Araştırma Makalesi

Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Subjective Health Complaints Inventory

Cilt: 47 Sayı: 1 31 Mart 2022
PDF İndir
EN TR

Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Subjective Health Complaints Inventory

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to evaluate the reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Subjective Health Complaints (SHC) inventory, which can be used to monitor health complaints experienced by the hospital support staff. Materials and Methods: In this methodological study, data were collected from 240 hospital support staff working in five different hospitals in Turkey. Participants were asked demographic questions and administered a Turkish translated SHC inventory. Construct validity was confirmed using exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Internal consistency was assessed by calculating the Cronbach’s alpha and split-half reliability coefficients. Results: The Turkish SHC inventory with 29 items showed acceptable content validity, construct validity, and internal consistency reliability (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.905). Confirmatory factor analysis confirmed the original five-dimensional structure of the scale. Model fit indices implied a good model-data fit: the normed chi-square value of 1.488 (χ2 = 513.423, df=345); error of root mean square approximation of 0.045; comparative fit index of 0.939 and standardized root mean square residuals of 0.060. Conclusion: The findings assert the reliability and validity of the Turkish SHC inventory, and recommend its use as a suitable tool for monitoring health complaints experienced by health service workers.

Keywords

health , hospital , health personnel , validation study.

Kaynakça

  1. Eriksen HR, Ihlebeak C. Subjective health complaints. Scand J Psychol. 2002;43:101-03.
  2. Weerdesteijn KHN, Schaafsma F, Bonefaas-Groenewoud K, Heymans M, Van der Beek A, Anema J. Predicting return to work after long-term sickness absence with subjective health complaints: a prospective cohort study. BMC Public Health. 2020;20:1095.
  3. Lerner D, Allaire SH, Reisine ST. Work disability resulting from chronic health conditions. J Occup Environ Med. 2005;47:253-64.
  4. Cochrane A, Higgins NM, Rothwell C et al. Work outcomes in patients who stay at work despite musculoskeletal pain. J Occup Rehabil. 2018;28:559-67.
  5. Eriksen W. The prevalence of musculoskeletal pain in Norwegian nurses’ aides. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2003;76:625-30.
  6. Adams JM. The value of worker well-being. Public Health Rep. 2019;134:583-86.
  7. Joseph B, Joseph M. The health of the healthcare workers. Indian J Occup Environ Med. 2016;20:71-72.
  8. WHO. Classifying health workers: Mapping occupations to the international standard classification. https://www.who.int/hrh/statistics/Health_workers_classification.pdf (accessed June 2021).
  9. WHO. Health workers: A global profile. In: The World Health Report 2006. Geneva, WHO, 2006.
  10. Sahin F, Yılmaz F, Sahin T, Soydemir R., Yılmaz Ö, Yamaç S et al. Musculoskeletal pain among healthcare personnel working in the hospital. Şişli Etfal hastanesi Tıp Bülteni. 2006;40:37-43.

Kaynak Göster

MLA
Kalaycıoğlu, Oya, vd. “Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Subjective Health Complaints Inventory”. Cukurova Medical Journal, c. 47, sy 1, Mart 2022, ss. 366-7, doi:10.17826/cumj.1035899.