Telegram and disinformation: A systematic review of toxic content in the age of polycrisis

Öz

Through a systematic review, this study explores research at the intersection of Telegram and disinformation, arguing that in an era of polycrisis, marked by heightened uncertainty and evolving forms of misinformation, a fragile information ecosystem has emerged. Within this environment, semi-regulated platforms such as Telegram, have become increasingly prominent as spaces where diverse actors circulate disinformation. This trend highlights the growing need for structured and systematic scientific inquiry into the relationship between Telegram and disinformation. Accordingly, the study examines 34 articles retrieved from three major academic databases: Web of Science, Scopus, and Directory of Open Access (DOAJ). An inductive analytical approach is adopted to enable a multidimensional assessment of the selected studies, focusing on their thematic orientations, methodological designs, and analytical practices. The findings reveal key patterns in how Telegram is conceptualized within the disinformation landscape, identifying dominant research themes and methodological tendencies, as well as core variables that position the platform as a significant hub for misinformation.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Telegram
• disinformation
• polycrisis
• instant messaging services

Telegram ve dezenformasyon: Toksik içeriğin polikriz çağındaki durumu üzerine bir sistematik gözden geçirme

Öz

Bu çalışma, Telegram ve dezenformasyon kesişimindeki araştırmaları sistematik gözden geçirme yaklaşımıyla incelemektedir. Yanlış bilginin yeni formlarının yeni bağlamlarda ortaya çıktığı polikriz çağında, belirsizliğin artması kırılgan bir bilgi ekosisteminin mevcudiyetine sebep olmaktadır. Bu noktada, Telegram gibi yarı-denetimli alanların kullanımı yaygınlaşmakta; dezenformatif içerik söz konusu kanallar üzerinden dolaşıma girerek dijital ekosisteme dağılmaktadır. Bu durum dezenformasyon ve Telegram kesişiminde bilimsel bilginin üretimini ve yapılandırılmasını gerekli kılmaktadır. Telegram gibi yarı-denetimli alanlara yönelik gerçekleştirilen çalışmaların sistematik bir biçimde gözden geçirilmesi bu süreçteki bilgi ihtiyacına etkin bir yanıt geliştirebilmek adına önemlidir. Bu kapsamda Telegram ve dezenformasyon ilişkisini konu alan çalışmalar üzerinden bir sistematik gözden geçirme yapılması gerekli görülmüştür. Araştırmalar Web of Science, Scopus ve DOAJ olmak üzere üç bilimsel veritabanından toplanmış, 34 çalışma incelemeye tabi tutulmuştur. Benimsenen tümevarımcı perspektifle, araştırmalar çok boyutlu biçimde keşfedilmiştir. Bulgular, Telegram ve dezenformasyon kesişimindeki çalışmaların tematik karakteristiğine; araştırmaların metodolojik tasarım ve uygulamalarına ışık tuttuğu gibi Telegram’ı yanlış bilgi için bir merkez hâline getiren değişkenlerin keşfine de olanak tanımaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Telegram
• dezenformasyon
• polikriz
• anlık mesajlaşma servisleri

Kaynakça

1. Aïmeur, E., Amri, S., & Brassard, G. (2023). Fake news, disinformation and misinformation in social media: A review. Social Network Analysis and Mining, 13(1), 30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13278-023-01028-5 google scholar
2. Allchorn, W., Orofino, E., & Saheer, B.L. (2025). Analyzing radicalization dynamics in the language of non-violent extremists online in the UK (2016–2021): A longitudinal analysis of Britain First, 5 Pillars, and Earth First! Crime & Delinquency, 71(3), 656-686. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128724126423 google scholar
3. Almodt, R. (2024). From criticism to conspiracies: The populist discourse of COVID-19 sceptics in Germany’s Querdenken community on Telegram. Discourse & Society, 35(1), 3-26. https://doi.org/10.1177/09579265231191971 google scholar
4. Al-Rawi, A. (2024). Online hate on social media. Palgrave Macmillan. google scholar
5. Alvisi, L., Tardelli, S., & Tesconi, M. (2025). Mapping the Italian Telegram ecosystem: Communities, toxicity, and hate speech. Arxiv, 2504.19594. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2504.19594 google scholar
6. Adekoya, C. O., & Fasae, J. K. (2022). Social media and the spread of COVID-19 infodemic. Global Knowledge, Memory, and Communication, 71(3), 105-120. https://doi.org/10.1108/GKMC-11-2020-0165 google scholar
