Emek Sürecinde Yeni Arayışlar

Yıl 2015, Cilt: 4 Sayı: 47, 77 - 94, 01.01.2015

Taner Akpınar Şener Akpınar

Öz

Kapitalist üretim tarzında artı-değer oranını artırma konusunda sürekli bir arayış vardır. Tarihsel süreçte, iş yasalarıyla çalışma gününe mutlak artı-değer üretimine bir üst sınır getirilmeye başlanması ile birlikte emek yoğunluğunu nispi artı-değer artırarak artı-değer oranını artırmanın yolları aranır olmuştur. Bu konu, endüstri mühendisliği disiplininin temel ilgi alanlarından birini oluşturmaktadır. Bu mühendislik kolu emek yoğunluğunu artırma konusunda bir son noktaya ulaşmış değildir. Belirli bir zaman diliminde harcanan emek yoğunluğuna kısıtlama getiren herhangi bir yasal düzenlemenin olmadığı bir ortamda, insanın fiziksel ve ruhsal kapasitesinin sınırlarını zorlayıcı çalışma düzenleri kurulmaktadır. Bu çalışma, endüstri mühendislerinin gündeminde yer alan tartışmalar üzerinden, nispi artıdeğer üretimi konusundaki güncel gelişmeleri irdelemeye çalışmaktadır

Anahtar Kelimeler

Emek süreci, kapitalist emek süreci, artı-değer, endüstri mühendisliği, bant sistemi New trends in labour process

New trends in labour process

Öz

In the capitalist production process, intensive efforts have been continuously expending with the aim of increasing the rate of surplus value. Alternative ways have been searched in order to increase the relative surplus value rather than absolute surplus value, since the work days have been limited by labour laws within the historical development. This subject is one of the basic research fields on which the industrial/manufacturing engineering disciplines have been studying intensively. This branch of engineering discipline has not come to an end in its endeavour to intensify the labour, yet. There is a lack of regulations putting limitations on labour intensity in a specific part of time. Such a labour intensive environment damages physical and psychological capacity of human being unavoidably. This paper investigates the current discussions about this topic among industrial engineers

Anahtar Kelimeler

Labour process, capitalist labour process, surplus value, industrial engineering, assembly line

