Algılanan Örgütsel Destek, İş Özellikleri ve Kontrol Odağı Faktörlerinin İşgören Yabancılaşması Üzerine Etkileri

Öz

Bu çalışmada algılanan örgütsel desteğin, iş özelliklerinin ve kontrol odağı faktörlerinin işgören yabancılaşması üzerine etkileri araştırılmıştır. Araştırma Çalışma örneklemini Konya il merkezindeki üç hastaneden rastgele örnekleme yöntemiyle seçilen 270 sağlık çalışanı oluşturmuştur. Çalışmada Yabancılaşma Ölçeği, Algılanan Örgütsel Destek Ölçeği, İş Özellikleri Ölçeği ve Kontrol Odağı Ölçeği kullanılmıştır. Verilerin analizinde doğrulayıcı faktör analizi, tanımlayıcı istatistikler, korelasyon ve regresyon analizleri yapılmıştır. Çalışmada, iç kontrol odağının, yabancılaşmanın sosyal izolasyon boyutuna düşük düzeyde negatif yönde; dış kontrol odağı ve iş özelliklerinin, yabancılaşmaya pozitif ve düşük düzeyde ve algılanan örgütsel destek, yabancılaşmayı negatif ve düşük düzeyde etkisi olduğu sonuçları bulunmuştur

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Algılanan Örgütsel Destek, İş Özellikleri, Kontrol Odağı, İşgören Yabancılaşması

Algılanan Örgütsel Destek, İş Özellikleri ve Kontrol Odağı Faktörlerinin İşgören Yabancılaşması Üzerine Etkileri

Öz

This study investigated the variables affecting the alienation. Accordingly, it examined the effects of the internal locus of control, external locus of control and job characteristics upon alienation. The study was conducted with 270 healthcare professionals by selecting random samples from 3 grand hospitals in Konya province of Turkey. We used the Alienation Scale from the study of Banai and Weisberg (2003), Perceived Organizational Support Scale from the study of Eisenberger et al. (1986), Job Characteristics Scale from the study of Paulin, Ferguson and Bergeron (2006) and Locus of Control Scale from the study of Mueller and Thomas (2000). As a result of the study, we determined no relationship between the internal locus of control and the total score of alienation; and a low and negative relationship between the internal locus of control and the social isolation dimension of alienation. Among other variables, the external locus of control and job characteristics have a positive and low effect upon alienation, whereas the perceived organizational support has a negative and low effect upon alienation

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Perceived Organizational Support, Job Design Characteris

Kaynakça

1. Akyıldız, H., Dulupçu, M.A., Kavramsal Ve Diyalektik Süreç Olarak Yabancılaşma, Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi İktisadi Ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi, Vol.8, No.3, 2003, s.27-48.
2. Allen, D.G., Shore, L.M., Griffeth, R.W., The role of Perceived Organizational Support and Supportive Human Resource Practices in the Turnover Process , Journal of Management, Vol.29, No.1, 2003, s.99-118.
3. Andrew, M.C., Kacmar, K.M., Discriminating among organizational politics, justi- ce, and support , Journal of Organizational Behavior, Vol.22, No.4, 2001, s.347- 366.
4. Armeli, S., Eisenberger, R., Fasolo, P., & Lynch, P., Perceived Organizational Support and Police Performance: The Moderating Influence of Sociomotional Needs. Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol.83, 1998, s.288-297.
5. Aselage, J., Eisenberger, R., Perceived organizational support and psychologi- cal contracts: A theoretical integration , Journal of Organizational Behavior, Vol.24, No.5, 2003, 491-509.
6. Ashby, J.S, Kottman, T., Draper K., ve ark. Social Interest and Locus of Control: Relationship and Implications. J Individual Psychol, Vol.58, No.1, 2002, 52-61.
7. Astrauskaite, M., Notelaers, G., Medisauskaite, A., Kern, R. M., Workplace harass- ment: Deterring role of transformational leadership and core job characteris- tics, Scandinavian Journal of Management, 893, 2014, s.1-15.
8. Banai, M., Weisberg, J., (Yaakov), Alienation in state-owned and private companies in Russia, Scand. J. Mgmt, Vol.19, 2003, s.359-383.

