, R. H. (1993). Justice as a Mediator of the Relationship Between Methods of Monitoring and Organisational Citizenship Behaviour. Academy of Management Journal, 36(3), 527-556.
• Pelit, N. and Pelit, E. (2014). Mobbing and Organisational Cynicism (Theory-Process and Yansımaları to Organisations), Ankara: Detay Publishing.
• Polat, S. (2007). The Relationship Between Secondary School Teachers' Organisational Justice Perceptions, Organisational Trust Levels and Organisational Citizenship Behaviours (Doctoral Dissertation). Kocaeli University Institute of Social Sciences, Izmit.
• Riege, A. (2005). Three-dozen knowledge-sharing barriers managers must consider. Journal of knowledge management, 9(3), 18-35.
• Soysal, E., and Kerse, G. (2023). The Effect of Organisational Injustice on Organisational Cynicism and Time Theft: A Mediated Model. Karamanoğlu Mehmetbey University Journal of Social and Economic Research, 25(45), 902-913.
• Taşkın, E. (2022). Organisational injustice and organisational cynicism as antecedents of time theft: An application in Konya Organised Industrial Zone (Master's thesis, Karamanoğlu Mehmetbey University).
• Ülbeği, İ. D., Özgen, H. M., and Özgen, H. (2014). Turkish adaptation of the perceived victimisation scale: Reliability and validity analysis. Çukurova University Journal of Institute of Social Sciences, 23(2), 101-112.
• Volpe, R. L., Mohammed, S., Hopkins, M., Shapiro, D., and Dellasega, C. (2014). The negative impact of organisational cynicism on physicians and nurses. The health care manager, 33(4), 276-288.