Social Network: An Emerging Income Distribution Mechanism In Transitional Urban China

Öz

In the decades since 1978, when China initiated economic reform, the country’s income distribution structure has substantially changed. Unlike the majority of existing studies that use individuals’ social network as a key indicator to explain their income in urban China, we contend that social network is an important mechanism that influences income distribution. Using the 2009 Social Networks and Job Search Survey, this study adopts a social capital perspective to investigate how the impact of a social network on income changes with the development of market reforms. The study finds that while social capital from a social network has a positive effect on income, the rates of income return decrease with accumulation of social capital. In addition, with increasing marketization, the income return of accessed social capital decreases, and that of mobilized social capital increases. By comparing multiple resource allocation mechanisms, this paper also discusses the logic of effect change of social capital.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Marketization,Social Network,Social Capital,Income Effects

Kaynakça

1. Acemoglu D and Robinson J (2012) Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power, Prosperity and Poverty. NewYork: Random House. Adamchak DJ, Chen S and Li J (1999) Occupations, work unites and work rewards in urban China. International Sociology 14(4): 423-441. Akos R (1994) The first shall be the last? Entrepreneurship and the communist cadres in the transition from socialism. American Journal of Sociology 100(1): 40-69. Bian Y (1996) Chinese occupational prestige: A comparative analysis. International Sociology 11(2): 161-186. Bian Y (1997) Bringing strong ties back in: Indirect ties, network bridges and job searches in China. American Sociological Review 62(3): 366-385. Bian Y (2002) Chinese social stratification and social mobility. Annual Review of Sociology 28: 91-116. Bian Y (2004) Source and functions of urbanites’ social capital: A network approach. Social Sciences in China 4: 136-146. Bian Y and Logan JR (1996) Market transition and the persistence of power: The changing stratification system in urban China. American Sociological Review 61(5): 739-758. Bian Y and Huang X (2015) The guanxi influence on occupational attainment in urban China. Chinese Journal of Sociology 1(3): 307-332. Cao Y and Nee VG (2000) Comment: Controversies and evidence in the market transition debate. American Journal of Sociology 105(4):1175–1189. Djilas M (1957) The New Class: An Analysis of the Communist System of Power. New York: Praeger. Fei X (1949/1992) From the Soil, the Foundations of Chinese Society: A Translation of Fei Xiaotong’s Xiangtu Zhongguo. Berkeley: University of California Press. Gerber TP and Hout M (1998) More shock than therapy: Market transition, employment, and income in Russia, 1991-1995. American Journal of Sociology 104(1): 1-50. Granovetter M (1973) The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology 78(6): 1360- 1380. Granovetter M (1985) Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology 91(3): 481-510. Guthrie D (1998) The declining significance of guanxi in China’s economic transition. China Quarterly (154): 254-282. Hao D and Li L (2006) State monopoly and income inequality in regional disparity reform: Based on national comprehensive social survey data 2003. Social Sciences in China 2: 136-146. Hainmueller J, Mummolo J and Xu Y (2016) How much should we trust estimates from multiplicative interaction models? Simple tools to improve empirical practice. Available at http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2739221 (accessed January 6 2017). He Y (2009) The changes of the rate of return to education: An empirical study based on the data of CHNS. Chinese Journal of Population Science 2: 44-54. Jaccard J and Turrisi R (2003) Interaction Effects in Multiple Regression. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE. Jansen W and Wu X (2012) Income inequality in urban China, 1978–2005. Chinese Sociological Review 45(1): 3–27. Lai G and Lee RPL(2006) Market reforms and psychological distress in urban Beijing. International Sociology 21(4): 551-579. Li L, Yang X and Wang F (1991) The structure of social stratification and the modernisation process in contemporary China. International Sociology 6(1): 25-36. Li P (1996) The social networks and social status of floating migrant workers. Sociological Studies 4: 41-52. Li S and Ding S (2003) Long-term change in private returns to education in urban China. Social Sciences in China 6: 58-72. Liang Y (2010) Is social capital and social networks useless? Sociological Studies 5: 50-82. Lin N (1982) Social resources and instrumental action. In: Marsden PV and Lin N (eds) Social Structure and Network Analysis. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications, pp. 131-145. Lin N (1995) Local market socialism: Local corporatism in action in rural China. Theory and Society 24(3): 301-354. Lin N (2001) Social Capital: A Theory of Social Structure and Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Ma G and Yang E (2011) Social networks, informal finance and entrepreneurship. Economic Research Journal 3: 83-93. Nee VG (1989) A theory of market transition: From redistribution to markets in state socialism. American Sociological Review 54: 663–681. Nee VG (1991) Social inequalities in reforming state socialism: Between redistribution and markets in state socialism. American Sociological Review 56: 267–282. Nee VG (1996) The emergence of a narket society: Changing mechanisms of stratification in China. American Journal of Sociology 101: 908–949. Nee VG and Matthews R (1996) Market transition and societal transformation in reforming state socialism. Annual Review of Sociology 22: 401-435. Putnam RD (1993) Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton: Princeton UniversityPress. Saloner G (1985) Old boy networks as screening mechanisms. Journal of Labor Economics 3(3): 255-267. Shen J and Irena K (2017) Contact use in job placement and its impact on the gender earnings gap in transnational urban China: Evidence from Xiamen, 1999. International Sociology 32(1): 130-154. Stiglitz JE (2000) Formal and informal institution. In: Dasgupta P and Serageldin I (eds) Social Capital: A Multi-faceted Perspective. Washington, DC: World Bank, pp. 59-68. Storesletten K and Zilibotti F (2014) China’s great convergence and beyond. Annual Review of Economics 6(6): 333–362. Tyner A and Ren Y (2016) The hukou system, rural institutions, and migrant integration in China. Journal of East Asian Studies 16: 331-348. Walder AG (1996) Markets and inequality in transitional economics: Toward testable t h e - ories. American Journal of Sociology 101(4): 1060-1073. Whyte MK (2009) Paradoxes of China’s economic boom. Annual Review of Sociology 35: 371–392. Wu X (2002) Work units and income inequality: The effect of market transition in urban China. Social Forces 80(3): 1069-1099. Wu X and Xie Y (2003) Does the market pay off? Earnings inequality and returns to education in urban China. American Sociological Review 68: 425–442. Xie Y and Hannum E (1996) Regional variation in earnings inequality in reform-era urban China. American Journal of Sociology 101(4): 950-992. Zang X (2002) Labor market segmentation and income inequality in urban China. The Sociological Quarterly 43: 27-44. Zhang W (1996) Non-institutional factors and status attainment: A particular focus on social stratification structure in current China. Sociological Studies 1: 64-73. Zhang Y and Li J (2000) Strong relation tie and the retirees’ reemployment. Chinese Journal of Population Science 2: 34-40. Zhao Y (2003) The social networks and retention wage for job searchers: A case of the reemployment of laid-off workers. Sociological Studies 4: 51-60. Zhou X (2000) Economic transformation and income inequality in urban China: Evidence from panel data. American Journal of Sociology 105(4): 1135-1174.