Avrupa’da Kamu Sektöründe İnovasyon ve Yenilikçi Yöntemler

Öz

İnovasyon, kamu yönetiminden daha çok özel sektör ile ilgili bir kavram olarak algılanmaktadır. Ancak kamu sektöründe de özellikle Avrupa ülkelerinde oldukça yenilikçi uygulamalar vardır. Çalışma bu uygulamaları tanıtmayı amaçlamaktadır. Ayrıca kamu sektöründe inovasyon kavramı etrafında yürütülen tartışmaları ele almaktadır. Avrupa’da kamu yönetimi alanında inovasyon denince ne anlaşılmaktadır? Avrupa ülkelerinin kamu hizmeti ve kamu yönetimi ile ilgili olarak uygulamaya koydukları yenilikler nelerdir? Makale bu sorulara cevap vermeyi ve birkaç örnek uygulamaya değinmeyi amaçlamaktadır. Özellikle bürokrasiyi azaltmaya ve bilgi-iletişim teknolojilerini kullanmaya yönelik olarak geliştirilen politikaların incelenmesi, Türkiye’deki benzer çalışmalara ışık tutabilir

Anahtar Kelimeler

• İnovasyon, Kamu Sektörü, Avrupa

-

Öz

Innovation is mostly considered as a concept related to private sector rather than public sector. however, especially in European countries, several innovative practices can be witnessed. The paper aims to introduce these applications. It also deals with the discussions on the concept of innovation in public sector in European spheres. What is understood from innovation in public sector in Europe? What are the innovative practices implemented by European countries as regards public service and public administration? The article aims to provide answers to such questions. Examination of policies which specifically aim to decrease bureaucratism and employ information and communication technologies can shed light to similar efforts in Turkey

Anahtar Kelimeler

• innovation, public sector, Europe

Kaynakça

1. Bason, Christian (2010), Leading public sector innovation: Co-creating for a better soci- ety, Policy Press, Bristol.
2. Bloch, Carter (2011), Measuring Public Innovation in the Nordic Countries (MEPIN), Danish Centre for Studies in Research and Research Policy: Aarhus.
3. Cartensen, Helle Vibeke ve Bason, Christian (2012), “Powering Collaborative Po- licy Innovation: Can Innovation Labs Help”, The Innovation Journal: The Public Sector Innovation Journal, Volume 17(1), article 4.
4. COM (2014) 367 final, Proposal for a Decısıon of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a programme on interoperability solutions for European public administrations, businesses and citizens (ISA2) - Interoperability as a means for mo- dernising the public sector, Brüksel.
5. Cunningham, Paul ve Karakasidou, Aikaterini (2009), Innovation in the Public Sec- tor, INNO POLICY Trendchart Policy Brief No. 2.
6. Dunleavy, Patrick, Margetts, Helen, Bastow, Simon ve Tinkler, Jane (2005), “New Public Management Is Dead—Long Live Digital-Era Governance”, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 16, s. 467-494.
7. Flash Eurobarometer 343 (2012), Innovation in the Public Sector: Its Perception and Impact on Business (http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/flash/fl_343_en.pdf, 14.10.2014)
8. Jones, Glyn ve Cole, Alistair (2009), “French administrative reform: change and resistance”, Goldfinch, Shaun F. ve Wallis, Joe L. (Ed.), International Handbook of Public Management Reform, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, Birleşik Krallık, Nort- hampton, ABD, s. 220-234.

