BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Bilinçli Farkındalığın Kendine Aşırı Güvenme Üzerine Etkisi

Yıl 2017, Cilt: 15 Sayı: 29, 175 - 192, 12.07.2017

Öz

Bu çalışma bilinçli farkındalık ve bir karar verme hatası olarak tanımlanan kendine aşırı güvenme arasındaki ilişkiyi ortaya koymak amacıyla yapılmıştır. İşletme bölümü öğrencilerinden oluşan örneklemden elde edilen verilere uygulanan faktör analizinde bilinçli farkındalık, kabullenme ve dikkat boyutlarına ayrılmış ve kendine aşırı güvenmenin boyutları olan kendini üstün değerlendirme ve abartılı öngörü üzerindeki katkıları analiz edilmiştir. Araştırma bulguları kabullenmenin kendini üstün değerlendirme üzerinde olumsuz bir katkısının olduğunu yani olayları ve durumları kabul eden katılımcıların kendilerinin ve başkalarının performanslarına ilişkin daha doğru tahminde bulunduklarını göstermektedir. Çalışmanın kuramsal açıdan önemi bilinçli farkındalığın karar verme üzerindeki etkisini inceleyen az sayıda çalışmadan biri olmasıdır. Doğru karar vermenin kurumlara kazanç getireceği düşüncesinden hareketle, insan kaynakları tarafından özellikle stratejik öneme sahip karar vericilere kendi duygu ve düşüncelerini fark etmelerini sağlayacak kabullenme odaklı eğitimler verilmesi önerilmektedir