7. Baker, S. A., & Walsh, M. J. (2024). “Memes save life”: Stigma and the production of antivaccination memes during the COVID-19 pandemic. Social Media + Society, 10(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051231224729 google scholar
8. Bazdyrev, A. (2025). Russo-Ukrainian war disinformation detection in suspicious Telegram channels. arXiv, 2503.05707. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2503.05707 google scholar

9. Bergengruen, V. (2022, 21 March). How Telegram became the digital battlefield in the Russia-Ukraine war. Time. https://time.com/6158437/telegram-russia-ukraine-information-war. google scholar
10. Bidochko, L. (2024). Disinformation against Crimean Tatars in Russian social media: Communication dynamics during the first year of Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine. Journal of Ethnopolitics and Minority Issues in Europe, 23(2), 81-107. https://doi.org/10.53779/LEBI1430 google scholar
11. Boumechaal, S. & Sharoff, S. (2024). Attitudes, communicative functions, and lexicogrammatical features of anti-vaccine discourse on Telegram. Applied Corpus Linguistics, 4(2), 100095. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acorp.2024.100095 google scholar
12. Bovet, A. & Grindrod P. (2022). Organization and evolution of the UK far-right network on Telegram. Applied Network Science, 7(76), 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41109-022-00513-8 google scholar
13. Cavalini, A., Malini, F., Gouveia, F., & Comarela, G. (2022). Politics and disinformation: Analyzing the use of Telegram’s information disorder network in Brazil for political mobilization. First Monday, 28(5), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v28i5.12901 google scholar
14. Cazzamatta, R., & Santos, A. (2023). Checking verifications during the 2022 Brazilian run-off election: How fact-checking organizations exposed falsehoods and contributed to the accuracy of the public debate. Journalism, 25(10), 2022-2043. https://doi.org/10.1177/14648849231196080 google scholar
15. Charbonneau, B., & Giguère, A. (2025). The polycrisis and uncertainty possibility space. Global Sustainability, 8, e4, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1017/sus.2025.9 google scholar
16. Costa-Sanchez, C., Vizoso, A., & Lopez-Garcia, X. (2023). Fake news in the post-COVID-19 era? The health disinformation agenda in Spain. Societies, 13(11), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc13110242 google scholar
17. Curato, N., & Tomacruz, S. (2025). True costs of misinformation | Conspiracy Theories Harm Democracy. International Journal of Communication, 19, 2407-2423. google scholar
18. Curley, C., Siapera, E., & Carthy, J. (2022). Covid-19 protesters and the far right on Telegram: Co-conspirators or accidental bedfellows? Social Media + Society, 8(4), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051221129187 google scholar
19. Diaz, E. P., & Ricaurte, P. (2024). Doctors for the truth: Latin American antivaccine oppositional cultures on Telegram. Big Data & Society, 11(4), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517241306359 google scholar
20. Dehkordi, A. H., Mazaheri, E., Ibrahim, H. A., Dalvand, S., & Gheshlagh, R. G. (2021). How to write a systematic review: A narrative review. International Journal of Preventive Medicine, 12(1), 1-6. google scholar
21. Dominguez-Garcia, R., Perez-Curiel, C., & Casero-Ripolles, A. (2024). Zelensky’s leadership in Telegram and its impact on citizens: Internationalisation, mobilisation, and emotions in the Ukrainian war. Tripodos, 56, 37-57. https://doi.org/10.51698/tripodos.2024.56.04 google scholar
22. Dutta, M. J. (2024). Digital platforms, Hindutva, and disinformation: Communicative strategies and the Leicester violence. Communication Monogpraphs, 92(1), 20-48. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2024.2339799 google scholar
23. Funke, M., Schularick, M., & Trebesch, C. (2016). Going to extremes: Politics after financial crises, 1870-2014. European Economic Review, 88, 227-260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2016.03.006 google scholar
24. Gerard, P., Volkova, S., Penafiel, L., Lerman, K., & Weninger, T. (2025, June). Modeling information narrative evolution on Telegram during the Russia-Ukraine war. Proceedings of the 19th International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, 19(1), 602-614. https://doi.org/10.1609/icwsm.v19i1.35834 google scholar
