THE ROLE OF HUMAN RESOURCE STRATEGIES IN THE MANAGEMENT OF CULTURAL DIFFERENCES: THE CASE OF IKEA

Öz

-

Anahtar Kelimeler

• -

Kültürel Farklılıkların Yönetiminde İnsan Kaynakları Stratejilerinin Rolü: IKEA Örneği

Öz

Bilginin kaynakları ve çok faktörlü verimlilik (MFP) üzerindeki etkileri Ar-Ge çalışmalarının ana hedefi olmuştur. Ancak, ülkelerin MFP seviyeleri bilgi stokları dışındaki faktörlere duyarlı oldukları görülmektedir ki bu dahil edilmeyen değişkenler ülkeler arasindaki MFP’nin farklılıklarının esaslarını, büyüme oranlarını açıklamada önemli olabilirler. Ar-Ge teorilerine rakip olan teoriler, verimliliği etkileyen diğer fakörler teklif etmişlerdir; beşeri sermaye, kamu altyapı yatırımları, ihracat pazarlarına erişim (yaparak öğrenme), ithalat, doğrudan yabancı yatırımlar bunlaran bazılarıdır. Bu teoriler MFP’nin bu değişkenler tarafından nasıl etkilendiğini analiz etmişlerdir. Ancak, bunların hiçbiri hem bilimsel bilgi üreten hem de iktisat teorilerinde belirtilen verimliliği belirleyen kaynakların sağlamlığını birarada incelememişlerdir. Yerek MFP belirleyicileri, üniversite Ar-Ge stoğu ve rekabetçi verimlilik teorilerinde belirtilen değişkenler kullanılarak, 13 OECD ülkesi ve 1985-2005 yılları için tahmin edilmiştir. Sonuçlar göstermektedir ki, OECD ülkelerri genelinde homojen verimlilik ilişkisi olduğu varsayımı oldukça güçlü görünmektedir, çünkü tahmin edilen katsayılar çalışmadaki bütün ülkeler için farklı tahmin edilmiştir. Her ülkeye özgü parametreler görünürde ilişkisiz regresyon tekniği kullanılarak tahmin edilmiştir ve sadece üniversite Ar-Ge stoğu ve konjonktürel dalgalanmalar MFP’nin önemli belirleyicileri olarak genelleştirilebilir

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Üniversite Ar-Ge stoku, çok faktörlü verimlilik, amortisman oranı tahmini, görünürde ilişkisiz regresyon, katsayılarının heterojenliği

Kaynakça

1. ADAMS, James D., BLACK, Grant C., CLEMMONS, J. Roger, and STEPHAN, Paula E., ‘Scientific Teams and Institutional Collaborations: Evidence from U.S. Universities, 1981–1999’, Research Policy, 34, 2005, pp. 259–285.
2. ADAMS, James D. and CLEMMONS, J. Roger, ‘The Origins of Industrial Scientific Discoveries’ National Bureau of Economic Research (Cambridge, MA), Working Paper No 13823, February 2008.
3. ARNOLD, Jens, BASSANINI, Andrea and SCARPETTA, Stefano ‘Solow or Lucas? Testing Growth Models Using Panel Data from OECD Countries’, Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development, Economics Department Working Paper, No. 592, 2007.
4. BARRO, Robert J. and SALA-I-MARTIN, Xavier, Economic Growth, New York: McGraw-Hill, 1995.
5. BASSANINI, Andrea and SCARPETTA, Stefano ‘Does Human Capital Matter for Growth in OECD countries? A Pooled Mean-Group Approach’, Economics Letters, Vol. 74, No. 3, 2002, pp. 399-405.
6. BAYOUMI, Tamim A., COE, David T. and HELPMAN, Elhanan, ‘R&D Spillovers and Global Growth’ National Bureau of Economic Research (Cambridge, MA), Working Paper, no. 5628, June 1996.
7. BAUMOL, William J., The Free-Market Innovation Machine: Analyzing the Growth Miracle of Capitalism, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2002.
8. BOWIE, Norman E., University-Business Partnership: an Assessment, Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 1994.