Kaynakça

  • Asuero Andres Martin et al., ‘Effectiveness of a mindfulness education program in primary healthcare professionals: A pragmatic controlled trial’, Journal of Continuing Educa- tion in the Health Professions, 34(1), 2014, p. 4–12.
  • Barber, Brad M. & Odean, Terrance, ‘Boys will be Boys: Gender, Overconfidence and Com- mon Stock Investment’,The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2001, p. 261-291.
  • Bishop, Scott R. et al., ‘Mindfulness: A proposed operational definition’, Clinical Psychol- ogy: Science and Practice, 11 (3), 2004, 230-241.
  • Botta Ariel A., Cadet Tamara. J. and Maramaldi, Peter, ‘Reflections on a Quantitative, Group- Based Mindfulness Study with Social Work Students’ Social Work with Groups, 38:2, 2015 , p. 93-105, DOI: 10.1080/01609513.2014.975885.
  • Brown Kirk Warren and Ryan Richard M., ‘The benefits of being present: mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(4), 2003, p. 822-848.
  • Çatak Pelin, ‘The Turkish version of the cognitive and affective mindfulness scale-revised’, Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 8 (4), 2012, p. 603-619.
  • Ehrlinger Joyce, Johnson Kerri, Banner Matthew, Dunning David and Kruger Justin, ‘Why the unskilled are unaware: Further explorations of (absent) self-insight among the in- competent’, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 105, 2008, p. 98- 121.
  • Emich Kyle J., ‘But consider the alternative: The influence of positive affect on overconfi- dence’, Cognitive and Emotion, 28:8, 2014, p. 1382-1397.
  • Feldman Greg, Hayes Adele, Kumar Sameet, Greeson Jeff, and Laurenceau, Jean Philippe, ‘Mindfulness and emotion regulation: The development and initial validation of the Cognitive and Affective Mindfulness Scale-Revised (CAMS-R)’, Journal of Psychopa- thology and Behavioral Assessment, 29, 2007, p. 177-190. doi:10.1007/s10862-006-9035- 8
  • Feltman Roger, Robinson Michael D. and Ode Scott, ‘Mindfulness as a moderator of neu- roticism-outcome relations: A self-regulation perspective’, Journal of Research in Per- sonality, 43, 2009, p. 953-961.
  • Festinger Leon, ‘A theory of social comparison processes’, Human Relations, 7, 1954, p. 117–140
  • Froh Jeffrey J., ‘The history of positive psychology: truth be told’, The Psychologist, 16(3), 2004, p. 18-20.
  • Jankowski Tomasz and Holas Pawel, ‘Metacognitive model of mindfulness’, Conscious- ness and Cognition, 28, 2014, p. 64-80.
  • Kabat-Zinn Jon, ‘Wherever you go, there you are: Mindfulness meditation in everyday life’, (New York: Hyperion, 1994).
  • Kabat Zinn Jon, ‘Full Catastrophe Living’, (New York, Bantam Dell, 2005).
  • Kahneman Daniel, ‘Thinking Fast and Slow’, (London, Penguin Books, 2011).
  • Karelaia Natalie and Reb Jochen, ‘Improving decision making through mindfulness’, Mindfulness in Organizations, 2014, Reb J. & Atkins, P. (Eds). Cambridge University Press.
  • Lakey, Chad E., Campbell, W. Keith, Brown Kirk Warren and Goodie Adam S., ‘Disposi- tional mindfulness as a predictor of the severity of gambling outcomes’, Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 2007, p. 1698-1710.
  • Moore Don A. and Healy, Paul J. ‘The trouble with overconfidence’, Psychological Review, 115 (2), 2008, p. 502-517.
  • Moore Don A. and Small Deborah A. ‘Error and Bias in Comparative Judgment: On being both better and worse than we think we are’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychol- ogy, 92 (6), 2007, p. 972-989.
  • Myers David G., ‘Social Psychology’, 6th edition. (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1999).
  • Neale Margaret A. and Bazerman Max H., ‘The effects of framing and negotiator overcon- fidence on bargaining behaviors and outcomes’, Academy of Management Journal, 28 (1), 1985, p. 34-49.
  • Odean Terrance, ‘Volume, volatility, price, and profit when all traders are above average’, The Journal of Finance, 53, 1998, p. 1887–1934.
  • Ruedy Nicole E. and Schweitzer Maurice E., ‘In the moment: The effect of mindfulness on ethical decision making’, Journal of Business Ethics, 95, 2011, p. 73-87.
  • Shapiro Shauna L., Carlson, Linda E., Astin, John A. and Freedman Benedict, ‘Mechanisms of mindfulness’, Journal of Clinical Psychology, 62 (3), 2006, p. 373-386.
  • Schoemaker, Paul J. H. and Russo, J. Edward, “A pyramid of decision approaches”, Califor- nia Management Review, 1993, p. 9-31.
  • Simon Herbert, ‘What is an explanation of behavior?’ In Myers, D. G. Intuition: Its Powers and Perils (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2002), 1992, p. 56.
  • Stanovich Keith E. and West Richard F., ‘Individual difference in reasoning: implications for the rationality debate?’, Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 23, 2000, p.645–726.
  • Vallabh Priyanka and Singhal Manish, ‘Buddhism and decision-making at individual, group and organizational levels’, Journal of Management Development, 33, 2014, p.8- 9.
  • Werner Karel, ‘The law of karma and mindfulness’, e-book, 2009, available at http://www. bps.lk/olib/bl/bl061.pdf (accessed April 29, 2015).
  • Wittman Marc, Peter Joachim, Gutina Oksana, Otten Simone, Kohls Niko and Meissner Karin, ‘Individual differences in self attributed mindfulness levels are related to the experience of time and cognitive self control’, Personality and Individual Differences, 64, 2014, p. 41-45.
  • Zeidan Fadel, Johnson Susan K., Diamond Bruce J., David Zhanna and Goolkasian Paula, ‘Mindfulness meditation improved cognition: Evidence of brief mental training’, Con- sciousness and Cognition, 19, 2010, p.597-605.

The Effects of Mindfulness on Overconfidence

Yıl 2017, Cilt: 15 Sayı: 29, 175 - 192, 12.07.2017

Öz

This study aims to investigate the relationship between mindfulness and overconfidence defined as a decision making error. Data were gathered from department of business administration students. Mindfulness was divided into acceptance and attention dimensions and their effects on overplacement and overestimation as the dimensions of overconfidence were explored. Results indicate that acceptance has significant relations with overplacement which means participants who accept the events and situations predict more accurately about their performance and others’ than participants who don’t accept. This study contributes to literature as few studies exist about the association between mindfulness and decision making process. Based on a belief that organizations benefit from better decisions, acceptance based training programs were suggested for employees who work for strategic decision making positions