25. Gerster, L., Kuchta, R., Hammer, D., & Schwieter, C. (2022). Telegram as a buttress: How far-right extremists and conspiracy theorists are expanding their infrastructures via Telegram. Institute for Strategic Dialogue. google scholar
26. Ghasiya, P., & Sasahara, K. (2023). Messaging strategies of Ukraine and Russia on Telegram during the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine. First Monday, 28(8), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v28i8.12873 google scholar
27. Gherman, M., Melnychuk, L., & Shuliak, A. (2024). Anti-Western narratives in Ukraine and Romania (comparative analysis). Ideology and Politics Journal, 2(26), 150-174. https://doi.org/10.36169/2227-6068.2024.02.00008 google scholar
28. Gursky, J., Riedl, M. J., Joseff, K., & Woolley, S. (2022). Chat apps and cascade logic: A multi-platform perspective on India, Mexico, and the United States. Social Media + Society, 8(2), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051221094773 google scholar
29. Habro, I., Shevchuk, O., Lanoviuk, L., & Khvist, V. (2024). Information Hygiene During the Armed Aggression of the Russian Federation Against Ukraine. European Political and Law Discourse, 11(3), 51-59. https://doi.org/10.46340/eppd.2024.11.3.5 google scholar
30. Helleiner, E. (2024). Economic globalization’s polycrisis. International Studies Quarterly, 68(2), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqae024 google scholar
31. Herasimenka, A., Bright, J., Knuutila, A., & Howard, P. N. (2023). Misinformation and professional news on largely unmoderated platforms: The case of Telegram. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 20(2), 198-212. https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2022.2076272 google scholar
32. Júnior, M., Melo, P., da Silva, A. P. C., Benevenuto, F., & Almeida, J. (2021, November). Towards understanding the use of telegram by political groups in Brazil. Proceedings of the Brazilian Symposium on Multimedia and the Web, 237-244. https://doi.org/10.1145/3470482.3479640 google scholar
33. Katerynhych, P. (2023). Propaganda at play: A thematic analysis of Belarusian media narratives in the context of the Russo-Ukrainian war. Media Literacy and Academic Research, 6(1), 23-39. https://doi.org/10.34135/mlar-23-01-02 google scholar
34. Knuutila, A., Herasimenka, A., Bright, J., Nielsen, R., & Howard, P. N. (2020, July 20). Junk News Distribution on Telegram: The visibility of English-language news sources on public Telegram channels. https://demtech.oii.ox.ac.uk/research/posts/junk-news-distribution-on-telegram-the-visibility-of-english-language-news-sources-on-public-telegram-channels. google scholar
35. Kiess, J. (2025). Euroscepticism and local far-right mobilization via Telegram in light of the fundamental transformation of the public sphere. Political Studies Review, 23(2), 635-642. https://doi.org/10.1177/14789299231190731 google scholar
36. Kim, C. (2023). How right-wing extremism uses the COVID-19 pandemic: Focusing anti-Asian rhetoric. Lectio Socialis, 7(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.47478/lectio.1242723 google scholar
37. Leahy, R., Restrepo, N. J., Sear, R., & Johnson, N. F. (2022). Connectivity between Russian information sources and extremist communities across social media platforms. Frontiers in Political Science, 4, 885362. 1-10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2022.885362 google scholar
38. Loucaides, D. (2022, March 10). Telegram: The digital battlefront between Russia and Ukraine. Politico. https://www.politico.eu/article/telegram-the-digital-battlefront-between-russia-and-ukraine. google scholar
39. Malini, F., Sodré, F., Cavalini, A., Herkenhoff, G., & Goveia, F. (2025). Five patterns of vaccine misinformation on Telegram. In L.M. Aiello, T. Chakraborty, & S. Gaito (Eds.), Social networks analysis and mining (pp. 181-196). Springer. google scholar
40. Mark, S., Holder, S., Hoyer, D., Schoonover, R., & Aldrich, D. P. (2025). Understanding polycrisis: definitions, applications, and responses. Global Sustainability, 8, e35, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1017/sus.2025.10018 google scholar
