Araştırma Makalesi

DİN GÖREVLİSİNİN TOPLUMSALLAŞTIGI AİLEDE GELENEKSEL FORMLAR VE BUNLARIN KENDİ AİLE YAPILARINDAKi GÖRÜNÜMLERİ (Antalya İli Örneği)

Cilt: 15 Sayı: 2 15 Aralık 2011
  • Şaban Erdiç
PDF İndir
EN TR

TRADITIONAL FORMS OF RELIGIOUS OFFICERS IN THEFAMILYTHAT THEY SOCIALIZED AND THEIR REFLECTION INTHEIR OWN FAMILY (IN THE CASE OF ANTALYA)

Öz

There is very important status of the family in the socialization of the individua ı. Rural environment which constitutes great social origins of religious officers continues to carry the attitude and b1havior of traditional large family even though it has same kind of change ioınd transformation. Their family environment in the satellite cities according to their matrix is defıned different than the modern nuclear family. A religious officer who has a close relation with this family type seems very eager to re-product this ~ind of family type'in their working places from rural to urban. In this regard forms which a religious officer reached in his/her family type reflect attitudes and behaviors which are motivated by agricultural production mode that underHes largely to preserve the socio-cultural and economical unity. 

Anahtar Kelimeler

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

-

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yazarlar

Şaban Erdiç Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi

15 Aralık 2011

Gönderilme Tarihi

15 Ekim 2011

Kabul Tarihi

15 Kasım 2011

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2011 Cilt: 15 Sayı: 2

Kaynak Göster

APA
Erdiç, Ş. (2011). TRADITIONAL FORMS OF RELIGIOUS OFFICERS IN THEFAMILYTHAT THEY SOCIALIZED AND THEIR REFLECTION INTHEIR OWN FAMILY (IN THE CASE OF ANTALYA). Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi, 15(2), 101-130. https://izlik.org/JA28ZE93BE
AMA
1.Erdiç Ş. TRADITIONAL FORMS OF RELIGIOUS OFFICERS IN THEFAMILYTHAT THEY SOCIALIZED AND THEIR REFLECTION INTHEIR OWN FAMILY (IN THE CASE OF ANTALYA). CUIFD. 2011;15(2):101-130. https://izlik.org/JA28ZE93BE
Chicago
Erdiç, Şaban. 2011. “TRADITIONAL FORMS OF RELIGIOUS OFFICERS IN THEFAMILYTHAT THEY SOCIALIZED AND THEIR REFLECTION INTHEIR OWN FAMILY (IN THE CASE OF ANTALYA)”. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi 15 (2): 101-30. https://izlik.org/JA28ZE93BE.
EndNote
Erdiç Ş (01 Aralık 2011) TRADITIONAL FORMS OF RELIGIOUS OFFICERS IN THEFAMILYTHAT THEY SOCIALIZED AND THEIR REFLECTION INTHEIR OWN FAMILY (IN THE CASE OF ANTALYA). Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi 15 2 101–130.
IEEE
[1]Ş. Erdiç, “TRADITIONAL FORMS OF RELIGIOUS OFFICERS IN THEFAMILYTHAT THEY SOCIALIZED AND THEIR REFLECTION INTHEIR OWN FAMILY (IN THE CASE OF ANTALYA)”, CUIFD, c. 15, sy 2, ss. 101–130, Ara. 2011, [çevrimiçi]. Erişim adresi: https://izlik.org/JA28ZE93BE
ISNAD
Erdiç, Şaban. “TRADITIONAL FORMS OF RELIGIOUS OFFICERS IN THEFAMILYTHAT THEY SOCIALIZED AND THEIR REFLECTION INTHEIR OWN FAMILY (IN THE CASE OF ANTALYA)”. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi 15/2 (01 Aralık 2011): 101-130. https://izlik.org/JA28ZE93BE.
JAMA
1.Erdiç Ş. TRADITIONAL FORMS OF RELIGIOUS OFFICERS IN THEFAMILYTHAT THEY SOCIALIZED AND THEIR REFLECTION INTHEIR OWN FAMILY (IN THE CASE OF ANTALYA). CUIFD. 2011;15:101–130.
MLA
Erdiç, Şaban. “TRADITIONAL FORMS OF RELIGIOUS OFFICERS IN THEFAMILYTHAT THEY SOCIALIZED AND THEIR REFLECTION INTHEIR OWN FAMILY (IN THE CASE OF ANTALYA)”. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi, c. 15, sy 2, Aralık 2011, ss. 101-30, https://izlik.org/JA28ZE93BE.
Vancouver
1.Şaban Erdiç. TRADITIONAL FORMS OF RELIGIOUS OFFICERS IN THEFAMILYTHAT THEY SOCIALIZED AND THEIR REFLECTION INTHEIR OWN FAMILY (IN THE CASE OF ANTALYA). CUIFD [Internet]. 01 Aralık 2011;15(2):101-30. Erişim adresi: https://izlik.org/JA28ZE93BE