Firmalar Arası Bilgi Paylaşımı İle Tedarik Zinciri Yönetimi Performansı İlişkisinde Bilgi Kalitesinin Moderatör Etkisi

Öz

Tedarik zinciri yönetimi performansı ile ilgili yapılan araştırmalar, fir-malar arası bilgi paylaşımının tedarik zinciri performansı üzerine pozitif etkisine odaklanmıştır. Yapılan birçok araştırmada TZY’de bilgi payla-şımının önemi incelenirken, firmalar arasında paylaşılan bilginin kalitesi ihmal edilmiştir. Bu araştırma, firmalar arası bilgi paylaşımının tedarik zinciri performansına etkisini incelemede bilgi kalitesinin moderatör rolünü açıklamaktadır. 175 firmada 237 geçerli anket sayısına ulaşılmış ve firmalar arası bilgi paylaşımının tedarik zinciri performansına etkisini incelemede bilgi kalitesinin moderatör rolü hiyerarşik regresyon yöntemi ile analiz edilmiştir. Yapılan analiz; firmalar arası bilgi paylaşımının tedarik zinciri performansı üzerine etkisinde bilgi kalitesinin moderatör rolü olduğu sonucunu desteklemektedir

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Tedarik Zinciri Yönetimi, firmalar arası bilgi payla-şımı, bilgi kalitesi

The Moderating Role Of Information Quality On The Relation Between Inter-Company Information Share And Supply Chain Management Performance

Öz

The researches that are related to supply chain management performance (SCMP) have been focused on the positive impact of shared information among firms. While many researches have been investigating the importance of shared information in Supply Chain Management (SCM), the quality of shared information among firms has been neglected. This paper is explaining the moderator role of the shared information quality on the SCMP. It has been reached to 237 valid surveys through 175 firms and the moderator role of shared information quality on the SCMP has been analyzed by multiple regression method. The result of the analysis is supporting that the quality of shared information among firms has got a positive impact on the SCMP

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Supply Chain Management, Interfirm knowledge sharing

Kaynakça

1. Aydın, A.O. ve Çörekçioğlu, M., ‘Tedarik Zincirinde Kalite Odaklı Bilgi
2. Yönetimi Yaklaşımı’, Niğde Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt 5, Sayı 2, 2001, s. 1–12.
3. Bakoğlu, R. ve Yılmaz, E., “Tedarik Zinciri Tasarımının Rekabet Avantajı Yaratması Açısından Değerlendirilmesi: ‘Fast Food’ Sektörü Örneği”, (Tebliğ, 6. Ulusal Pazarlama Kongresi, Erzurum, 2001).
4. Bhatt, G.D. and Emdad, A.F., ‘An Analysis of the Virtual Value Chain in
5. Electronic Commerce’, Logistics Information Management, Vol. 38, No.5, 2001, s. 215–25.
6. Bayraktar, E., Demirbağ, M., Koh, S.C.L., Tatoğlu, E. and Zaim, H., ‘A causal analysis of the impact of information systems and supply chain management practices on operational performance: Evidence from manufacturing SMEs in Turkey’, International Journal of Production Economics, Vol.122, No. 1, 2009, p.133–49.
7. Cheng, J., Yeh, C. and Tu, C., ‘Trust and knowledge sharing in greensupply Cha- ins’, Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, Vol. 13, No. 4, 2008, s. 283–95.
8. Cheung, M., ‘Inter-firm knowledge sharing and its effect on relationship