41. Maschmeyer, L., Abrahams, A., Pomerantsev, P., & Yermolenko, V. (2025). Donetsk don’t tell – ‘hybrid war’ in Ukraine and the limits of social media influence operations. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 22(1), 49-64. https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2023.2211969 google scholar
42. Meyer, T., & Vetulani-Cęgiel, A. (2024). Transparency as an empty signifier? Assessing transparency in EU and platform initiatives on online political advertising and actors. Policy & Internet, 17(1), e417, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1002/poi3.417 google scholar
43. Monaci, S., & Persico, S. (2023). Wartime and social media ecosystem: Disinformation strategies and bridges for under-the-radar platforms. DigitCult: Scientific Journal on Digital Cultures, 8(2), 37-56. https://doi.org/10.36158/97888929589203 google scholar
44. Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G. & PRISMA Group. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS medicine, 6(7), e1000097, 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097 google scholar
45. Murphy, H. (2024, March 12). Telegram: social media giant or the new ‘dark web’?. Financial Times. https://www.ft.com/content/c70ef7d6-230a-4404-b854-2e75fe0f2e0a. google scholar
46. Nobari, A. D., Sarraf, M. H. K. M., Neshati, M., & Daneshvar, F. E. (2021). Characteristics of viral messages on Telegram; The world’s largest hybrid public and private messenger. Expert Systems with Applications, 168, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2020.114303 google scholar
47. Ng, L. H. X., & Loke, J. Y. (2021). Analyzing public opinion and misinformation in a COVID-19 Telegram group chat. IEEE Internet Computing, 25(2), 84-91. https://doi.org/10.1109/MIC.2020.3040516 google scholar
48. Ng, L.H.X., Kloo, I., Clark, S. & Carley, K.M. (2024). An exploratory analysis of COVID bot vs human disinformation dissemination stemming from the disinformation dozen on Telegram. Journal of Computational Social Science, 7, 695-720. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42001-024-00253-y google scholar
49. Oleksiyuk, T. (2025). The right to access official information as a resilince-improving tool: Ukrainian lessons during wartime. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 11, 101549. 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.101549 google scholar
50. Patton, M. Q. (2024). Evaluation in the Polycrisis Epoch. In Petrakis, P.E., Boufounou, P.V., Kostis, P.C. (Eds.). The political economy of evaluation in Greece. Palgrave Macmillan. google scholar
51. Poldi, F., Alaphilippe, A., Jonusaite, R., & Sessa, M. G. (2022). Disinformation on Telegram: Research and content moderation policies. EU DisinfoLab. google scholar
52. Rieskamp, J., Mirbabaie, M., Langer, M., & Kocur, A. (2024). From virality to veracity: Examining false information on Telegram vs. Twitter. Proceedings of the 57th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2516-2525. google scholar
53. Santini, R. M., Salles, D., & Barros, C. E. (2022). We love to hate George Soros: A cross-platform analysis of the Globalism conspiracy theory campaign in Brazil. Convergence, 28(4), 983-1006. https://doi.org/10.1177/13548565221085833 google scholar
54. Santini, R. M., Salles, D. G., Santos, M. L., Leopoldo Belin, L., & Ciodaro, T. (2025). Anti-sustainability narratives in chat apps: What shapes the Brazilian far-right discussion about socio-environmental issues on WhatsApp and Telegram. Journalism and Media, 6(2), 85. 1-25. https://doi.org/10.3390/journalmedia6020085 google scholar
55. Santos, M., Park, C. S., Santos, J. G. B., Cavalini, A., & Zuniga, H. G. (2025). Latent bombs of disinformation. Information, Communication & Society, 28(16), 2868-2889. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2025.2492575 google scholar
56. Schlette, A., van Prooijen, J.-W., Blokland, A., & Thijs, F. (2022). The online structure and development of posting behaviour in Dutch anti-vaccination groups on Telegram. New Media & Society, 26(8), 4689-4710. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448221128475 google scholar
57. Schwarzenegger, C., & Wagner, A. (2023). Commemorative populism in the COVID-19 pandemic: The strategic (ab)use of memory in anti-corona protest communication on Telegram. International Journal of Communication, 17, 2138-2156. google scholar