9. Banai, M., Reisel, W.D. ve Probst, T.M., A Managerial and Personal Control Model: Predictions of Work Alienation and Organizational Commitment in Hungary, Journal of International Management, Vol.10, No.3, 2004, s.375-392.
10. Banai, M. ve Reisel, W.D., The Influence of Supportive Leadership and Job Characteristics on Work Alienation: A Six-Country Investigation, Journal of World Business, 42, 2007, s.463-476.
11. Bao, Y., Zhou, K.Z., Zhou N., Social alienation in a transitional economy: Antecedents and impact on attitude toward social reform, Journal of Business Research, Vol.59, 2006, s.990–998.
12. Bentler, P.M., Comparative fit indexes in structural models, Psychological Bulletin, Vol.107, 1990, s.238-246.
13. Bilgiç, R., İş Özellikleri Kuramı: Geniş Kapsamlı Gözden Geçirme, Türk Psikoloji Yazıları, Vol.11, No.22, 2008, s.66-77.
14. Bishop, J.W., Dow, K.S., and Susan M.B., Support, Commitment, and Employee Outcomes in A Team Environment, Journal of Management, Vol.26, No.6, 2000, s.1113-1132.
15. Blauner, R., Alienation and Freedom: The Factory Worker and His Industry, The Sociological Quarterly, Vol.6, No.(1), 1965, s.83-85.
16. Bolton, C.D., Source: American Journal of Sociology, Published by: The University of Chicago PressStable, Vol.78, No.3, 1972, s.537-561.
17. Breet, L., Myburgh, C., & Poggenpoel, M., The relationship between the percepti- on of own locus of control and aggression of adolescent boys. South African Journal of Education, Vol.30, 2010, s.511-526.
18. Büyükşahin, A. ve Hovardaoğlu, S. Yatırım modelinin bazı ilişkisel değişkenler yönünden incelenmesi. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, Vol.22, 2207, s.69-86.
19. Büyüköztürk, Ş., Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı, Pegem A Yayıncılık, Ankara 2007.
20. Byrne, B.M., Structural Equation Modeling With AMOS, EQS, and LISREL: Comparative Approaches to Testing for the Factorial Validity of a Measuring Instrument, International Journal of Testing, Vol.1, No.(1), 2001, s.55-86.
21. Camerino, D. and Conway, P.M. and Heijden, B.I.J.M. van der and Schoot, E. van der and Pokorski, J. and Estryn-Behar, M. and Hasselhorn, H.M. The Role of Job Alienation in Work Ability Deterioration And Unhealthy Ageing, International Congress Series 1280, 2005, s.61-66.
22. Canary, D.J., Cunningham, E.M., Cody, M.J., ve ark., Goal Types, Gender, and Locus of Control in Managing Interpersonal Conflict. Commun Res, Vol.15, No.4, 1988, s.426-446.
23. Chandra, R., The effect of perceived organizational support on organizational commitment of diagnostic imaging radiographers Radiography, Vol.12, No.2, 2006, s.118-126.
24. Coelho, F. and Augusto, M., Job Characteristics and the Creativity of Frontline Service Employees, Journal of Service Research, Vol.13, No.4, 2010, s.426-438.
25. Cropanzano, R., John C.H., Alicia A.G., and Paul T., The relationship of organiza- tional politics and support to workbehaviors, attitudes, and stress , Journal of Organizational Behavior, Vol.18, No.2, 1997, s.159-180.
26. Debnath, S.C., Tandon, S., Desıgnıng Busıness School Courses to Promote Student Motıvatıon: An Applıcatıon of The Job Characterıstıcs Model, Journal of Management Educatıon, Vol.31, No.6, 2007, s.812-831.
27. Doherty, W.J., Locus of Control Differences and Marital Dissatisfaction, Journal of Marriage and Family,Vol.43, No.2, 1981, s.369-377.
28. D’Souza, P., Mulla, Z.R., Can an Entrepreneurial Personality Compensate for a Boring Job? The Influence of Proactive Personality and Job Characteristics on Employee Engagement Levels, The Journal of Entrepreneurship, Vol.20, No.2, 2011, s.207-226.
