Araştırma Makalesi

Müteşâbihü’l-Kur’an’la İlgili Bir Tasnif Önerisi ve Müteşâbihlik Üzerine Yapılan Dil Tartışmaları

Cilt: 18 Sayı: 1 15 Haziran 2014
  • Bilal Deliser
PDF İndir
EN TR

A Classification Proposal on Muteshabih al-Qur'an and Linguistic Discussions on Ambiguity

Öz

One of the dominant subjects of Quranic sciences, “Muteshabihu’l Quran” is presented in a different approach and classification in this study. The approach contains a classification which will help us to see unity. The data having no practical value and not hel-ping us understand Quran or use related information in terms of methodology will not take place in the classification while mutes-habihat (ambiguity) and some new information will be involved. On the other hand, this triple classification is a practical one which will help us put historical information and discussions into place. In the classification, “Muteshabihu’l Quran” will be analyzed under three main titles as follow: 1. Literal similarity, 2. Muteshabihat (ambiguity) discussed within the context of the verse 3/7 in Al-i İmran (Surah), and 3. Muteshabihat formed within the scope of the attributes of Allah. In the study, some overlooked approaches will be brought to the attention of readers, and some efforts will be made for linguistic, historical and socio-cultural understanding of the subject.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kaynakça

  1. ALEVLER, Köksal, Edebiyat Sosyolojisi, Hece Yay., Ank., 2012.
  2. AYDIN, Muhammed Kur’an’da Benzer Ayetlerdeki Anlatım Farklılıkları, Değişim Yay., Adapazarı, 2001.
  3. BALJON, J. M. S., Kur’ân’ın İnsan-Biçimci Dili, Çeviri: Mevlüt, Erten, Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi Cilt: VIII / 1, Haziran-2004.
  4. BAŞOĞLU, Tuncay, “Muhkem” TDİA, İstanbul, 2009.
  5. CEVHERİ, Ebu Nasr Muhammed b. Muhammed, Sıhah, Tah. Emil Bedi’-Muhammed Nebil Tarifi, Daru’l- Kütübü’l- İlmiyye, Beyrut, 1999.
  6. CÜRCÂNÎ, es-Seyyid Şerif Ali b. Muhammed, et-Ta’rîfât, Matbaatu Mus-tafa el-Bâbî el-Halebî, (Mısır) 1938.
  7. DÜZGÜN, Şaban Ali, Allah, Tabiat ve Tarih, Lotus Yay, Ankara, 2005.
  8. DEMİRCİ, Muhsin, Kur’an’ın Müteşâbihleri Üzerine, Birleşik Yay. İstan-bul, 1996.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

-

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yazarlar

Bilal Deliser Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi

15 Haziran 2014

Gönderilme Tarihi

4 Ocak 2014

Kabul Tarihi

5 Mayıs 2014

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2014 Cilt: 18 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA
Deliser, B. (2014). A Classification Proposal on Muteshabih al-Qur’an and Linguistic Discussions on Ambiguity. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi, 18(1), 5-35. https://doi.org/10.18505/cuifd.254634
AMA
1.Deliser B. A Classification Proposal on Muteshabih al-Qur’an and Linguistic Discussions on Ambiguity. CUIFD. 2014;18(1):5-35. doi:10.18505/cuifd.254634
Chicago
Deliser, Bilal. 2014. “A Classification Proposal on Muteshabih al-Qur’an and Linguistic Discussions on Ambiguity”. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi 18 (1): 5-35. https://doi.org/10.18505/cuifd.254634.
EndNote
Deliser B (01 Haziran 2014) A Classification Proposal on Muteshabih al-Qur’an and Linguistic Discussions on Ambiguity. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi 18 1 5–35.
IEEE
[1]B. Deliser, “A Classification Proposal on Muteshabih al-Qur’an and Linguistic Discussions on Ambiguity”, CUIFD, c. 18, sy 1, ss. 5–35, Haz. 2014, doi: 10.18505/cuifd.254634.
ISNAD
Deliser, Bilal. “A Classification Proposal on Muteshabih al-Qur’an and Linguistic Discussions on Ambiguity”. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi 18/1 (01 Haziran 2014): 5-35. https://doi.org/10.18505/cuifd.254634.
JAMA
1.Deliser B. A Classification Proposal on Muteshabih al-Qur’an and Linguistic Discussions on Ambiguity. CUIFD. 2014;18:5–35.
MLA
Deliser, Bilal. “A Classification Proposal on Muteshabih al-Qur’an and Linguistic Discussions on Ambiguity”. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi, c. 18, sy 1, Haziran 2014, ss. 5-35, doi:10.18505/cuifd.254634.
Vancouver
1.Bilal Deliser. A Classification Proposal on Muteshabih al-Qur’an and Linguistic Discussions on Ambiguity. CUIFD. 01 Haziran 2014;18(1):5-35. doi:10.18505/cuifd.254634