EMPOWERED TEACHERS - STRONGER INSTITUTIONS

Öz

Most educational institutions practice a ‘hierarchical’ approach toward decision making. Decisions are taken and made, mostly, by one person, who usually is the headmaster. Despite the fact that this approach, which sidelines ‘practitioners’, may lead to effective consequences on part of the institution, it however, may also lead to some kind of unease on part of the teachers wishing to voice their views on topics such as selection of instructional material, syllabus design, rules setting, exams, assessment, meetings, etc. This study argues that powerful teachers lead to powerful institutions. Based on this premise, it was conducted with 73 teachers functioning at Turkish primary educational institutions; all expressing views on matters building and enhancing an autonomous stand in the institution.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Decision making, shared decision making, teacher empowerment, teacher autonomy

Kaynakça

1. Armstrong, M. A. (1984). Handbook of personnel management practice. London: Kogan Page Ltd.
2. Bascia, N. (1996). Teacher leadership: Contending with adversity. Canadian Journal of Education, 21(2), 155-169.
3. Belasco, J.A., & Alutto, J.A. (1972). Decisional participation and teacher satisfaction. Educational Administration Quarterly, 8(1), 44-58.
4. Bezzina, C. (1997). Restructuring schools in Malta. The International Journal of Educational. Management, 11(5), 194-202.
5. Bogler, R., & Somech, A. (2004). Influence of teacher empowerment on teachers’ organizational commitment, professional commitment and organizational citizenship behavior in schools. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20(3), 277-289.
6. Bridges, E. (1967). A model for shared decision-making in the school principalship. Educational Administration Quarterly, 3, 49-61.
7. Conley, S. C. (1989). Who's on First?: School Reform, Teacher Participation, and the Decision-Making Process. Education and Urban Society, 21, 366-379.
8. Conway, J., & Calzi, C. (1996). The dark side of shared leadership. Educational Leadership, 53(4), 45-49.

9. Cosh, J. (1999). Peer observation: a reflective model. ELT Journal, 53(1), 22-27.
10. Dwivedi, R.S. (1988). Dynamics of human behavior at work. New Delhi: Oxford Publishing Ltd.
11. Halliday, L. (1993). Why delegate? A resource book for educational administration. London: Commonwealth Secretariat.
12. Hutchinson, T., & Torres, E. (1994). The textbook as agent of change．ELT Journal, 45(3), 218-229.
13. Griffin, G. (1995). Influences of shared decision-making on school and classroom activity. The Elementary School Journal, 96(1), 29-45.
14. Koul, L. (1984). Methodology of educational research. New Delhi: Hindustani offset printers.
15. Kunz, D., & Hoy, W. (1976). Leadership style of principals and the professional zone of acceptance of teachers. Educational Administration Quarterly, 12(3), 49-64.
16. Leithwood, K., & Jantzi, D. (1997). Explaining variations in teachers’ perceptions of principals’ leadership. Journal of Educational Leadership, 35(4), 312-331.
17. Leithwood, K., Jantzi, D., & Steinbach, R. (1998). Changing leadership for changing times. Toronto: Draft Version.
18. Skaalvik, E. M., & Skaalvik, S. (2009). Does school context matter? Relations with teacher burnout and job satisfaction. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25(3), 518-524.
19. Smith, R.C. (2001). Learner and teacher development: Connections and constraints. The Language Teacher, 25(6), 43-4.
20. Somech, A. (2010). Participative Decision Making in Schools: A Mediating-Moderating Analytical Framework for Understanding School and Teacher Outcomes. Educational Administration Quarterly, 46(2), 174-209.
21. Taylor, D., & Tashakkori, A. (1997). Toward an understanding of teachers desire for participation in decision-making. Journal of School Leadership, 7(Nov), 609-628.
22. Thanasoulas, D. 2000. What is learner autonomy and how can it be fostered? The Internet TESL Journal, 6, 1-11.
23. Tyree, M. (1969). Coordinated administration: who will run our schools? In London and Sprinter (Ed) Education in the 21st century. Danville: The Interstate Printers and Publishers Inc.
24. Wahlstrom, K. L., & Louis, K. S. (2008). How teachers experience principal leadership: The roles of professional community, trust, efficacy, and shared responsibility. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44, 458-495.