29. Eisenberger, R., Fasolo, P., LaMastro, V.D., Perceived Organizational Support and Employee Diligence, Commitment and Innovation, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol.75, No.1, 1990, s.51-59.
30. Eisenberger, R., Huntington R., Hutchison S., and Sowa, D., Perceived Organizational Support, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol.7, 1986, s.500-507.
31. Fornell, C., and Larcker, D.F., Evaluating structural equation models with unob- servable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, Vol.18, No.1, 1981, s.39-50.
32. Gaski, J.F., Ray, N.M., Measurement and Modeling of Alienation in the Distribution Channel, Industrial Marketing Management, Vol.30, 2001, s.207-225.
33. George, M. J., The Illusion of Will in Organizational Behavior Research: Nonconscious Processes and Job Design, Journal of Management, Vol.35, No.6, 2009, s.1318-1339.
34. Hackman, J.R., Oldham, G.R., Janson, R., & Purdy, K., A new strategy for job en- richment. California Management Review, Vol.17, No.4, 1975, s.57-71.
35. Hackman, J.R., & Oldham, G.R., Motivation through the design of work: Test of a theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, Vol.16, 1976, s.250- 279.
36. Hellman, C.M., Dale R.F., and Jody, W., A Reliability Generalization Study on The Survey of Perceived Organizational Support: The Effects of Mean Age and Number of Items on Score Reliability, Educational and Psychological Measurement, Vol.66, No.4, 2006, s.631-642.
37. Hisli Şahin, N., Basım, H. N. ve Çetin, F., Kişilerarası çatışma çözme yaklaşımla- rında kendilik algısı ve kontrol odağı, Türk Psikiyatri Dergisi, Vol.20, 2009, s.153-163.
38. Hui, S., Revision of Genetic Regulatory Models Using Structural Equation Modeling/Path Analysis. 2003, http://zencaroline.blogspot.com/2007/06/com- positereliability.html, (erişim tarihi: 03.09.2010)
39. Johlke, M.C., Stamper, C.L, Shoemaker, M.E., Antecedents to boundary-spanner perceived organizational support , Journal of Managerial Psychology, Vol.17, No.2, 2002, s.116-128.
40. Johlke, M. C., Iyer, R., A model of retail job characteristics, employee role ambigu- ity, external customer mind-set, and sales performance, Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 20, 2013, s.58–67.
41. Jossa, B., Alienation and the Self-ManagedFirm System; Review of Radical Political Economics 2014, Vol.46, No.1, 2014, s.5-14.
42. Kanungo, R.N., Alienation and Empowerment: Some Ethical Imperatives in Business, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol.5, No.6, 1992, s.413-422.
43. Kraimer, M., An Examination of Perceived Organizational Support as a Multidimensional Construct in the Context of an Expatriate Assignment , Journal of Management, Vol.30, No.2, 2004, s.209-237.
44. Li, S.R., Ragu-Nathan T.S., Ragu-Nathan, B., Development and Validation of a Measurement Instrument for Studying Supply Chain Management Practices, Journal of Operations Management, 23, 2003, s.618-641.
45. Loosemore, M, Lam A.S.Y., The Locus of Control: A Determinant of Opportunistic Behaviour in Construction Health and Safety, Construction Management and Economics, 22, 2004, s.385-394.
46. Luthans, F., Organizational Beehavior, 7. Baskı, McGraw-Hill, 1995.
47. Madden, M.E., and Janoff-Bulman, R., Blame, control and marital satisfaction: Wives’ attributions for confl ict in marriage, Journal of Marriage and the Family, 43, 1981, s.663-674.
