Burnout among healthcare workers at the first wave of the COVID-19: meta analysis
Öz
conditions during the COVID-19 pandemic, threaten the lives and physical well-being of healthcare workers (HCWs), and also their mental health, such as burnout, etc. which is often neglected. The aim of this review is to analyze published studies on the proportion of burnout among HCWs during the first wave of the COVID-19.
Materials and Methods: We conducted a systematic review of studies that reported burnout (measured by Maslach Burnout Inventory) among HCWs during the COVID-19 pandemic and searched PubMed, PsycINFO, and WOS of relevant articles up to Feb 25th, 2021. Out of 145 non-duplicate studies, 10 were included in the meta-analysis.
Results: The overall estimated pooled proportion for emotional exhaustion (EE) was 31% (95% CI: 24%-40%), for depersonalization (DP) was 28% (95% CI: 23%-38%) and 22% (95% CI: 13%-34%) for personal accomplishment (PA). The results show that in countries where the number of cases is high and the number of beds and doctors is low, the level of EE appears to be slightly lower and PA is slightly higher. However, there were no significant differences according to subgroup analyses.
Conclusion: Evidence from early studies highlight the fact that a significant proportion of HCWs suffers from burnout during this pandemic. It will be necessary to pay close attention to HCWs' mental health and identify ways to reduce risks and prepare a rehabilitation program for the HCWs during and after the pandemic.
Anahtar Kelimeler
Coronavirus, COVID-19, Healthcare workers, Burnout, Systematic Review-Meta Analysis.
Kaynakça
- 1. Maslach C; Goldberg, J. Prevention of burnout: New perspectives. Applied and Preventive Psychology 1998; 7(1), 63–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0962-1849(98)80022-X
- 2. Bianchi, R. Do burnout and depressive symptoms form a single syndrome ? Con fi rmatory factor analysis and exploratory structural equation modeling bifactor analysis. Journal of Psychosomatic Research 2020; 131, 109954. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2020.109954
- 3. Engebretsen, K. M., & Bjorbækmo, W. S. Burned out or “just” depressed ? An existential phenomenological exploration of burnout. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 2020; 26(2), 439–446. https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.13288
- 4. Koutsimani, P., Montgomery, A., & Georganta, K. he relationship between burnout, depression, and anxiety: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Frontiers in Psychology 2019; 10(284), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00284
- 5. Fischer, R., Mattos, P., Teixeira, C., Ganzerla, D. S., Rosa, R. G., & Bozza, F. A. Association of Burnout With Depression and Anxiety in Critical Care Clinicians in Brazil. JAMA Network Open 2021; 3(12), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.30898
- 6. Massaro, G., Monteiro, C., Lucia, F., Baeza, C., & Hauck, S. Work Environment Evaluation Instrument (WEEI): development, validation, and association with burnout. Trends in Psychiatry and Psychotherapy 2020; 42(2), 185–189.
- 7. West, C. P., Dyrbye, L. N., Erwin, P. J., & Shanafelt, T. D. Interventions to prevent and reduce physician burnout: a systematic review and meta-analysis. The Lancet 2016; 388(10057), 2272–2281. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31279-X
- 8. Joanna Briggs Institute 2017; https://jbi.global/critical-appraisal-tools
- 9. Maslach, C., & Leiter, M. P. Understanding the burnout experience: recent research and its implications for psychiatry. World Psychiatry: Official Journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA) 2016; June, 103–111.
- 10. Hedges, L. V, & Pigott, T. D. The power of statistical tests in meta-analysis. Psychol Methods 2001; 6(3), 203–217. https://doi.org/10.1037//1082-989X.6.3.203