Kaynakça

• Aase Gerald R., Olson John R. and Schniederjans Marc J. (2004), “U-shaped assembly line layouts and their impact on labor productivity: An experimental study”, European Journal of Operational Research, 156(3): 698-711.
• Bain Peter et al. (2002), “Taylorism, targets and the pursuit of quantity and quality by call centre management”, New Technology, Work and Employment, 17(3): 170-185.
• Battaїa Olga and Dolgui Alexandre (2013), “Review -A taxonomy of line balancing problems and their solution approaches”, International Journal of Production Economics, 142(2): 259-277.
• Battini D. Et al., (2011), “New methodological framework to improve productivity and ergonomics in assembly system design”, International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 41(1): 30-42.
• Boysen Nils, Fliedner Malte and Scholl Armin (2007), “A classification of assembly line balancing problems”, European Journal of Operational Research, 183(2): 674-693.
• Boysen Nils, Fliedner Malte and Scholl Armin (2008), “Assembly line balancing: Which model to use when?”, International Journal of Production Economics, 111(2): 509-528.
• Braverman Harry (1974), Labor and Monopoly Capital –The Degradation of Work in the Twentieth Century, New York and London: Monthly Review Press.
• Buchanan Ruth and Koch-Schulte Sarah (2000), Gender on the Line: Technology, Restructuring and the Reorganization of Work in the Call Centre Industry, Ottawa: Status of Women Canada.
• Burawoy Michael (1979), Manufacturing Consent –Changes in the Labor Process Under Monopoly Capitalism, Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
• Burawoy Michael (1985), The Politics of Production –Factory Regimes Under Capitalism and Socialism, London: Verso.
• Carnahan Brian J., Norman Bryan A. and Redfern Mark S. (2001), “Incorporating physical demand criteria into assembly line balancing”, IIE Transactions, 33(10): 875-887.
• Dahrendorf Ralf (1959), Class and Class Conflict in Industrial Society, Stanford University Press, Stanford, California.
• Drucker Peter F. (1962), The New Society -The Anatomy of Industrial Order, Harper Torchbooks, Harper & Row Publishers, New York and Evanston.
• Edwards Richard (1979), Contested Terrain –The Transformation of the Workplace in the Twentieth Century, New York: Basic Books.
• Eklund Jörgen A. E. (1995), “Relationships between ergonomics and quality in assembly work”, Applied Ergonomics, 26(1): 15-20.
• Falck Ann-Christine, Örtengren Roland and Högberg Dan (2010), “The Impact of Poor Assembly Ergonomics on Product Quality: A Cost–Benefit Analysis in Car Manufacturing”, Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries, 20(1): 24–41.
• Florida Richard and Kenney Martin (1991), “Transplanted Organizations: The Transfer of Japanese Industrial Organization to the U.S.”, American Sociological Review, 56(3): 381-398.
• Friedman Andrew L. (1977), Industry and Labour –Class Struggle at Work and Monopoly Capitalism, London: Macmillan.
• Gorz Andre (1982), Farewell to the Working Class, an essay on post-industrial socialism, (Translated by Michael Sonenscher), Pluto Press, London and Sydney.
• Harvey David (2006), Postmodernliğin Durumu, Dördüncü Basım, (Çeviren: Sungur Savran), Metis Yayınları, İstanbul.
• Head Simon (2003), The New Ruthless Economy –Work and Power in the Digital Age, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Kelly John E. (1982), Scientific Management, Job Redesign and Work Performance, London: Academic Press.
• Knights David, Willmot Hugh and Collinson David (eds) (1985), Job Redesign – Critical Perspectives on the Labour Process, Aldershot: Grower.
• Knights David and Willmot Hugh (eds) (1986a), Gender and the Labour Process, Aldershot: Grower.
• Knights David and Willmot Hugh (eds) (1986b), Managing the Labour Process, Aldershot: Grower.
• Knights David and Willmot Hugh (eds) (1987), New Technology and the Labour Process, London: Macmillan.
• Knights David and Willmot Hugh (eds) (1990), Labour Process Theory, London: Macmillan.
• Laclau Ernesto and Mouffe Chantal (1985), Hegemony and Socialist Strategy - Towards a Radical Democratic Politics, Verso, London – New York.
• Le Play Frederic (1872), The Organization of Labour in accordance with Custom and the Law of the Decalogue, (Translated by Gouverneur Emerson), Philadelphia: Claxton, Remsen&Haffelfinger.
• Ling Peter J. (1990), America and the Automobile –Technology, Reform and Social Change, 1893-1923, Manchester: Manchester University Press.
• Littler Craig R. (1985), “Taylorism, Fordism and Job Design”, Job Redesign – Critical Perspectives on the Labour Process, (Edited by David Knights, Hugh Willmott and David Collinson), Aldershot: Gower, 10-29.
• Lukács Georg (1971), History and Class Consciousness –Studies in Marxist Dialectics, (Translated by Rodney Livingstone), Cambridge – Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
• Marx Karl (2004), Kapital Cilt I, (Yedinci Baskı), (Çeviren: Alaattin Bilgi), Ankara: Sol Yayınları.
• Marx Karl, (2012), Fransa’da Sınıf Mücadeleleri 1848-1850, (2.Baskı), İstanbul: Yazılama.
• Mayo Elton (1945), The Social Problems of an Industrial Civilization, (Fourth Printing), The Andover Press, Andover, Massachusetts.
• Moody Kim (1997), Workers in a Lean World –Unions in the International Economy, Verso: London.
• Otto Alena and Scholl Armin (2011), “Incorporating ergonomic risks into assembly line balancing”, European Journal of Operational Research, 212(2): 277-286.
• Peck Jamie (1996), Work-Place The Social Regulation of Labour Markets, The Guilford Press, New York.
• Rinehart James, Huxley Christopher and Robertson David (1997), Just Another Car Factory? –Lean Production and Its Discontents, Ithaca, New York: ILR Press.
• Rinehart James W. (2001), The Tyranny of Work –Alienation and the Labour Process, (Fourth Edition), Ontario: Thomson – Nelson.
• Russell Jack (1978), “The Coming of the Line –the Ford Highland Park Plant, 1910-1914”, Radical America, 12(3): 29-45.
• Sallaz Jeffrey J. (2015), “Permanent Pedagogy: How Post-Fordist Firms Generate Effort but Not Consent”, Work and Occupations, 42(1): 3-34.
• Sandberg Åke ed. (2007), Enriching Production -Perspectives on Volvo’s Uddevalla plant as an alternative to lean production, (Digital edition, Stockholm), muenchen.de/10785/1/MPRA_paper_10785.pdf>, (Erişim: 25.4.2015).
• Sirovetnukul Ronnachai ve Chutima Parames (2010), “The Impact of Walking Time on U-Shaped Assembly Line Worker Allocation Problems”, Engineering Journal, 14(2): 53-78.
• Sivasabkaran P. and Shahabudeen P. (2014), “Literature review of assembly line balancing problems”, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 73(9-12): 1665-1694.
• Standing Guy (1999), Global Labour Flexibility –Seeking Distributive Justice, London: Macmillan.
• Taylor Frederick Winslow (1919), The Principles of Scientific Management, Harper & Brothers Publishers, New York and London.
• Taylor Philip and Bain Peter (2001), “Trade Unions, Workers’ Rights and the Frontier of Control in UK Call Centres”, Economic and Industrial Democracy, 22(1): 39-66.
• Taylor Phil and Bain Peter (2005), “‘India calling to the far away towns’: the call centre labour process and globalization”, Work, Employment and Society, 19(2): 261-282.
• Thomopoulos Nick T. (2014), Assembly Line Planning and Control, New York: Springer.
• Touraine Alain (1971), The Post-Industrial Society –Tomorrow’s Social History: Classes, Conflicts and Culture in the Programmed Society, (Translated by Leonard F. X. Mayhew), Random House, New York.
• Williams Karel, Haslam Colin and Williams John (1992), “Ford versus ‘Fordism’: The Beginning of Mass Production?”, Work, Employment & Society, 6(4): 517-555.
• Williams Karel et al. (1993), “The Myth of the Line: Ford’s Production of the Model T at Highland Park, 1909-1916”, Business History, 35(3): 66-87.
• Womack James P., Jones Daniel T. and Roos Daniel (1990), The Machine That Changed The World, New York: Rawson Associates.
• Zieren Gregory (2004), “American Manufacturing, American Technology and the Labor Question at the Paris Exposition Universelle of 1867”, Essay in Economic and Business History, 22: 313-322.