Kaynakça

  • Asuero Andres Martin et al., ‘Effectiveness of a mindfulness education program in primary healthcare professionals: A pragmatic controlled trial’, Journal of Continuing Educa- tion in the Health Professions, 34(1), 2014, p. 4–12.
  • Barber, Brad M. & Odean, Terrance, ‘Boys will be Boys: Gender, Overconfidence and Com- mon Stock Investment’,The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2001, p. 261-291.
  • Bishop, Scott R. et al., ‘Mindfulness: A proposed operational definition’, Clinical Psychol- ogy: Science and Practice, 11 (3), 2004, 230-241.
  • Botta Ariel A., Cadet Tamara. J. and Maramaldi, Peter, ‘Reflections on a Quantitative, Group- Based Mindfulness Study with Social Work Students’ Social Work with Groups, 38:2, 2015 , p. 93-105, DOI: 10.1080/01609513.2014.975885.
  • Brown Kirk Warren and Ryan Richard M., ‘The benefits of being present: mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(4), 2003, p. 822-848.
  • Çatak Pelin, ‘The Turkish version of the cognitive and affective mindfulness scale-revised’, Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 8 (4), 2012, p. 603-619.
  • Ehrlinger Joyce, Johnson Kerri, Banner Matthew, Dunning David and Kruger Justin, ‘Why the unskilled are unaware: Further explorations of (absent) self-insight among the in- competent’, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 105, 2008, p. 98- 121.
  • Emich Kyle J., ‘But consider the alternative: The influence of positive affect on overconfi- dence’, Cognitive and Emotion, 28:8, 2014, p. 1382-1397.
  • Feldman Greg, Hayes Adele, Kumar Sameet, Greeson Jeff, and Laurenceau, Jean Philippe, ‘Mindfulness and emotion regulation: The development and initial validation of the Cognitive and Affective Mindfulness Scale-Revised (CAMS-R)’, Journal of Psychopa- thology and Behavioral Assessment, 29, 2007, p. 177-190. doi:10.1007/s10862-006-9035- 8
  • Feltman Roger, Robinson Michael D. and Ode Scott, ‘Mindfulness as a moderator of neu- roticism-outcome relations: A self-regulation perspective’, Journal of Research in Per- sonality, 43, 2009, p. 953-961.
  • Festinger Leon, ‘A theory of social comparison processes’, Human Relations, 7, 1954, p. 117–140
  • Froh Jeffrey J., ‘The history of positive psychology: truth be told’, The Psychologist, 16(3), 2004, p. 18-20.
  • Jankowski Tomasz and Holas Pawel, ‘Metacognitive model of mindfulness’, Conscious- ness and Cognition, 28, 2014, p. 64-80.
  • Kabat-Zinn Jon, ‘Wherever you go, there you are: Mindfulness meditation in everyday life’, (New York: Hyperion, 1994).
  • Kabat Zinn Jon, ‘Full Catastrophe Living’, (New York, Bantam Dell, 2005).
  • Kahneman Daniel, ‘Thinking Fast and Slow’, (London, Penguin Books, 2011).
  • Karelaia Natalie and Reb Jochen, ‘Improving decision making through mindfulness’, Mindfulness in Organizations, 2014, Reb J. & Atkins, P. (Eds). Cambridge University Press.
  • Lakey, Chad E., Campbell, W. Keith, Brown Kirk Warren and Goodie Adam S., ‘Disposi- tional mindfulness as a predictor of the severity of gambling outcomes’, Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 2007, p. 1698-1710.
  • Moore Don A. and Healy, Paul J. ‘The trouble with overconfidence’, Psychological Review, 115 (2), 2008, p. 502-517.
  • Moore Don A. and Small Deborah A. ‘Error and Bias in Comparative Judgment: On being both better and worse than we think we are’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychol- ogy, 92 (6), 2007, p. 972-989.
  • Myers David G., ‘Social Psychology’, 6th edition. (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1999).
  • Neale Margaret A. and Bazerman Max H., ‘The effects of framing and negotiator overcon- fidence on bargaining behaviors and outcomes’, Academy of Management Journal, 28 (1), 1985, p. 34-49.
  • Odean Terrance, ‘Volume, volatility, price, and profit when all traders are above average’, The Journal of Finance, 53, 1998, p. 1887–1934.
  • Ruedy Nicole E. and Schweitzer Maurice E., ‘In the moment: The effect of mindfulness on ethical decision making’, Journal of Business Ethics, 95, 2011, p. 73-87.
  • Shapiro Shauna L., Carlson, Linda E., Astin, John A. and Freedman Benedict, ‘Mechanisms of mindfulness’, Journal of Clinical Psychology, 62 (3), 2006, p. 373-386.
  • Schoemaker, Paul J. H. and Russo, J. Edward, “A pyramid of decision approaches”, Califor- nia Management Review, 1993, p. 9-31.
  • Simon Herbert, ‘What is an explanation of behavior?’ In Myers, D. G. Intuition: Its Powers and Perils (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2002), 1992, p. 56.
  • Stanovich Keith E. and West Richard F., ‘Individual difference in reasoning: implications for the rationality debate?’, Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 23, 2000, p.645–726.
  • Vallabh Priyanka and Singhal Manish, ‘Buddhism and decision-making at individual, group and organizational levels’, Journal of Management Development, 33, 2014, p.8- 9.
  • Werner Karel, ‘The law of karma and mindfulness’, e-book, 2009, available at http://www. bps.lk/olib/bl/bl061.pdf (accessed April 29, 2015).
  • Wittman Marc, Peter Joachim, Gutina Oksana, Otten Simone, Kohls Niko and Meissner Karin, ‘Individual differences in self attributed mindfulness levels are related to the experience of time and cognitive self control’, Personality and Individual Differences, 64, 2014, p. 41-45.
  • Zeidan Fadel, Johnson Susan K., Diamond Bruce J., David Zhanna and Goolkasian Paula, ‘Mindfulness meditation improved cognition: Evidence of brief mental training’, Con- sciousness and Cognition, 19, 2010, p.597-605.
Toplam 32 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Bölüm Araştırma Makalesi
Yazarlar