48. Mariappan, M., Analysis of Nursing Job Characteristics in Public Sector Hospitals, Journal of Health Management, Vol.15, No.2, 2013, s.253-262.
49. Martin, R., Thomas G., Charles, K., ve ark., The Role of Leadermember Exchanges in Mediating the Relationship Between Locus of Control and Work Reactions, J Occupational and Organizational Psychol, 78, 2005, s.141-147.
50. Michael, J.H., Evans, D.D., Jansen, K.J, Management commitment to safety as or- ganizational support: Relationships with non-safety outcomes in wood manu- facturing employees , Journal of Safety Research, Vol.36, No.2., 2005, s.171-179.
51. Morry M.M., Perceived Locus of Control and Satisfaction in Same-sex Friendships, Personal Relationships, Vol.10, 2003, s.495-509.
52. Mueller, S.I., & Thomas, A.S., Culture and Entrepreneurial Potential: A Nine Country Study of Locus of Control and Innovativeness. Journal of Business Venturing, 16, 2000, s.51-75.
53. Naumann, S., Laid off, but still loyal: The influence of perceived justice and organi- zational support , International Journal of Conflict Management, Vol.9, No.4, 1998, s.356-368.
54. Nelson, L., O’Donohue, W., Alienation Psychology and Human Resource Management, Proceedings of the 2nd Australian Centre for Research in Employment and Work (ACREW) Conference, Prato, Italy 2006.
55. Özdevecioğlu, M., Algılanan Örgütsel Destek İle Örgütsel Bağlılık Arasındaki İlişkilerin Belirlenmesine Yönelik Bir Araştırma, D.E.Ü.İ.İ.B.F.Dergisi, Vol.18, No.2, 2003, 113-130.
56. Ramaswami, S.N., Agarwal, S. ve Bhargava, M., Work Alienaton of Marketing Employees: Influence of Task, Supervisory and Organizational Structure Factor, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol.21, No:3, 1993, s.179- 193.
57. Randall, M.R., Cropanzano, R., Bormann C. A., Bırjulin, A., Organizational politics and organizational support as predictors of work attitudes, job performance, and organizational citizenship behavior , Journal of Organizational Behavior, Vol.20, No.2, 1999, s.159-174.
58. Pappenheim, F., Alienation in American Society, Monthly Review, Vol.52, No.2, 2000, s.36-53.
59. Paulin, M., Ferguson, R.J. & Bergeron, J., Service Climate and Organizational Commitment: The Importance of Customer Linkages. Journal of Business Research, 59, 2006, s.906-915.
60. Rhoades, L., & Eisenberger, R. Perceived Organizational Support: A Review of The Literature. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 2002, s.698-714.
61. Rossier J., Dahourou D., Mccrae R.R., ve ark., Structural and Mean-Level Analyses of the Five-Factor Model and Locus of Control: Further Evidence From Africa, J Cross-Cultural Psychol, 36, 2005, s.227-246.
62. Rotter, J.B., Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinfor- cement, Psychological Monographs, 1966, s.80, 1-28.
63. Rotter, J.B., Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinfor- cement, Psychological Monographs, 80, 1966, s.1-28.
64. Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H., Müller, H., Evaluating The Fit of Structural Equa-Equation Models: Tests of Significance and Descriptive Goodness-of-Fit. Measures, Methods of Psychological Research Online, Vol.8, No.2, 2003, s.23-74.
65. Schumacker, R.E., Lomax, R.G., A Beginner's Guide to Structural Equation Modeling, Taylor and Francis Group, New York, London 2010.
66. Seeman, M. On the meaning of alienation. American. Sociological Review, 24, 1959, s.782-791.
67. Sidorkin, A.M., In the Event of Learning: Alienation and Participative Thinking inEducation, Educational Theory, Vol.54, No.3, 2004, s.251-262.
