Sosyal Politikanın Anlamı ve İşlevini Tartışmak

Öz

Öz

Due to the profound changes characterising our times, social policy has entered into a process of radical change, in terms of both its meaning as well its practice. Given that social policy is a sequence of policies belonging to the State, and oriented towards the society, it adapts itself inexorably to such changes. On the one hand, multifarious changes are on the agenda, ranging, as they are, from the party in charge of the implementation, to the target and the ends of social policy. On the other hand, from the perspective of the social state and policy, one could speak of both a loss of meaning and function ensuing current impasses and relapses, and the need to pay heed to the rising concerns to conserve its basic goals and function. Thus, possible paths to change are to be taken into consideration by paying due attention such concerns. This exposition aims at considering this dual state, and bringing up, in this context, some data —albeit limited— and debates. Its point of origin is some concerns of ours as to the nature of the transformation of the meaning and function of social policy, as well as its future direction

Kaynakça

1. Bauman, Z. (1999), Çalışma, Tüketicilik ve Yeni Yoksullar, Sarmal Yayınevi, İstanbul.
2. Beck, U. (2000), What is Globalization?, Polity Pres, Cambridge.
3. Bohman, J., (2003), “Constitution Making and Democratic Innovation”, European Journal of Political Theory, (3).
4. Bohman, J., (1998), “The Coming of Age of deliberative Democracy”, The Journal of Political Philosophy, (4).
5. Bradley, D; Huber E; Moller, S; Nielsen, F; Stephens, J.D; (2003), “Democracy, Income Distribution, Political Science, Welfare”, World Politics, Baltimore, 55 (2).
6. Braudel, F. (1996); Medeniyet ve Kapitalizm, İz Yay. İstanbul.
7. Clarke, John (2001), “Globalization and Welfare States: Some Unsettling Thoughts”, Globalization and Erupean Welfare States, (der), Sykes, R.; Palier, B.; Prior, P.M., Palgrave, Hampshire.
8. Cohen, J. (1999), “reflections on habermas on Democracy”, Ratio Juris, (4).