9. Heper, Metin (1974), Bürokratik Yönetim Geleneği: Osmanlı İmparatorluğu ve Türkiye Cumhuriyetinde Gelişimi ve Niteliği, ODTÜ Yayınları, Ankara.
10. Heper, Metin (1976), “Political Modernization As Reflected in Bureaucratic Chan- ge: The Turkish Bureaucracy and a “Historical Bureaucratic Empire” Traditi- on”, International Journal of Middle East Studies, 7, ss. 507-521.
11. Hollanders, Hugo, Arundel, Anthony, Buligescu, Bianca, Peter, Viola, Roman, La- ura, Simmonds, Paul ve Es-Sadki, Nordine (2013), European Public Sector Inno- vation Scoreboard: A Pilot Exercise, Belçika.
12. http://blog.la27eregion.fr/ (14.09.2014)
13. http://blog.okfn.org/ (15.09.2014)
14. http://challenge.gov (10.09.2014)
15. http://digitaliser.dk/resource/432461 (18.09.2014)
16. http://ec.europa.eu/isa/index_en.htm (20.10.2014)
17. http://grips-public.mediactive.fr/home/ (22.09.2014)
18. http://nestainnovation.ning.com/forum/topics/measuring-innovation-within (17.09.2014)
19. http://urbact.eu/en/about-urbact/urbact-at-a-glance/urbact-in-words/ (12.09.2014)
20. http://urbact.eu/en/our-projects/ (13.09.2014)
21. Hughes, Alastair, Moore, Kyla ve Kataria, Nimesh (2011), Innovation in Public Sec- tor Organisations. A pilot survey for measuring innovation across the public sector, NESTA, Londra.
22. INNO GRIPS (2009), Innovation Policy Workshop 5, INNO GRIPS (Global Review of Innovation Intelligence and Policy Studies), Brüksel.
23. Lewis, J. Owen, Hógáin, Sadhbh Ní, Borghi, Antonio (2013), Building Energy Effici- ency in European Cities, URBACT, Nancy, Fransa.
24. Maesschalck, Jeroen (2004), “The Impact of New Public Management Reforms on Public Servants’ Ethics: Towards A Theory”, Public Administration, 82:2, s. 465- 489.
25. Mulgan, Geoff (2014), “The radical’s dilemma: an overview of the practice and prospects of Social and Public Labs – Version 1”, Social and Public Labs, 2014, Version 1.
26. Mulgan, Geoff ve Albury, David (2003), Innovation in the Public Sector, ver. 1.9, Ka- bine Ofisi Raporu, Londra.
27. NAO (2007), The carbon trust: Accelerating the move to a low carbon economy, National Audit Office, HC 7 Session 2007-2008.
28. Oktay, Cemil (1997), Siyasal Sistem ve Bürokrasi: Yükselen İstemler Karşısında Türk Siyasal Sistemi ve Kamu Bürokrasisi, Der Yayınları, İstanbul.
29. Ongaro, Edoardo (2009), Public Management Reform and Modernization: Trajectories of Administrative Change in Italy, France, Greece, Portugal and Spain, Edward El- gar, Cheltenham, Birleşik Krallık, Northampton, ABD.
30. Petkovsek, Veronika - Cankar, Stanka Setnikar (2013), “Public Sector Innovation in the European Union and Example of Good Practice”, Management, Knowledge and Learning International Conference, 19-21 Haziran 2013, Zadar, Hırvatistan, s. 1329-1336 (http://econpapers.repec.org/bookchap/tkpmklp13/, 11.09.2014).
31. Rivera León, Lorena, Simmonds, Paul ve Roman, Laura (2012), Trends and Challen- ges in Public Sector Innovation in Europe, Thematic Report 2012 under Specific Contract for the Integration of INNO Policy Trend Chart with ERAWATCH (2011–2012). Inno Policy TendChart. European Commission.
32. Soares, Delfina ve Amaral, Luis (2010), “Information Systems Interoperability in Public Administration: Identifying the Major Acting Forces through a Delp- hi Study”, Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, ISSN 0718–1876 Elektronik Versiyon, 6:1, Nisan 2011, s. 61-94
33. Tanner, Will (2013), The Case for Private Prisons, Reform Ideas No:2. (http://www. reform.co.uk/resources/0000/0635/Reform_Ideas_No_2_-_The_case_for_pri- vate_ prisons.pdf, 14.09.2014)
34. Thenint, Hugo (2010), Mini Study 10 – Innovation in the Public Sector, INNO GRIPS (Global Review of Innovation Intelligence and Policy Studies), Brüksel.
35. Waldo, Dwight (1948), The Administrative State: A Study of the Political Theory of American Public Administration, New York: The Ronald Press Company.