68. Silvester J., Anderson-Gough F.M, Anderson N.R., ve ark. Locus of Control, Attributions and Impression Management in the Selection Interview, J Occupational and Organizational Psychol, 75, 2002, s.59-76.
69. Smrt, D.L., Nelson, R.E., Playing With a Concept: Teaching Job Characteristics Model With a Tinkertoy Builder Set, Journal of Management Education, Vol.37, No.4, 2012, s.539-561.
70. Sterling, R. M., Effects of rumination on internal and external locus of control. Thesis Submitted in Portial Fulfillment of Requirement of The Master of Arts In mental Health Counseling and Applied Psychology Degree of the Graduate School at Rowan University, 2007, s.3.
71. Stevens, J.P., Applied Multivariate Statistics for the Social Sciences, Taylor&Francis Group, New York, London 2009.
72. Sulu, S., Ceylan, A. and Kaynak, R. Work Alienation as a Mediator of the Relationship Between Organizational Injustice and Organizational Commitment: Implications for Healthcare Professionals, International Journal of Business and Management, Vol.5, No.8, 2010, s.27-38.
73. Şahin, D.B., Gülleroğlu, H.D., Likert Tipi Ölçeklere Madde Seçmede Kullanılan Farklı Madde Analizi Teknikleri ile Oluşturulan Ölçeklerin Psikometrik Özelliklerinin İncelenmesi, Asya Öğretim Dergisi, Vol.1, No.2, 2013, s.18-28.
74. Taştan, S., İşçi, E., Arslan, B., Örgütsel Destek Algısının İşe Yabancılaşma ve Örgütsel Bağlılığa Etkisinin İncelenmesi: İstanbul Özel Hastanelerinde Bir Çalışma, Pamukkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi Sayı, 19, 2014, s.121-138.
75. Thakor, M. V., Joshi, A. W., Motivating salesperson customer orientation: insights from the job characteristics model, Journal of Business Research, 58, 2005, s.584-592.
76. Thompson, L.A., The Development Of Marx's Concept Of Alıenatıon: An Introductıon,MidAmerican Review of Sociology, Vol.4, No.1, 1979, s.23-38.
77. Treville, S., Antonakis, J., Could lean production job design be intrinsically moti- vating? Contextual, configurational, and levels-of-analysis issues, Journal of Operations Management, 24, 2006, s.99-12.
78. Turunç, Ö., and Çelik, M., Algılanan Örgütsel Desteğin Çalışanların İş-Aile, Aile-İş Çatışması, Örgütsel Özdeşleşme ve İşten Ayrılma Niyetine Etkisi: Savunma Sektöründe Bir Araştırma, Atatürk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, Vol.14, No.1, 2010, s.209-232.
79. Tutar, H., İşgören Yabancılaşması ve Örgütsel Sağlık İlişkisi: Bankacılık Sektöründe Bir Uygulama, Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi, 65, 2010, s.82.
80. Tükel, İ., Modern Örgütlerde Yabancılaşma ve Kafka’nın “Dönüşüm” Romanının Bu Bağlamda Analizi, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Edebiyat Fakültesi Dergisi, Vol.1, No.2, 2012, s.34-50.
81. Twenge, J.M., Zhang, L., Im, C., It's Beyond My Control: A Cross-Temporal Meta- Analysis of Increasing Externality in Locus of Control, 1960-2002, Personality and Social Psychology Review, Vol.8, No.3, 2004, s.308-319.
82. Yıldız, S., Şaylıkay, M., The effect of organisational cynicism on alienation, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 109, 2014, s.622-627.
83. Yoon, J., and Shane R.T., A Dual Process Model of Organizational Commitment, Work and Occupations, Vol.29, No.1, 2002, s.97-124.
84. Wayne, S.J., Shore, L.M., Linden, R. C, Perceived organizational support and leader- member exchange: Asocial exchange perspective, Academy of Management Journal, Vol.40, No.1, 2004, s.82-111.
85. Xue, L., Navarrete, D.M., Buzindec, C.N., Theorizing the concept of alienation in tourism studies, Annal of Tourism Research, Vol.44, 2013, s.186-199.