9. COE, David T. and HELPMAN, Elhanan, ‘International R&D Spillovers’, European Economic Review, Vol. 39, No.5, 1995, pp. 859-887.
10. DIETZ, James S. andBOZEMAN, Barry, ‘Academic Careers, Patents, and Productivity: Industry Experience as Scientific and Technical Human Capital’, Research Policy, 34, 2005, pp 349–367.
11. ETZKOWITZ, Henry, WEBSTER, Andrew and HEALEY, Peter, ‘Introduction’. In ETZKOWITZ, Henry, Andrew WEBSTER, and Peter HEALEY (Eds), Capitalizing Knowledge: New Intersections of Industry and Academia (pp.1- 17) Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 1998.
12. ETZKOWITZ, Henry and STEVENS, Ashley J., ‘Inching toward industrial policy: the university’s role in government initiatives to assist small, innovative companies in the United States’. In ETZKOWITZ, Henry, Andrew WEBSTER and Peter HEALEY (Eds), Capitalizing Knowledge: New Intersections of Industry and Academia (pp.215-238), Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 1998.
13. GRILICHES, Zvi, ‘Distributed Lags’ Econometrica, 37, 1967, pp. 16-49.
14. GRILICHES, Zvi, R&D and Productivity: The Econometric Evidence, The University of Chicago Press: Chicago, 1998.
15. GROSSMAN, Gene M. and HELPMAN, Elhanan, Innovation and Growth in the Global Economy, MIT Press: Cambridge, 1991.
16. HALL, Bronwyn H., ‘Measuring the Returns to R&D: the Depreciation Problem’, NBER Working Paper, no. 13473, October 2007.
17. HEALY, Bernadine, ‘Behind the Baby Count’ U.S. News & World Report http://health.usnews.com/usnews/health/articles/060924/2healy.htm, September 2006. 24
18. JENSEN, Richard and THURSBY, Marie, ‘Proofs and Prototypes for Sale: The Licensing of University Inventions’, The American Economic Review, Vol. 91, No. 1, 2001, pp. 240-259
19. KELLER, Wolfgang, ‘International Technology Diffusion’, Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 42, No. 3, 2004, pp. 752-782.
20. LICHTENBERG, Frank R., ‘R&D Investment and International Productivity Differences’, National Bureau of Economic Research (Cambridge, MA), Working Paper No. 4161, September 1992.
21. LIPSEY, Robert E., ‘Home and Host Country Effects of FDI’, National Bureau of Economic Research (Cambridge, MA), Working Paper No. 9293, October 2002.
22. LUCAS, Robert E. Jr., ‘On the mechanics of development planning’ Journal of Monetary Economics, Vol. 22, No. 1, 1988, pp. 3-42.
23. LUINTEL, Kul B. and KHAN, Mosahid, “A Quantitative Reassessment of the Finance-Growth Nexus: Evidence from a Multivariate VAR”, Journal of Development Economics, Vol. 60, No. 2, 1999, pp. 381-405.
24. MORRIS, Morris David, Measuring the Condition of the World’s Poor: the Physical Quality of Life Index, New York: Pergamon Press, 1979.
25. MOSTELLER, Frederick and TUKEY, John W., Data Analysis and Regression: a Second Course in Statistics, Reading, Mass. : Addison-Wesley Pub. Co., 1977.
26. National Science Foundation, Division of Science Resources Statistics. 2008. Academic Research and Development Expenditures: Fiscal Year 2007. Detailed Statistical Tables NSF 09-303. Arlington, VA. Available at http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/nsf09303/.
27. NICKELL, Stephen and VAN REENEN, John, ‘Technological Innovation and Performance in the United Kingdom’ Center for Economic Performances Discussion Paper, no. 488, January 2001.
28. OECD (1993). The measurement of scientific and technological activities: standard practice for surveys of experimental development – Frascati Manual 1993. Paris: OECD Press.
29. OECD (2002). Benchmarking science-industry relationships. Paris: OECD
30. OECD (2005). OECD science, technology, and industry scoreboard. Paris: OECD Press.
31. PARK, Walter G., ‘International R&D Spillovers and OECD Economic Growth’, Economic Inquiry, Vol. 33, No. 4, 1995, pp. 571-591.
32. PISANO, Gary P. ‘Pharmaceutical Biotechnology’, In Technological Innovation and Economic Performance, In. STEIL, Benn, David G. VICTOR and Richard R. NELSON (Eds.), Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2002
33. PESARAN, Hashem M., HAQUE, Nadeem U. and SHARMA, Sunil, ‘Neglected Heterogeneity KRISHNAKUMAR, Jaya and RONCHETTI, Elvezio (eds), Panel Data Econometrics –Future Directions, Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Elsevier Science, 2000. Dynamics in Cross Country Savings’, in
34. PRESS, Eyal and WASHBURN, Jennifer, ‘The Kept University’ The Atlantic Monthly, Vol. 285, No. 3, pp. 39-54, 2000.
35. ROMER, Paul. M ‘Increasing Returns and Long-run Growth’ Journal of Political Economy, 94, 1986, pp. 1002-1037.
36. SAMPAT, Bhaven N., ‘Patenting and US Academic Research in the 20th Century: The World Before and After Bayh-Dole’, Research Policy, 35. 2006, pp. 772–789.
37. SLAUGHTER, Sheila and LESLIE, Larry L., Academic Capitalism: Politics, Policies, and the Entrepreneurial University, Baltimore, Maryland: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1997.
38. STEPHAN, Paula E., ‘The Economics of Science’, Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 34, No. 3, 1996, pp. 1199-1235.
39. VAN POTTELSBERGHE DE LA POTTERIE, Bruno and LICHTENBERG, Frank, ‘Does Foreign Direct Investment Transfer Technology across Borders?’, Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 83, No. 3, pp. 490-497, 2001.