9. Esping-Andersen, G. (1990), The Three Worlds Of Welfare Capitalism, Princeton University Press, New Jersey.
10. Esping-Andersen, G. (1997), “Towards a Post-industrial Welfare State”, Politik und Gesellschaft- International Politics and Society, (3).
11. Flora, A. ve Alber, J. (1990), “Modernization, Democratization and the Development of Welfare States in Western Europe”, The Development Of Welfare States in Europe and America, (der) Flora, P. ve Heidenheimer, A.J., Transaction, London.
12. Flora, P. ve Heidenheimer A. J. (1990), “The Historical Core and Changing Boundaries of the Welfare State”, The Development Of Welfare States in Europe and America, (der) Flora, P. ve Heidenheimer, A.J. Transaction, London.
13. Forst, Rainer, (2001), “The Rule of Reasons: Three Models of Deliberative Democracy”, Ratio Juris, (4).
14. Friedman, M. (1988), Kapitalizm ve Özgürlük, Altın Kitaplar, İstanbul.
15. Habermas, J. (2001), “Why Europe Needs a Constitution”, The Left Review, 11, September-October.
16. Habermas, J.( 1996), “Three Normative Models of Democracy”, Democracy and Difference. Contesting the Boundaries of the Political, (der). S Benhabib, Princeton University Press.
17. Hanke, S. H. (1997), “The Specter of Capitalism”, Forbes (5).
18. Hardt, M; Negri, A. (2000); İmparatorluk, Ayrıntı Yay, İstanbul.
19. Hayek, F. A. (1993), Kanun, Yasama Faaliyeti ve Özgürlük, İş Bankası yayını, Ankara.
20. Heinrichs, K; Offe C. Ve Wiesenthal, H. (1993), “Zaman, Para ve Refah Devleti Kapitalizmi”, Sivil Toplum ve Devlet, (der) Keane J. , Ayrıntı Yayınları, İstanbul.
21. Gilpin, R. ( 2000), The Challenge of The Global Capitalism, Princeton University Pres.
22. Gorz A. (1980), Elveda Proleterya, Afa Yayınları, İstanbul.
23. Gutman,A. ve Thompson, D. (2002), The Journal of Political Philosophy, (2).
24. Jessop, B. (2002), The Future of Capitalist State, Polity Pres, Blackwell Publishing, Cambridge.
25. Klein, R. (1993), “O’ Goffe’s tale”, Welfare State in Europe, (der) Jones, C. Routledge Yayınları, London ve Newyork.
26. Kleinman, M. (2002). A European Welfare State?, Palgrave, London.
27. Koray, M. (2005), “Görülmek İstenmeyen Gerçek: Sosyal Refah Politikaları ve Demokrasi İlişkisi”, Çalışma ve Toplum, (2).
28. Koray, M. (2005), Avrupa Toplum Modeli 2. Baskı, İmge Kitabevi, Ankara.
29. Koray, M ve Çelik A. (7007), Avrupa Birliği ve Türkiye’de Sosyal Diyalog, Beladiye-İş Yayını, Ankara.
30. Korpi, W.; Palme, J. (2003), “New Politics and Class Politics in the Context of Austerity and Globaliziton: Welfare State Regress in 18 Countries 1975-95”, American Political Science Review, 97 (3).
31. Korpi, W. (1978), The Working Class in Welfare Capitalism, Routledge ve Kegan Paul, London.
32. Kurten, D. C. (1999), “Enemy of the People”, Forbes (1)..
33. Lewis, S. (2003), “Are Democracy and capitalism Incompatible?”, Student Economic Review, Cilt 17.
34. Liebfried S.; Pierson P. (1995), “Semisovereign welfare states: Social policy in a multitiered Europe”, European Social Policy: Between Fragmentation and Integration, Washington DC. Broıokings Institute.
35. Liebfried S.; Pierson P. (2000), “Social Policy”, Policy-Making in the European Union, (der) Wallace H. ve Wallace W. Oxford University Press, Newyork.
36. Lockwood, D. (1999), “Civic Integration and Social Cohesion”, Capitalism and Social Cohesion, Palgrave, Macmillan, London.
37. Marshall, T.H. (1965), Class, Citizenship and Social Development, Anchor Boks, NewYork.
38. Offe. C. (2003), “The European Model of ‘Social’ Capitalism: Can it Survive European Integration?”, The Journal of Political Philosophy, Cilt 11 (4).
39. Olofsson, G. (1999), “Embeddedness and Integration”, Capitalism and Social Cohesion, Palgrave, Macmillan, London.
40. Palier, B. ve Sykes, R (2001), “Challenges and Change: Issues and Perspectives in the Analysis of Globalization and the European Welfare States”, Globalization and Erupean Welfare States, (der), Sykes, R.; Palier, B.; Prior, P.M., Palgrave, Hampshire.
41. Pateman, Carole (2004), Democratizing Citizenship: Some Advantages of Basic Income, Politics and Society, (32/89).
42. Petersman, E.-U.(2003), “Time for a United Nations ‘Global Campact’ for Intagratating Human Rights into the Law of Worldwide Organizations: Lessons from European Integration” http://www.ejil.org/journal/Vol13/No3/art1.html
43. Pierson, P. (2000), “Three Worlds of Welfare State Resarch”, Comparative Political Stuudies, 33 (6-7).
44. Polanyi, K. (2000), Büyük Dönüşüm, İletişim Yayınları, İstanbul.
45. Przeworski, A. (1991), Capitalism and Social Democracy, Cambridge University Press,
46. Rawls, J. (2001), Collected Papers, (der) Samuel Freeman, Harvard University Press.
47. Sapancalı, F. (2003), Sosyal Dışlanma, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İİB Fakültesi Yayını, İzmir.
48. Schedler, A. (1997), “Introduction: Antipolitics-Closing and Colonizing The Public Sphere”, The End of Politics, Andreas Schedler (Der), Macmillan Press, UK.
49. Sen, A. (1987), On Ethics and Economics, The Royel Lectures, Blackwell, Oxford.
50. Shaw, M. (2000); Theory of the Global State, Cambridge University Press.
51. Speth, J.G. (1998), “Poverty: A denial of Human Rights”, Journal of International Affairs, (Vol 52 No1, Fall).
52. Stamatis, C. (2001), “The Idea of deliberative Democracy. A Critical Appraisal”, Ratio Juris, December.
53. Stiglitz, J. (2002), Küreselleşme-Büyük Hayal Kırıklığı, Plan B, İstanbul.
54. Tobin, J. (1978), “A Proposal for Monetary Reform”, The Eastern Economic Journal, (4).
55. Wallerstein, I. (1998), Liberalizmden Sonra, Metis Yayınları, İstanbul.
56. Wallerstein, I. (1992), Tarihsel Kapitalizm, Metis Yayınları, İstanbul.
57. Wivel, A (2004), “The Power Politics of Peace: Exploring the Link Between Globalization and European Integration from a Realist Perspective”, Journal of the Nordic International Studies Association, 39 (1).
58. Woods, E. M. (2003), Kapitalizm Demokrasiye Karşı, İletişim Yayınları, İstanbul.