Yaprak Kalafatoğlu Bu kişi benim

Tülay Turgut Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi 12 Temmuz 2017
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2017 Cilt: 15 Sayı: 29

Kaynak Göster

APA Kalafatoğlu, Y., & Turgut, T. (2017). The Effects of Mindfulness on Overconfidence. Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi, 15(29), 175-192.

Sayın Araştırmacı;

Dergimize gelen yoğun talep nedeniyle Ekim 2024 sayısı için öngörülen kontenjan dolmuştur, gönderilen makaleler ilerleyen sayılarda değerlendirilebilecektir. Bu hususa dikkat ederek yeni makale gönderimi yapmanızı rica ederiz.

Yönetim Bilimler Dergisi Özel Sayı Çağrısı
Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi 2024 yılının Eylül ayında “Endüstri 4.0 ve Dijitalleşmenin Sosyal Bilimlerde Yansımaları” başlıklı bir özel sayı yayınlayacaktır.
Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart Üniversitesi Biga İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi tarafından 5-6 Temmuz 2024 tarihlerinde çevrimiçi olarak düzenlenecek olan 4. Uluslararası Sosyal Bilimler Konferansı’nda sunum gerçekleştiren yazarların dergi için ücret yatırmasına gerek olmayıp, dekont yerine Konferans Katılım Belgesini sisteme yüklemeleri yeterli olacaktır.
Gönderilen makalelerin derginin yazım kurallarına uygun olması ve DergiPark sistemi üzerinden sisteme yüklenmesi gerekmektedir. Özel sayı ana başlığı ile ilgisiz makaleler değerlendirmeye alınmayacaktır. Özel sayı için gönderilen makalelerin "Makalemi özel sayıya göndermek istiyorum" kutucuğu işaretlenerek sisteme yüklenmesi gerekmektedir. Özel sayı için gönderilmemiş makalelerin bu sayıya eklenmesi mümkün olmayacaktır.
Özel Sayı Çalışma Takvimi
Gönderim Başlangıcı: 15 Nisan 2024
Son Gönderim Tarihi: 15 Temmuz 2024
Özel Sayı Yayınlanma Tarihi: Eylül 2024

Dergimize göndereceğiniz çalışmalar linkte yer alan taslak dikkate alınarak hazırlanmalıdır. Çalışmanızı aktaracağınız taslak dergi yazım kurallarına göre düzenlenmiştir. Bu yüzden biçimlendirmeyi ve ana başlıkları değiştirmeden çalışmanızı bu taslağa aktarmanız gerekmektedir.
İngilizce Makale Şablonu için tıklayınız...

Saygılarımızla,