58. Schulze, H., Hohner, J., Griepl, S., Girgnhuber, M., Desta, I., & Rieger, D. (2022). Far-right conspiracy groups on fringe platforms: A longitudinal analysis of radicalization dynamics on Telegram. Convergence, 28(4), 1103-1126. https://doi.org/10.1177/13548565221104977 google scholar
59. Siddaway, A. P., Wood, A. M., & Hedges, L. V. (2019). How to do a systematic review: A best practice guide for conducting and reporting narrative reviews, meta-analyses, and meta-syntheses. Annual review of psychology, 70, 747-770. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-102803 google scholar
60. Silva, E. C. D. M. (2024). Climate change denial and anti-science communities on Brazilian Telegram: Climate disinformation as a gateway to broader conspiracy networks. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2408.15311. google scholar
61. Skarzauskiene, A., Maciuliene, M., Dirzyte, A. & Guleviciute, G. (2025). Profiling antivaccination channels in Telegram: Early efforts in detecting misinformation. Frontiers in Communication, 10, 1525899. 1-13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2025.1525899 google scholar
62. Statista. (2025). Telegram - statistics & facts. Statista. https://www.statista.com/topics/9640/telegram. google scholar
63. Suherman, A., Hidayatullah, M., Sa’ban, L.O.M.A., & Mulia, F. (2026). Information disorder and electoral integrity: The impact of disinformation on elections in developing democracies. In O.I. Aluko (Ed.), Elections in the Global South and North-A Comprehensive Overview. IntechOpen. google scholar
64. Terracciano, B. (2023). Accessing to a “Truer truth”: Conspiracy and figurative reasoning from Covid-19 to the Russia-Ukraine war. Media and Communication, 11(2), 64-75. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v11i2.6396 google scholar
65. Theisen, W., Yankoski, M., Hook, K., Verdeja, E., Scheirer, W., & Weninger, T. (2025). Visual narratives and political instability: A case study of visual media prior to the Russia-Ukraine conflict. Information, Communication & Society, 28(16), 2890-2912. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2025.2492577 google scholar
66. Urman, A., & Katz, S. (2022). What they do in the shadows: examining the far-right networks on Telegram. Information, Communication & Society, 25(7), 904–923. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2020.1803946 google scholar
67. Voinea, D. (2022). The migration of news to Telegram channels in the Ukraine-Russia conflict. Social Sciences and Education Research Review, 9(1), 257-261. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15251996 google scholar
68. Walther, S., & McCoy, A. (2021). US extremism on Telegram: Fueling disinformation, conspiracy theories, and accelerationism. Perspectives on Terrorism, 15(2), 100–124. google scholar
69. Wardle, C., & Darekshan, H. (2017). Information disorder: Toward an interdisciplinary framework for research and policymaking. Strasbourg: Council of Europe. google scholar
70. Watkin, A., & Conway, M. (2022). Building social capital to counter polarization and extremism? A comparative analysis of tech platforms’ official blog posts. First Monday, 27(5). 1-26. https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v27i5.12611 google scholar
71. Willaert, T., Peeters, S., Seijbel, J., & Raemdonck, N. (2022). Disinformation networks: A quali-quantitative investigation of antagonistic Dutch-speaking Telegram channels. First Monday, 27(5), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v27i5.12533 google scholar
72. Xiao, Y., & Watson, M. (2019). Guidance on conducting a systematic literature review. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 39(1), 93–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X17723971 google scholar
73. Xue, H., & Shen, C. (2025). Big data approaches to identifying crisis misinformation. In K.B. Wright (Ed.), Communication and misinformation: Crisis events in the age of social media (pp.196-214). Wiley & Sons. google scholar
74. Yarova, A. (2023). Thematic patterns of Russian disinformation. Baltic Journal of Legal and Social Sciences, 4, 158-165. https://doi.org/10.30525/2592-8813-2022-4-19 google scholar
75. Zhong, W., Bailard, C., Broniatowski, D., & Tromble, R. (2024). Proud Boys on Telegram. Journal of Quantitative Description: Digital Media, 4, 1-47. https://doi.org/10.51685/jqd.2024.003 google scholar