9. value: A global supply chain perspective’, (A dissertation submitted to Tennessee University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for degree of Doctor of Philosophy , 2005).
10. Chizzo, S.A., ‘Supply chain strategies: solutions for the customer driven
11. Enterprise’, Software Magazine, Supply Chain Management Directions Supple- ment, Vol. January 1998, s.4–9.
12. Cox, A., ‘Power, Value and Supply Chain Management’, Supply Chain Manage- ment: An International Journal, Vol. 4, No. 4, 1999, s. 167–75.
13. Crook, T.R., Giunipero, L., Reus, H.T., Handfield, R. and William, K.S., “Antece- dents and Outcomes of Supply Chain Effectiveness: An Exploratory Investiga- tion”, Journal of Managerial Issues, Vol. 20, No. 2, 2008, s. 161-77.
14. Croom, S, Romano, P.and Giannakis, M., ‘Supply Chain Management: An Analy- tical Framework for Critical Literature Review’, European Journal of Purcha- sing & Supply Management, Vol. 6, No. 1, 2000, s.67-83.
15. Fawcett, S.E., Osterhaus, P., Magnan, M.G., Brau, J.C., and Mc Carter, M.W, ‘In- formation sharing and supply chain performance: the role of connectivity and willingness’, Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, Vol.12, No. 5, 2007, s. 358–68.
16. Feldmann, M. and Müller, S., ‘An incentive scheme for true information providing in supply chains’, OMEGA, Vol. 31, No. 2, 2003, s. 63–73.
17. Graham, G.and Hardaker, G., ‘Supply-Chain Management Across the Internet’, In- ternational Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics, Vol. 30, No. 3/4, 2000, s. 286-95.
18. Hartono, E., Li, X., Na, K. and Simpson, J., ‘The role of quality of shared informati- on in interorganizational systems use’, International Journal of Management,
19. Hsu, C., Kannan, V.R, Tan, K.C. and Leong, G.K., ‘Information sharing,buyer- supplier relationships, and firm performance: A multi-region analysis’, Inter- national Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, Vol. 38, No. 4, 2008, s. 296–310.
20. Jarrell, J.L., ‘Supply chain economics’, World Trade, Vol. 11, No. 11, 1998, s. 58–61.
21. Jones, R. and Towill, D.R., ‘Information enrichment: designing the supply chain for competitive Advantage’, Supply Chain Management, Vol. 2, No. 4, 1997, s.137–48.
22. Koh, S.C.L, Demirbağ, M.E., Bayraktar, E., Tatoğlu, S.and Zaim, H., ‘The impact of supply chain management practices on performance of SMEs’, Industrial Management & Data Systems, Vol. 107, No. 1, 2007, s. 103–24.
23. Lewis, A.T., “The effect of information sharing, organizational capability and re- lationship characteristics on outsourcing performance in the supplychain: An empirical study”, (Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillmentof the Require- ments for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the GraduateSchool of The Ohio State University, 2006).
24. Li, S. and Lin, B, ‘Accessing information sharing and information qualityin supply chain management’, Decision Support Systems, Vol. 42, No.3, 2006, s. 1641– 656.
25. Lummus, R.R. and Vokurka, R.J., ‘Defining Supply Chain Management:A Histo- rical Perspective and Practical Guidelines’, Industrial Management & Data Systems, Vol. 99, No. 1, 1999, s. 11–17.
26. Lui, G.H., Yang, L., Sun, A.S.and Sun, A.S., ‘The impact of IT implementation on supply chain integration and performance’, International Journal of Producti- on Economics, Vol. 120, No. 1, 2009, s.125–38.
27. Monczka, R.M., Petersen, K.J., Handfield, R.B. and Ragatz, G.L., ‘Success factors in strategic supplier alliances: The buying company perspective’, Decision Scien- ce, Vol. 29, No. 3, 1998, s. 553–78.
28. Narasimhan, R.and Nair, A., ‘The antecedent role of quality, informationsharing and supply chain proximity on strategic alliance formation and performance’, International Journal of Production Economics, Vol. 96, No. 3, 2005, s. 301–313.
29. Petersen, K.J., ‘The effect of information quality on supply chain performance: An interorganizational information system perspective’, (A dissertation submit- ted to Michigan State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for degree of Doctor of Philosophy, 1999).
30. Samaddar, S., Nargundkar, S.and Daley, M., ‘Inter-organizational information sha- ring: The role of supply network configuration and partner goal congruence’, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 174, No. 2, 2006, s. 744–65.
31. Selness, F. and Sallis, J., ‘Promoting Relationship Learning’, Journal ofMarketing, Vol. 67, No. 3, 2003, s. 80–95.
32. Sezen, B., ‘Relative effects of design, integration and information sharing on supply chain Performance’, Supply Chain Management: An International Journal,
33. Tan K.C., Lyman S.B., and Wisner J.D., ‘Supply chain management: Astrategic perspective’, International Journal of Operations & ProductionManagement, Vol. 22 No. 5/6, 2002, s. 6-14.
34. Yüksel H., ‘Tedarik Zinciri Yönetiminde Bilgi Sistemlerinin Önemi’, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Dergisi, Cilt 4, Sayı.3, 2002, s. 261–67.
35. Zhou, H. and Benton, W.C., ‘Supply chain practice and information sharing’, Jour- nal of Operations Management, Vol. 25, No. 6, 2007, s. 1348–365.