Relationship Between Knowledge Economy Performance Indicators And Selected Macroeconomic Variables: an Application for OECD Countries

Dilek Murat; Betül İnam; Simla Güzel

Relationship Between Knowledge Economy Performance Indicators And Selected Macroeconomic Variables: an Application for OECD Countries

Öz

Bilgi, tarih boyunca toplumların zenginliğinin en önemli kaynağı olmuştur. Daha fazla ve daha nitelikli bilgiye sahip olan ve bilgiyi etkin bir siyasal, ekonomik ve sosyal örgütlenme ile doğru biçimde kullanabilen toplumlar diğerlerinin önüne geçerek daha yüksek bir refah seviyesine erişmiştir. Bu çalışmada bilgi ekonomisi performans göstergeleri ve seçilmiş makro ekonomik değişkenler arasındaki ilişki tespit edilmeye çalışılmıştır. Bu amaçla ele alınan OECD üyesi 34 ülke için derlenen veri seti kanonik korelasyon analizi ile değerlendirilmiştir. Yapılan analizler sonucunda değişken setleri arasında anlamlı ve güçlü bir ilişki olduğu görülmüştür.

Anahtar Kelimeler: Bilgi Ekonomisi, Bilgi ve İletişim Teknolojileri (BİT), Kanonik
Korelasyon Analizi.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Knowledge Economy,Information and Communication Technologies (ICT),Canonical Correlation Analysis

Kaynakça

REFERENCES
Amiri, Shahram and Reif, Brian, “Internet Penetration and its Correlation to Gross Domestic Product: An Analysis of the Nordic Countries”, International Journal of Business, Humanities and Technology, Vol. 3, No. 2, 2013, pp. 50-60.
Billon, Margarita, Lera-Lopez Fernando and Marco, Rocio, “Differences in Digitalization Levels: A Multivariate Analysis Studying the Global Digital Divide”, Review of World Economics, Vol. 146, No. 1, 2010, pp. 39-73.
Beilock, Richard and Dimitrova, Daniela V., “An Exploratory Model of Inter-Country Internet Diffusion”, Telecommunications Policy, Vol. 27, 2003, pp. 237–252.
Boshkin, Micheal J., Lau, Lawrence J., “Generalized, Solow – Neutral Technical Progress and Postwar Economic Growth”, NBER Working Paper No:8023, 2000, pp.1-39.
Colecchia, Alessandra and Schreye, Paul (2002), “Ict Investment and Economic Growth in the 1990s: Is The United States A Unique Case? A Comparative Study of Nine OECD Countries”, STI Working Paper, 2002, pp.1-31.
Dewan, Sanjeev and Kraemer, L. Kenneth, “Information Technology and Productivity: Evidence From Country-Level Data”, Management Science, Vol. 46, No. 4, 2000, pp. 548-562.
Drucker, Peter F., Kapitalist Ötesi Toplum, İnkılap Kitabevi, İstanbul, 1993.

Erkekoğlu, Hatice ve Arıç, K. Halil, “APEC Ülkeleri ve Türkiye’nin Bilgi Toplumu Kriterleri Açısından İstatistiksel Analizi ve Bazı Tespitler”, Bilgi Ekonomisi ve Yönetimi Dergisi, Vol. 8, No. 1, 2013, pp. 103-114.
Falk, Martin, “R&D Spending in the High-tech Sector and Economic Growth”, Research in Economics, Vol. 61, 2007, pp.140-147.
Hargittai, Eszter, “Weaving the Western Web: Explaining Differences in Internet Connectivity Among OECD Countries”, Telecommunications Policy, Vol. 23, No. 10–11, 1999, pp. 701–718.
Jin, Sangki and Cheong Moon Cho, “Is ICT a New Essential for National Economic Growth in an Information Society?” Government Information Quarterly, Vol. 32, 2015, pp. 253-260.
Johnson, Richard A. and Wichern Dean. W., Applied Multivariate Statistical Analysis, 4th ed., Prentice-Hall Inc., Upper Saddle River, New Jersey 1998.I NISTRY OF DEVELOPMENT Kamara, Abdul B., Bourish, Lobna and Nyende, Magidu, “Growing a Knowledge Based Economy: Evidence from Public Expenditure and Education in Africa”, Economic Research Working Paper, No: 88, African Development Bank, 2007, pp. 1-31.
Kiiski, Sampsa and Pohjola Matti, “Cross-country Diffusion of the Internet”, Information Economics and Policy, Vol. 14, No. 2, 2002, pp. 297–310.
Koski Heli, Rouvinen Petri and Yla-Anttila Pekka, “ICT Clusters in Europe the Great Central Banana and the Small Nordic Potato”, Information Economics and Policy, Vol. 14, 2002, pp.145–165.
OECD, “The Knowledge-Based Economy”, OECD/GD(96)102, Paris, 1996.
OECD, “New Sources of Growth: Knowledge-Based Capital Key Analyses and Policy Conclusions”, Synthesis Report, 2013.
O'Mahony Mary and Vecchi, Michela (2005), “Quantifying the Impact of ICT Capital on Output Growth: A Heterogeneous Dynamic Panel Approach”, Economica, Vol. 72, No. 288, 2005, pp. 615-633.
Oort Frank G. Van, Oud, Johan H. L. and Raspe Otto, “The Urban Knowledge Economy and Employment Growth: a Spatial Structural Equation Modeling Approach”, The Annals of Regional Science, Vol. 43, 2009, pp. 859-877.
Özdamar, Kazım, Paket Programlar ile İstatistiksel Veri Analizi, 5. Baskı, Kaan Kitabevi, Eskişehir, 2004.
Pick, James B. and Azari, Rasool, “Global Digital Divide: Influence of Socioeconomic, Governmental, and Accessibility Factors on Information Technology”, Information Technology for Development, Vol. 14, No. 2, 2008, pp. 91-115.
Pohjola, Matti, “Information Technology and Economic Growth: A Cross-Country Analysis”, United Nations University / World Institute for Development Economics Research (UNU/WIDER) Working Papers, No: 173, January 2000.
Powell, Walter W. and Snellman Kaisa (2004), “The Knowledge Economy”, Annu. Rev. Sociol, Vol. 30, 2004, pp.199-220.
Republic of Turkey Ministry of Development, “2015-2018 Bilgi Toplumu Stratejisi ve Eylem Planı”, Ankara, 2015.
Sharma, Subhash, Applied Multivariate Techniques, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 1996.
Stewart Douglas and Love William, “A general canonical correlation index”, Psychological Bulletin, Vol 70 (3, Pt.1), 1968, pp. 160-163.
Suh, Joonghae and Chen, Drek H. C., Korea as a Knowledge Economy, Korea Development Institute and World Bank Institute, Washington DC, 2007.
Taşçı, Kamil (2013), “Bilgi ve İletişim Teknolojileri Sektörünün Girdi-Çıktı Analizi Yöntemiyle Türkiye Ekonomisi Açısından Önemi”, Akademik Bakış Dergisi, Vol. 34, 2013, pp. 1-20.
Tatlıdil, Hüseyin, Uygulamalı Çok Değişkenli İstatistik Analiz, Ziraat Matbaacılık A.Ş., Ankara, 2002. Yamak, Rahmi ve Koçak, Necmettin Alpay, “Bilgi Teknolojisi Harcamalarının Ekonomik Büyüme Üzerine Etkileri: 1993-2005”, Bilgi Ekonomisi ve Yönetimi Dergisi, Vol. 2, No. 1, 2007, pp. 1-10. Wong, Poh-Kam (2002), “ICT Production and Diffusion in Asia: Digital Dividends or Digital Divide Information Economics and Policy, Vol. 14, No. 2, 2002, pp. 167–187.
World Bank (2012), http://knoema.ru/atlas/sources/WB?topic=World-Rankings.
World Economic Forum, “ICT for Economic Growth: Adynamic Ecosystem Driving The Global Recovery”, 2009.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

Türkçe

Konular

-

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yazarlar

Dilek Murat ^*
Türkiye

Betül İnam

Simla Güzel

Yayımlanma Tarihi

20 Nisan 2018

Gönderilme Tarihi

1 Mart 2017

Kabul Tarihi

2 Mayıs 2017

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2018 Cilt: 15 Sayı: 30

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA82ND52RE

Kaynak Göster

RIS / Bibtex

APA

Murat, D., İnam, B., & Güzel, S. (2018). Relationship Between Knowledge Economy Performance Indicators And Selected Macroeconomic Variables: an Application for OECD Countries. Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi, 15(30), 9-26. https://izlik.org/JA82ND52RE

AMA

1.Murat D, İnam B, Güzel S. Relationship Between Knowledge Economy Performance Indicators And Selected Macroeconomic Variables: an Application for OECD Countries. Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi. 2018;15(30):9-26. https://izlik.org/JA82ND52RE

Chicago

Murat, Dilek, Betül İnam, ve Simla Güzel. 2018. “Relationship Between Knowledge Economy Performance Indicators And Selected Macroeconomic Variables: an Application for OECD Countries”. Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi 15 (30): 9-26. https://izlik.org/JA82ND52RE.

EndNote

Murat D, İnam B, Güzel S (01 Nisan 2018) Relationship Between Knowledge Economy Performance Indicators And Selected Macroeconomic Variables: an Application for OECD Countries. Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi 15 30 9–26.

IEEE

[1]D. Murat, B. İnam, ve S. Güzel, “Relationship Between Knowledge Economy Performance Indicators And Selected Macroeconomic Variables: an Application for OECD Countries”, Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi, c. 15, sy 30, ss. 9–26, Nis. 2018, [çevrimiçi]. Erişim adresi: https://izlik.org/JA82ND52RE

ISNAD

Murat, Dilek - İnam, Betül - Güzel, Simla. “Relationship Between Knowledge Economy Performance Indicators And Selected Macroeconomic Variables: an Application for OECD Countries”. Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi 15/30 (01 Nisan 2018): 9-26. https://izlik.org/JA82ND52RE.

JAMA

1.Murat D, İnam B, Güzel S. Relationship Between Knowledge Economy Performance Indicators And Selected Macroeconomic Variables: an Application for OECD Countries. Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi. 2018;15:9–26.

MLA

Murat, Dilek, vd. “Relationship Between Knowledge Economy Performance Indicators And Selected Macroeconomic Variables: an Application for OECD Countries”. Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi, c. 15, sy 30, Nisan 2018, ss. 9-26, https://izlik.org/JA82ND52RE.

Vancouver

1.Dilek Murat, Betül İnam, Simla Güzel. Relationship Between Knowledge Economy Performance Indicators And Selected Macroeconomic Variables: an Application for OECD Countries. Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi [Internet]. 01 Nisan 2018;15(30):9-26. Erişim adresi: https://izlik.org/JA82ND52RE